Re: [Openstack] [Grizzly] Unable to reboot instance after Migrate

2013-09-09 Thread happy idea
"Live Migration failure: not all arguments converted during string
formatting"
You need to find the error code location, and log the stacktrace.


2013/9/9 Guilherme Russi 

> Hello Happy,
>
>  I've my NFS configuration again, but I keep getting this error on my
> compute's logs:
>
> Live Migration failure: not all arguments converted during string
> formatting
>
> I don't know if it's a problem with my nova or my libvirt, my compute
> nodes connect to another NFS server that is not my controller node, would
> may be it?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> 2013/9/4 happy idea 
>
>> o ...I just disable the firewall.$ufw  disable
>>
>>
>> 2013/9/5 Guilherme Russi 
>>
>>> Just to check, How did you do this part?
>>>
>>> 7. Configure your firewall to allow libvirt to communicate between nodes.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/9/3 happy idea 
>>>

 follow this page's guide *carefully* ,
 http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/admin/content/configuring-live-migrations.html
 replace 'NOVA-INST-DIR'  with '/var/lib/nova'


 2013/9/4 Guilherme Russi 

> Hey there, I made my NFS configuration again, I made this way:
>
> Controller node:
> 1- mkdir -p /local2/instances
>
> 2- mount --bind /var/lib/nova/instances /local2/instances
>
> 3- added this inside /etc/exports
> /var/lib/nova/instances
> 192.168.3.0/24(rw,sync,fsid=0,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check)
> /local2/instances
> 192.168.3.0/24(rw,sync,fsid=0,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check,nohide)
>
> 4- added this inside /etc/fstab
> /var/lib/nova/instances /local2/instances none bind 0 0
>
>
> Compute node:
> 1- added inside /etc/fstab
> 192.168.3.1://var/lib/nova/instances   nfs4 defaults
>0   0
>
>  2- mount -t nfs4 192.168.3.1:/ /var/lib/nova/instances/
>
> Do I need to do anything else?
>
> Regards.
>
> Guilherme.
>
>
> 2013/9/1 happy idea 
>
>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.569 12667 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-]
>> Getting disk size of instance-007d: [Errno 2] No such file or
>> directory: '/var/lib/nova/instances/72ec37a3-b209-4729-b628-
>> 005fdcea5a3c/disk'
>>
>> *I think may be your NFS config is not correct.*
>>
>>
>> 2013/8/31 Guilherme Russi 
>>
>>> Hello Happy, these are my logs:
>>>
>>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.402 12667 AUDIT nova.compute.resource_tracker
>>> [-] Auditing locally available compute resources
>>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.562 12667 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-]
>>> Getting disk size of instance-0084: [Errno 2] No such file or
>>> directory:
>>> '/var/lib/nova/instances/c9e1c5ed-a108-4196-bfbc-24495e2e71bd/disk'
>>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.564 12667 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-]
>>> Getting disk size of instance-0077: [Errno 2] No such file or
>>> directory:
>>> '/var/lib/nova/instances/483f98e3-8ef5-43e2-8c3a-def55abdabcd/disk'
>>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.567 12667 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-]
>>> Getting disk size of instance-00bd: [Errno 2] No such file or
>>> directory:
>>> '/var/lib/nova/instances/66abd40e-fb19-4cbe-a248-61d968fd84b7/disk'
>>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.569 12667 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-]
>>> Getting disk size of instance-007d: [Errno 2] No such file or
>>> directory:
>>> '/var/lib/nova/instances/72ec37a3-b209-4729-b628-005fdcea5a3c/disk'
>>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.679 12667 AUDIT nova.compute.resource_tracker
>>> [-] Free ram (MB): 2746
>>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.679 12667 AUDIT nova.compute.resource_tracker
>>> [-] Free disk (GB): 53
>>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.679 12667 AUDIT nova.compute.resource_tracker
>>> [-] Free VCPUS: 1
>>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.773 12667 INFO nova.compute.resource_tracker
>>> [-] Compute_service record updated for caos:caos
>>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.774 12667 INFO nova.compute.manager [-]
>>> Updating host status
>>>
>>>
>>> And here the output when I run the command:
>>>
>>> ERROR: Live migration of instance
>>> c9af3e9e-87b1-4aa3-95aa-22700e1091e4 to host tiresias failed (HTTP 400)
>>> (Request-ID: req-630d7837-6886-4e23-bc3d-a9fccc4a8868)
>>>
>>> My destiny host awsers ping when I ping.
>>>
>>> I've been fighting against it a quite while without success.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> Guilherme.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/8/29 happy idea 
>>>
 OK.


 2013/8/30 Guilherme Russi 

> I am too, if I find something I'll let you know.
>
> Regards.
>
>
> 2013/8/29 happy idea 
>
>> I am trying to figure out what cause the bug.
>>
>>
>> 2013/8/30 Guilherme Russi 
>>
>>> Well mine are:
>>>
>>> ii  nova-api
>>> 1:2013.1-0ubuntu2.1~c

Re: [Openstack] Havana-3 development milestone available

2013-09-09 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Hi!

I'm seeing that `Ubuntu Cloud Archive' for Havana is outdated... Still not
H3...

How can I test it today? Is there any PPA with most recent package versions
available? Or maybe, is it ready for tests only for Saucy?

Thanks!


On 6 September 2013 12:59, Thierry Carrez  wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> The last milestone in the Havana development cycle, "havana-3" is now
> available for Keystone, Glance, Nova, Horizon, Neutron, Cinder,
> Ceilometer, and Heat. In the last 7 weeks, more than 200 features were
> added and more than 750 bugs fixed (!).
>
> You can see the full list of new features and fixed bugs, as well as
> tarball downloads, at:
>
> https://launchpad.net/keystone/havana/havana-3
> https://launchpad.net/glance/havana/havana-3
> https://launchpad.net/nova/havana/havana-3
> https://launchpad.net/horizon/havana/havana-3
> https://launchpad.net/neutron/havana/havana-3
> https://launchpad.net/cinder/havana/havana-3
> https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/havana/havana-3
> https://launchpad.net/heat/havana/havana-3
>
> This milestone is nearly feature-complete. A few exceptions should land
> next week, but those projects are otherwise feature-frozen in
> preparation of the first Havana release candidate.
>
> We should now all switch to testing and bugfixing mode for the next
> weeks, and make Havana as bug-free as we can. The release-critical bugs
> will be tracked on the havana-rc1 milestone pages. Once all those bugs
> are fixed and the first release candidates are out, the next development
> cycle (Icehouse) will start. Final coordinated release is expected on
> October 17th.
>
> More information on the OpenStack development cycle can be found at:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Cycle
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> ___
> Mailing list:
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe :
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] dhcp-agent stops updating dnsmasq

2013-09-09 Thread Jonathan Proulx
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Édouard Thuleau  wrote:

> Hi Jon,
>
> Effectively, a bug [1] was identified. When DHCP agent is down because its
> overloaded, Neutron agent will not send update to that agent and doesn't
> raise the problem.
> I submitted small patch to a warning log but I abandoned it to propose
> another one (not yet finish) which will raise an exception and destroy the
> created port.
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1185916
>
> Édouard.
>

That does seem to be the case, at least the symptoms match.

Based on the comments you made on that bug is sounds like increasing
"agent_down_time" should help with this?  I had already increased from the
default 5sec to 20sec going to try a full minute and see if the incidence
of problems decreases.

Thanks,
-Jon
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] dhcp-agent stops updating dnsmasq

2013-09-09 Thread Édouard Thuleau
Hi Jon,

Effectively, a bug [1] was identified. When DHCP agent is down because its
overloaded, Neutron agent will not send update to that agent and doesn't
raise the problem.
I submitted small patch to a warning log but I abandoned it to propose
another one (not yet finish) which will raise an exception and destroy the
created port.

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1185916

Édouard.


On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Jonathan Proulx  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I'm running Grizzly on Ubuntu 12.04 and using quantum ovs.
>
> Periodically it seems the quantum-dhcp-agent stops informing dnsmasq when
> new ports are created.
>
> looking at the instance info from nova or the related port information in
> quantum the MAC address to IP mapping shows up correctly.
>
> The dnsmasq 'host' file has no record of either and while dnsmasq logs
> show requests from the MAC(s) in question it also logs "no ip available"
>
> Existing registrations renew properly  and the quantum-dhcp-agent
> continues to run with nothing logged.  Restarting quantum-dhcp-agentget
> things back to normal, but this is happening multiple times a day and my
> only current means of detection is user complaints.
>
> currently there are 365 active ports on the default network with a
> lease_time of 30min (default is 2min). There are a few project networks
> with a small number of active ports, it is unclear if these have the same
> issues do to small sample size.
>
> I'm thinking of pushing the leas_time further out maybe to a few hours,
> but it's unclear to me if that would help.
>
> -Jon
>
>
> ___
> Mailing list:
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe :
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>
>
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [openstack-dev] [TROVE] database instance creation

2013-09-09 Thread Michael Basnight
On Sep 9, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:

> Excerpts from Michael Basnight's message of 2013-09-09 07:57:34 -0700:
>> On Sep 9, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Giuseppe Galeota  
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> So, I think that "Trove is designed to support a single-tenant database 
>>> within a Nova instance" is a misleading definition. What do you think?
>> 
>> What exactly is misleading about that? Don't get me wrong, I've been working 
>> on trove for a long time, so to me, the definition makes sense. But if its 
>> misleading for newcomers, lets work to make it sound less so!
>> 
>> Also, removing openstack-dev list. This is more general question stuff 
>> that's suited for openstack mailing list. 
>> 
> 
> The misleading thing to me is that it sounds like I only get one database
> user. As in, it creates an instance, spins up MySQL, and creates a single
> tenant inside the database.
> 
> It also is ambiguous enough that one might miss the significance of the
> dash and hear that it creates a single, tenant-database.
> 
> As nice as succinct descriptions are, it may be worth clarifying all of
> the objects in the sentence.
> 
> Perhaps: "Trove is designed to support a multi-user database for a single
> OpenStack tenant within a Nova instance."

+1. Very succinct, and it does remove ambiguity. Giuseppe, feel free to update 
the wiki to reflect this, and help remove ambiguity in other areas. Thank you 
Clint and Giuseppe.


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Grizzly] Unable to reboot instance after Migrate

2013-09-09 Thread Guilherme Russi
Hello Happy,

 I've my NFS configuration again, but I keep getting this error on my
compute's logs:

Live Migration failure: not all arguments converted during string formatting

I don't know if it's a problem with my nova or my libvirt, my compute nodes
connect to another NFS server that is not my controller node, would may be
it?

Thank you.


2013/9/4 happy idea 

> o ...I just disable the firewall.$ufw  disable
>
>
> 2013/9/5 Guilherme Russi 
>
>> Just to check, How did you do this part?
>>
>> 7. Configure your firewall to allow libvirt to communicate between nodes.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> 2013/9/3 happy idea 
>>
>>>
>>> follow this page's guide *carefully* ,
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/admin/content/configuring-live-migrations.html
>>> replace 'NOVA-INST-DIR'  with '/var/lib/nova'
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/9/4 Guilherme Russi 
>>>
 Hey there, I made my NFS configuration again, I made this way:

 Controller node:
 1- mkdir -p /local2/instances

 2- mount --bind /var/lib/nova/instances /local2/instances

 3- added this inside /etc/exports
 /var/lib/nova/instances
 192.168.3.0/24(rw,sync,fsid=0,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check)
 /local2/instances
 192.168.3.0/24(rw,sync,fsid=0,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check,nohide)

 4- added this inside /etc/fstab
 /var/lib/nova/instances /local2/instances none bind 0 0


 Compute node:
 1- added inside /etc/fstab
 192.168.3.1://var/lib/nova/instances   nfs4 defaults
  0   0

  2- mount -t nfs4 192.168.3.1:/ /var/lib/nova/instances/

 Do I need to do anything else?

 Regards.

 Guilherme.


 2013/9/1 happy idea 

> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.569 12667 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-]
> Getting disk size of instance-007d: [Errno 2] No such file or
> directory: '/var/lib/nova/instances/72ec37a3-b209-4729-b628-
> 005fdcea5a3c/disk'
>
> *I think may be your NFS config is not correct.*
>
>
> 2013/8/31 Guilherme Russi 
>
>> Hello Happy, these are my logs:
>>
>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.402 12667 AUDIT nova.compute.resource_tracker
>> [-] Auditing locally available compute resources
>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.562 12667 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-]
>> Getting disk size of instance-0084: [Errno 2] No such file or
>> directory:
>> '/var/lib/nova/instances/c9e1c5ed-a108-4196-bfbc-24495e2e71bd/disk'
>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.564 12667 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-]
>> Getting disk size of instance-0077: [Errno 2] No such file or
>> directory:
>> '/var/lib/nova/instances/483f98e3-8ef5-43e2-8c3a-def55abdabcd/disk'
>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.567 12667 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-]
>> Getting disk size of instance-00bd: [Errno 2] No such file or
>> directory:
>> '/var/lib/nova/instances/66abd40e-fb19-4cbe-a248-61d968fd84b7/disk'
>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.569 12667 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-]
>> Getting disk size of instance-007d: [Errno 2] No such file or
>> directory:
>> '/var/lib/nova/instances/72ec37a3-b209-4729-b628-005fdcea5a3c/disk'
>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.679 12667 AUDIT nova.compute.resource_tracker
>> [-] Free ram (MB): 2746
>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.679 12667 AUDIT nova.compute.resource_tracker
>> [-] Free disk (GB): 53
>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.679 12667 AUDIT nova.compute.resource_tracker
>> [-] Free VCPUS: 1
>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.773 12667 INFO nova.compute.resource_tracker [-]
>> Compute_service record updated for caos:caos
>> 2013-08-30 14:42:51.774 12667 INFO nova.compute.manager [-] Updating
>> host status
>>
>>
>> And here the output when I run the command:
>>
>> ERROR: Live migration of instance
>> c9af3e9e-87b1-4aa3-95aa-22700e1091e4 to host tiresias failed (HTTP 400)
>> (Request-ID: req-630d7837-6886-4e23-bc3d-a9fccc4a8868)
>>
>> My destiny host awsers ping when I ping.
>>
>> I've been fighting against it a quite while without success.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Guilherme.
>>
>>
>> 2013/8/29 happy idea 
>>
>>> OK.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/8/30 Guilherme Russi 
>>>
 I am too, if I find something I'll let you know.

 Regards.


 2013/8/29 happy idea 

> I am trying to figure out what cause the bug.
>
>
> 2013/8/30 Guilherme Russi 
>
>> Well mine are:
>>
>> ii  nova-api
>> 1:2013.1-0ubuntu2.1~cloud0  OpenStack Compute - API 
>> frontend
>> ii  nova-cert
>>  1:2013.1-0ubuntu2.1~cloud0  OpenStack Compute - 
>> certificate
>> management
>> ii  nova-common
>>  1:2013.1-0ubuntu2.1~cloud0  OpenStack Compute - common 
>> files
>>>

Re: [Openstack] [openstack-dev] [TROVE] database instance creation

2013-09-09 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Michael Basnight's message of 2013-09-09 07:57:34 -0700:
> On Sep 9, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Giuseppe Galeota  
> wrote:
> 
> > So, I think that "Trove is designed to support a single-tenant database 
> > within a Nova instance" is a misleading definition. What do you think?
> 
> What exactly is misleading about that? Don't get me wrong, I've been working 
> on trove for a long time, so to me, the definition makes sense. But if its 
> misleading for newcomers, lets work to make it sound less so!
> 
> Also, removing openstack-dev list. This is more general question stuff that's 
> suited for openstack mailing list. 
> 

The misleading thing to me is that it sounds like I only get one database
user. As in, it creates an instance, spins up MySQL, and creates a single
tenant inside the database.

It also is ambiguous enough that one might miss the significance of the
dash and hear that it creates a single, tenant-database.

As nice as succinct descriptions are, it may be worth clarifying all of
the objects in the sentence.

Perhaps: "Trove is designed to support a multi-user database for a single
OpenStack tenant within a Nova instance."

___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


[Openstack] OpenStack User Survey - Round 2

2013-09-09 Thread Tom Fifield
Hi all,

You might remember before the April Summit we ran a survey of OpenStack
deployers. We’re doing it again, and we need your help!

If your organization is running an OpenStack deployment, please
participate in the survey [http://www.openstack.org/user-survey]. If you
already completed the survey in April, you can simply log back in to
update your deployment details and answer a few new questions.

If you are a contributor, please help us spread the word. We're trying
to gather as much real-world deployment data as possible to share back
with you.

The information provided is confidential and will only be presented in
aggregate unless the user consents to making it public.
The deadline to complete the survey and be part of the next report is
September 30 at 23:00 UTC.

Questions? Check out the FAQ [https://www.openstack.org/user-survey/faq]
or feel free to contact me [t...@openstack.org].


Thanks for your help!

Regards,


Tom

___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [TROVE] database instance creation

2013-09-09 Thread Giuseppe Galeota
Dear all,
reading the TROVE's
Doc
 I see that "The trove-taskmanager service does the heavy lifting as far as
provisioning instances, managing the lifecycle of instances, and performing
operations on the *Database instance*".

So, once an instance was created, how does an application deployed in the
cloud platform (IaaS or PaaS level) perform CRUD operation on that database
instance? Maybe, does the trove-taskmanager release an endpoint on which
create a DBMS connection?

Giuseppe


2013/9/9 Daniel Salinas 

> Trove allows you to deploy a single vm with 1 server instance of whichever
> service supported.  So for example, if you were to deploy a mysql instance,
> you would have 1 vm with 1 mysql instance running on it.  You can put as
> many databases on that one server instance as you would like with as many
> database users as you would like.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Giuseppe Galeota <
> giuseppegale...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> reading the TROVE's 
>> DocI see that 
>> Trove is designed to support a single-tenant database within a
>> Nova instance.
>>
>> What does means this?
>>
>> Does it mean that Trove creates a single VM instance in which a single
>> database instance is created?
>>
>> Does it mean that Trove creates a single VM instance in which a more
>> database instances of a single tenant are created ?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Giuseppe
>>
>> ___
>> Mailing list:
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
>> Unsubscribe :
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>
>>
>
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [openstack-dev] [TROVE] database instance creation

2013-09-09 Thread Michael Basnight
On Sep 9, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Giuseppe Galeota  wrote:

> So, I think that "Trove is designed to support a single-tenant database 
> within a Nova instance" is a misleading definition. What do you think?

What exactly is misleading about that? Don't get me wrong, I've been working on 
trove for a long time, so to me, the definition makes sense. But if its 
misleading for newcomers, lets work to make it sound less so!

Also, removing openstack-dev list. This is more general question stuff that's 
suited for openstack mailing list. 

> 
> Giuseppe
> 
> 
> 2013/9/9 Daniel Salinas 
>> Trove allows you to deploy a single vm with 1 server instance of whichever 
>> service supported.  So for example, if you were to deploy a mysql instance, 
>> you would have 1 vm with 1 mysql instance running on it.  You can put as 
>> many databases on that one server instance as you would like with as many 
>> database users as you would like.
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Giuseppe Galeota  
>> wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> reading the TROVE's Doc I see that Trove is designed to support a 
>>> single-tenant database within a Nova instance. 
>>> 
>>> What does means this? 
>>> 
>>> Does it mean that Trove creates a single VM instance in which a single 
>>> database instance is created?
>>>  
>>> Does it mean that Trove creates a single VM instance in which a more 
>>> database instances of a single tenant are created ?
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Giuseppe
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
>>> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> 
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> openstack-...@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Trove] Relational or Non-relational DB?

2013-09-09 Thread Michael Basnight
On Sep 9, 2013, at 6:37 AM, Giuseppe Galeota  wrote:

> Dear Josh,
> can you link to me some blueprints for non-relational data stores?

These are all VERY high level. But here ya go,

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spec/cassandra-db-support

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spec/mongodb-support

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spec/redis-support


> 
> Thank you very much,
> Giuseppe
> 
> 
> 2013/9/6 Josh Odom 
>> Hi Giuesppe,
>> The mission statement for trove was recently changed and approved by the 
>> technical committee to include both relational and non-relational databases. 
>>   There are several blueprints in place for non-relational data stores with 
>> some implementation work also in flight.
>> 
>> -Josh
>> 
>> From: Giuseppe Galeota 
>> Date: Friday, September 6, 2013 8:23 AM
>> To: "openstack@lists.openstack.org" 
>> Subject: [Openstack] [Trove] Relational or Non-relational DB?
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> I am a developer interested to the Databases as a Service, and in particular 
>> for creation of relational and non-relational databases. So I joined the 
>> Trove project.
>> 
>> On this link (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Trove#Mission_Statement) I 
>> read: "Mission of Trove: to provide scalable and reliable Cloud Database as 
>> a Service provisioning functionality for both relational and non-relational 
>> database engines.
>> 
>> On this link (http://docs.openstack.org/developer/trove/#introduction), 
>> instead, I read: "It’s designed to run entirely on OpenStack, with the goal 
>> of allowing users to quickly and easily utilize the features of a relational 
>> database"
>> 
>> So, I am confused.
>> 
>> 1) Is Trove designed to create both a relational and a non-relational 
>> database? 
>> 
>> 2) Is Trove designed to create only a relational database?  In this case, 
>> how can I modify the source code in order to allow creation of relational 
>> databases that use no-mysql engine (but use, for example, Postegres)?
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you very much,
>> Giuseppe
> 
> ___
> Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


[Openstack] [Quantum] dhcp-agent stops updating dnsmasq

2013-09-09 Thread Jonathan Proulx
Hi All,

I'm running Grizzly on Ubuntu 12.04 and using quantum ovs.

Periodically it seems the quantum-dhcp-agent stops informing dnsmasq when
new ports are created.

looking at the instance info from nova or the related port information in
quantum the MAC address to IP mapping shows up correctly.

The dnsmasq 'host' file has no record of either and while dnsmasq logs show
requests from the MAC(s) in question it also logs "no ip available"

Existing registrations renew properly  and the quantum-dhcp-agent continues
to run with nothing logged.  Restarting quantum-dhcp-agentget things back
to normal, but this is happening multiple times a day and my only current
means of detection is user complaints.

currently there are 365 active ports on the default network with a
lease_time of 30min (default is 2min). There are a few project networks
with a small number of active ports, it is unclear if these have the same
issues do to small sample size.

I'm thinking of pushing the leas_time further out maybe to a few hours, but
it's unclear to me if that would help.

-Jon
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [TROVE] database instance creation

2013-09-09 Thread Daniel Salinas
Trove allows you to deploy a single vm with 1 server instance of whichever
service supported.  So for example, if you were to deploy a mysql instance,
you would have 1 vm with 1 mysql instance running on it.  You can put as
many databases on that one server instance as you would like with as many
database users as you would like.


On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Giuseppe Galeota
wrote:

> Dear all,
> reading the TROVE's 
> DocI see that 
> Trove is designed to support a single-tenant database within a
> Nova instance.
>
> What does means this?
>
> Does it mean that Trove creates a single VM instance in which a single
> database instance is created?
>
> Does it mean that Trove creates a single VM instance in which a more
> database instances of a single tenant are created ?
>
> Thank you,
> Giuseppe
>
> ___
> Mailing list:
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe :
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>
>
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [TROVE] database instance creation

2013-09-09 Thread Giuseppe Galeota
So, I think that "Trove is designed to support a *single-tenant *database
within a Nova instance" is a misleading definition. What do you think?

Giuseppe


2013/9/9 Daniel Salinas 

> Trove allows you to deploy a single vm with 1 server instance of whichever
> service supported.  So for example, if you were to deploy a mysql instance,
> you would have 1 vm with 1 mysql instance running on it.  You can put as
> many databases on that one server instance as you would like with as many
> database users as you would like.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Giuseppe Galeota <
> giuseppegale...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> reading the TROVE's 
>> DocI see that 
>> Trove is designed to support a single-tenant database within a
>> Nova instance.
>>
>> What does means this?
>>
>> Does it mean that Trove creates a single VM instance in which a single
>> database instance is created?
>>
>> Does it mean that Trove creates a single VM instance in which a more
>> database instances of a single tenant are created ?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Giuseppe
>>
>> ___
>> Mailing list:
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
>> Unsubscribe :
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>
>>
>
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


[Openstack] FW: Grizzly - Multinode cannot login to VM through console or VNC

2013-09-09 Thread raghavendra.lad

Hi,

I have the Openstack Grizzly ubuntu 12.04 multi node installed the VM is coming 
up fine with IP and also I can associate floating  ip however cannot login to 
VM using ssh or on console.  It just says loading and no go. The security group 
is also set.
Any help?

Now on VNC it says

console is currently unavailable. Please try again later. 
Reload

On my controller or nova node  :


C controller#  ping 20.0.0.5
PING 20.0.0.5 (20.0.0.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
>From 10.1.168.1: icmp_seq=1 Redirect Network(New nexthop: 10.1.168.2)





Thanks,
Raghavendra Lad


This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, 
proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in 
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other 
use of the e-mail by you is prohibited.

Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its 
affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be 
scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment 
of internal compliance with Accenture policy.

__

www.accenture.com
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] Links to summit sessions

2013-09-09 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:

> John Griffith wrote:
> > Not sure if I'm missing something but... I've had a number of people ask
> > me "what happened to the links to the summit sessions".  It seems that
> > if you try and go to a link for a session it just redirects back to the
> > main page.  Even from there if you search and find the session topic and
> > click, it seems to again redirect back to main page.
>
> Do you mean design summit sessions, or summit (conference) presentations
> ? Direct links to design summit sessions seem to work alright:
>
> http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/1
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> ___
> Mailing list:
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe :
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>

I was referring to conference presentations.
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


[Openstack] [TROVE] database instance creation

2013-09-09 Thread Giuseppe Galeota
Dear all,
reading the TROVE's
DocI see
that Trove is designed to support a single-tenant database within a
Nova instance.

What does means this?

Does it mean that Trove creates a single VM instance in which a single
database instance is created?

Does it mean that Trove creates a single VM instance in which a more
database instances of a single tenant are created ?

Thank you,
Giuseppe
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


[Openstack] Grizzly - Multinode cannot login to VM through console or VNC

2013-09-09 Thread raghavendra.lad
Hi,

I have the Openstack Grizzly ubuntu 12.04 multi node installed the VM is coming 
up fine with IP and also I can associate floating  ip however cannot login to 
VM using ssh or on console I cant see VNC. It just says loading and no go. The 
security group is also set.
Any help?


On my controller or nova node  :


C controller#  ping 20.0.0.5
PING 20.0.0.5 (20.0.0.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
>From 10.1.168.1: icmp_seq=1 Redirect Network(New nexthop: 10.1.168.2)


Thanks,
Raghavendra Lad


This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, 
proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in 
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other 
use of the e-mail by you is prohibited.

Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its 
affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be 
scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment 
of internal compliance with Accenture policy.

__

www.accenture.com
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] Load balancing traffic to instances

2013-09-09 Thread Christian Berendt
On 09/09/2013 03:52 PM, Nicolae Paladi wrote:
> What is the *simplest way* to balance HTTP (potentially other protocols)
> incoming traffic to the instances?

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS

HTH, Christian.

-- 
Christian Berendt
Cloud Computing Solution Architect
Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de

B1 Systems GmbH
Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


[Openstack] Load balancing traffic to instances

2013-09-09 Thread Nicolae Paladi
Hi,

i have a setup based on CentOS 6.4, quantum with vlan and have two
(potentially more) guests on one of the subnets.

What is the *simplest way* to balance HTTP (potentially other protocols)
incoming traffic to the instances?

Thanks,
/Nicolae.
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Trove] Relational or Non-relational DB?

2013-09-09 Thread Giuseppe Galeota
Dear Josh,
can you link to me some blueprints for non-relational data stores?

Thank you very much,
Giuseppe


2013/9/6 Josh Odom 

>  Hi Giuesppe,
> The mission statement for trove was recently changed and approved by the
> technical committee to include both relational and non-relational
> databases.   There are several blueprints in place for non-relational data
> stores with some implementation work also in flight.
>
>  -Josh
>
>   From: Giuseppe Galeota 
> Date: Friday, September 6, 2013 8:23 AM
> To: "openstack@lists.openstack.org" 
> Subject: [Openstack] [Trove] Relational or Non-relational DB?
>
>   Dear all,
>  I am a developer interested to the Databases as a Service, and in
> particular for creation of relational and non-relational databases. So I
> joined the Trove project.
>
>  On this link (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Trove#Mission_Statement) I
> read: "Mission of Trove: to provide scalable and reliable Cloud Database
> as a Service provisioning functionality for *both relational and
> non-relational database engines*.
>
>  On this link (http://docs.openstack.org/developer/trove/#introduction), 
> instead,
> I read: "It’s designed to run entirely on OpenStack, with the goal of
> allowing users to quickly and easily utilize the features of *a
> relational database*"
>
>  So, I am confused.
>
>  1) Is Trove designed to create both a *relational *and a *non-relationa*l
> database?
>
>  2) Is Trove designed to create *only a relational* database?  In this
> case, how can I modify the source code in order to allow creation of
> relational databases that use no-mysql engine (but use, for example,
> Postegres)?
>
>
>  Thank you very much,
> Giuseppe
>
>
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] Links to summit sessions

2013-09-09 Thread Thierry Carrez
John Griffith wrote:
> Not sure if I'm missing something but... I've had a number of people ask
> me "what happened to the links to the summit sessions".  It seems that
> if you try and go to a link for a session it just redirects back to the
> main page.  Even from there if you search and find the session topic and
> click, it seems to again redirect back to main page.

Do you mean design summit sessions, or summit (conference) presentations
? Direct links to design summit sessions seem to work alright:

http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/1

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack