Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-11 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 12/10/2013 06:24 PM, Kotwani, Mukul wrote:
 2.6.18, not sure about the IO schedulers. The default scheduler
 could be different. Is the expected performance between the
 schedulers supposed to be that dramatically different?

I expect redhat didn't backport CFS to 2.6.18 -- that's the process
scheduler, not i/o. Whether it'd make a difference depends on your job
mix, of course.

But in general if it were centos/sl you could try installing kernel-ml
from elrepo and then running your comparison. If it's rhel: talk to
redhat (and they'll probably advise you to upgrade to 6.5 if not 7).

-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread John Smith
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote:
 Hey John,
 Ubuntu is 13.04 and Redhat is 5.8.

So its 2x vs 3x kernel ?

___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread Kotwani, Mukul
Hey John,
Ubuntu is 13.04 and Redhat is 5.8.

Mukul


-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:lbalba...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 3:49 PM
To: Kotwani, Mukul
Cc: Pete Zaitcev; OpenStack Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

Hi,

What verslons of RHEL and Ubuntu are you comparing ?


Regards,

John Smith


On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote:
 A new piece of data..

 We used the disable_fallocate configurable on Ubuntu, and the numbers do 
 reduce, but they are nowhere near the numbers for Redhat (5.8).

 As an example, for a specific test:
 PUT for Ubuntu, default parameters: ~140 ops/sec PUT for Ubuntu, 
 disable_fallocate=true: ~100 ops/sec PUT for Redhat 5.8, default 
 parameters: ~15 ops/sec

 Has anyone seen this? We are not able to find anything that can explain this 
 kind of discrepancy. FYI, this is the same hardware(we are switching between 
 Ubuntu and RH, to keep things the same) and software(Swift and xfs, same 
 versions for both), same ring configuration, same test scripts. It seems like 
 Ubuntu is far ahead, and we don't have any root cause ATM.  PUTs are written 
 though to the disk and not cached, so I am not sure what to attribute this to.

 Has anyone run Swift on RH and done comparisons with Ubuntu?

 Any help/pointers would be great!

 Thanks,
 Mukul


 -Original Message-
 From: Kotwani, Mukul
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 6:44 PM
 To: Pete Zaitcev
 Cc: OpenStack Mailing List
 Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

 Thanks Pete!

 We were using Grizzly, which is over a release old, with Folsom Keystone for 
 RHEL. So not recent at all. Is there something that would be missing in 
 RHEL5.x which would cause performance issues? I saw some references to 
 fallocate, but not much beyond that. Is this something you would expect to 
 see?

 Which was the first RHEL release was Swift supported on officially?  I tried 
 to find a support matrix or supportable platforms but could not find 
 anything..

 Mukul

 -Original Message-
 From: Pete Zaitcev [mailto:zait...@redhat.com]
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 4:36 PM
 To: Kotwani, Mukul
 Cc: OpenStack Mailing List
 Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

 On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:19:49 +
 Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote:

 Has anyone used and/or deployed RHEL (5.8) with Swift?
 I was also looking for a Supported platforms for Swift, and I could 
 not find it.

 I don't think an RDO for RHEL 5.x ever existed. First packages were built a 
 year after RHEL 6 GA shipped. The oldest build in Koji is 
 openstack-swift-1.0.2-5.fc15 (a community build by Silas), and the oldest 
 RHOS build is openstack-swift-1.4.8-2.el6 from 2012.

 Frankly I'm surprised you managed to get it running at all. (Which 
 Swift release is that, BTW? We even require PBR nowadays.)

 I dimly remember bothering with XFS for RHEL 5, but it was so long ago that I 
 cannot even remember if I got that cluster to do anything useful.

 -- Pete

 ___
 Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
 Unsubscribe : 
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

 ___
 Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
 Unsubscribe : 
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread John Smith
Hi,

What verslons of RHEL and Ubuntu are you comparing ?


Regards,

John Smith


On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote:
 A new piece of data..

 We used the disable_fallocate configurable on Ubuntu, and the numbers do 
 reduce, but they are nowhere near the numbers for Redhat (5.8).

 As an example, for a specific test:
 PUT for Ubuntu, default parameters: ~140 ops/sec
 PUT for Ubuntu, disable_fallocate=true: ~100 ops/sec
 PUT for Redhat 5.8, default parameters: ~15 ops/sec

 Has anyone seen this? We are not able to find anything that can explain this 
 kind of discrepancy. FYI, this is the same hardware(we are switching between 
 Ubuntu and RH, to keep things the same) and software(Swift and xfs, same 
 versions for both), same ring configuration, same test scripts. It seems like 
 Ubuntu is far ahead, and we don't have any root cause ATM.  PUTs are written 
 though to the disk and not cached, so I am not sure what to attribute this to.

 Has anyone run Swift on RH and done comparisons with Ubuntu?

 Any help/pointers would be great!

 Thanks,
 Mukul


 -Original Message-
 From: Kotwani, Mukul
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 6:44 PM
 To: Pete Zaitcev
 Cc: OpenStack Mailing List
 Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

 Thanks Pete!

 We were using Grizzly, which is over a release old, with Folsom Keystone for 
 RHEL. So not recent at all. Is there something that would be missing in 
 RHEL5.x which would cause performance issues? I saw some references to 
 fallocate, but not much beyond that. Is this something you would expect to 
 see?

 Which was the first RHEL release was Swift supported on officially?  I tried 
 to find a support matrix or supportable platforms but could not find 
 anything..

 Mukul

 -Original Message-
 From: Pete Zaitcev [mailto:zait...@redhat.com]
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 4:36 PM
 To: Kotwani, Mukul
 Cc: OpenStack Mailing List
 Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

 On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:19:49 +
 Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote:

 Has anyone used and/or deployed RHEL (5.8) with Swift?
 I was also looking for a Supported platforms for Swift, and I could
 not find it.

 I don't think an RDO for RHEL 5.x ever existed. First packages were built a 
 year after RHEL 6 GA shipped. The oldest build in Koji is 
 openstack-swift-1.0.2-5.fc15 (a community build by Silas), and the oldest 
 RHOS build is openstack-swift-1.4.8-2.el6 from 2012.

 Frankly I'm surprised you managed to get it running at all. (Which Swift 
 release is that, BTW? We even require PBR nowadays.)

 I dimly remember bothering with XFS for RHEL 5, but it was so long ago that I 
 cannot even remember if I got that cluster to do anything useful.

 -- Pete

 ___
 Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
 Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

 ___
 Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
 Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread Chuck Thier
My first guess is that the Redhat kernel in 5.8 may not have as many xfs
improvements and may require that the inode size set to 1024 instead of the
default.

That would be the first thing I would try.

--
Chuck


On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:57 PM, John Smith lbalba...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com
 wrote:
  Hey John,
  Ubuntu is 13.04 and Redhat is 5.8.
 
 So its 2x vs 3x kernel ?

 ___
 Mailing list:
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
 Unsubscribe :
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread Rick Jones

On 12/10/2013 03:23 PM, Kotwani, Mukul wrote:

A new piece of data..

We used the disable_fallocate configurable on Ubuntu, and the numbers do 
reduce, but they are nowhere near the numbers for Redhat (5.8).

As an example, for a specific test:
PUT for Ubuntu, default parameters: ~140 ops/sec
PUT for Ubuntu, disable_fallocate=true: ~100 ops/sec
PUT for Redhat 5.8, default parameters: ~15 ops/sec

Has anyone seen this? We are not able to find anything that can
explain this kind of discrepancy. FYI, this is the same hardware(we
are switching between Ubuntu and RH, to keep things the same) and
software(Swift and xfs, same versions for both), same ring
configuration, same test scripts. It seems like Ubuntu is far ahead,
and we don't have any root cause ATM.  PUTs are written though to the
disk and not cached, so I am not sure what to attribute this to.


Are RH 5.8 (2.6.32 with assorted backports) and what you later say is
Ubuntu 13.04 (3.8 kernel?) using the same I/O scheduler in their drivers?

rick jones




Has anyone run Swift on RH and done comparisons with Ubuntu?

Any help/pointers would be great!

Thanks,
Mukul


-Original Message-
From: Kotwani, Mukul
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 6:44 PM
To: Pete Zaitcev
Cc: OpenStack Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

Thanks Pete!

We were using Grizzly, which is over a release old, with Folsom Keystone for 
RHEL. So not recent at all. Is there something that would be missing in RHEL5.x 
which would cause performance issues? I saw some references to fallocate, but 
not much beyond that. Is this something you would expect to see?

Which was the first RHEL release was Swift supported on officially?  I tried to 
find a support matrix or supportable platforms but could not find anything..

Mukul

-Original Message-
From: Pete Zaitcev [mailto:zait...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 4:36 PM
To: Kotwani, Mukul
Cc: OpenStack Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:19:49 +
Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote:


Has anyone used and/or deployed RHEL (5.8) with Swift?
I was also looking for a Supported platforms for Swift, and I could
not find it.


I don't think an RDO for RHEL 5.x ever existed. First packages were built a 
year after RHEL 6 GA shipped. The oldest build in Koji is 
openstack-swift-1.0.2-5.fc15 (a community build by Silas), and the oldest RHOS 
build is openstack-swift-1.4.8-2.el6 from 2012.

Frankly I'm surprised you managed to get it running at all. (Which Swift 
release is that, BTW? We even require PBR nowadays.)

I dimly remember bothering with XFS for RHEL 5, but it was so long ago that I 
cannot even remember if I got that cluster to do anything useful.

-- Pete

___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack




___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread Kotwani, Mukul
2.6.18, not sure about the IO schedulers. The default scheduler could be 
different. Is the expected performance between the schedulers supposed to be 
that dramatically different? 

Mukul

-Original Message-
From: Jones, Richard (Mr. Netperf) 
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 4:17 PM
To: Kotwani, Mukul; Pete Zaitcev
Cc: OpenStack Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

On 12/10/2013 04:12 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
 On 12/10/2013 03:23 PM, Kotwani, Mukul wrote:
 A new piece of data..

 We used the disable_fallocate configurable on Ubuntu, and the numbers 
 do reduce, but they are nowhere near the numbers for Redhat (5.8).

 As an example, for a specific test:
 PUT for Ubuntu, default parameters: ~140 ops/sec PUT for Ubuntu, 
 disable_fallocate=true: ~100 ops/sec PUT for Redhat 5.8, default 
 parameters: ~15 ops/sec

 Has anyone seen this? We are not able to find anything that can 
 explain this kind of discrepancy. FYI, this is the same hardware(we 
 are switching between Ubuntu and RH, to keep things the same) and 
 software(Swift and xfs, same versions for both), same ring 
 configuration, same test scripts. It seems like Ubuntu is far ahead, 
 and we don't have any root cause ATM.  PUTs are written though to the 
 disk and not cached, so I am not sure what to attribute this to.

 Are RH 5.8 (2.6.32 with assorted backports)

Or is that 2.6.18 and backports?  I may have been thinking of RHEL6.

rick jones

 and what you later say is
 Ubuntu 13.04 (3.8 kernel?) using the same I/O scheduler in their drivers?

 rick jones



 Has anyone run Swift on RH and done comparisons with Ubuntu?

 Any help/pointers would be great!

 Thanks,
 Mukul


 -Original Message-
 From: Kotwani, Mukul
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 6:44 PM
 To: Pete Zaitcev
 Cc: OpenStack Mailing List
 Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

 Thanks Pete!

 We were using Grizzly, which is over a release old, with Folsom 
 Keystone for RHEL. So not recent at all. Is there something that 
 would be missing in RHEL5.x which would cause performance issues? I 
 saw some references to fallocate, but not much beyond that. Is this 
 something you would expect to see?

 Which was the first RHEL release was Swift supported on officially?  
 I tried to find a support matrix or supportable platforms but could 
 not find anything..

 Mukul

 -Original Message-
 From: Pete Zaitcev [mailto:zait...@redhat.com]
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 4:36 PM
 To: Kotwani, Mukul
 Cc: OpenStack Mailing List
 Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

 On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:19:49 +
 Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote:

 Has anyone used and/or deployed RHEL (5.8) with Swift?
 I was also looking for a Supported platforms for Swift, and I 
 could not find it.

 I don't think an RDO for RHEL 5.x ever existed. First packages were 
 built a year after RHEL 6 GA shipped. The oldest build in Koji is
 openstack-swift-1.0.2-5.fc15 (a community build by Silas), and the 
 oldest RHOS build is openstack-swift-1.4.8-2.el6 from 2012.

 Frankly I'm surprised you managed to get it running at all. (Which 
 Swift release is that, BTW? We even require PBR nowadays.)

 I dimly remember bothering with XFS for RHEL 5, but it was so long 
 ago that I cannot even remember if I got that cluster to do anything useful.

 -- Pete

 ___
 Mailing list:
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
 Unsubscribe :
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

 ___
 Mailing list:
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
 Unsubscribe :
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack




___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


[Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-05 Thread Kotwani, Mukul
Folks,
Has anyone used and/or deployed RHEL (5.8) with Swift? We are running some 
experiments with Swift installed on both platforms, same hardware, and we are 
seeing some pretty different performance profiles. Ubuntu is doing much better 
than RHEL.

Has anyone else seen the performance difference?

I was also looking for a Supported platforms for Swift, and I could not find 
it. Any pointers to that will be great.

Thanks in advance!
Mukul
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-05 Thread John Smith
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote:

 Has anyone used and/or deployed RHEL (5.8) with Swift? We are running some
 experiments with Swift installed on both platforms, same hardware, and we
 are seeing some pretty different performance profiles. Ubuntu is doing much
 better than RHEL.

Hi,

Just curious: what Ubuntu version are you comparing to RHEL 5.8 ?



Regards,


John Smith.

___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-05 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:19:49 +
Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote:

 Has anyone used and/or deployed RHEL (5.8) with Swift?
 I was also looking for a Supported platforms for Swift, and
 I could not find it.

I don't think an RDO for RHEL 5.x ever existed. First packages
were built a year after RHEL 6 GA shipped. The oldest build in Koji
is openstack-swift-1.0.2-5.fc15 (a community build by Silas), and the
oldest RHOS build is openstack-swift-1.4.8-2.el6 from 2012.

Frankly I'm surprised you managed to get it running at all. (Which
Swift release is that, BTW? We even require PBR nowadays.)

I dimly remember bothering with XFS for RHEL 5, but it was so long
ago that I cannot even remember if I got that cluster to do anything
useful.

-- Pete

___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack