Thanks for the write up Eduardo. I thought you and Surya did a good job of presenting and moderating those sessions. Mark
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 17:08, Eduardo Gonzalez <dabar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi kollagues, > > During the Berlin Summit kolla team had a few talks and forum discussions, > as well as other cross-project related topics [0] > > First session was ``Kolla project onboarding``, the room was full of > people interested in contribute to kolla, many of them already using kolla > in production environments whiling to make upstream some work they've done > downstream. I can say this talk was a total success and we hope to see many > new faces during this release putting features and bug fixes into kolla. > Slides of the session at [1] > > Second session was ``Kolla project update``, was a brief resume of what > work has been done during rocky release and some items will be implemented > in the future. Number of attendees to this session was massive, no more > people could enter the room. Slides at [2] > > > Then forum sessions.. > > First one was ``Kolla user feedback``, many users came over the room. > We've notice a big increase in production deployments and some PoC > migrating to production soon, many of those environments are huge. > Overall the impressions was that kolla is great and don't have any big > issue or requirement, ``it works great`` became a common phrase to listen. > Here's a resume of the user feedback needs [3] > > - Improve operational usage for add, remove, change and stop/start nodes > and services. > - Database backup and recovery > - Lack of documentation is the bigger request, users need to read the code > to know how to configure other than core/default services > - Multi cells_v2 > - New services request, cyborg, masakari and tricircle were the most > requested > - SElinux enabled > - More SDN services such as Contrail and calico > - Possibility to include user's ansible tasks during deploy as well as > support custom config.json > - HTTPS for internal networks > > Second one was about ``kolla for the edge``, we've meet with Edge > computing group and others interested in edge deployments to identify > what's missing in kolla and where we can help. > Things we've identified are: > > - Kolla seems good at how the service split can be done, tweaking > inventory file and config values can deploy independent environments easily. > - Missing keystone federation > - Glance cache support is not a hard requirement but improves efficiency > (already merged) > - Multi cells v2 > - Multi storage per edge/far-edge > - A documentation or architecture reference would be nice to have. > > Last one was ``kolla for NFV``, few people came over to discuss about > NUMA, GPU, SRIOV. > Nothing noticiable from this session, mainly was support DPDK for > CentOS/RHEL,OracleLinux and few service addition covered by previous > discussions. > > [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-stein-summit > [1] > https://es.slideshare.net/EduardoGonzalezGutie/kolla-project-onboarding-openstack-summit-berlin-2018 > [2] > https://es.slideshare.net/EduardoGonzalezGutie/openstack-kolla-project-update-rocky-release > [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/berlin-2018-kolla-user-feedback > [4] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/berlin-2018-kolla-edge > [5] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/berlin-2018-kolla-nfv > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
