[openstack-dev] rating talks (and keynotes) at the OpenStack summit
I attended a talk by Mark Baker today (http://sched.co/2qbJ) entitled The OpenStack Summit Talk Selection Process is Broken and I think it was an informative session. The statistics presented indicated that just under a third of the talks submitted got accepted at this summit and that is a very healthy ratio and that's a great thing. One thing that was brought up at the talk was that there was no formal feedback mechanism about talks and keynotes at Summit. Is there any way in which we can get a feedback mechanism for the talks and sessions at this summit up and running? It would be a valuable piece of information if we could get it. Any thoughts on how this can be done? There were 296 sessions; we obviously know the names of the sessions and the speakers. Does our scheduling mechanism have a 'ratings module' that can be turned on? Is there some other quick and dirty mechanism we can use? It would be awesome if we could quickly get something in place before we all leave Vancouver so we can gather this information and it could serve as a valuable form of input for future selection committees. Thanks, -amrith P.S. I gave a talk and if there's no formal mechanism for feedback I welcome email on the subject. The talk was about Trove and replication with MySQL on Monday evening. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Neutron] We will have two service chaining feature development design meetings during the Summit
Hi Everyone, I got emails asking for the date of the meeting. Sorry that I forgot to mention the date of the Neutron work session that we can use for Neutron service chain feature discussion. It is at 4:10pm Thursday at room 221 and 9:30am Friday at room 306. Thanks, Cathy From: Cathy Zhang [mailto:cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com] Sent: 19 May 2015 06:37 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: We will have two service chaining feature development design meetings during the Summit Hi everyone, We will have two service chaining feature design meetings during this Summit. One at 4:10pm during the Neutron Work session at room 221, the other at 9:30am during Neutron Contributors Meetup at room 306. Bring your questions and requirements, poke holes at the API proposal and design, let's have a good deep dive technical discussion. Thanks, Cathy __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Nominating Chelsea Winfree for Barbican core
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 +1 from me as well. - - Douglas Mendizábal On 5/18/15 7:38 AM, John Vrbanac wrote: ?+1 John Vrbanac -- - -- *From:* Chad Lung chad.l...@gmail.com *Sent:* Sunday, May 17, 2015 6:34 PM *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Nominating Chelsea Winfree for Barbican core Hi all, I'd like to nominate Chelsea Winfree for the Barbican core review team. Chelsea has been active in Barbican as a regular contributor of code and helping always needed documentation. http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=chelsea-winfreerelease=all As a reminder to barbican-core members we use the voting process outlined in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Barbican/CoreTeam to add members to our team. Thanks, Chad Lung EMC Cloud Services __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVXBywAAoJEB7Z2EQgmLX7iYMQAJcWp3AnX/cls/Ln+QrTylNQ Yj9OYSw1RNFI9+d0B+IP3M3RsaKEVmSZ+n2SeXX6NOFYs9HRJsyk6Icj/u/xi+t2 a+hslDHH8NQnG5ZiYqRzDupfpsxNzi474auVdZESldXP8orjuesDVRNcwMWcwsSv DmxcYph73aU5pKeZ1E6Ami08xVauVvWnrvItlNpOd5QenH7nVEDxOioI5u6NxK5M j5KApPfpx8RmpNSvfe3jcFD1qxOaA637mZaKdeUf71+sfFGRCCAoGGQR9xYIdEdZ wG6okvZH/zDXY1dC+LWpR/btjrfHAYMUb01NYlHizcttHrZDeXpWone4TXDpEF7U P8IUb1HDRKXrYCWPWY61kzxbgziUV+04WMEAUcdK/AcQRBCkVm7TbOhb3I2a80Uv TuEGX/jwXxT9bmrtFRIsPZhyyH8tG+VKQV8vZ4cUh9pCKI5maPBN/NzSXPjYR91L uYH2lofx5cdBnamnJNGhPFlGKbiQg/xjAA+1U3Wfu3GlWBu5AO2c8XHM82eENLzt 35ozZEXjp1bJL3UZCzl/ZeFJseJJ4WN75EAiKcg2jMg2sRXJ4x3i1Ko9fkEhCkDF pI7sLls2BMl320cectIXSULjMx1nWEPGZsjs4XJfUkaG8o9fpFVEilQ+5PnlcqYD Sag66Hm2mGpN+Tyh+ieg =Qaep -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Re: Puppet-OpenStack API providers - Follow up
Hi, Just wanted to add, for clarification, the need to restructure the openstacklib. The use of resource[:auth] parameter is causing the providers to behave differently depending on the context, as expressed earlier in this thread. I would to highlight the fact that this change is driven by design. Therefore the need for a fix, sooner than later, especially at a time of the entire stack of provider to shift to Keystone V3. And this is actually a critical time because of patches waiting upon this structural change. The bp/auth-consolidation (sorry for the *bad* name) patches show authentication doesn't have to be using parameters, the latter was a mistake from a types/providers suitability viewpoint. The restructure (bp/auth-consolidation) is not only working but also simplifies the code which is going to make the development/maintenance of types/providers faster. If anyone has issues/questions with this please speak up! Thank you, Gilles On 07/05/15 11:50, Gilles Dubreuil wrote: On 07/05/15 11:33, Colleen Murphy wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Gilles Dubreuil gil...@redhat.com mailto:gil...@redhat.com wrote: It seems ~/.openrc is the only default [...] The extras module places it at '/root/openrc' [1], so either the extras module should be changed or the providers should look in /root/openrc, either way it should be consistent. Agreed. Let's use ~/openrc for now then. Colleen [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/puppet-openstack_extras/tree/manifests/auth_file.pp#n86 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] rating talks (and keynotes) at the OpenStack summit
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Amrith Kumar amr...@tesora.com wrote: I attended a talk by Mark Baker today (http://sched.co/2qbJ) entitled “The OpenStack Summit Talk Selection Process is Broken” and I think it was an informative session. The statistics presented indicated that just under a third of the talks submitted got accepted at this summit and that is a very healthy ratio and that’s a great thing. One thing that was brought up at the talk was that there was no formal feedback mechanism about talks and keynotes at Summit. Is there any way in which we can get a feedback mechanism for the talks and sessions at this summit up and running? It would be a valuable piece of information if we could get it. Any thoughts on how this can be done? There were 296 sessions; we obviously know the names of the sessions and the speakers. Does our scheduling mechanism have a ‘ratings module’ that can be turned on? Is there some other quick and dirty mechanism we can use? It would be awesome if we could quickly get something in place before we all leave Vancouver so we can gather this information and it could serve as a valuable form of input for future selection committees. Thanks, -amrith P.S. I gave a talk and if there’s no formal mechanism for feedback I welcome email on the subject. The talk was about Trove and replication with MySQL on Monday evening. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Hi Amrith, I think this is a great point, there's always informal conversations and mixed reviews on talks, but it would be really great if we could formalize this, and use it to aid in the process of choosing talks for the next summit. Of course the key is participation and some why of trying to make sure we actually get info submitted by people that attended the talk. Anyway, I think it's a great idea and certainly worth looking at possibly doing for the summit in Tokyo. Thanks, John __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] Format of 'locations' data in image metadata ?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:43:07PM +0800, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Zhi Yan Liu lzy@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:01:37AM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 19/05/15 17:19 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
In Nova we are attempting to model[1] the glance image metadata and
properties using the Nova object model (now oslo.versionedobjects).
The one item I'm stuck on understanding is the 'locations' field
and more specifically the 'metadata' element in each location
entry
In the file glance/api/v2/images.py I can see this description
of the data format:
'locations': {
'type': 'array',
'items': {
'type': 'object',
'properties': {
'url': {
'type': 'string',
'maxLength': 255,
},
'metadata': {
'type': 'object',
},
},
'required': ['url', 'metadata'],
},
'description': _('A set of URLs to access the image file kept
in '
'external store'),
As you can see here, 'metadata' is just said to be of type 'object'.
Is there somewhere that actually describes what is valid contents
for this field ? Is it sufficient to assume the metadata will only
ever be a dict of strings, or can the metadata be a complex type
with arbitrarily nested data structures ?
It's just arbitrary metadata for now, we don't have a specific format.
I'm curious to know if there are folks using this field. We do (did)
have a use case for it.
Yep, I'd be curious to understand just what it is used for in practice ?
Is the data to be stored in there determined by python code, or by the
local administrator or both ?
Yes, It determined by python code in nova as a part of image download
plugin, and administrator needs to prepare it based on particular
deployment environment as well. Current a usage is to accelerate image
download from nfs store to nova compute node, now there is only one
particular plugin in nova upstream tree [0]. (from the logic in
_file_system_lookup(), i think a predefined 'id' is needed in the
metadata of the location entry).
[0]
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/image/download/file.py#L150
zhiyan
Btw, for your question:
Is there somewhere that actually describes what is valid contents
for this field ? Is it sufficient to assume the metadata will only
ever be a dict of strings, or can the metadata be a complex type
with arbitrarily nested data structures ?
for current nova in-tree image download plugin (above [0]), the schema
of location metadata should be this:
https://github.com/openstack/glance_store/blob/master/glance_store/_drivers/filesystem.py#L72
zhiyan
Thankyou, that is useful information.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Magnum] Container + OpenStack Integration
Magnum and Neutron Teams, If you are in Vancouver today and can help design or implement native networking support to obviate the need for overlay networks when using containers, please join this design session: http://sched.co/3CjK (3:30 PM, Room 303) This will be based on feedback gathered at the Fishbowl session earlier in the day: http://sched.co/3B0z (11:00 AM, Room 306) Thanks, Adrian __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [neutron] What is a best way to find calls to Neutron API in OVS
Hello, Sorry for newbie question. I'm trying to identify all invocations of neutron API in OVS [1] and get lost. What is a best practice to find in code all neutron API calls regardless of the method they are done. I'll appreciate if anyone can reference me to documentation that describes ways to invoke neutron API calls. [1] https://github.com/openstack/neutron/tree/master/neutron/plugins/openvswitch -- Regards, LeoY - I enjoy the massacre of ads. This sentence will slaughter ads without a messy bloodbath __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][libvirt] Serious problem of block migration of a hybrid instance (instance based on local disk and cinder volume attached)
Hi devs, I find a serious problem when I try to live migrate a hybrid instance (instance based on local disk and cinder volume attached) . In current nova, such operation is allowed. But I don't think libvirt can deal with such condition correctly. When block migration of a hybird intance is triggered, nova will initiate a new connection to the volume in destination compute node and then call libvirt to do the block migration. However, libvirt doesn't distinguish local disk and a network volume, it may copy both local disk and cinder volume from source to destination. It is dangerous to write the same volume simutaneously on source and destination!! and apparently there is no need to do this! I believe we should do something to correct this, maybe patch libvirt? or just forbid user do such operation? -- Luo Gangyi__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Do we have weekly meeting today ?
Given folks are at the summit, is this mtg happening today ? __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][libvirt] Serious problem of block migration of a hybrid instance (instance based on local disk and cinder volume attached)
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:11:26PM +0800, Luo Gangyi wrote: Hi devs, I find a serious problem when I try to live migrate a hybrid instance (instance based on local disk and cinder volume attached) . In current nova, such operation is allowed. But I don't think libvirt can deal with such condition correctly. When block migration of a hybird intance is triggered, nova will initiate a new connection to the volume in destination compute node and then call libvirt to do the block migration. However, libvirt doesn't distinguish local disk and a network volume, it may copy both local disk and cinder volume from source to destination. It is dangerous to write the same volume simutaneously on source and destination!! and apparently there is no need to do this! I believe we should do something to correct this, maybe patch libvirt? or just forbid user do such operation? Both. Nova now forbids this commit d667b6a63e80b2f8d6311c2cf224ba32628eed84 Author: Chris St. Pierre stpie...@metacloud.com Date: Wed Dec 3 16:16:34 2014 -0600 libvirt: Fail when live block migrating instance with volumes This raises an exception when attempting to live block migrate (nova live-migration --block-migrate) an instance with attached volumes. libvirt copies these volumes from themselves to themselves. At a minimum, this is horribly slow and de-sparses a sparse volume; at worst, this could cause massive data corruption. Closes-Bug: 1398999 Change-Id: Ibcd423976bb9fea46e3e1cb23cc8e5cd944d8fc2 And work is being done to allow libvirt to be told to skip cinder volumes when migrating: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-May/msg00345.html Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Fuel] 6.1 HCF delayed, release date to be revised
Hello everyone, Our HCF milestone date was on May 12th, but unfortunately the amount of bugs at this point still does not meet HCF criteria [1]. Our current plan is the following: 1. Close the remaining high and critical bugs that fall to HCF criteria. Creating filter for these bugs with Launchpad means is tricky, so I am just publishing the list of bugs below [2] 2. Achieve at least 70% of passes in automated tests coverage (current numbers are 61% for Ubuntu and 42% for CentOS). We hope to complete these action items by May 22th. We will revise GA date estimations once we hit the HCF goals. If the GA date is changed, I'll send an update. I realize that I should have sent this earlier, I apologize for the delay with communication. -- EugeneB [1] Hard Code Freeze criteria: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/Hard_Code_Freeze [2] List of bugs left to be fixed (valid on May 20th, more bugs can be added later on if discovered). https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1439686 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456325 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1455048 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1454763 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1455660 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456191 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1443925 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1454741 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1455390 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1455539 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456276 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456587 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456634 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/6.1.x/+bug/1441435 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1443913 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1455661 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456540 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456630 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456791 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456491 https://bugs.launchpad.net/mos/6.1.x/+bug/1422350 https://bugs.launchpad.net/mos/6.1.x/+bug/1456243 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1455513 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1455923 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456459 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456605 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456746 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456526 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1449977 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1456805 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] Format of 'locations' data in image metadata ?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:01:37AM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 19/05/15 17:19 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
In Nova we are attempting to model[1] the glance image metadata and
properties using the Nova object model (now oslo.versionedobjects).
The one item I'm stuck on understanding is the 'locations' field
and more specifically the 'metadata' element in each location
entry
In the file glance/api/v2/images.py I can see this description
of the data format:
'locations': {
'type': 'array',
'items': {
'type': 'object',
'properties': {
'url': {
'type': 'string',
'maxLength': 255,
},
'metadata': {
'type': 'object',
},
},
'required': ['url', 'metadata'],
},
'description': _('A set of URLs to access the image file kept in '
'external store'),
As you can see here, 'metadata' is just said to be of type 'object'.
Is there somewhere that actually describes what is valid contents
for this field ? Is it sufficient to assume the metadata will only
ever be a dict of strings, or can the metadata be a complex type
with arbitrarily nested data structures ?
It's just arbitrary metadata for now, we don't have a specific format.
I'm curious to know if there are folks using this field. We do (did)
have a use case for it.
Yep, I'd be curious to understand just what it is used for in practice ?
Is the data to be stored in there determined by python code, or by the
local administrator or both ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] Format of 'locations' data in image metadata ?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:01:37AM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 19/05/15 17:19 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
In Nova we are attempting to model[1] the glance image metadata and
properties using the Nova object model (now oslo.versionedobjects).
The one item I'm stuck on understanding is the 'locations' field
and more specifically the 'metadata' element in each location
entry
In the file glance/api/v2/images.py I can see this description
of the data format:
'locations': {
'type': 'array',
'items': {
'type': 'object',
'properties': {
'url': {
'type': 'string',
'maxLength': 255,
},
'metadata': {
'type': 'object',
},
},
'required': ['url', 'metadata'],
},
'description': _('A set of URLs to access the image file kept in
'
'external store'),
As you can see here, 'metadata' is just said to be of type 'object'.
Is there somewhere that actually describes what is valid contents
for this field ? Is it sufficient to assume the metadata will only
ever be a dict of strings, or can the metadata be a complex type
with arbitrarily nested data structures ?
It's just arbitrary metadata for now, we don't have a specific format.
I'm curious to know if there are folks using this field. We do (did)
have a use case for it.
Yep, I'd be curious to understand just what it is used for in practice ?
Is the data to be stored in there determined by python code, or by the
local administrator or both ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Yes, It determined by python code in nova as a part of image download
plugin, and administrator needs to prepare it based on particular
deployment environment as well. Current a usage is to accelerate image
download from nfs store to nova compute node, now there is only one
particular plugin in nova upstream tree [0]. (from the logic in
_file_system_lookup(), i think a predefined 'id' is needed in the
metadata of the location entry).
[0]
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/image/download/file.py#L150
zhiyan
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] Format of 'locations' data in image metadata ?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Zhi Yan Liu lzy@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:01:37AM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 19/05/15 17:19 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
In Nova we are attempting to model[1] the glance image metadata and
properties using the Nova object model (now oslo.versionedobjects).
The one item I'm stuck on understanding is the 'locations' field
and more specifically the 'metadata' element in each location
entry
In the file glance/api/v2/images.py I can see this description
of the data format:
'locations': {
'type': 'array',
'items': {
'type': 'object',
'properties': {
'url': {
'type': 'string',
'maxLength': 255,
},
'metadata': {
'type': 'object',
},
},
'required': ['url', 'metadata'],
},
'description': _('A set of URLs to access the image file kept
in '
'external store'),
As you can see here, 'metadata' is just said to be of type 'object'.
Is there somewhere that actually describes what is valid contents
for this field ? Is it sufficient to assume the metadata will only
ever be a dict of strings, or can the metadata be a complex type
with arbitrarily nested data structures ?
It's just arbitrary metadata for now, we don't have a specific format.
I'm curious to know if there are folks using this field. We do (did)
have a use case for it.
Yep, I'd be curious to understand just what it is used for in practice ?
Is the data to be stored in there determined by python code, or by the
local administrator or both ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Yes, It determined by python code in nova as a part of image download
plugin, and administrator needs to prepare it based on particular
deployment environment as well. Current a usage is to accelerate image
download from nfs store to nova compute node, now there is only one
particular plugin in nova upstream tree [0]. (from the logic in
_file_system_lookup(), i think a predefined 'id' is needed in the
metadata of the location entry).
[0]
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/image/download/file.py#L150
zhiyan
Btw, for your question:
Is there somewhere that actually describes what is valid contents
for this field ? Is it sufficient to assume the metadata will only
ever be a dict of strings, or can the metadata be a complex type
with arbitrarily nested data structures ?
for current nova in-tree image download plugin (above [0]), the schema
of location metadata should be this:
https://github.com/openstack/glance_store/blob/master/glance_store/_drivers/filesystem.py#L72
zhiyan
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [heat] Can't make it to the summit.
Hi, Due to some visa issues, my travel to Vancouver summit is canceled. I will miss meeting the Heat team and the planned session on convergence phase 2. Kanagaraj M has some context on the phase 2 plans and he should be able to drive it. Hope you will have a good discussion. - Anant __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] needed, driver for oslo.db thursday session
Thanks Jeremy, Mike, Roman, Victor, Please see remote connection details in: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-oslo-db-plans The schedule time for the session is in: https://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/3571aa54b364c62e097da8cd32d97258 Hope you can make it :) yes, please pick one of the 2 choices there (either sip or google hangout) and drop a note in the etherpad which one you want me to connect to thanks, dims On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-05-19 09:06:56 -0700 (-0700), Davanum Srinivas wrote: Ouch. Thanks for the heads up Roman We have https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Conferencing which we used yesterday to successfully bridge Clark B. into an I18n tooling session via Jitsi over the normal conference wireless network with the built-in mic/speaker in Jim's laptop. Feel free to use it in your sessions, just try to pick a random conference number between 6000 and 7999 so nobody steps on the toes of other sessions which might be using it (maybe add your conference room number to 6000 or something?). Let me or other Infra people know if you have any questions about or trouble using it! -- Jeremy Stanley __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Question to driver maintainers
Hello Igor, share extending works without interruption in Quobyte storage. Best regards Silvan 2015-05-18 10:15 GMT+02:00 Igor Malinovskiy imalinovs...@mirantis.com: Hello, everyone! My letter is mainly addressed to driver maintainers, but could be interesting to everybody. As you probably know, on Kilo midcycle meetup we discussed share resize functionality (extend and shrink) and I already have implemented 'extend' API in Generic driver (https://review.openstack.org/182383/). After implementation review we noticed that some backends are able to resize a share without causing disruptions, but others might only be able to do it disruptively (Generic driver case). So I want to ask driver maintainers here: Will your driver be able to do share extending without loss of connectivity? Depending on your answers, we will handle this situation differently. Best regards, Igor Malinovskiy (IRC: u_glide) Manila Core Team __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Dr. Silvan Kaiser Quobyte GmbH Boyenstr. 41 - 10115 Berlin-Mitte - Germany +49-30-814 591 800 - www.quobyte.comhttp://www.quobyte.com/ Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 149012B Management board: Dr. Felix Hupfeld, Dr. Björn Kolbeck, Dr. Jan Stender -- -- *Quobyte* GmbH Hardenbergplatz 2 - 10623 Berlin - Germany +49-30-814 591 800 - www.quobyte.com Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 149012B management board: Dr. Felix Hupfeld, Dr. Björn Kolbeck, Dr. Jan Stender __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [App-Catalog] Planning/working session Wednesday in Vancouver
[Cross-posting to both dev and operators list because I believe this is important to both groups] For those of us who have been working on the OpenStack Community App Catalog (http://apps.openstack.org) yesterday was really exciting. We had a chance to do a quick demo and walk through during they keynote, followed by a longer talk in the afternoon (slides here: http://www.slideshare.net/aedocw/openstack-community-app-catalog-httpappsopenstackorg) The wiki page with more details is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/App-Catalog If you are in Vancouver and are interested in helping improve the Community App Catalog please join us for this working session: http://sched.co/3Rk4 (11:50 room 116/117) Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/YVR-app-catalog-plans If you can't join the session but have ideas or thoughts you would like to see discussed please add them to the etherpad. I've put down a few of the ideas that have come up so far, but it's definitely not a comprehensive list. We got really great feedback yesterday afternoon and found a lot of people are interested in contributing to the catalog and working together to add improvements. Hopefully you can join us today! -Christopher __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session
Hi, What is the final decision about this discussion? When will it happen? thanks Gosha On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Douglas Mendizábal douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I'm very much interested in talking with some Keystone folks about this auth issue. I would be willing to dedicate a Barbican Working Session to this discussion if there is a time slot that works for all the interested parties. - - Douglas Mendizabal On 5/14/15 3:13 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: If there's a free session, can we dedicate a session specifically to the zaqar, barbican, sahara, heat, trove, guestagent, keystone auth thingy so everyone's all together? Thanks, Kevin From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 12:15 PM To: Sergey Lukjanov Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session On 14/05/15 10:07 -0700, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: Hey, in Sahara we're looking on using Zaqar as a transport for agent some day as well. Unfortunately this section overlaps with Sahara sessions. Sergey, We still have some free sessions, we'd be happy to dedicate one to Sahara. Any slot that looks good for you? http://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/design+summit/Zaqar #.VVT0CvYU9hE Thanks, Flavio On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 13/05/15 18:06 +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Sahara also has the same problem, but worse, since they currently only support ssh with their agent, so its either assign floating ip's to all nodes, or your sahara controller must be on your one and only network node so it can tunnel. :/ Should we have a chat with them too? We've scheduled a discussion with Trove's team on Thursday at 5pm. It'd be great to have this discussion once and together to know what the common issues are and what things need to be done. I'll ping folks from both teams to invite them to this session. If they can't make it, I'm happy to use another working session slot. Cheers, Flavio http://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/59dc6ec910a732cdbf5970b679 2e1cef #.VVRL0PYU9hE Thanks, Kevin From: Zane Bitter [zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 10:26 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session On 11/05/15 05:49, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 08/05/15 00:45 -0700, Nikhil Manchanda wrote: 3) The trove-guest-agent is in vm. it is connected by taskmanager by rabbitmq. We designed it. But is there some prectise to do this? how to make the vm be connected in vm-network and management network? Most deployments of Trove that I am familiar with set up a separate RabbitMQ server in cloud that is used by Trove. It is not recommended to use the same infrastructure RabbitMQ server for Trove for security reasons. Also most deployments of Trove set up a private (neutron) network that the RabbitMQ server and guests are connected to, and all RPC messages are sent over this network. We've discussed trove+zaqar in the past and I believe some folks from the Trove team have been in contact with Fei Long lately about this. Since one of the projects goal's for this cycle is to provide support to other projects and contribute to the adoption, I'm wondering if any of the members of the trove team would be willing to participate in a Zaqar working session completely dedicated to this integration? +1 I learned from a concurrent thread ([Murano] [Mistral] SSH workflow action) that Murano are doing exactly the same thing with a separate RabbitMQ server to communicate with guest agents. It's a real waste of energy when multiple OpenStack projects all have to solve the same problem from scratch, so a single answer to this would be great. In that thread I suggested (and Murano developers agreed with) making the transport pluggable so that operators could choose Zaqar instead. I would strongly support doing the same here. +1 :) Flavio cheers, Zane. It'd be a great opportunity to figure out what's really needed, edge cases and get some work done on this specific case. Thanks, Flavio _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org? subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] Supporting multiple local subnets for VPN connections
However after thinking about it more deeply, option A might be suitable if
the vpn-service becomes more generic, and usable by other vpn objects
(ipsec-site-connection, bgpvpn-connection).
I would become an object that the tenant can update to attach CIDR it wants
to export in its VPN.
To transform the vpn-service object in a generic vpn description, we need
to remove the mandatory ROUTER attribute, so that we can use it for l2vpn
either.
Hope we can discuss that on friday morning
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
In Kilo, VPNaaS APIs were no longer marked as experimental. We need to
understand the implication of changing the API. I'm not sure how much
VPNaaS is being used by OpenStack users at this time, either. I'm hoping
to seek out answers to this at the summit.
If anyone has suggestions, comments, information on this, please chime in.
I'll
likely make a BP for multiple subnets, when I get back from the summit.
Lastly, I'm planning on trying to get people interested in VPN to meet on
Friday morning at the summit to discuss all the VPN topics that have been
coming up.
Regards,
Paul Michali (pc_m)
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:54 AM Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi paul,
this is also something that we would like to introduce for BGP/MPLS VPNs
[2].
We choose to allow tenants to attach existing networks ( it might evolve
to subnets) to bgpvpn-connection objects, by updating the bgpvpn-connection
object, which is the equivalent of the ipsec-site-connection object.
So I think that Option B is suitable here.
Concerning backward compatibility, I think VPNaas is still considered as
experimental, am I wrong? Do you have to provide backward compatbility in
this case?
Mathieu
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177740/
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:
Hi,
There has been, over the years, some mention about having VPN IPSec
connections supporting multiple CIDRs for local (left side) private
networks, in addition to the current support for multiple peer CIDRs (right
side).
I'm raising the question again with these goals:
1) Determine if the reference IPSec implementations support this
capability
2) Determine if there is a community desire to enhance VPN to support
this capability (for all VPN types)
3) See what would be the best way to handle this (changes to API and
model)
4) Identify any consequences of making this change.
Note: My assumption here is something that could be used for any type of
VPN connection - current IPSec, future BGP/MPLS VPN, DM VPN, etc.
Here is some information that was gathered from people on the VPN team
so far. Please correct any inaccuracies and comment on the items...
(1) It looks like OpenSwan and Libreswan will support this capability.
StrongSwan will support this with IKEv2. For IKEv1, a Cisco Unity plugin
extensions is needed. I'm not sure what that implies [1].
(2) Do we, as a community, want to enhance VPNaaS to provide this
capability of N:M subnets for VPN implementations? Putting on my vendor
hat, I can see cases where customers want to be able to only create one
connection and reference multiple subnets on each end. Is there a desire to
do this and bake it into the reference implementation (thus making it
available for other implementations)?
(3) Currently, the vpn service API includes the router and subnet ID.
The IPSec connection command includes the peer CIDR(s). For reference, here
are two of the APIs:
usage: neutron vpn-service-create [-h] [-f
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
[-c COLUMN] [--max-width integer]
[--prefix PREFIX]
[--request-format {json,xml}]
[--tenant-id TENANT_ID]
[--admin-state-down]
[--name NAME] [--description
DESCRIPTION]
ROUTER SUBNET
usage: neutron ipsec-site-connection-create [-h]
[-f
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
[-c COLUMN]
[--max-width integer]
[--prefix PREFIX]
[--request-format {json,xml}]
[--tenant-id TENANT_ID]
[--admin-state-down] [--name
NAME]
[--description DESCRIPTION]
[--mtu MTU]
[--initiator
{bi-directional,response-only}]
[--dpd
action=ACTION,interval=INTERVAL,timeout=TIMEOUT]
--vpnservice-id
Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo] disabling pypy unit test jobs for oslo
On 11 May 2015 at 23:51, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: It appears that we've basically run out of interest / time in realistically keeping pypy working in our system. With the focus on really getting python 3.4 working, it seems like it would just be better to drop pypy entirely in the system. In the last couple of years we've not seen any services realistically get to the point of being used for any of the services. And as seen by this last failure, pypy is apparently not keeping up with upstream tooling changes. So pypy is useful for clients - so that folk using pypy can talk to OpenStack. I don't have a view on the servers today - certainly the majority of our servers are not CPU bound. I asked for volunteers on Twitter - people that about openstack and pypy, and got two, one of whom helped us with the current glitch - which was all fixed by using modern virtualenv, so it was easy :). I've put a web page together summarising my understanding of the situation: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PyPy I think we should make the jobs voting again (checking that each one is passing first, of course). -Rob __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Nominating Kaitlin Farr for barbican-core
+1 from my side. On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Douglas Mendizábal douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi All, I would like to nominate Kaitlin Farr for barbican-core. Kaitlin has been contributing to the project for a long time, both by contributing code to Barbican, python-barbicanclient and Castellan, and also by providing valuable reviews. [1] As a reminder to the rest of the core team, we use the process outlined in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Barbican/CoreTeam to add members to the barbican-core team. Thanks, Douglas Mendizábal [1] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/barbican-group/90 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVW9CgAAoJEB7Z2EQgmLX7u6kP/22G3NqsnJmKRsnw065btt8z /Sb7OqFa2RKuIKk88a9yehwRuunh2YCdfLmXta1+XXpucghG9dbflfFVGU4/VujX VG/B3yUXTBYT2kn72mtwpKk4S6mYXBPn+fpKGR7iJrifYSg55XO7a2c2m/xIC8pO R9+d5/8ZztxS1UbmhNuqLwBDpo9FIG+5CoWOfYPTAQ1TxB/SIs2ltk4jzLaU05yb 5LTG3uq5K3CT+LvM3Rl6SCZ7bIiTmaTuPsXMnqqLiqhya90U63VJGGXUE1yjW11G Kgm7yxUV8DkcESHXEe0aW8hpLMuGKda/f83XetGN27+YpM3/G1z8N656zLX9sF3t oVU7dWnARn9NsByFP9ASg8BCk8iWr/mCeB/fajwXT95C+OXAicNWn5jXKowXQhQH v4XaFrjafROLdJocgH0mfcoEbTXZXlsKyHYtnZdwAO+T06RNd21c/lnNiG1rMYeh 2Yl48nzxxx33YprizHDRMEhABIb11HO040+j+EHNCvbsGSJGZIZmzzbxNe2QGXkx q++JvMBW60pPd6pi7nEVjbjSEZhb6f6xHs13/y+nZ9NCSNkUPx1UoxKz18JRtrLi /XDZLv6D92Trlaxae9mpVlWTM1elYPWSm3QVMxMrSP9wtAYbUIoq0PN+WwKk/1J7 WaeQpFjA1SdFHj5uPNZk =1OIW -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Juan Antonio Osorio R. e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][barbican] VM-spec discussion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi All, Kevin Fox and I were wondering if there's a good time today where we could get together with someone from Keystone and Nova to talk through the vm-integration spec. [1] This is the spec to be able to have credentials which are unique to each new vm so that the vm is able to access a secret in Barbican. Thanks, Douglas Mendizábal [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159571/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVXLnnAAoJEB7Z2EQgmLX73nIQAIBJNosFdyYIjhfOg5v51B82 ADZa0PCoTPW9/LWceYw2iqWCgF5CjXcUkj1t//dtjUCIRlGHFQzLAji8nlYl7KqH lnCTjsoFmEZxbNXp+XaJkm8k20IekbOUWz+voQI8tBn4K4f5QxZqQOkmnHpjoJhE VQOI2Gf/3F/bpR3rzLDqgxOts5c97GXJJP5oigg1lUavgnVEnWKwrGjF8RQPB54I SQPWEuY2iHqXCIWPkbBT6+Z9ehETnRzP42ja9I3h88ye2f8OxJCh5ICKjHP2EnQv lFbW5GVtX/NH+edoOsxeCPCZjq20bxe0im+5WIjZqAbzvcC5k0/wJvATasGSKEuf UbypM7Lv5cSfTWEEEvZEniDC6TGEnpBzr7ummG6YANlYnC6piM6/Q9GytHPZR3f3 JBWM24vextpOb73H3HltWNxfNkeQ8FtAMlANuN1E38/Mzt59g2WtNpyTCXKURqwn HxxvXFkejXBBFpsT4mNYk5UaJ//XVIcVUxTeTssqk+2Ci/6jl7h+WctHV9kUkm3k z+yyw8TVFI7VtdaVETBexwgJ1e04Z+LTkqauq8xqOMNjdxrz7oZALDWDJrDMN1HW OoYf+J/mk4Xdx2GGhkw+UJMFbcBER/EqWyA7jd/6g+hEUTFMRn0b1/bN9g26Xjw1 +YI3dIpxfd9cFOvrdVMM =Hn3b -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Inviting Robert Collins to Oslo core
On Wed, May 20 2015, Davanum Srinivas wrote: I'd like to invite Robert Collins (aka lifeless) as an Oslo core. Robert has been a long time contributor to a whole bunch of OpenStack projects and a member of our TC. Robert indicated that he can help across Oslo projects this cycle, so let's please welcome him. Here's my +1. +1 -- Julien Danjou -- Free Software hacker -- http://julien.danjou.info signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Nova][libvirt] Understand why we lookup libvirt domains by instance name
I note that we use instance.name to lookup the libvirt domain a bunch in the driver. I'm wondering why we don't just use instance.uuid all the time -- the code for that already exists. Is there a good reason to not move to always using the uuid? I ask because instance.name is not guaranteed to be unique depending on how weird the nova deployment is. Michael -- Rackspace Australia __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Inviting Robert Collins to Oslo core
I am +1 on this. Michael On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: On Wed, May 20 2015, Davanum Srinivas wrote: I'd like to invite Robert Collins (aka lifeless) as an Oslo core. Robert has been a long time contributor to a whole bunch of OpenStack projects and a member of our TC. Robert indicated that he can help across Oslo projects this cycle, so let's please welcome him. Here's my +1. +1 -- Julien Danjou -- Free Software hacker -- http://julien.danjou.info __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Rackspace Australia __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session
The session where we're planning to discuss this is at 5:00 pm on Thursday in Room 302. Thanks, Nikhil On May 20, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: I think Sergey will present Murano team. I added him to CC as he probably filters out Zaqar and Trove e-mails. Thanks Gosha On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, What is the final decision about this discussion? When will it happen? thanks Gosha On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Douglas Mendizábal douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I'm very much interested in talking with some Keystone folks about this auth issue. I would be willing to dedicate a Barbican Working Session to this discussion if there is a time slot that works for all the interested parties. - - Douglas Mendizabal On 5/14/15 3:13 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: If there's a free session, can we dedicate a session specifically to the zaqar, barbican, sahara, heat, trove, guestagent, keystone auth thingy so everyone's all together? Thanks, Kevin From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 12:15 PM To: Sergey Lukjanov Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session On 14/05/15 10:07 -0700, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: Hey, in Sahara we're looking on using Zaqar as a transport for agent some day as well. Unfortunately this section overlaps with Sahara sessions. Sergey, We still have some free sessions, we'd be happy to dedicate one to Sahara. Any slot that looks good for you? http://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/design+summit/Zaqar #.VVT0CvYU9hE Thanks, Flavio On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 13/05/15 18:06 +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Sahara also has the same problem, but worse, since they currently only support ssh with their agent, so its either assign floating ip's to all nodes, or your sahara controller must be on your one and only network node so it can tunnel. :/ Should we have a chat with them too? We've scheduled a discussion with Trove's team on Thursday at 5pm. It'd be great to have this discussion once and together to know what the common issues are and what things need to be done. I'll ping folks from both teams to invite them to this session. If they can't make it, I'm happy to use another working session slot. Cheers, Flavio http://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/59dc6ec910a732cdbf5970b679 2e1cef #.VVRL0PYU9hE Thanks, Kevin From: Zane Bitter [zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 10:26 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session On 11/05/15 05:49, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 08/05/15 00:45 -0700, Nikhil Manchanda wrote: 3) The trove-guest-agent is in vm. it is connected by taskmanager by rabbitmq. We designed it. But is there some prectise to do this? how to make the vm be connected in vm-network and management network? Most deployments of Trove that I am familiar with set up a separate RabbitMQ server in cloud that is used by Trove. It is not recommended to use the same infrastructure RabbitMQ server for Trove for security reasons. Also most deployments of Trove set up a private (neutron) network that the RabbitMQ server and guests are connected to, and all RPC messages are sent over this network. We've discussed trove+zaqar in the past and I believe some folks from the Trove team have been in contact with Fei Long lately about this. Since one of the projects goal's for this cycle is to provide support to other projects and contribute to the adoption, I'm wondering if any of the members of the trove team would be willing to participate in a Zaqar working session completely dedicated to this integration? +1 I learned from a concurrent thread ([Murano] [Mistral] SSH workflow action) that Murano are doing exactly the same thing with a separate RabbitMQ server to communicate with guest agents. It's a real waste of energy when multiple OpenStack projects all have to solve the same problem from scratch, so a single answer to this would be great. In that thread I suggested (and Murano developers agreed with) making the transport pluggable so that operators could choose Zaqar instead. I would strongly support doing the same here. +1 :) Flavio cheers, Zane. It'd be a great opportunity to figure out what's really needed, edge cases and get some work done on this specific case. Thanks, Flavio
Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session
Perfect. Thanks. Kevin From: Nikhil Manchanda Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 1:18:13 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session The session where we're planning to discuss this is at 5:00 pm on Thursday in Room 302. Thanks, Nikhil On May 20, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.commailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: I think Sergey will present Murano team. I added him to CC as he probably filters out Zaqar and Trove e-mails. Thanks Gosha On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.commailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, What is the final decision about this discussion? When will it happen? thanks Gosha On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Douglas Mendizábal douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.commailto:douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I'm very much interested in talking with some Keystone folks about this auth issue. I would be willing to dedicate a Barbican Working Session to this discussion if there is a time slot that works for all the interested parties. - - Douglas Mendizabal On 5/14/15 3:13 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: If there's a free session, can we dedicate a session specifically to the zaqar, barbican, sahara, heat, trove, guestagent, keystone auth thingy so everyone's all together? Thanks, Kevin From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.commailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 12:15 PM To: Sergey Lukjanov Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session On 14/05/15 10:07 -0700, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: Hey, in Sahara we're looking on using Zaqar as a transport for agent some day as well. Unfortunately this section overlaps with Sahara sessions. Sergey, We still have some free sessions, we'd be happy to dedicate one to Sahara. Any slot that looks good for you? http://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/design+summit/Zaqar #.VVT0CvYU9hEhttp://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/design+summit/Zaqar#.VVT0CvYU9hE Thanks, Flavio On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.commailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 13/05/15 18:06 +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Sahara also has the same problem, but worse, since they currently only support ssh with their agent, so its either assign floating ip's to all nodes, or your sahara controller must be on your one and only network node so it can tunnel. :/ Should we have a chat with them too? We've scheduled a discussion with Trove's team on Thursday at 5pm. It'd be great to have this discussion once and together to know what the common issues are and what things need to be done. I'll ping folks from both teams to invite them to this session. If they can't make it, I'm happy to use another working session slot. Cheers, Flavio http://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/59dc6ec910a732cdbf5970b679 2e1cefhttp://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/59dc6ec910a732cdbf5970b6792e1cef #.VVRL0PYU9hE Thanks, Kevin From: Zane Bitter [zbit...@redhat.commailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 10:26 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session On 11/05/15 05:49, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 08/05/15 00:45 -0700, Nikhil Manchanda wrote: 3) The trove-guest-agent is in vm. it is connected by taskmanager by rabbitmq. We designed it. But is there some prectise to do this? how to make the vm be connected in vm-network and management network? Most deployments of Trove that I am familiar with set up a separate RabbitMQ server in cloud that is used by Trove. It is not recommended to use the same infrastructure RabbitMQ server for Trove for security reasons. Also most deployments of Trove set up a private (neutron) network that the RabbitMQ server and guests are connected to, and all RPC messages are sent over this network. We've discussed trove+zaqar in the past and I believe some folks from the Trove team have been in contact with Fei Long lately about this. Since one of the projects goal's for this cycle is to provide support to other projects and contribute to the adoption, I'm wondering if any of the members of the trove team would be willing to participate in a Zaqar working session completely dedicated to this integration? +1 I learned from a concurrent thread ([Murano] [Mistral] SSH workflow action) that Murano are doing exactly the same thing with a separate RabbitMQ server to communicate with guest agents. It's a
Re: [openstack-dev] [akanda] design session
Neutron sessions moved, so we need to move to 4:30-5:20pm today, dev lounge by room 220. On Wednesday, May 20, 2015, sean roberts seanrobert...@gmail.com wrote: today, Wednesday 20 may, 14:40-15:20, Dev lounge outside room 220 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-akanda-design -- ~sean -- ~sean __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Nominating Kaitlin Farr for barbican-core
+1 John Vrbanac From: Douglas Mendizábal douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 7:09 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Nominating Kaitlin Farr for barbican-core -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi All, I would like to nominate Kaitlin Farr for barbican-core. Kaitlin has been contributing to the project for a long time, both by contributing code to Barbican, python-barbicanclient and Castellan, and also by providing valuable reviews. [1] As a reminder to the rest of the core team, we use the process outlined in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Barbican/CoreTeam to add members to the barbican-core team. Thanks, Douglas Mendizábal [1] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/barbican-group/90 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVW9CgAAoJEB7Z2EQgmLX7u6kP/22G3NqsnJmKRsnw065btt8z /Sb7OqFa2RKuIKk88a9yehwRuunh2YCdfLmXta1+XXpucghG9dbflfFVGU4/VujX VG/B3yUXTBYT2kn72mtwpKk4S6mYXBPn+fpKGR7iJrifYSg55XO7a2c2m/xIC8pO R9+d5/8ZztxS1UbmhNuqLwBDpo9FIG+5CoWOfYPTAQ1TxB/SIs2ltk4jzLaU05yb 5LTG3uq5K3CT+LvM3Rl6SCZ7bIiTmaTuPsXMnqqLiqhya90U63VJGGXUE1yjW11G Kgm7yxUV8DkcESHXEe0aW8hpLMuGKda/f83XetGN27+YpM3/G1z8N656zLX9sF3t oVU7dWnARn9NsByFP9ASg8BCk8iWr/mCeB/fajwXT95C+OXAicNWn5jXKowXQhQH v4XaFrjafROLdJocgH0mfcoEbTXZXlsKyHYtnZdwAO+T06RNd21c/lnNiG1rMYeh 2Yl48nzxxx33YprizHDRMEhABIb11HO040+j+EHNCvbsGSJGZIZmzzbxNe2QGXkx q++JvMBW60pPd6pi7nEVjbjSEZhb6f6xHs13/y+nZ9NCSNkUPx1UoxKz18JRtrLi /XDZLv6D92Trlaxae9mpVlWTM1elYPWSm3QVMxMrSP9wtAYbUIoq0PN+WwKk/1J7 WaeQpFjA1SdFHj5uPNZk =1OIW -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session
I think Sergey will present Murano team. I added him to CC as he probably filters out Zaqar and Trove e-mails. Thanks Gosha On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, What is the final decision about this discussion? When will it happen? thanks Gosha On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Douglas Mendizábal douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I'm very much interested in talking with some Keystone folks about this auth issue. I would be willing to dedicate a Barbican Working Session to this discussion if there is a time slot that works for all the interested parties. - - Douglas Mendizabal On 5/14/15 3:13 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: If there's a free session, can we dedicate a session specifically to the zaqar, barbican, sahara, heat, trove, guestagent, keystone auth thingy so everyone's all together? Thanks, Kevin From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 12:15 PM To: Sergey Lukjanov Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session On 14/05/15 10:07 -0700, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: Hey, in Sahara we're looking on using Zaqar as a transport for agent some day as well. Unfortunately this section overlaps with Sahara sessions. Sergey, We still have some free sessions, we'd be happy to dedicate one to Sahara. Any slot that looks good for you? http://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/design+summit/Zaqar #.VVT0CvYU9hE http://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/design+summit/Zaqar#.VVT0CvYU9hE Thanks, Flavio On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 13/05/15 18:06 +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Sahara also has the same problem, but worse, since they currently only support ssh with their agent, so its either assign floating ip's to all nodes, or your sahara controller must be on your one and only network node so it can tunnel. :/ Should we have a chat with them too? We've scheduled a discussion with Trove's team on Thursday at 5pm. It'd be great to have this discussion once and together to know what the common issues are and what things need to be done. I'll ping folks from both teams to invite them to this session. If they can't make it, I'm happy to use another working session slot. Cheers, Flavio http://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/59dc6ec910a732cdbf5970b679 2e1cef http://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/59dc6ec910a732cdbf5970b6792e1cef #.VVRL0PYU9hE Thanks, Kevin From: Zane Bitter [zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 10:26 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][zaqar] Trove and Zaqar integration. Summit working session On 11/05/15 05:49, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 08/05/15 00:45 -0700, Nikhil Manchanda wrote: 3) The trove-guest-agent is in vm. it is connected by taskmanager by rabbitmq. We designed it. But is there some prectise to do this? how to make the vm be connected in vm-network and management network? Most deployments of Trove that I am familiar with set up a separate RabbitMQ server in cloud that is used by Trove. It is not recommended to use the same infrastructure RabbitMQ server for Trove for security reasons. Also most deployments of Trove set up a private (neutron) network that the RabbitMQ server and guests are connected to, and all RPC messages are sent over this network. We've discussed trove+zaqar in the past and I believe some folks from the Trove team have been in contact with Fei Long lately about this. Since one of the projects goal's for this cycle is to provide support to other projects and contribute to the adoption, I'm wondering if any of the members of the trove team would be willing to participate in a Zaqar working session completely dedicated to this integration? +1 I learned from a concurrent thread ([Murano] [Mistral] SSH workflow action) that Murano are doing exactly the same thing with a separate RabbitMQ server to communicate with guest agents. It's a real waste of energy when multiple OpenStack projects all have to solve the same problem from scratch, so a single answer to this would be great. In that thread I suggested (and Murano developers agreed with) making the transport pluggable so that operators could choose Zaqar instead. I would strongly support doing the same here. +1 :) Flavio cheers, Zane. It'd be a great opportunity to figure out what's really needed, edge cases and get some work done on this specific case. Thanks, Flavio
Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Can't make it to the summit.
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Anant Patil anant.pa...@hp.com wrote: Hi, Due to some visa issues, my travel to Vancouver summit is canceled. Sorry to hear it, we will try and fill you in as best as possible. -Angus I will miss meeting the Heat team and the planned session on convergence phase 2. Kanagaraj M has some context on the phase 2 plans and he should be able to drive it. Hope you will have a good discussion. - Anant __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [oslo] Inviting Robert Collins to Oslo core
Hi Team, I'd like to invite Robert Collins (aka lifeless) as an Oslo core. Robert has been a long time contributor to a whole bunch of OpenStack projects and a member of our TC. Robert indicated that he can help across Oslo projects this cycle, so let's please welcome him. Here's my +1. thanks, Dims [1] http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=lifelessrelease=all [2] https://www.openstack.org/foundation/tech-committee/ -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] OpenStack Design Summit Solum sessions
Hi Mark, As Adrian mentioned in another email on this chain, hopefully we can have a session for the next summit. In the meantime, you can check out current capabilities of Solum here: https://solum.readthedocs.org/en/latest/getting_started/index.html We also have a vagrant environment where you can try out Solum. A screencast of some of the key current features and details on getting the vagrant environment up are available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/solum_kilo_demo If you have specific questions/comments, feel free to reach out to us here or on #solum on freenode. Regards, Devdatta From: Mark Carlson m...@carlson.net Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 10:03 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] OpenStack Design Summit Solum sessions Sad but true. Are you here in Vancouver? Did you see Adrian give his demos on stage yesterday? He seems to have gone off into Container-Land now -- mark On 5/20/15 8:48 AM, Gilbert Pilz wrote: Looking at the Design Summit schedule and list of Etherpads it appears that there are no sessions scheduled for Solum. Is this correct? ~ gp __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Inviting Robert Collins to Oslo core
+1 Robert is really great, helpful, and always welcoming! Get er' done :-) Davanum Srinivas wrote: Hi Team, I'd like to invite Robert Collins (aka lifeless) as an Oslo core. Robert has been a long time contributor to a whole bunch of OpenStack projects and a member of our TC. Robert indicated that he can help across Oslo projects this cycle, so let's please welcome him. Here's my +1. thanks, Dims [1] http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=lifelessrelease=all [2] https://www.openstack.org/foundation/tech-committee/ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Inviting Robert Collins to Oslo core
+1 from me 5/20/15 22:23, Joshua Harlow пишет: +1 Robert is really great, helpful, and always welcoming! Get er' done :-) Davanum Srinivas wrote: Hi Team, I'd like to invite Robert Collins (aka lifeless) as an Oslo core. Robert has been a long time contributor to a whole bunch of OpenStack projects and a member of our TC. Robert indicated that he can help across Oslo projects this cycle, so let's please welcome him. Here's my +1. thanks, Dims [1] http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=lifelessrelease=all [2] https://www.openstack.org/foundation/tech-committee/ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Inviting Robert Collins to Oslo core
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-05-20 12:16:50 -0700: Hi Team, I'd like to invite Robert Collins (aka lifeless) as an Oslo core. Robert has been a long time contributor to a whole bunch of OpenStack projects and a member of our TC. Robert indicated that he can help across Oslo projects this cycle, so let's please welcome him. Here's my +1. +1 very much Doug __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [akanda] design session
today, Wednesday 20 may, 14:40-15:20, Dev lounge outside room 220 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-akanda-design -- ~sean __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] rating talks (and keynotes) at the OpenStack summit
- Original Message - From: Amrith Kumar amr...@tesora.com To: openst...@lists.openstack.org, OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) I attended a talk by Mark Baker today (http://sched.co/2qbJ) entitled The OpenStack Summit Talk Selection Process is Broken and I think it was an informative session. The statistics presented indicated that just under a third of the talks submitted got accepted at this summit and that is a very healthy ratio and that's a great thing. One thing that was brought up at the talk was that there was no formal feedback mechanism about talks and keynotes at Summit. Is there any way in which we can get a feedback mechanism for the talks and sessions at this summit up and running? It would be a valuable piece of information if we could get it. Any thoughts on how this can be done? There were 296 sessions; we obviously know the names of the sessions and the speakers. Does our scheduling mechanism have a 'ratings module' that can be turned on? Is there some other quick and dirty mechanism we can use? For Red Hat Summit we have something like this built into the official app and speakers are encouraged to remind people to use it to submit feedback at the end. Users have the choice of just leaving a rating in a couple of categories or also entering written comments. I have found the feedback quite useful in the past for helping me to better target the presentations I do at that particular event and think it would be great if there was something like this for OpenStack summit. Thanks, Steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] rating talks (and keynotes) at the OpenStack summit
On 05/20/15 11:42, Steve Gordon wrote: - Original Message - From: Amrith Kumar amr...@tesora.com To: openst...@lists.openstack.org, OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) I attended a talk by Mark Baker today (http://sched.co/2qbJ) entitled The OpenStack Summit Talk Selection Process is Broken and I think it was an informative session. The statistics presented indicated that just under a third of the talks submitted got accepted at this summit and that is a very healthy ratio and that's a great thing. One thing that was brought up at the talk was that there was no formal feedback mechanism about talks and keynotes at Summit. Is there any way in which we can get a feedback mechanism for the talks and sessions at this summit up and running? It would be a valuable piece of information if we could get it. Any thoughts on how this can be done? There were 296 sessions; we obviously know the names of the sessions and the speakers. Does our scheduling mechanism have a 'ratings module' that can be turned on? Is there some other quick and dirty mechanism we can use? For Red Hat Summit we have something like this built into the official app and speakers are encouraged to remind people to use it to submit feedback at the end. Users have the choice of just leaving a rating in a couple of categories or also entering written comments. I have found the feedback quite useful in the past for helping me to better target the presentations I do at that particular event and think it would be great if there was something like this for OpenStack summit. Thanks, Steve I would highly recommend that we start accepting the input from the participants with regards to their experience - during the sessions, Keynote speakers, food, venue everything. This feedback can be used by the foundation to evaluate what was amazing, what was wrong, and in addition also help the track leads during the session selection process. -- Best Regards, Maish Saidel-Keesing __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Speed Up RabbitMQ Recovering
Actually, we are not skipping 'Started' state - we just consider resource as started when beam is powered up and rabbitmq start_app/stop_app action succeeds. Such a node is considered as a good one that can be marked as 'Master' to which the nodes should connect and then all the cluster join/leave actions are handled using multi-state notification mechanism. On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com wrote: On 20 May 2015, at 6:05 am, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:01 PM Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com wrote: On 5 May 2015, at 1:19 pm, Zhou Zheng Sheng / 周征晟 zhengsh...@awcloud.com wrote: Thank you Andrew. on 2015/05/05 08:03, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 28 Apr 2015, at 11:15 pm, Bogdan Dobrelya bdobre...@mirantis.com wrote: Hello, Hello, Zhou I using Fuel 6.0.1 and find that RabbitMQ recover time is long after power failure. I have a running HA environment, then I reset power of all the machines at the same time. I observe that after reboot it usually takes 10 minutes for RabittMQ cluster to appear running master-slave mode in pacemaker. If I power off all the 3 controllers and only start 2 of them, the downtime sometimes can be as long as 20 minutes. Yes, this is a known issue [0]. Note, there were many bugfixes, like [1],[2],[3], merged for MQ OCF script, so you may want to try to backport them as well by the following guide [4] [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1432603 [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175460/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175457/ [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175371/ [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/170476/ Is there a reason you’re using a custom OCF script instead of the upstream[a] one? Please have a chat with David (the maintainer, in CC) if there is something you believe is wrong with it. [a] https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/blob/master/heartbeat/rabbitmq-cluster I'm using the OCF script from the Fuel project, specifically from the 6.0 stable branch [alpha]. Ah, I’m still learning who is who... i thought you were part of that project :-) Comparing with upstream OCF code, the main difference is that Fuel RabbitMQ OCF is a master-slave resource. Fuel RabbitMQ OCF does more bookkeeping, for example, blocking client access when RabbitMQ cluster is not ready. I beleive the upstream OCF should be OK to use as well after I read the code, but it might not fit into the Fuel project. As far as I test, the Fuel OCF script is good except sometimes the full reassemble time is long, and as I find out, it is mostly because the Fuel MySQL Galera OCF script keeps pacemaker from promoting RabbitMQ resource, as I mentioned in the previous emails. Maybe Vladimir and Sergey can give us more insight on why Fuel needs a master-slave RabbitMQ. That would be good to know. Browsing the agent, promote seems to be a no-op if rabbit is already running. To the master / slave reason due to how the ocf script is structured to deal with rabbit's poor ability to handle its self in some scenarios. Hopefully the state transition diagram [5] is enough to clarify what's going on. [5] http://goo.gl/PPNrw7 Not really. It seems to be under the impression you can skip started and go directly from stopped to master. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Yours Faithfully, Vladimir Kuklin, Fuel Library Tech Lead, Mirantis, Inc. +7 (495) 640-49-04 +7 (926) 702-39-68 Skype kuklinvv 35bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str. Moscow, Russia, www.mirantis.com http://www.mirantis.ru/ www.mirantis.ru vkuk...@mirantis.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Question to driver maintainers
Hi guys, I am a little confused and would like to maybe clear some things up. GlusterFS (the storage system) does support the ability to resize volumes. I will talk to Csaba and see what he means, and we will get back to you soon. - Original Message - From: Ben Swartzlander b...@swartzlander.org To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 12:41:31 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Question to driver maintainers On 05/19/2015 10:42 AM, Csaba Henk wrote: Hi Igor, From: Igor Malinovskiy imalinovs...@mirantis.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 10:15:25 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Question to driver maintainers ... So I want to ask driver maintainers here: Will your driver be able to do share extending without loss of connectivity? Currenty: - glusterfs driver can - glusterfs-native won't support share extension (*) in Liberty timeframe, we are to unify the glusterfs* drivers' backend management logic, so both glusterfs driver style and glusterfs-native driver style backend management will be available for both drivers (actual choice made in configuration). So when this will be in place, the answer modifies as follows: - glusterfs and glusterfs-native will either support non-disruptive share extension, or won't support share resize at all (*) (depending on configuration) Csaba, this is a truly interesting set of limitations! I'm trying to understand what's going on down in the storage system to prevent the extension. Is it a case of not having enough free space? Or can you support creating new (larger) shares on the same backend while simultaneously not being able to resize an existing share? Is there some mapping to physical resources that's immutable once configured? What is your recommendation to customers who run out of space in a glusterfs share today (independent of Manila)? If your system can't support this case then I'm worried others may have similar problems and we could end up having to choose between making extend an optional operation (a choice I don't like) or making the glusterfs-native driver and possibly other drivers unsupported (also an option I don't like). -Ben (*) There are efforts to remove this limitation in GlusterFS, but too vague at this point to make a statement on it. Csaba __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][libvirt] Serious problem of block migration of a hybrid instance (instance based on local disk and cinder volume attached)
The change Dan refers to merged in Kilo. I assume that if you actually found this problem then you're using an earlier OpenStack, so it's worth noting that there's an outstanding backport: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176768/ Matthew On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:11:26PM +0800, Luo Gangyi wrote: Hi devs, I find a serious problem when I try to live migrate a hybrid instance (instance based on local disk and cinder volume attached) . In current nova, such operation is allowed. But I don't think libvirt can deal with such condition correctly. When block migration of a hybird intance is triggered, nova will initiate a new connection to the volume in destination compute node and then call libvirt to do the block migration. However, libvirt doesn't distinguish local disk and a network volume, it may copy both local disk and cinder volume from source to destination. It is dangerous to write the same volume simutaneously on source and destination!! and apparently there is no need to do this! I believe we should do something to correct this, maybe patch libvirt? or just forbid user do such operation? Both. Nova now forbids this commit d667b6a63e80b2f8d6311c2cf224ba32628eed84 Author: Chris St. Pierre stpie...@metacloud.com Date: Wed Dec 3 16:16:34 2014 -0600 libvirt: Fail when live block migrating instance with volumes This raises an exception when attempting to live block migrate (nova live-migration --block-migrate) an instance with attached volumes. libvirt copies these volumes from themselves to themselves. At a minimum, this is horribly slow and de-sparses a sparse volume; at worst, this could cause massive data corruption. Closes-Bug: 1398999 Change-Id: Ibcd423976bb9fea46e3e1cb23cc8e5cd944d8fc2 And work is being done to allow libvirt to be told to skip cinder volumes when migrating: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-May/msg00345.html Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [mistral] Mistral fishbowl sessions - Thursday 4.10 - 5.40pm
Hi OpenStack Summit attendees, I’d like to announce two Mistral fishbowl sessions scheduled for tomorrow: 4.10 pm - Mistral: Where is Mistral Today - Intro, Demo, QA (Subtype: mistral) https://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/3066ec2ddd824d9134fecfcd0466d399 5.00 pm - Mistral: Features, Liberty Roadmap + Open Mike (Subtype: mistral) https://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/6b72209b698a55abbedc3bb961ef987c The first session will be mostly devoted to Live Demo of Mistral for autoscaling OpenStack shown by James Fryman from StackStorm. We also want to discuss a high-level roadmap for Liberty with a wider audience. Thanks Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][libvirt] Understand why we lookup libvirt domains by instance name
On 21 May 2015 at 10:01, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: I note that we use instance.name to lookup the libvirt domain a bunch in the driver. I'm wondering why we don't just use instance.uuid all the time -- the code for that already exists. Is there a good reason to not move to always using the uuid? I ask because instance.name is not guaranteed to be unique depending on how weird the nova deployment is. I don't know. I know that we had issues with nova-baremetal and around the start of Ironic and IIRC moved to uuids everywhere as a result. -Rob -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [akanda] design session
The neutron work sessions schedule changed last minute today, so we needed to adapt. It looks like 1:30pm tomorrow is the remaining time slot where no time conflicts exist. Plan to meet outside room 220 in the developer lounge area as it has been a bit less crowded. We can move a bit deeper into the lounge as if space is available. On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:49 PM, sean roberts seanrobert...@gmail.com wrote: Neutron sessions moved, so we need to move to 4:30-5:20pm today, dev lounge by room 220. On Wednesday, May 20, 2015, sean roberts seanrobert...@gmail.com wrote: today, Wednesday 20 may, 14:40-15:20, Dev lounge outside room 220 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-akanda-design -- ~sean -- ~sean -- ~ sean __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] Supporting multiple local subnets for VPN connections
Extra subnets is suitable for attribute of IKE connections, but not
the whole VPN service. Because customer usually want fine-grained
control of which local subnet could communicate to remote subnets.
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
However after thinking about it more deeply, option A might be suitable if
the vpn-service becomes more generic, and usable by other vpn objects
(ipsec-site-connection, bgpvpn-connection).
I would become an object that the tenant can update to attach CIDR it wants
to export in its VPN.
To transform the vpn-service object in a generic vpn description, we need to
remove the mandatory ROUTER attribute, so that we can use it for l2vpn
either.
Hope we can discuss that on friday morning
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
In Kilo, VPNaaS APIs were no longer marked as experimental. We need to
understand the implication of changing the API. I'm not sure how much VPNaaS
is being used by OpenStack users at this time, either. I'm hoping to seek
out answers to this at the summit.
If anyone has suggestions, comments, information on this, please chime in.
I'll likely make a BP for multiple subnets, when I get back from the summit.
Lastly, I'm planning on trying to get people interested in VPN to meet on
Friday morning at the summit to discuss all the VPN topics that have been
coming up.
Regards,
Paul Michali (pc_m)
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:54 AM Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi paul,
this is also something that we would like to introduce for BGP/MPLS VPNs
[2].
We choose to allow tenants to attach existing networks ( it might evolve
to subnets) to bgpvpn-connection objects, by updating the bgpvpn-connection
object, which is the equivalent of the ipsec-site-connection object.
So I think that Option B is suitable here.
Concerning backward compatibility, I think VPNaas is still considered as
experimental, am I wrong? Do you have to provide backward compatbility in
this case?
Mathieu
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177740/
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:
Hi,
There has been, over the years, some mention about having VPN IPSec
connections supporting multiple CIDRs for local (left side) private
networks, in addition to the current support for multiple peer CIDRs (right
side).
I'm raising the question again with these goals:
1) Determine if the reference IPSec implementations support this
capability
2) Determine if there is a community desire to enhance VPN to support
this capability (for all VPN types)
3) See what would be the best way to handle this (changes to API and
model)
4) Identify any consequences of making this change.
Note: My assumption here is something that could be used for any type of
VPN connection - current IPSec, future BGP/MPLS VPN, DM VPN, etc.
Here is some information that was gathered from people on the VPN team
so far. Please correct any inaccuracies and comment on the items...
(1) It looks like OpenSwan and Libreswan will support this capability.
StrongSwan will support this with IKEv2. For IKEv1, a Cisco Unity plugin
extensions is needed. I'm not sure what that implies [1].
(2) Do we, as a community, want to enhance VPNaaS to provide this
capability of N:M subnets for VPN implementations? Putting on my vendor
hat,
I can see cases where customers want to be able to only create one
connection and reference multiple subnets on each end. Is there a desire to
do this and bake it into the reference implementation (thus making it
available for other implementations)?
(3) Currently, the vpn service API includes the router and subnet ID.
The IPSec connection command includes the peer CIDR(s). For reference, here
are two of the APIs:
usage: neutron vpn-service-create [-h] [-f
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
[-c COLUMN] [--max-width integer]
[--prefix PREFIX]
[--request-format {json,xml}]
[--tenant-id TENANT_ID]
[--admin-state-down]
[--name NAME] [--description
DESCRIPTION]
ROUTER SUBNET
usage: neutron ipsec-site-connection-create [-h]
[-f
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
[-c COLUMN]
[--max-width integer]
[--prefix PREFIX]
[--request-format
{json,xml}]
[--tenant-id TENANT_ID]
[--admin-state-down] [--name
NAME]
[--description DESCRIPTION]
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] Supporting multiple local subnets for VPN connections
Loy, yeah, that is why I was thinking option B, as user has flexibility to
specify what subnet(s) are used for a connection. Ideally, we want to
consider different VPN connection types.
Regards,
Paul Michali (pc_m)
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:34 PM loy wolfe loywo...@gmail.com wrote:
Extra subnets is suitable for attribute of IKE connections, but not
the whole VPN service. Because customer usually want fine-grained
control of which local subnet could communicate to remote subnets.
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com
wrote:
However after thinking about it more deeply, option A might be suitable
if
the vpn-service becomes more generic, and usable by other vpn objects
(ipsec-site-connection, bgpvpn-connection).
I would become an object that the tenant can update to attach CIDR it
wants
to export in its VPN.
To transform the vpn-service object in a generic vpn description, we
need to
remove the mandatory ROUTER attribute, so that we can use it for l2vpn
either.
Hope we can discuss that on friday morning
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
In Kilo, VPNaaS APIs were no longer marked as experimental. We need to
understand the implication of changing the API. I'm not sure how much
VPNaaS
is being used by OpenStack users at this time, either. I'm hoping to
seek
out answers to this at the summit.
If anyone has suggestions, comments, information on this, please chime
in.
I'll likely make a BP for multiple subnets, when I get back from the
summit.
Lastly, I'm planning on trying to get people interested in VPN to meet
on
Friday morning at the summit to discuss all the VPN topics that have
been
coming up.
Regards,
Paul Michali (pc_m)
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:54 AM Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi paul,
this is also something that we would like to introduce for BGP/MPLS
VPNs
[2].
We choose to allow tenants to attach existing networks ( it might
evolve
to subnets) to bgpvpn-connection objects, by updating the
bgpvpn-connection
object, which is the equivalent of the ipsec-site-connection object.
So I think that Option B is suitable here.
Concerning backward compatibility, I think VPNaas is still considered
as
experimental, am I wrong? Do you have to provide backward compatbility
in
this case?
Mathieu
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177740/
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:
Hi,
There has been, over the years, some mention about having VPN IPSec
connections supporting multiple CIDRs for local (left side) private
networks, in addition to the current support for multiple peer CIDRs
(right
side).
I'm raising the question again with these goals:
1) Determine if the reference IPSec implementations support this
capability
2) Determine if there is a community desire to enhance VPN to support
this capability (for all VPN types)
3) See what would be the best way to handle this (changes to API and
model)
4) Identify any consequences of making this change.
Note: My assumption here is something that could be used for any type
of
VPN connection - current IPSec, future BGP/MPLS VPN, DM VPN, etc.
Here is some information that was gathered from people on the VPN team
so far. Please correct any inaccuracies and comment on the items...
(1) It looks like OpenSwan and Libreswan will support this capability.
StrongSwan will support this with IKEv2. For IKEv1, a Cisco Unity
plugin
extensions is needed. I'm not sure what that implies [1].
(2) Do we, as a community, want to enhance VPNaaS to provide this
capability of N:M subnets for VPN implementations? Putting on my
vendor hat,
I can see cases where customers want to be able to only create one
connection and reference multiple subnets on each end. Is there a
desire to
do this and bake it into the reference implementation (thus making it
available for other implementations)?
(3) Currently, the vpn service API includes the router and subnet ID.
The IPSec connection command includes the peer CIDR(s). For
reference, here
are two of the APIs:
usage: neutron vpn-service-create [-h] [-f
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
[-c COLUMN] [--max-width integer]
[--prefix PREFIX]
[--request-format {json,xml}]
[--tenant-id TENANT_ID]
[--admin-state-down]
[--name NAME] [--description
DESCRIPTION]
ROUTER SUBNET
usage: neutron ipsec-site-connection-create [-h]
[-f
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
[-c COLUMN]
[openstack-dev] [glance] [kolla] [magnum] [nova] [neutron] Vancouver Summit Operations Containers Session
I apologize if this message is inappropriately broad, but I wanted to share the results of the Vancouver Summit operations containers session[0] we held yesterday with all of the projects which were mentioned. This was a great discussion with approximately two-dozen individuals in attendance. Most of the conversation was captured pretty well on the etherpad, which can be found here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-ops-containers A big thank you to everyone who participated - it was really informative. Regards, Richard Raseley SysOps Engineer @ Puppet Labs [0] - http://sched.co/3B45 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] 1.0.1 released
Hi openstack-dev team, Can you also release latest oslo.config to allow pbr 1.0.1? In my convenience I want to use it. Thanks, kakuma On Wed, 20 May 2015 11:07:36 +1200 Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: We are super psyched to announce the release of: pbr 1.0.1: Python Build Reasonableness With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/pbr For more details, please see the git log history below and: http://launchpad.net/pbr/+milestone/1.0.1 Please report issues through launchpad: http://bugs.launchpad.net/pbr Changes in pbr 1.0.0..1.0.1 --- b72e446 Remove self.pre_run calls in packaging.py 8e87679 Update hacking to 0.10.x series Diffstat (except docs and test files) - pbr/packaging.py | 2 -- test-requirements.txt | 2 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) Requirements updates diff --git a/test-requirements.txt b/test-requirements.txt index 2b33504..6e4521c 100644 --- a/test-requirements.txt +++ b/test-requirements.txt @@ -4 +4 @@ fixtures=0.3.14 -hacking=0.9.2,0.10 +hacking=0.10.0,0.11 -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- fumihiko kakuma kak...@valinux.co.jp __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] [barbican] Relationship between Octavia and Barbican and Octavia 1.0 questions
+1 On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Maish Saidel-Keesing mais...@maishsk.com wrote: Hello all, Going over today's presentation Load Balancing as a Service, Kilo and Beyond[1] (great presentation!!) - there are a few questions I have regarding the future release: For Octavia 1.0: 1. Can someone explain to me how the flow would work for spinning up a a new Amphora with regards to interaction between Neutron, LBaaS and Barbican? Same question as well regarding how the standby is created and its relationship with Barbican. 2. Will the orchestration (Heat) also be implemented when Octavia 1.0 is released or only further down the line? If not what would you suggest be the way to orchestrate LBaaS until this is ready? 3. Is there some kind of hook into Security groups also planned for the Amphora to also protect the Load Balancer? I think that based on the answers to these questions above - additional questions will follow. Thanks [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eAKur8lErU -- Best Regards, Maish Saidel-Keesing __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Puppet] puppet-openstack_zeromq module
Harish Kumar wrote: Hello All, I have written a puppet-openstack_zeromq module using which one can install/configure openstack zeromq reciever. I would like to know if it make sense to host that code with other openstack related puppet module. Please see the code - https://github.com/jiocloud/puppet-openstack_zeromq Thanks, Harish -- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-openstack+unsubscr...@puppetlabs.com mailto:puppet-openstack+unsubscr...@puppetlabs.com. Harish, Quick note that we've moved Puppet-OpenStack related conversation to the OpenStack development mailing list Thank you so much for this contribution - it is certainly much appreciated. At this time, as I understand it, we are only hosting the OpenStack-specific modules (e.g. Nova, Neutron, etc.). While someone very well might want to use your module for deploying OpenStack, I think it would be treated in the same way as our other supporting modules (e.g. MySQL, RabbitMQ, etc.) - which is that they would live under your (or your company's namespace). Do you feel comfortable publishing this module on the Puppet Forge? I would be more than happy to help with that process if necessary. Regards, Richard __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [kolla] [magnum] [nova] [neutron] Vancouver Summit Operations Containers Session
Great info, thanks for sharing. Since i couldn't attend the summit, are there any AIs which needs to happen/ take place and which i can keep an eye on? thanks, Dani On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Richard Raseley rich...@raseley.com wrote: I apologize if this message is inappropriately broad, but I wanted to share the results of the Vancouver Summit operations containers session[0] we held yesterday with all of the projects which were mentioned. This was a great discussion with approximately two-dozen individuals in attendance. Most of the conversation was captured pretty well on the etherpad, which can be found here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-ops-containers A big thank you to everyone who participated - it was really informative. Regards, Richard Raseley SysOps Engineer @ Puppet Labs [0] - http://sched.co/3B45 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] Why need br-int and br-tun in openstack neutron
Dear, When OVS plugin is used with GRE option in Neutron, I see that each compute node has br-tun and br-int bridges created. I'm trying to understand why we need the additional br-tun bridge here. Can't we create tunneling ports in br-int bridge, and have br-int relay traffic between VM ports and tunneling ports directly? Why do we have to introduce another br-tun bridge? Regards, Juno Zhu Staff Software Engineer, System Networking China Systems and Technology Lab (CSTL), IBM Wuxi Email: na...@cn.ibm.com__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] [barbican] Relationship between Octavia and Barbican and Octavia 1.0 questions
Hi Maish, Thanks for the feedback, some answers below. Please also be aware of the lbaas use cases session tomorrow at 9am (yuck, I know), https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-neutron-lbaas-use-cases https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-neutron-lbaas-use-cases On May 19, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Maish Saidel-Keesing mais...@maishsk.com wrote: Hello all, Going over today's presentation Load Balancing as a Service, Kilo and Beyond[1] (great presentation!!) - there are a few questions I have regarding the future release: For Octavia 1.0: 1. Can someone explain to me how the flow would work for spinning up a a new Amphora with regards to interaction between Neutron, LBaaS and Barbican? Same question as well regarding how the standby is created and its relationship with Barbican. The lbaas API runs inside neutron-server. The general flow is: - User interacts with neutron CLI/API or horizon (in liberty), and creates an LB. - Lbaas plugin in neutron creates logical models, fetches cert data from barbican, and calls the backend lbaas driver. - The backend driver does what it needs to to instantiate the LB. Today this is a synchronous call that waits for the nova boot, but by Liberty, it will likely be an async call to the octavia controller to finish the job. Once Octavia has control, it is doing: - Get REST calls for objects, - Talk to nova, spin up an amphora image, - Talk to neutron, plumb in the networks, - Send the amphora its config. 2. Will the orchestration (Heat) also be implemented when Octavia 1.0 is released or only further down the line? If not what would you suggest be the way to orchestrate LBaaS until this is ready? We need to talk to the Heat folks and coordinate this, which we are planning to do soon. 3. Is there some kind of hook into Security groups also planned for the Amphora to also protect the Load Balancer? Not at present, but I recorded this in the feature list on the etherpad above. I think that based on the answers to these questions above - additional questions will follow. Thanks [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eAKur8lErU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eAKur8lErU -- Best Regards, Maish Saidel-Keesing __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] OpenStack Design Summit Solum sessions
Sad but true. Are you here in Vancouver? Did you see Adrian give his demos on stage yesterday? He seems to have gone off into Container-Land now -- mark On 5/20/15 8:48 AM, Gilbert Pilz wrote: Looking at the Design Summit schedule and list of Etherpads it appears that there are no sessions scheduled for Solum. Is this correct? ~ gp __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Re: Puppet-OpenStack API providers - Follow up
On 05/20/2015 12:17 AM, Gilles Dubreuil wrote: Hi, Just wanted to add, for clarification, the need to restructure the openstacklib. The use of resource[:auth] parameter is causing the providers to behave differently depending on the context, as expressed earlier in this thread. I would to highlight the fact that this change is driven by design. Therefore the need for a fix, sooner than later, especially at a time of the entire stack of provider to shift to Keystone V3. And this is actually a critical time because of patches waiting upon this structural change. The bp/auth-consolidation (sorry for the *bad* name) patches show authentication doesn't have to be using parameters, the latter was a mistake from a types/providers suitability viewpoint. The restructure (bp/auth-consolidation) is not only working but also simplifies the code which is going to make the development/maintenance of types/providers faster. The current proposal for puppet-openstacklib is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/180407/ This breaks the published API in Juno as used by puppet-keystone. For example, the Juno branch code: https://github.com/stackforge/puppet-keystone/blob/stable/juno/lib/puppet/provider/openstack.rb def request(service, action, object, credentials, *properties) but in the new code, there is no object request method, only self.request: defself.request(service,action,*args) Is it ok to break this API? I don't think anyone is actually using it, but I have no idea. Doing it this way also means that the change cannot be implemented incrementally - all of the type/provider/spec/other code has to be changed at the same time in a single commit (or live with failing gate tests). Is this ok? I have been working on the Keystone v3 code for a long time, and had a working implementation. Does the Puppet OpenStack community think that it is the right thing to do to wait for the new authentication restructuring code to be merged, before the Keystone v3 code is merged? If anyone has issues/questions with this please speak up! Thank you, Gilles On 07/05/15 11:50, Gilles Dubreuil wrote: On 07/05/15 11:33, Colleen Murphy wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Gilles Dubreuil gil...@redhat.com mailto:gil...@redhat.com wrote: It seems ~/.openrc is the only default [...] The extras module places it at '/root/openrc' [1], so either the extras module should be changed or the providers should look in /root/openrc, either way it should be consistent. Agreed. Let's use ~/openrc for now then. Colleen [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/puppet-openstack_extras/tree/manifests/auth_file.pp#n86 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] OpenStack Design Summit Solum sessions
Gil, That’s right. We’ll pick up again at the M Summit in Tokyo. If you’d like to meet on anything Solum related this week, I’d be happy to arrange the right contributors to have those talks. Adrian On May 20, 2015, at 7:48 AM, Gilbert Pilz gilbert.p...@oracle.com wrote: Looking at the Design Summit schedule and list of Etherpads it appears that there are no sessions scheduled for Solum. Is this correct? ~ gp __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] Supporting multiple local subnets for VPN connections
Hi Mathieu,
In Kilo, VPNaaS APIs were no longer marked as experimental. We need to
understand the implication of changing the API. I'm not sure how much
VPNaaS is being used by OpenStack users at this time, either. I'm hoping
to seek out answers to this at the summit.
If anyone has suggestions, comments, information on this, please chime in. I'll
likely make a BP for multiple subnets, when I get back from the summit.
Lastly, I'm planning on trying to get people interested in VPN to meet on
Friday morning at the summit to discuss all the VPN topics that have been
coming up.
Regards,
Paul Michali (pc_m)
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:54 AM Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi paul,
this is also something that we would like to introduce for BGP/MPLS VPNs
[2].
We choose to allow tenants to attach existing networks ( it might evolve
to subnets) to bgpvpn-connection objects, by updating the bgpvpn-connection
object, which is the equivalent of the ipsec-site-connection object.
So I think that Option B is suitable here.
Concerning backward compatibility, I think VPNaas is still considered as
experimental, am I wrong? Do you have to provide backward compatbility in
this case?
Mathieu
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177740/
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:
Hi,
There has been, over the years, some mention about having VPN IPSec
connections supporting multiple CIDRs for local (left side) private
networks, in addition to the current support for multiple peer CIDRs (right
side).
I'm raising the question again with these goals:
1) Determine if the reference IPSec implementations support this
capability
2) Determine if there is a community desire to enhance VPN to support
this capability (for all VPN types)
3) See what would be the best way to handle this (changes to API and
model)
4) Identify any consequences of making this change.
Note: My assumption here is something that could be used for any type of
VPN connection - current IPSec, future BGP/MPLS VPN, DM VPN, etc.
Here is some information that was gathered from people on the VPN team so
far. Please correct any inaccuracies and comment on the items...
(1) It looks like OpenSwan and Libreswan will support this capability.
StrongSwan will support this with IKEv2. For IKEv1, a Cisco Unity plugin
extensions is needed. I'm not sure what that implies [1].
(2) Do we, as a community, want to enhance VPNaaS to provide this
capability of N:M subnets for VPN implementations? Putting on my vendor
hat, I can see cases where customers want to be able to only create one
connection and reference multiple subnets on each end. Is there a desire to
do this and bake it into the reference implementation (thus making it
available for other implementations)?
(3) Currently, the vpn service API includes the router and subnet ID. The
IPSec connection command includes the peer CIDR(s). For reference, here are
two of the APIs:
usage: neutron vpn-service-create [-h] [-f
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
[-c COLUMN] [--max-width integer]
[--prefix PREFIX]
[--request-format {json,xml}]
[--tenant-id TENANT_ID]
[--admin-state-down]
[--name NAME] [--description
DESCRIPTION]
ROUTER SUBNET
usage: neutron ipsec-site-connection-create [-h]
[-f
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
[-c COLUMN]
[--max-width integer]
[--prefix PREFIX]
[--request-format {json,xml}]
[--tenant-id TENANT_ID]
[--admin-state-down] [--name
NAME]
[--description DESCRIPTION]
[--mtu MTU]
[--initiator
{bi-directional,response-only}]
[--dpd
action=ACTION,interval=INTERVAL,timeout=TIMEOUT]
--vpnservice-id VPNSERVICE
--ikepolicy-id IKEPOLICY
--ipsecpolicy-id IPSECPOLICY
--peer-address PEER_ADDRESS
--peer-id PEER_ID --peer-cidr
PEER_CIDRS --psk PSK
I could envision several ways to handle this (feel free to add more).
Here are some thoughts on this...
A) Allow multiple subnets for the vpn service API. The implication here
is that all types of VPN
Re: [openstack-dev] [security] Nominating Mike McCune as Security-Doc Core
On 05/20/2015 02:20 AM, Dillon, Nathaniel wrote:
To the Security and Docs groups as well as other interested parties,
I would like to nominate Mike McCune to the Security Guide core. He has been
contributing to the Security Guide for about six months now, and he has been a
consistent participant improving content and helping new submittors. In
addition, he knows the inner workings of the guide, having created and merged
for the security guide the chapter on Sahara.
Please chime in with your agreement, or concerns.
+1,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton,
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Solum] OpenStack Design Summit Solum sessions
Looking at the Design Summit schedule and list of Etherpads it appears that there are no sessions scheduled for Solum. Is this correct? ~ gp __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] Supporting multiple local subnets for VPN connections
Hi paul,
this is also something that we would like to introduce for BGP/MPLS VPNs
[2].
We choose to allow tenants to attach existing networks ( it might evolve to
subnets) to bgpvpn-connection objects, by updating the bgpvpn-connection
object, which is the equivalent of the ipsec-site-connection object.
So I think that Option B is suitable here.
Concerning backward compatibility, I think VPNaas is still considered as
experimental, am I wrong? Do you have to provide backward compatbility in
this case?
Mathieu
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177740/
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:
Hi,
There has been, over the years, some mention about having VPN IPSec
connections supporting multiple CIDRs for local (left side) private
networks, in addition to the current support for multiple peer CIDRs (right
side).
I'm raising the question again with these goals:
1) Determine if the reference IPSec implementations support this capability
2) Determine if there is a community desire to enhance VPN to support this
capability (for all VPN types)
3) See what would be the best way to handle this (changes to API and model)
4) Identify any consequences of making this change.
Note: My assumption here is something that could be used for any type of
VPN connection - current IPSec, future BGP/MPLS VPN, DM VPN, etc.
Here is some information that was gathered from people on the VPN team so
far. Please correct any inaccuracies and comment on the items...
(1) It looks like OpenSwan and Libreswan will support this capability.
StrongSwan will support this with IKEv2. For IKEv1, a Cisco Unity plugin
extensions is needed. I'm not sure what that implies [1].
(2) Do we, as a community, want to enhance VPNaaS to provide this
capability of N:M subnets for VPN implementations? Putting on my vendor
hat, I can see cases where customers want to be able to only create one
connection and reference multiple subnets on each end. Is there a desire to
do this and bake it into the reference implementation (thus making it
available for other implementations)?
(3) Currently, the vpn service API includes the router and subnet ID. The
IPSec connection command includes the peer CIDR(s). For reference, here are
two of the APIs:
usage: neutron vpn-service-create [-h] [-f
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
[-c COLUMN] [--max-width integer]
[--prefix PREFIX]
[--request-format {json,xml}]
[--tenant-id TENANT_ID]
[--admin-state-down]
[--name NAME] [--description DESCRIPTION]
ROUTER SUBNET
usage: neutron ipsec-site-connection-create [-h]
[-f
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
[-c COLUMN]
[--max-width integer]
[--prefix PREFIX]
[--request-format {json,xml}]
[--tenant-id TENANT_ID]
[--admin-state-down] [--name
NAME]
[--description DESCRIPTION]
[--mtu MTU]
[--initiator
{bi-directional,response-only}]
[--dpd
action=ACTION,interval=INTERVAL,timeout=TIMEOUT]
--vpnservice-id VPNSERVICE
--ikepolicy-id IKEPOLICY
--ipsecpolicy-id IPSECPOLICY
--peer-address PEER_ADDRESS
--peer-id PEER_ID --peer-cidr
PEER_CIDRS --psk PSK
I could envision several ways to handle this (feel free to add more). Here
are some thoughts on this...
A) Allow multiple subnets for the vpn service API. The implication here is
that all types of VPN connections would be able to support multiple subnets.
vpn-service-create ... ROUTER LOCAL_CIDRS
Issue here is that, if a change is desired on a subnet for a specific
connection, the service must be updated.
Today, I think one has to delete the connections from the service, and
then can update the service. Would need to have ability to update a
service, but still there is concern about the effect on other connections.
It just doesn't seem like the right thing to me.
B) Remove the subnet from the vpn service API and add it to the IPSec
connection API, like is done with peer CIDR selection, allowing multiples.
Different VPN types could do the same thing for their connection API.
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] needed, driver for oslo.db thursday session
On 5/20/15 9:31 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Thanks Jeremy, Mike, Roman, Victor, Please see remote connection details in: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-oslo-db-plans The schedule time for the session is in: https://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/3571aa54b364c62e097da8cd32d97258 Hope you can make it :) yes, please pick one of the 2 choices there (either sip or google hangout) and drop a note in the etherpad which one you want me to connect to probably google hangout, maybe my cats can join in that way also. confirming this is 2:20 PM PDT and 5:20 PM EDT for me. I've updated my calendar, talk to you tomorrow. thanks, dims On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-05-19 09:06:56 -0700 (-0700), Davanum Srinivas wrote: Ouch. Thanks for the heads up Roman We have https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Conferencing which we used yesterday to successfully bridge Clark B. into an I18n tooling session via Jitsi over the normal conference wireless network with the built-in mic/speaker in Jim's laptop. Feel free to use it in your sessions, just try to pick a random conference number between 6000 and 7999 so nobody steps on the toes of other sessions which might be using it (maybe add your conference room number to 6000 or something?). Let me or other Infra people know if you have any questions about or trouble using it! -- Jeremy Stanley __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How should edge services APIs integrate into Neutron?
Hi Keshava, Please find my response iniline. Thanks Vikram On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:10 PM, A, Keshava keshav...@hp.com wrote: Hi Vikarm 1. What are the use case of “ Dynamic Routing Framework” ? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/bgp-dynamic-routing You are thinking of running both IGP and BGP in the same neutron ? Vikram: I didn't get you question. Can you please elaborate. In which kind of scenario we need this ? It is better have more information. We also need to think do we really need IGP with in the cloud, or we only need BGP for external connectivity . In that scenario, we may not go for Routing Framework, and not to complicate things too much. *If some things works well with L2 with in the cloud lets not touch those area. We may need to see where there are real problem.* Vikram Usecase is discussed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125401/; 2. What is the use case of “Prefix Clashing” ? You are thinking of running multiple routing protocol and they will learn “same prefix + Route” ? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/prefix-clashing-issue-with-dynamic-routing-protocol In my opinion, with in the cloud we may not such deployment scenario. Vikram Usecase is discussed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/180267/; *Let us not mix underlay network with overlay network . Both will go as different solution provider, so different business domain.* This is my thoughts . keshava *From:* Vikram Choudhary [mailto:vikram.choudh...@huawei.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:45 AM *To:* p...@michali.net; openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org *Cc:* Kalyankumar Asangi *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How should edge services APIs integrate into Neutron? Hi Paul, Thanks for starting this mail thread. We are also eyeing for supporting MPBGP in neutron and will like to actively participate in this discussion. Please let me know about the IRC channels which we will be following for this discussion. Currently, I am following below BP’s for this work. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/edge-vpn https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/bgp-dynamic-routing https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dynamic-routing-framework https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/prefix-clashing-issue-with-dynamic-routing-protocol Moreover, a similar kind of work is being headed by Cathy for defining an intent framework which can extended for various use case. Currently it will be leveraged for SFC but I feel the same can be used for providing intend VPN use case. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/intent-based-service-chaining Thanks Vikram *From:* Paul Michali [mailto:p...@michali.net p...@michali.net] *Sent:* 06 May 2015 01:38 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [neutron] How should edge services APIs integrate into Neutron? There's been talk in VPN land about new services, like BGP VPN and DM VPN. I suspect there are similar things in other Advanced Services. I talked to Salvatore today, and he suggested starting a ML thread on this... Can someone elaborate on how we should integrate these API extensions into Neutron, both today, and in the future, assuming the proposal that Salvatore has is adopted? I could see two cases. The first, and simplest, is when a feature has an entirely new API that doesn't leverage off of an existing API. The other case would be when the feature's API would dovetail into the existing service API. For example, one may use the existing vpn_service API to create the service, but then create BGP VPN or DM VPN connections for that service, instead of the IPSec connections we have today. If there are examples already of how to extend an existing API extension that would help in understanding how to do this. I see that there are RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_MAPs with the information on the API, and I see that the plugin has a supported_extension_aliases, but beyond that, I'm not really sure how it all hooks up, and how to extend an existing extension. I'm assuming that the python-neutronclient would also need to be updated. So... the intent here is to start some discussion on how we do this, such that we have some things figured out before the summit and can save some time. Thanks in advance, Paul Michali (pc_m) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:
