Re: [Openstack] Physical host identification

2011-07-18 Thread Blake Yeager
The original purpose behind sharing the HostID with a customer was to allow
a customer to identify situations where they had two VMs placed on the same
host.  This knowledge is extremely critical if a customer is trying to setup
two VMs in an HA configuration.  Because this use case does not require the
HostID to be globally unique the HostID was hashed with the customer ID to
create a customer specific identifier for each host.  (This is how Rackspace
Cloud Servers works today.)

The two arguments that I have heard for not making HostIDs globally unique
are; one, it would allow customers (or partners) to figure out exactly how
many hosts a given cloud is running and two, it would potentially allow
customers to figure out if their VM is on the same host as another
customer's VM.  The first concern is specific to the cloud operator; some
operators may feel that the size of their cloud is material information that
needs to be protected, while other operators may go as far as to publish
those types of stats.  The second concern is around the potential for a
customer to either a) impact the performance of another customer's VM by
excessively taxing the host machine or b) if there was a hypervisor exploit
it would enable a customer to more easily target another customer's VM.  For
example, if you found out the HostID of your target VM you could then keep
spinning up instances until you got one on the same host, then attack.

I strongly feel that HostID should be unique per project (or tenant) and if
it isn't that way right now I think we should look at changing it.

Of course this doesn't address Glen's original question which is around the
need for an cloud admin to have a globally unique host identifier for
targeting operations on a specific host.  That type of concept is probably
worth building in, but in my opinion should be separate from HostID (which
should be reserved for determining VM placement collisions).

-Blake

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Jorge Williams 
jorge.willi...@rackspace.com wrote:

 Right so we should really be hashing this with the tenant ID as well.

 -jOrGe W.

 On Jul 15, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:

  I think it's sensitive because one could figure out how many hosts a SP
 has globally... which a SP might not necessarily want to reveal.
 
  - Chris
 
 
  On Jul 15, 2011, at 3:34 PM, karim.allah.ah...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Chris Behrens 
 chris.behr...@rackspace.com wrote:
  Nevermind.  Just found a comment in the API spec that says hostID is
 unique per account, not globally.  Hmmm...
 
  This is weird ! I can't find anything in the code that says so !! hostID
 is just a hashed version of the 'host' which is set as the 'hostname' of the
 physical machine and this isn't user sensitive. So, It's supposed to be a
 global thing !
 
  Can somebody explain how this is a user sensitive ?
 
 
 
  On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:
 
  I see the v1.1 API spec talks about a 'hostId' item returned when you
 list your instances (section 4.1.1 in the spec).  These should be the same
 thing, IMO.
 
  I think you're right, though.  I don't believe we have any sort of
 'hostId' today, since hosts just become available by attaching to AMQP.
 
  - Chris
 
  On Jul 15, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Glen Campbell wrote:
 
  I understand that we're all familiar with virtualization and its
 benefits. However, in the Real World, those of us who run clouds often need
 to work with physical devices. I've proposed a blueprint and spec for a
 /hosts admin API resource that would return information on physical hosts.
 However, I don't believe that there's any way for us to actually identify a
 specific server (I'm actually hoping I'm mistaken about this, because that
 would make my life easier).
 
  So, to get information about a specific host, you'd use /host/{id} —
 but what should go in the {id} slot?
 
  We'd also like to include this data elsewhere; for example, in error
 messages, it might help to know the physical device on which a server is
 created.
 
 
  signature[4].png
  This email may include confidential information. If you received it in
 error, please delete it.
  ___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 
 
  This email may include confidential information. If you received it in
 error, please delete it.
 
 
  ___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 
 
 
  --
  Karim Allah Ahmed.
  LinkedIn
 
  ___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
  

Re: [Openstack] Physical host identification

2011-07-16 Thread Jorge Williams
Right so we should really be hashing this with the tenant ID as well.

-jOrGe W.

On Jul 15, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:

 I think it's sensitive because one could figure out how many hosts a SP has 
 globally... which a SP might not necessarily want to reveal.
 
 - Chris
 
 
 On Jul 15, 2011, at 3:34 PM, karim.allah.ah...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Chris Behrens 
 chris.behr...@rackspace.com wrote:
 Nevermind.  Just found a comment in the API spec that says hostID is 
 unique per account, not globally.  Hmmm...
 
 This is weird ! I can't find anything in the code that says so !! hostID is 
 just a hashed version of the 'host' which is set as the 'hostname' of the 
 physical machine and this isn't user sensitive. So, It's supposed to be a 
 global thing !
 
 Can somebody explain how this is a user sensitive ?
 
 
 
 On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:
 
 I see the v1.1 API spec talks about a 'hostId' item returned when you list 
 your instances (section 4.1.1 in the spec).  These should be the same 
 thing, IMO.
 
 I think you're right, though.  I don't believe we have any sort of 'hostId' 
 today, since hosts just become available by attaching to AMQP.
 
 - Chris
 
 On Jul 15, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Glen Campbell wrote:
 
 I understand that we're all familiar with virtualization and its benefits. 
 However, in the Real World, those of us who run clouds often need to work 
 with physical devices. I've proposed a blueprint and spec for a /hosts 
 admin API resource that would return information on physical hosts. 
 However, I don't believe that there's any way for us to actually identify 
 a specific server (I'm actually hoping I'm mistaken about this, because 
 that would make my life easier).
 
 So, to get information about a specific host, you'd use /host/{id} — but 
 what should go in the {id} slot?
 
 We'd also like to include this data elsewhere; for example, in error 
 messages, it might help to know the physical device on which a server is 
 created.
 
 
 signature[4].png
 This email may include confidential information. If you received it in 
 error, please delete it.
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 
 
 This email may include confidential information. If you received it in 
 error, please delete it.
 
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 
 
 
 -- 
 Karim Allah Ahmed.
 LinkedIn
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 
 This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, 
 please delete it.
 
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, 
please delete it.


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Physical host identification

2011-07-15 Thread Chris Behrens
I see the v1.1 API spec talks about a 'hostId' item returned when you list your 
instances (section 4.1.1 in the spec).  These should be the same thing, IMO.

I think you're right, though.  I don't believe we have any sort of 'hostId' 
today, since hosts just become available by attaching to AMQP.

- Chris

On Jul 15, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Glen Campbell wrote:

 I understand that we're all familiar with virtualization and its benefits. 
 However, in the Real World, those of us who run clouds often need to work 
 with physical devices. I've proposed a blueprint and spec for a /hosts admin 
 API resource that would return information on physical hosts. However, I 
 don't believe that there's any way for us to actually identify a specific 
 server (I'm actually hoping I'm mistaken about this, because that would make 
 my life easier). 
 
 So, to get information about a specific host, you'd use /host/{id} — but what 
 should go in the {id} slot?
 
 We'd also like to include this data elsewhere; for example, in error 
 messages, it might help to know the physical device on which a server is 
 created. 
 
 
 signature[4].png
 This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, 
 please delete it.
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, 
please delete it.


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Physical host identification

2011-07-15 Thread karim.allah.ah...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Chris Behrens chris.behr...@rackspace.com
 wrote:

 Nevermind.  Just found a comment in the API spec that says hostID is
 unique per account, not globally.  Hmmm...


This is weird ! I can't find anything in the code that says so !! hostID is
just a hashed version of the 'host' which is set as the 'hostname' of the
physical machine and this isn't user sensitive. So, It's supposed to be a
global thing !

Can somebody explain how this is a user sensitive ?




 On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:

  I see the v1.1 API spec talks about a 'hostId' item returned when you
 list your instances (section 4.1.1 in the spec).  These should be the same
 thing, IMO.
 
  I think you're right, though.  I don't believe we have any sort of
 'hostId' today, since hosts just become available by attaching to AMQP.
 
  - Chris
 
  On Jul 15, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Glen Campbell wrote:
 
  I understand that we're all familiar with virtualization and its
 benefits. However, in the Real World, those of us who run clouds often need
 to work with physical devices. I've proposed a blueprint and spec for a
 /hosts admin API resource that would return information on physical hosts.
 However, I don't believe that there's any way for us to actually identify a
 specific server (I'm actually hoping I'm mistaken about this, because that
 would make my life easier).
 
  So, to get information about a specific host, you'd use /host/{id} — but
 what should go in the {id} slot?
 
  We'd also like to include this data elsewhere; for example, in error
 messages, it might help to know the physical device on which a server is
 created.
 
 
  signature[4].png
  This email may include confidential information. If you received it in
 error, please delete it.
  ___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 

 This email may include confidential information. If you received it in
 error, please delete it.


 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
Karim Allah Ahmed.
LinkedIn http://eg.linkedin.com/pub/karim-allah-ahmed/13/829/550/
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Physical host identification

2011-07-15 Thread Chris Behrens
I think it's sensitive because one could figure out how many hosts a SP has 
globally... which a SP might not necessarily want to reveal.

- Chris


On Jul 15, 2011, at 3:34 PM, karim.allah.ah...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Chris Behrens chris.behr...@rackspace.com 
 wrote:
 Nevermind.  Just found a comment in the API spec that says hostID is unique 
 per account, not globally.  Hmmm...
  
 This is weird ! I can't find anything in the code that says so !! hostID is 
 just a hashed version of the 'host' which is set as the 'hostname' of the 
 physical machine and this isn't user sensitive. So, It's supposed to be a 
 global thing !
 
 Can somebody explain how this is a user sensitive ?
  
 
 
 On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:
 
  I see the v1.1 API spec talks about a 'hostId' item returned when you list 
  your instances (section 4.1.1 in the spec).  These should be the same 
  thing, IMO.
 
  I think you're right, though.  I don't believe we have any sort of 'hostId' 
  today, since hosts just become available by attaching to AMQP.
 
  - Chris
 
  On Jul 15, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Glen Campbell wrote:
 
  I understand that we're all familiar with virtualization and its benefits. 
  However, in the Real World, those of us who run clouds often need to work 
  with physical devices. I've proposed a blueprint and spec for a /hosts 
  admin API resource that would return information on physical hosts. 
  However, I don't believe that there's any way for us to actually identify 
  a specific server (I'm actually hoping I'm mistaken about this, because 
  that would make my life easier).
 
  So, to get information about a specific host, you'd use /host/{id} — but 
  what should go in the {id} slot?
 
  We'd also like to include this data elsewhere; for example, in error 
  messages, it might help to know the physical device on which a server is 
  created.
 
 
  signature[4].png
  This email may include confidential information. If you received it in 
  error, please delete it.
  ___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 
 
 This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, 
 please delete it.
 
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 
 
 
 -- 
 Karim Allah Ahmed.
 LinkedIn
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, 
please delete it.


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp