[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Request for re-integration of Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Driver
Dear Cinder team, Sorry if this message appears duplicated to you. I'd like to kindly request re-integration of Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Cinder driver to 2 branches: master and stable/kilo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178319 The iSCSI CI has been working stably since 6/8, and the patchset is ready to be reviewed. The complete reports list can be found here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Please let me know if you have any question. Thanks, Diem. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Driver
Dear Cinder team, A patchset has been uploaded to request re-integration of Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Cinder driver to 2 branches: master and stable/kilo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178319 Here are some success reports of the Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI CI: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175809/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176802/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176930/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/174291/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175077/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176543/ The complete reports list can be found here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Please let me know if you have any question. Thanks, Diem. On 04/21/2015 01:38 PM, Diem Tran wrote: On 04/21/2015 01:01 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 09:57 Apr 21, Mike Perez wrote: On 15:47 Apr 20, Diem Tran wrote: Hi Mike, Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI CI is now reporting test results. It is configured to run against the ZFSSA iSCSI driver. You can see the results here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Below are some patchsets that the CI reports: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168424/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168419/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175247/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175077/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163706/ I would like to kindly request you and the core team to get the Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI driver re-integrated back to the Cinder code base. If there is anything else you need from the CI and the driver, please do let me know. This was done on 4/8: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/170770/ My mistake this was only the NFS driver. The window to have drivers readded in Kilo has long past. Please see: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059990.html This will have to be readded in Liberty only at this point. Thank you for your reply. Could you please let me know the procedure needed for the driver to be readded to Liberty? Specifically, will you be the one who upload the revert patchset, or it is the driver maintainer's responsibility? Diem. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Driver
On 04/21/2015 01:01 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 09:57 Apr 21, Mike Perez wrote: On 15:47 Apr 20, Diem Tran wrote: Hi Mike, Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI CI is now reporting test results. It is configured to run against the ZFSSA iSCSI driver. You can see the results here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Below are some patchsets that the CI reports: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168424/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168419/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175247/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175077/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163706/ I would like to kindly request you and the core team to get the Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI driver re-integrated back to the Cinder code base. If there is anything else you need from the CI and the driver, please do let me know. This was done on 4/8: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/170770/ My mistake this was only the NFS driver. The window to have drivers readded in Kilo has long past. Please see: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059990.html This will have to be readded in Liberty only at this point. Thank you for your reply. Could you please let me know the procedure needed for the driver to be readded to Liberty? Specifically, will you be the one who upload the revert patchset, or it is the driver maintainer's responsibility? Diem. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Driver
Hi Duncan, We totally understand that CI is not a box ticking exercise, it actually serves a purpose, and we are fully on board with the need for CI. We have resources monitoring the CI results and handling failures on daily basis. As far as the failures, we have resolved all issues related to our drivers that occur during the weekend (hence the failures). My understanding is that some time due to instability of devstack, there might be intermittent failures not related to out drivers at all, such as this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168177/ Thanks, Diem. On 04/21/2015 03:40 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: Can you please investigate and comment here on this thread as to why your CI is failing for all patches? If this is not resolved, your driver will not be re-added, and ignoring requests to investigate CI failures will increase the chances of your driver being removed in future, without notice. Setting up a CI system is not a box ticking exercise, it requires monitoring and maintenance. If that is not possible then you are not yet in a position to be added back into cinder. On 21 Apr 2015 19:32, Diem Tran diem.t...@oracle.com mailto:diem.t...@oracle.com wrote: On 04/21/2015 01:01 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 09:57 Apr 21, Mike Perez wrote: On 15:47 Apr 20, Diem Tran wrote: Hi Mike, Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI CI is now reporting test results. It is configured to run against the ZFSSA iSCSI driver. You can see the results here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Below are some patchsets that the CI reports: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168424/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168419/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175247/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175077/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163706/ I would like to kindly request you and the core team to get the Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI driver re-integrated back to the Cinder code base. If there is anything else you need from the CI and the driver, please do let me know. This was done on 4/8: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/170770/ My mistake this was only the NFS driver. The window to have drivers readded in Kilo has long past. Please see: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059990.html This will have to be readded in Liberty only at this point. Thank you for your reply. Could you please let me know the procedure needed for the driver to be readded to Liberty? Specifically, will you be the one who upload the revert patchset, or it is the driver maintainer's responsibility? Diem. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Driver
Hi Mike, Could you please take a look at the results and consider re-integrating the driver? We the Oracle ZFSSA team would like to target the Kilo RC deadline if possible. Thank you, Diem. On 4/20/15 3:47 PM, Diem Tran wrote: Hi Mike, Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI CI is now reporting test results. It is configured to run against the ZFSSA iSCSI driver. You can see the results here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Below are some patchsets that the CI reports: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168424/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168419/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175247/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175077/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163706/ I would like to kindly request you and the core team to get the Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI driver re-integrated back to the Cinder code base. If there is anything else you need from the CI and the driver, please do let me know. Thank you, Diem. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Driver
Hi Mike, Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI CI is now reporting test results. It is configured to run against the ZFSSA iSCSI driver. You can see the results here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Below are some patchsets that the CI reports: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168424/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168419/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175247/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175077/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163706/ I would like to kindly request you and the core team to get the Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI driver re-integrated back to the Cinder code base. If there is anything else you need from the CI and the driver, please do let me know. Thank you, Diem. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Hi Mike, Thank you for re-integrating our NFS Cinder driver back in Kilo RC. We appreciate your support. We would like you to re-consider our iSCSI Cinder driver as well. We have some results already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159856/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166422/ The CI system is up and running and should continuously test and post results from now on. We had network issues so only the CI for NFS driver was reporting, but now we have set up a new infrastructure which will be more stable. We really appreciate you considering ZFSSA iSCSI Cinder driver to be part of Kilo RC. Thank you, Diem. On 04/06/2015 01:43 AM, Mike Perez wrote: On 18:20 Mon 23 Mar , Diem Tran wrote: Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Patch is up to revert the removal. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/170770/ Since this CI only covers ZFSSANFSDriver and not also the ZFSSAISCSIDriver, we won't be able to add back in iscsi driver this release. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169283/ http://ec2-54-149-113-183.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/ci_results/refs-changes-83-169283-1-nfs/logs/etc/cinder/cinder.conf __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Hi Ramy, Thank you for the insight. I have made the changes, Oracle ZFSSA CI should include testr results in html from now on. Diem. On 03/31/2015 05:39 PM, Asselin, Ramy wrote: Hi Diem, Looking at: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z I don't see any issues, other than missing testr_results.html (nit). You can get that using John's latest code: https://github.com/j-griffith/sos-ci/commit/1aa63782b1745a87c72562edcce19358f9ba79d5 Also, as explained here: http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requirements, please add your CI contact info here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems +1 Ramy -Original Message- From: Diem Tran [mailto:diem.t...@oracle.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 2:23 PM To: Mike Perez Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org; Alka Deshpande Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS) Hi Mike, This is just a gentle status check from our team: We are aware of the requirements where the CI needs to report in a stable fashion for at least 5 days prior to 4/6/2015. Hence we'd like to know if you and the Cinder team have any issue with the current state of Oracle ZFSSA CI. We want to handle it immediately and stay complied with the requirements. Thank you, Diem. On 03/26/2015 01:28 PM, Diem Tran wrote: Hi Mike, The CI has been adjusted to run 304 tests since 3/24/2015 evening: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Here are examples of recent success runs: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167080/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165763/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166823/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166689/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167366/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166164/ We delayed our response until now because we want to get proofs of success runs and make sure our CI complies with the requirements. We believe it does now. Thank you for your contribution and effort in keeping us updated on this matter. Diem. On 03/24/2015 05:28 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 18:20 Mon 23 Mar , Diem Tran wrote: Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Diem, I appreciate your team getting back to us on the CI. It appears your CI is running 247 tests, when it should be running 304. Please verify you're running tempest as followed in the instructions here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#What_t ests_do_I_use.3F Once this issue is resolved, I'll continue to monitor the stability, and based on that make a decision for readding the driver. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Hi Mike, This is just a gentle status check from our team: We are aware of the requirements where the CI needs to report in a stable fashion for at least 5 days prior to 4/6/2015. Hence we'd like to know if you and the Cinder team have any issue with the current state of Oracle ZFSSA CI. We want to handle it immediately and stay complied with the requirements. Thank you, Diem. On 03/26/2015 01:28 PM, Diem Tran wrote: Hi Mike, The CI has been adjusted to run 304 tests since 3/24/2015 evening: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Here are examples of recent success runs: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167080/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165763/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166823/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166689/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167366/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166164/ We delayed our response until now because we want to get proofs of success runs and make sure our CI complies with the requirements. We believe it does now. Thank you for your contribution and effort in keeping us updated on this matter. Diem. On 03/24/2015 05:28 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 18:20 Mon 23 Mar , Diem Tran wrote: Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Diem, I appreciate your team getting back to us on the CI. It appears your CI is running 247 tests, when it should be running 304. Please verify you're running tempest as followed in the instructions here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#What_tests_do_I_use.3F Once this issue is resolved, I'll continue to monitor the stability, and based on that make a decision for readding the driver. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Hi Mike, The CI has been adjusted to run 304 tests since 3/24/2015 evening: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Here are examples of recent success runs: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167080/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165763/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166823/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166689/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167366/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166164/ We delayed our response until now because we want to get proofs of success runs and make sure our CI complies with the requirements. We believe it does now. Thank you for your contribution and effort in keeping us updated on this matter. Diem. On 03/24/2015 05:28 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 18:20 Mon 23 Mar , Diem Tran wrote: Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Diem, I appreciate your team getting back to us on the CI. It appears your CI is running 247 tests, when it should be running 304. Please verify you're running tempest as followed in the instructions here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#What_tests_do_I_use.3F Once this issue is resolved, I'll continue to monitor the stability, and based on that make a decision for readding the driver. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Thank you, Diem. Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:48:37 -0400 From: Alka Deshpande alka.deshpa...@oracle.com To: Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com CC: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org, Fanyaohong fanyaoh...@huawei.com On 3/20/15 2:19 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 12:37 Fri 20 Mar , Alka Deshpande wrote: Hi MIke, My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and we are in the process of going through internal security review, which is expected to be done by the end of March. In the mean time, we have gotten permission to post test results to an external webserver. We will have results reported by the end of the week. If need be, we can show proof of CI running internally by pasting results to pastebin:http://paste.openstack.org/show/193964/ We have been working diligently on setting up the CI system, and we have been keeping you updated since the mid-cycle meetup in Austin. We really appreciate your consideration. We do take CI setup effort very seriously and striving to get it to the level of your satisfaction. The tag for Kilo in Cinder has already happened, so it's too late to revert. We may be able to revisit this in Kilo RC, but I want to see your CI reporting reliably now to then to Cinder reviews. Thanks for the revisit consideration for Kilo RC. My team members will be in touch with you with the CI reporting information, shortly. thanks -Alka FWIW, everyone who was removed told me they were taking it seriously too. Just not serious enough to have CI's reporting by the overly announced deadline. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] [1] -http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/054614.html [2] -https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers [3] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-01-21-16.00.log.html [4] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-04-16.04.log.html [5] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-18-16.00.log.html [6] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-25-16.00.log.html [7] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-04-16.00.log.html [8] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-18-16.00.log.html ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
