Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][neutron-classifier] info on common classifier

[Shaughnessy, David]

Hi Hemanth
The API is just waiting for its last review and will hopefully merge after that.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487182/25
We wanted to ensure that the project was thoroughly tested and setting up the 
project to run these tests took some time.
The patch to follow this one is an extension to the OpenStack client which 
would give the cli to interact with this plugin.
Regards.
David.

-Original Message-
From: Hemanth N [mailto:mail2hemant...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 10:58 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][neutron-classifier] info on common classifier

Hi

I am looking for information on Neutron Common Classifier. What is the 
implementation done today (Is API extension implemented?) and further plans for 
the same.

I could not get much information except for the specification and github 
https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/pike/common-classification-framework.html
https://github.com/openstack/neutron-classifier

Also could you provide any references to early adopters of 
neutron-common-classifier, if any.

Regards,
Hemanth

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [neutron][classifier] CCF Meeting

[Shaughnessy, David]

Hi everyone.
Reminder that the Common Classification Framework meeting is at 14:00 UTC.
The Agenda can be found here: 
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#All_Meetings.27_Agendas
Regards.
David.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [neutron][classifier] CCF Meeting

[Shaughnessy, David]

Hi everyone.
Reminder that the Common Classification Framework meeting is at 14:00 UTC.
The Agenda can be found here: 
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#All_Meetings.27_Agendas
Regards.
David.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [neutron][classifier] CCF Meeting

[Shaughnessy, David]

Hi everyone.
Reminder that the Common Classification Framework meeting is at 14:00 UTC.
The Agenda can be found here: 
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#All_Meetings.27_Agendas
Regards.
David.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [neutron][classifier] CCF Meeting

[Shaughnessy, David]

Hi everyone.
Reminder that the Common Classification Framework meeting is at 14:00 UTC 
tomorrow.
We will be discussing topics raised at the PTG and other updates.
The Agenda can be found here: 
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#All_Meetings.27_Agendas
Regards.
David.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] ovsdpdk mitaka

[Shaughnessy, David]

Hi Santosh.
There is a getting started guide in the networking-ovs-dpdk project that should 
be of some help.[1]
It’s written for Ubuntu 14.04, but the master branch/ stable newton is for 
Ubuntu 16.04.
Regards.
David.


[1] 
https://github.com/openstack/networking-ovs-dpdk/blob/stable/mitaka/doc/source/getstarted/devstack/ubuntu.rst


From: Santosh S [mailto:santoshsethu2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 10:45 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; Santosh S 
Subject: [openstack-dev] ovsdpdk mitaka


Hello Folks,,

I am a learner in openstack to understand the cloud computing.
Here, I am attempting to install a networking-ovs-dpdk-agent in openstack
mitaka release on controller and compute node setup with ubuntu 16.04.

Could you please help me what steps i need to follow to bring ovspdk up in
this 2 node setup.

It would be great if you help me on this.

Thank you
Santosh
--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qos] Question about behavior expectations if network policy is set

[Shaughnessy, David]

Hi Michael.
When you update a network with a qos_policy_id it updates all ports on that 
network too [1].
If you want to have a port on that network without any QoS features on it you 
can make a policy with no rules attached.
This empty policy would override the networks QoS policy when it's attached to 
a port.
Hope that answers your question.
Regards.
David.

[1] 
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/plugins/ml2/drivers/openvswitch/agent/ovs_neutron_agent.py#L427-L437

-Original Message-
From: Michael Micucci [mailto:micu...@midokura.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 8:28 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qos] Question about behavior 
expectations if network policy is set


Hey all,

Quick question: If I have a network and a port, and neither has any QOS policy 
set, and then I change the network to set the qos_policy_id, should this new 
QOS policy affect traffic on the already-created port?  
In other words, is this a network default for future ports (like with
port_security_enabled) which would only affect ports created on this network 
from here on out (but leave already-created ports untouched)?  
Or is this a network setting which takes effect for all ports, regardless if 
they were already created or not?

If the latter, the question had come up, this seems to mean that if a net 
policy is set, then there is no way a port can be set to have no policy, 
because if you unset a port's specific policy, it will fallback to the network 
policy, rather than skip policy calculations altogether.  
So, what does one do if they want all ports on a net to follow Policy X, EXCEPT 
for a single port?

I would say the first question is the most important for me to understand the 
behavior, with the second question as a further clarification.

Thanks a bunch!

Sincerely,

Michael Micucci


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies.


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [qos] gathering Friday 9:30

[Shaughnessy, David]

Sounds good, +1.

From: Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo [mailto:majop...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 11:03 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>; Nate Johnston 
<nate_johns...@cable.comcast.com>; Margaret Frances 
<margaret_fran...@cable.comcast.com>; Shaughnessy, David 
<david.shaughne...@intel.com>; irenab@gmail.com; Moshe Levi 
<mosh...@mellanox.com>; reedi...@gmail.com
Subject: [neutron] [qos] gathering Friday 9:30


Does governors ballroom in Hilton sound ok?

We can move to somewhere else if necessary.
--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

[Shaughnessy, David]

+1
Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: Akihiro Motoki [mailto:amot...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 6:31 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 

Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1

Thanks for coordinating!

2016-04-25 10:55 GMT-05:00 Kyle Mestery :
> Ihar, Henry and I were talking and we thought Thursday night makes sense for 
> a Neutron social in Austin. If others agree, reply on this thread and we'll 
> find a place.
>
> Thanks!
> Kyle
>
> __
>  OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies.


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle

[Shaughnessy, David]

Hi Cathy.
I’d be interested in contributing.
I think a meet up at the summit would be a good idea as the people I’ve engaged 
with from the other projects on this topic expressed interest.
There was an etherpad for the l2-agent-extensions-api that was merged in Mitaka 
that listed projects that needed access to the flow table[1].
Hope you find it helpful.
Regards.
David.

[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/l2-agent-extensions-api-expansion

From: Mathieu Rohon [mailto:mathieu.ro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 10:05 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 

Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS 
Agent extension for Newton cycle

Hi cathy,
at net-bgpvpn, we're very interested in this effort. Please, keep us in the 
loop.
Mathieu

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Haim Daniel 
> wrote:
Hi,

I'd +1 Vikram's comment on neutron-classifier , RFE [1] contains the original 
thread about that topic.


[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1527671

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Vikram Choudhary 
> wrote:

Hi Cathy,

A project called "neutron-classifier [1]" is also there addressing the same use 
case. Let's sync up and avoid work duplicity.

[1] https://github.com/openstack/neutron-classifier

Thanks
Vikram
On Apr 14, 2016 6:40 AM, "Cathy Zhang" 
> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Per Armando’s request, Louis and I are looking into the following features for 
Newton cycle.

• Neutron Common FC used for SFC, QoS, Tap as a service etc.,
• OVS Agent extension
Some of you might know that we already developed a FC in networking-sfc project 
and QoS also has a FC. It makes sense that we have one common FC in Neutron 
that could be shared by SFC, QoS, Tap as a service etc. features in Neutron.
Different features may extend OVS agent and add different new OVS flow tables 
to support their new functionality. A mechanism is needed to ensure consistent 
OVS flow table modification when multiple features co-exist. AFAIK, there is 
some preliminary work on this, but it is not a complete solution yet.
We will like to start these effort by collecting requirements and then posting 
specifications for review. If any of you would like to join this effort, please 
chime in. We can set up a meet-up session in the Summit to discuss this 
face-in-face.
Thanks,
Cathy

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev