Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.vmware] Bump oslo.vmware to 1.0.0
Dims, There are some problems with exception hierarchy which need to be fixed. -Original Message- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dava...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 7:32 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [oslo.vmware] Bump oslo.vmware to 1.0.0 Gary, Tracy, Vipin and other contributors, Is oslo.vmware API solid enough for us to bump to 1.0.0? if not, what's left to be done? thanks, dims -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_dimsd=BQICAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=CTAUyaHvyUUJ-0QHviztQxBhCDLLSg1DksoSE4TOfZ8m=kJNU_fkxhspoxLdOSLde2j2GO0QDJLhUi8W9uh6x5V4s=_U0Uo0Fogc_CkxUAPs9E2ql0AbSNYzFJ4YRjsq7qdv8e= __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]VMware: concurrent create two volumes, one is failed when vcenter session is timout
Sorry for the long delay. This is fixed in oslo.vmware 0.9.0. https://github.com/openstack/oslo.vmware/commit/a229faf8ba59724a4fda3f37d5a7473376f93d9c From: hao wang [mailto:sxmatch1...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 12:40 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]VMware: concurrent create two volumes, one is failed when vcenter session is timout The default timeout about vCenter server(5.5 used) is 30 minutes, so when session is timeout and then concurrent create two volumes through cinder API. There will be one of volumes creation failed. The error log is here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/246678/ Looks like if there is concurrent requests, the vmware driver will re-create the session both at same time. I'm not sure whether it is the issue point. Need some help from VMware engineer, thanks. -- Best Wishes For You! __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Attaching extra-spec to vol-type using Cinder py-client
cinder.volume_types.create returns an instance of VolumeType.
https://github.com/openstack/python-cinderclient/blob/master/cinderclient/v2/volume_types.py#L118
Thanks,
Vipin
From: Pradip Mukhopadhyay [mailto:pradip.inte...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 10:07 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Attaching extra-spec to vol-type using Cinder
py-client
Hello,
I am trying to create and type-set some parameters to a volume-type as follows:
cinder type-create nfs
cinder type-key nfs set volume_backend_name=myNFSBackend
The same thing I want to achieve through python client.
I can create the type as follows:
from cinderclient import client
cinder = client.Client('2', 'admin', 'pw', 'demo',
'http://127.0.0.1:5000/v2.0https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__127.0.0.1-3A5000_v2.0d=AwMBaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=CTAUyaHvyUUJ-0QHviztQxBhCDLLSg1DksoSE4TOfZ8m=EIUflZKBvoV_Hp3DkmTE612FqBGHpwXLuwGJ3UpwbbIs=hk8YML4Dn_kR2cMzCB4Lohd-fnmlk8Z9zBEu1Cc3DO0e=',
service_type=volumev2)
cinder.volume_types.create('nfs')
However how can I associate the extra-spec through python-client code to the
'nfs' volume (same impact as the CLI 'cinder type-key nfs set
volume_backend_name=myNFSBackend' does)?
The 'set_keys' etc. methods are there in the v2/volume_types.py in
python-cinderclient codebase. How to call it? (it's part of VolumeType class,
not VolumeTypeManager).
Any help would be great.
Thanks, Pradip
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] stable-maint for oslo.vmware
Doug, Please add me to the stable maintenance team for oslo.vmware. Thanks, Vipin -Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 2:08 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [oslo] stable-maint for oslo.vmware Gary pinged me on IRC earlier today and I missed him, so I’m sending this to the list in case someone else wants to volunteer. It sounds like there are some stable branch changes for oslo.vmware that need attention. Does someone on the oslo.vmware team want to volunteer to be on a stable-maintenance team for the library? Doug __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo-vmware] Propose adding Radoslav to core team
+1 From: Vui Chiap Lam [mailto:vuich...@vmware.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:52 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo-vmware] Propose adding Radoslav to core team +1. Rado has been very instrumental in helping with reviews and making significant fixes to oslo.vmware. He also contributed greatly to the effort to integrate the library with other projects. Vui From: Arnaud Legendre alegen...@vmware.commailto:alegen...@vmware.com Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 10:18 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo-vmware] Propose adding Radoslav to core team +1 On Sep 15, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.commailto:gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Radoslav to be a core team member. Over the course of the J cycle he has been great with the reviews, bug fixes and updates to the project. Can the other core team members please update with your votes if you agree or not. Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] VMware tools in oslo-incubator or straight to oslo.vmware
The current API is stable since this is used by nova and cinder for the last two releases. Yes, I can act as the maintainer. Here is the list of reviewers: Arnaud Legendre arnaud...@gmail.com Davanum Srinivas (dims) dava...@gmail.com garyk gkot...@vmware.com Kartik Bommepally kbommepa...@vmware.com Sabari Murugesan smuruge...@vmware.com Shawn Hartsock harts...@acm.org Subbu subramanian.neelakan...@gmail.com Vui Lam v...@vmware.com From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 4:22 AM To: Vipin Balachandran Cc: Donald Stufft; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] VMware tools in oslo-incubator or straight to oslo.vmware On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Vipin Balachandran vbalachand...@vmware.com wrote: This library is highly specific to VMware drivers in OpenStack and not a generic VMware API client. As Doug mentioned, this library won't be useful outside OpenStack. Also, it has some dependencies on openstack.common code as well. Therefore it makes sense if we make this code as part of OSLO. I think we have consensus that, assuming you are committing to API stability, this set of code does not need to go through the incubator before becoming a library. How stable is the current API? If it stable and is not going to be useful to anyone outside of OpenStack, we can create an oslo.vmware library for it. I can start working with -infra next week to set up the repository. We will need someone on your team to be designated as the lead maintainer, to coordinate with the Oslo PTL for release management issues and bug triage. Is that you, Vipin? We will also need to have a set of reviewers for the new repository. I'll add oslo-core, but it will be necessary for a few people familiar with the code to also be included. If you have anyone from nova or cinder who should be a reviewer, we can add them, too. Please send me a list of names and the email addresses used in gerrit so I can add them to the reviewer list when the repository is created. Doug By the way, a work in progress review has been posted for the VMware cinder driver integration with the OSLO common code (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70108/). The nova integration is currently under progress. Thanks, Vipin From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 4:06 AM To: Donald Stufft Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Vipin Balachandran Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] VMware tools in oslo-incubator or straight to oslo.vmware On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote: On Jan 28, 2014, at 5:01 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: On Tue, Jan 28 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote: There are several reviews related to adding VMware interface code to the oslo-incubator so it can be shared among projects (start at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65075/7 if you want to look at the code). I expect this code to be fairly stand-alone, so I wonder if we would be better off creating an oslo.vmware library from the beginning, instead of bringing it through the incubator. Thoughts? This sounds like a good idea, but it doesn't look OpenStack specific, so maybe building a non-oslo library would be better. Let's not zope it! :) +1 on not making it an oslo library. Given the number of issues we've seen with stackforge libs in the gate, I've changed my default stance on this point. It's not clear from the code whether Vipin et al expect this library to be useful for anyone not working with both OpenStack and VMware. Either way, I anticipate having the library under the symmetric gating rules and managed by the one of the OpenStack teams (oslo, nova, cinder?) and VMware contributors should make life easier in the long run. As far as the actual name goes, I'm not set on oslo.vmware it was just a convenient name for the conversation. Doug -- Julien Danjou # Free Software hacker # independent consultant # http://julien.danjou.info ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev - Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] VMware tools in oslo-incubator or straight to oslo.vmware
This library is highly specific to VMware drivers in OpenStack and not a generic VMware API client. As Doug mentioned, this library won't be useful outside OpenStack. Also, it has some dependencies on openstack.common code as well. Therefore it makes sense if we make this code as part of OSLO. By the way, a work in progress review has been posted for the VMware cinder driver integration with the OSLO common code (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70108/). The nova integration is currently under progress. Thanks, Vipin From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 4:06 AM To: Donald Stufft Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Vipin Balachandran Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] VMware tools in oslo-incubator or straight to oslo.vmware On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote: On Jan 28, 2014, at 5:01 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: On Tue, Jan 28 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote: There are several reviews related to adding VMware interface code to the oslo-incubator so it can be shared among projects (start at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65075/7 if you want to look at the code). I expect this code to be fairly stand-alone, so I wonder if we would be better off creating an oslo.vmware library from the beginning, instead of bringing it through the incubator. Thoughts? This sounds like a good idea, but it doesn't look OpenStack specific, so maybe building a non-oslo library would be better. Let's not zope it! :) +1 on not making it an oslo library. Given the number of issues we've seen with stackforge libs in the gate, I've changed my default stance on this point. It's not clear from the code whether Vipin et al expect this library to be useful for anyone not working with both OpenStack and VMware. Either way, I anticipate having the library under the symmetric gating rules and managed by the one of the OpenStack teams (oslo, nova, cinder?) and VMware contributors should make life easier in the long run. As far as the actual name goes, I'm not set on oslo.vmware it was just a convenient name for the conversation. Doug -- Julien Danjou # Free Software hacker # independent consultant # http://julien.danjou.info ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev - Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
