Re: [openstack-dev] [senlin] Nominations to Senlin Core Team

[x Lyn]

+1 to both, looking forward to their future contribution.

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 12:59 AM, Duc Truong  wrote:
> 
> Hi Senlin Core Team,
> 
> I would like to nominate 2 new core reviewers for Senlin:
> 
> [1] Jude Cross (jucr...@blizzard.com)
> [2] Erik Olof Gunnar Andersson (eanders...@blizzard.com)
> 
> Jude has been doing a number of reviews and contributed some important
> patches to Senlin during the Rocky cycle that resolved locking
> problems.
> 
> Erik has the most number of reviews in Rocky and has contributed high
> quality code reviews for some time.
> 
> [1] 
> http://stackalytics.com/?module=senlin-group&metric=marks&release=rocky&user_id=jucr...@blizzard.com
> [2] 
> http://stackalytics.com/?module=senlin-group&metric=marks&user_id=eandersson&release=rocky
> 
> Voting is open for 7 days.  Please reply with your +1 vote in favor or
> -1 as a veto vote.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Duc (dtruong)
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [senlin] Senlin Weekly Meeting Time Change

[x Lyn]

+1, works for me.


> On Aug 21, 2018, at 12:34 PM, Duc Truong  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As we are starting the Stein cycle, I would like to start having weekly
> meetings again for Senlin.  I'm proposing to move the weekly meeting
> to the following time:
> 
> Friday 5:30 UTC to 6:30 UTC in #senlin channel
> 
> Please reply if this works for you or reply with an alternative time
> slot.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Duc
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Senlin] Nominate changing in Senlin core team

[x Lyn]

+1 to both!

Ethan

> On 9 Mar 2018, at 5:28 PM, liu.xuefe...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi team,
> 
> I would like to propose adding chenyb and DucTruong to the Senlin core 
> team.
> 
> Chenyb has been working on Openstack more than 3 years, with the 
> responsibility of intergation Nova, Senlin and Ceilometer cloud production.  
> He has finished many features and bugs for Senlin project, now he is the most 
> active non-core contributor on Senlin group projects.
> 
> DucTruong works for Blizzard Entertainment, Blizzard company is an active 
> user of Senlin project. Duc and his colleagues have  finished some useful 
> features for Senlin, from this feautres they also got a good understand about 
> Senlin. Now Duc is a active code reviewer on Senlin.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks
> XueFeng   
> 
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Senlin] Proposing Liyi as core reviewer

[x Lyn]

+1 !
He is a qualified contributor!

> On Aug 16, 2017, at 12:50, Qiming Teng  wrote:
> 
> Dear Senlin cores,
> 
> As you might have witnessed, Liyi has been a solid contributor to Senlin
> during Pike cycle. His patches are of high quality, showing that he has
> a good grasp of the design and the code. Based on the contribution
> record and his agreement to work with the team more closely, I'm
> proposing adding him to the core team.
> 
> Please reply this email if there are concerns or comments.
> 
> Happy coding!
> 
> - Qiming
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Traditional question about Heat IRC meeting time.

[x Lyn]

+1 for 7:00

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 1, 2015, at 10:36 PM, Zane Bitter  wrote:
> 
>> On 29/09/15 05:56, Sergey Kraynev wrote:
>> Hi Heaters!
>> 
>> Previously we had constant "tradition" to change meeting time for
>> involving more people from different time zones.
>> However last release cycle show, that two different meetings with 07:00
>> and 20:00 UTC are comfortable for most of our contributors. Both time
>> values are acceptable for me and I plan to visit both meetings. So I
>> suggested to leave it without any changes.
>> 
>> What do you think about it ?
> 
> Sadly I can only make the 2000 UTC, but +1 anyway... it seems to be working 
> ok at the moment.
> 
> - ZB
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] is cloudwatch really deprecated?

[x Lyn]

Since cloudwatch is deprecated, is there any plan to remove it away from
codes? Or still has some functions depend on this service?

2015-04-18 2:29 GMT+08:00 Zane Bitter :

> On 17/04/15 13:54, Matt Fischer wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Zane Bitter > > wrote:
>>
>> On 17/04/15 12:46, Matt Fischer wrote:
>>
>> The wiki for Using Cloudwatch states:
>>
>> "This feature will be deprecated or removed during the Havana
>> cycle as
>> we move to using Ceilometer as a metric/alarm service instead."
>> [1]
>>
>> However it seems that cloudwatch is still being developed.
>>
>>
>> It doesn't seem that way to me, and without at least some kind of
>> hint I'm not in a position to speculate on why it might seem that
>> way to you.
>>
>> So is it deprecated or not?
>>
>>
>> Yes, it's very deprecated.
>>
>> In fact, we should go ahead and disable it in the default config.
>>
>> - ZB
>>
>>
>> I was just looking at the dates in the commit log for the cloudwatch
>> folder and seeing things from 2015. If it's truly deprecated, that's
>> great, I'll remove it from my environment.
>>
>
> OK, that's what I looked at too, and there were a lot of recent changes
> but they all appeared to be global cleanups that went across the whole Heat
> codebase. The last thing that looked like active development was in July
> 2013. You definitely won't regret removing it ;)
>
> cheers,
> Zane.
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev