date:20180209

[openstack-dev] [heat] heat 10.0.0.0rc1 (queens)

2018-02-09 Thread no-reply


Hello everyone,

A new release candidate for heat for the end of the Queens
cycle is available!  You can find the source code tarball at:

https://tarballs.openstack.org/heat/

Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release
candidate respin, this candidate will be formally released as the
final Queens release. You are therefore strongly
encouraged to test and validate this tarball!

Alternatively, you can directly test the stable/queens release
branch at:

http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/heat/log/?h=stable/queens

Release notes for heat can be found at:

http://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/heat/




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] Security PTG Planning, x-project request for topics.

2018-02-09 Thread Pino de Candia

Hi Folks,

here are the slides for the Tatu presentation:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1HI5RR3SNUu1If-A5Zi4EMvjl-3TKsBW20xEUyYHapfM

I meant to record the demo video as well but I haven't gotten around to
editing all the bits. Please stay tuned.

thanks,
Pino


On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Giuseppe de Candia <
giuseppe.decan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Luke,
>
> Fantastic! An hour would be great if the schedule allows - there are lots
> of different aspects we can dive into and potential future directions the
> project can take.
>
> thanks!
> Pino
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Luke Hinds  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Giuseppe de Candia <
>> giuseppe.decan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> I know the request is very late, but I wasn't aware of this SIG until
>>> recently. Would it be possible to present a new project to the Security SIG
>>> at the PTG? I need about 30 minutes. I'm hoping to drum up interest in the
>>> project, sign on users and contributors and get feedback.
>>>
>>> For the past few months I have been working on a new project - Tatu [1]-
>>> to automate the management of SSH certificates (for both users and hosts)
>>> in OpenStack. Tatu allows users to generate SSH certificates with
>>> principals based on their Project role assignments, and VMs automatically
>>> set up their SSH host certificate (and related config) via Nova vendor
>>> data. The project also manages bastions and DNS entries so that users don't
>>> have to assign Floating IPs for SSH nor remember IP addresses.
>>>
>>> I have a working demo (including Horizon panels [2] and OpenStack CLI
>>> [3]), but am still working on the devstack script and patches [4] to get
>>> Tatu's repositories into OpenStack's GitHub and Gerrit. I'll try to post a
>>> demo video in the next few days.
>>>
>>> best regards,
>>> Pino
>>>
>>>
>>> References:
>>>
>>>1. https://github.com/pinodeca/tatu (Please note this is still very
>>>much a work in progress, lots of TODOs in the code, very little testing 
>>> and
>>>documentation doesn't reflect the latest design).
>>>2. https://github.com/pinodeca/tatu-dashboard
>>>3. https://github.com/pinodeca/python-tatuclient
>>>4. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/tatu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Giuseppe, of course you can! I will add you to the agenda. We could
>> get your an hour if it allows more time for presenting and post discussion?
>>
>> We will be meeting in an allocated room on Monday (details to follow).
>>
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/security-ptg-rocky
>>
>> Luke
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Luke Hinds  wrote:
>>>

 On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Adam Young  wrote:

> Bug 968696 and System Roles.   Needs to be addressed across the
> Service catalog.
>

 Thanks Adam, will add it to the list. I see it's been open since 2012!


>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Luke Hinds  wrote:
>
>> Just a reminder as we have not had many uptakes yet..
>>
>> Are there any projects (new and old) that would like to make use of
>> the security SIG for either gaining another perspective on security
>> challenges / blueprints etc or for help gaining some cross project
>> collaboration?
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Luke Hinds 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> I am seeking topics for the PTG from all projects, as this will be
>>> where we try out are new form of being a SIG.
>>>
>>> For this PTG, we hope to facilitate more cross project collaboration
>>> topics now that we are a SIG, so if your project has a security need /
>>> problem / proposal than please do use the security SIG room where a 
>>> larger
>>> audience may be present to help solve problems and gain x-project 
>>> consensus.
>>>
>>> Please see our PTG planning pad [0] where I encourage you to add to
>>> the topics.
>>>
>>> [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/security-ptg-rocky
>>>
>>> --
>>> Luke Hinds
>>> Security Project PTL
>>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.op
>> enstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.op
> enstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


 --
 Luke Hinds | NFV Partner Engineering | CTO

[Openstack-operators] Developer Mailing List Digest February 3-9th

2018-02-09 Thread Mike Perez

Please help shape the future of the Developer Mailing List Digest with this two
question survey:
https://openstackfoundation.formstack.com/forms/openstack_developer_digest_feedback

Contribute to the Dev Digest by summarizing OpenStack Dev List threads:

* https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/devdigest
* http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/
* http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs

HTML version: https://www.openstack.org/blog/?p=8287

Success Bot Says
* stephenfin on #openstack-nova [0]: After 3 years and 7 (?) releases,
  encryption between nova's consoleproxy service and compute nodes is finally
* possible ✌️
* AJaeger on #openstack-infra [1]: zuul and nodepool feature/zuulv3 branches
  have merged into master
* ildikov on #openstack-nova [2]: OpenStack now supports to attach a Cinder
  volume to multiple VM instances managed by Nova.
* mriedem on #openstack-nova [3]: osc-placement 1.0.0 released; you can now do
  things with resource providers/classes via OSC CLI now.
* AJaeger on #openstack-infra [4]: All tox jobs have been converted to Zuul v3
  native syntax, run-tox.sh is gone.
* ttx on #openstack-dev [5]: All teams have at least one candidate for PTL for
  the Rocky cycle! Might be the first time.
* Tell us yours in OpenStack IRC channels using the command "#success
  "
* More: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Successes

[0] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2018-01-15.log.html
[1] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2018-01-18.log.html
[2] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2018-01-23.log.html
[3] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2018-01-24.log.html
[4] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2018-02-07.log.html
[5] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-dev/%23openstack-dev.2018-02-08.log.html


Community Summaries
===
* Release countdown [0]
* Nova placement resource provider update [1]
* TC Report [2]
* POST /api-sig/news [3]
* Technical Committee Status Update [4]

[0] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127120.html
[1] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127203.html
[2] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127012.html
[3] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127140.html
[4] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127192.html


Dublin PTG Schedule is Up
=
PTG schedule is available [0]. A lot of rooms are available Monday/Tuesday to
discuss additional topics that take half a day and can be requested [1]. For
small things (90 min discussions) we can book them dyncamically during the
event with the new PTG bot features. Follow the thread for updates to the
schedule [2].

[0] - https://www.openstack.org/ptg#tab_schedule
[1] - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PTG-Dublin-missing-topics
[2] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/thread.html#126892

Full thread: 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/thread.html#126892


Last Chance for PTG Dublin Tickets
==
PTG tickets for Dublin were sold out this week, and the Foundation received
many requests for more tickets. Working with the venue to accommodate the extra
capacity, every additional attendee incrementally increases costs to $600. It's
understood the importance of this event and the need to have key team members
present, so the OpenStack Foundation has negotiated an additional 100 tickets
and will partially subsidize to be at sold at $400 [0].

[0] - 
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/project-teams-gathering-dublin-2018-tickets-39055825024

Full message: 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127129.html


New Zuul Depends-On Syntax

Recently introduced url-based syntax for Depends-On: footer in your commit 
message:

Depends-On: https://review.openstack.org/535851

Old syntax will continue to work for a while, but please begin using the new
syntax. Zuul has grown the ability to talk to multiple backend systems (Gerrit,
Git and plain Git so far).

From a change in gerrit you could have:
Depends-On: https://github.com/ikalnytskyi/sphinxcontrib-openapi/pull/17

Or from a Github pull request:
Depends-On: https://review.openstack.org/536159

Tips and certain cases contained further in the full message.

Full message: 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126535.html


Call For Mentors and Funding

The Outreachy program [0] helps people of underrepresented groups get involved
in free and open source software by matching interns with established mentors
in the upstream community.

OpenStack will be

[openstack-dev] Developer Mailing List Digest February 3-9th

2018-02-09 Thread Mike Perez

Please help shape the future of the Developer Mailing List Digest with this two
question survey:
https://openstackfoundation.formstack.com/forms/openstack_developer_digest_feedback

Contribute to the Dev Digest by summarizing OpenStack Dev List threads:

* https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/devdigest
* http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/
* http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs

HTML version: https://www.openstack.org/blog/?p=8287

Success Bot Says
* stephenfin on #openstack-nova [0]: After 3 years and 7 (?) releases,
  encryption between nova's consoleproxy service and compute nodes is finally
* possible ✌️
* AJaeger on #openstack-infra [1]: zuul and nodepool feature/zuulv3 branches
  have merged into master
* ildikov on #openstack-nova [2]: OpenStack now supports to attach a Cinder
  volume to multiple VM instances managed by Nova.
* mriedem on #openstack-nova [3]: osc-placement 1.0.0 released; you can now do
  things with resource providers/classes via OSC CLI now.
* AJaeger on #openstack-infra [4]: All tox jobs have been converted to Zuul v3
  native syntax, run-tox.sh is gone.
* ttx on #openstack-dev [5]: All teams have at least one candidate for PTL for
  the Rocky cycle! Might be the first time.
* Tell us yours in OpenStack IRC channels using the command "#success
  "
* More: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Successes

[0] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2018-01-15.log.html
[1] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2018-01-18.log.html
[2] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2018-01-23.log.html
[3] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2018-01-24.log.html
[4] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2018-02-07.log.html
[5] - 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-dev/%23openstack-dev.2018-02-08.log.html


Community Summaries
===
* Release countdown [0]
* Nova placement resource provider update [1]
* TC Report [2]
* POST /api-sig/news [3]
* Technical Committee Status Update [4]

[0] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127120.html
[1] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127203.html
[2] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127012.html
[3] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127140.html
[4] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127192.html


Dublin PTG Schedule is Up
=
PTG schedule is available [0]. A lot of rooms are available Monday/Tuesday to
discuss additional topics that take half a day and can be requested [1]. For
small things (90 min discussions) we can book them dyncamically during the
event with the new PTG bot features. Follow the thread for updates to the
schedule [2].

[0] - https://www.openstack.org/ptg#tab_schedule
[1] - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PTG-Dublin-missing-topics
[2] - 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/thread.html#126892

Full thread: 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/thread.html#126892


Last Chance for PTG Dublin Tickets
==
PTG tickets for Dublin were sold out this week, and the Foundation received
many requests for more tickets. Working with the venue to accommodate the extra
capacity, every additional attendee incrementally increases costs to $600. It's
understood the importance of this event and the need to have key team members
present, so the OpenStack Foundation has negotiated an additional 100 tickets
and will partially subsidize to be at sold at $400 [0].

[0] - 
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/project-teams-gathering-dublin-2018-tickets-39055825024

Full message: 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127129.html


New Zuul Depends-On Syntax

Recently introduced url-based syntax for Depends-On: footer in your commit 
message:

Depends-On: https://review.openstack.org/535851

Old syntax will continue to work for a while, but please begin using the new
syntax. Zuul has grown the ability to talk to multiple backend systems (Gerrit,
Git and plain Git so far).

From a change in gerrit you could have:
Depends-On: https://github.com/ikalnytskyi/sphinxcontrib-openapi/pull/17

Or from a Github pull request:
Depends-On: https://review.openstack.org/536159

Tips and certain cases contained further in the full message.

Full message: 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126535.html


Call For Mentors and Funding

The Outreachy program [0] helps people of underrepresented groups get involved
in free and open source software by matching interns with established mentors
in the upstream community.

OpenStack will be

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Keystone Team Update - Weeks of 29 January and 5 February 2018

2018-02-09 Thread Colleen Murphy

# Keystone Team Update - Weeks of 29 January and 5 February 2018

It's been a busy couple of weeks and I missed the last update, here's
an update for the last two weeks.

## News

### RC1

RC1 was cut today[1]. We expect to release an RC2 after branching
since we have a translations patch and a couple of bugfixes that we
hope to get in.

### PTG Planning

We're finalizing topics to cover during the cross-project days of the PTG[2].

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/542385/
[2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/baremetal-vm-rocky-ptg

## Open Specs

Search query: https://goo.gl/pc8cCf

We don't have any new specs proposed currently but Adrian has hinted
that an interesting one is on its way[3].

[3] 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2018-February/014852.html

## Recently Merged Changes

Search query: https://goo.gl/hdD9Kw

We merged 33 changes this last week, 76 since the last update
newsletter. These included the last of our api-ref reorganization
changes, cleanup of v2 cruft and documentation, and some major
bugfixes.

## Changes that need Attention

Search query: https://goo.gl/tW5PiH

There are 25 changes that are passing CI, not in merge conflict, have
no negative reviews and aren't proposed by bots. Please focus reviews
on release-critical bugs.

## Milestone Outlook

https://releases.openstack.org/queens/schedule.html

We've released our RC1 and we are in hard string freeze. We have two
more weeks to make another RC release.

## Shout-outs

Thanks to our Outreachy intern Suramya for completing our api-ref
reorganization! This was a big step in making our API reference more
useable. Of course we have many more things for you to help us with ;)

## Help with this newsletter

Help contribute to this newsletter by editing the etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-team-newsletter

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on containerized undercloud

2018-02-09 Thread Emilien Macchi

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:30 PM, James Slagle  wrote:
[...]

You may want to add an item for the routed ctlplane work that landed
> at the end of Queens. Afaik, that will need to be supported with the
> containerized undercloud.
>

Done: https://trello.com/c/kFtIkto1/17-routed-ctlplane-networking

Thanks,
-- 
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on containerized undercloud

2018-02-09 Thread James Slagle

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Emilien Macchi  wrote:
> Quite a lot of progress has been made over the last months (and days), so I
> found useful to share an update on where we are with the efforts on
> containerized undercloud.
>
> ## CI efforts
>
> - tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers job has been reworked to use the
> "undercloud install" interface. Job is green and will probably start voting
> during the next days. See https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517445/ and
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517444/.
> - we're looking at switching some other CI jobs (maybe one to start) to
> deploy a containerized undercloud, and then deploy an overcloud (probably
> featureset010). We have a few blockers but we're working on it. It's mostly
> the overcloud_prep that fails:
> http://logs.openstack.org/06/542906/1/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode/0b18c49/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_prep_containers.log.txt.gz#_2018-02-09_17_07_27
> - because of that effort, we're also taking an opportunity to refactor
> tripleo-quickstart-extras roles to be more "standard" for both undercloud
> and overcloud (example, renaming overcloud-prep-containers to
> prep-containers, etc). We'll need help from TripleO CI squad probably.
> - Chandan will help us to run validate-tempest in
> tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers so we can have some actual testing
> for this job, since no overcloud is deployed.
>
> ## Feature parity
>
> - TLS work is ongoing.
> - TripleO UI containerization is ongoing.
> - Nova join support is targeted for Rocky
> - Upgrade workflow is under investigation. We'll work on re-using the
> upgrade_tasks in THT to upgrade a non-containerized undercloud (Queens) to a
> containerized undercloud (Rocky) like we did between Ocata and Pike with the
> upgrade_tasks. We'll actually re-use the same code but will have to change
> the undercloud upgrade workflow in tripleoclient.

You may want to add an item for the routed ctlplane work that landed
at the end of Queens. Afaik, that will need to be supported with the
containerized undercloud.

-- 
-- James Slagle
--

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on containerized undercloud

2018-02-09 Thread Emilien Macchi

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Emilien Macchi  wrote:

> Quite a lot of progress has been made over the last months (and days), so
> I found useful to share an update on where we are with the efforts on
> containerized undercloud.
>
> ## CI efforts
>
> - tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers job has been reworked to use
> the "undercloud install" interface. Job is green and will probably start
> voting during the next days. See https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517445/
> and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517444/.
> - we're looking at switching some other CI jobs (maybe one to start) to
> deploy a containerized undercloud, and then deploy an overcloud (probably
> featureset010). We have a few blockers but we're working on it. It's mostly
> the overcloud_prep that fails:
> http://logs.openstack.org/06/542906/1/check/tripleo-ci-
> centos-7-containers-multinode/0b18c49/logs/undercloud/home/
> zuul/overcloud_prep_containers.log.txt.gz#_2018-02-09_17_07_27
> - because of that effort, we're also taking an opportunity to refactor
> tripleo-quickstart-extras roles to be more "standard" for both undercloud
> and overcloud (example, renaming overcloud-prep-containers to
> prep-containers, etc). We'll need help from TripleO CI squad probably.
> - Chandan will help us to run validate-tempest in 
> tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers
> so we can have some actual testing for this job, since no overcloud is
> deployed.
>
> ## Feature parity
>
> - TLS work is ongoing.
> - TripleO UI containerization is ongoing.
> - Nova join support is targeted for Rocky
> - Upgrade workflow is under investigation. We'll work on re-using the
> upgrade_tasks in THT to upgrade a non-containerized undercloud (Queens) to
> a containerized undercloud (Rocky) like we did between Ocata and Pike with
> the upgrade_tasks. We'll actually re-use the same code but will have to
> change the undercloud upgrade workflow in tripleoclient.
>
> That highlights the current efforts, if you have any question, need more
> specific or just any feedback, please go ahead.
> At the PTG, we'll discuss about some technical details and hope to move
> forward with this nice feature during Rocky cycle.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Emilien Macchi
>

I forgot to mention, but people working on this topic have been using
Trello to collaborate:
https://trello.com/b/nmGSNPoQ/containerized-undercloud

To keep things in the open, here's the link and anyone is free to
participate.

Thanks,
-- 
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on containerized undercloud

2018-02-09 Thread Emilien Macchi

Quite a lot of progress has been made over the last months (and days), so I
found useful to share an update on where we are with the efforts on
containerized undercloud.

## CI efforts

- tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers job has been reworked to use
the "undercloud install" interface. Job is green and will probably start
voting during the next days. See https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517445/
and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517444/.
- we're looking at switching some other CI jobs (maybe one to start) to
deploy a containerized undercloud, and then deploy an overcloud (probably
featureset010). We have a few blockers but we're working on it. It's mostly
the overcloud_prep that fails:
http://logs.openstack.org/06/542906/1/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode/0b18c49/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_prep_containers.log.txt.gz#_2018-02-09_17_07_27
- because of that effort, we're also taking an opportunity to refactor
tripleo-quickstart-extras roles to be more "standard" for both undercloud
and overcloud (example, renaming overcloud-prep-containers to
prep-containers, etc). We'll need help from TripleO CI squad probably.
- Chandan will help us to run validate-tempest in
tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers so we can have some actual
testing for this job, since no overcloud is deployed.

## Feature parity

- TLS work is ongoing.
- TripleO UI containerization is ongoing.
- Nova join support is targeted for Rocky
- Upgrade workflow is under investigation. We'll work on re-using the
upgrade_tasks in THT to upgrade a non-containerized undercloud (Queens) to
a containerized undercloud (Rocky) like we did between Ocata and Pike with
the upgrade_tasks. We'll actually re-use the same code but will have to
change the undercloud upgrade workflow in tripleoclient.

That highlights the current efforts, if you have any question, need more
specific or just any feedback, please go ahead.
At the PTG, we'll discuss about some technical details and hope to move
forward with this nice feature during Rocky cycle.

Thanks,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

66 matches

Mail list logo