Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Glance] Feedback on the proposed refactor to the image import process required
Thanks to everyone who has commented on the spec and/or participated in the discussions at the summit last week. I've uploaded a new patch set that describes my interpretation of the image import workflow and API calls that were discussed. Please take a look and leave comments. -- cheers, brian On 10/20/15, 1:06 PM, "Brian Rosmaita" wrote: >Hello, > >I've updated the image import spec [4] to incorporate the discussion thus >far. > >The fishbowl session [5] is scheduled for Thursday, October 29, >2:40pm-3:20pm. > >If you read through the spec and the current discussion on the review, >you'll be in a good position to help us get this worked out during the >summit. > >-- >cheers, >brian > >On 10/9/15, 3:39 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: > >>Greetings, >> >>There was recently a discussion[0] on the mailing list, started by Doug >>Hellman, to discuss some issues related to Glance's API, the conflicts >>between v1 and v2 and how this is making some pandas sad. >> >>The above served as a starting point for a discussion around the >>current API, how it can be improved, etc. This discussions happened on >>IRC[1], on a call (sorry, I forgot to record this call, this is entirely >>my fault) and on an etherpad[2]. Later on, Brian Rosmaita summarized >>all this in a document[3], which became a spec[4]. :D >> >>The spec is the central point of discussion now and it contains a more >>structured, more organized and more concrete proposal that needs to be >>discussed. Nevertheless, I believe there's still lot to do there and I >>also believe - I'm sure others do as well - this spec could use >>opinions from a broader audience. Therefore, I'd really appreciate >>your opinion on this thread. >> >>This will also be discussed at the summit[5] in a fishbowl session and >>I hope to see you all there as well. >> >>I'd like to thank everyone that has participated in this discussion so >>far and I hope to see others chime in as well. >> >>Flavio >> >>[0] >>http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074360. >>h >>tml >>[1] >>http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-glance/%23openstack-g >>l >>ance.2015-09-22.log.html#t2015-09-22T14:31:00 >>[2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-upload-mechanism-reloaded >>[3] >>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_mQZlUN_AtqhH6qh3ANz-m1zCOYkp1GyxndLt >>Y >>MFRb0 >>[4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232371/ >>[5] >>http://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/event/398b1f44af7a4ae3dde9cb47d4d52d9 >>a >> >>-- >>@flaper87 >>Flavio Percoco > > >__ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Glance] Feedback on the proposed refactor to the image import process required
Hello, I've updated the image import spec [4] to incorporate the discussion thus far. The fishbowl session [5] is scheduled for Thursday, October 29, 2:40pm-3:20pm. If you read through the spec and the current discussion on the review, you'll be in a good position to help us get this worked out during the summit. -- cheers, brian On 10/9/15, 3:39 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: >Greetings, > >There was recently a discussion[0] on the mailing list, started by Doug >Hellman, to discuss some issues related to Glance's API, the conflicts >between v1 and v2 and how this is making some pandas sad. > >The above served as a starting point for a discussion around the >current API, how it can be improved, etc. This discussions happened on >IRC[1], on a call (sorry, I forgot to record this call, this is entirely >my fault) and on an etherpad[2]. Later on, Brian Rosmaita summarized >all this in a document[3], which became a spec[4]. :D > >The spec is the central point of discussion now and it contains a more >structured, more organized and more concrete proposal that needs to be >discussed. Nevertheless, I believe there's still lot to do there and I >also believe - I'm sure others do as well - this spec could use >opinions from a broader audience. Therefore, I'd really appreciate >your opinion on this thread. > >This will also be discussed at the summit[5] in a fishbowl session and >I hope to see you all there as well. > >I'd like to thank everyone that has participated in this discussion so >far and I hope to see others chime in as well. > >Flavio > >[0] >http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074360.h >tml >[1] >http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-glance/%23openstack-gl >ance.2015-09-22.log.html#t2015-09-22T14:31:00 >[2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-upload-mechanism-reloaded >[3] >https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_mQZlUN_AtqhH6qh3ANz-m1zCOYkp1GyxndLtY >MFRb0 >[4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232371/ >[5] >http://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/event/398b1f44af7a4ae3dde9cb47d4d52d9a > >-- >@flaper87 >Flavio Percoco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [All][Glance] Feedback on the proposed refactor to the image import process required
Greetings, There was recently a discussion[0] on the mailing list, started by Doug Hellman, to discuss some issues related to Glance's API, the conflicts between v1 and v2 and how this is making some pandas sad. The above served as a starting point for a discussion around the current API, how it can be improved, etc. This discussions happened on IRC[1], on a call (sorry, I forgot to record this call, this is entirely my fault) and on an etherpad[2]. Later on, Brian Rosmaita summarized all this in a document[3], which became a spec[4]. :D The spec is the central point of discussion now and it contains a more structured, more organized and more concrete proposal that needs to be discussed. Nevertheless, I believe there's still lot to do there and I also believe - I'm sure others do as well - this spec could use opinions from a broader audience. Therefore, I'd really appreciate your opinion on this thread. This will also be discussed at the summit[5] in a fishbowl session and I hope to see you all there as well. I'd like to thank everyone that has participated in this discussion so far and I hope to see others chime in as well. Flavio [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074360.html [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-glance/%23openstack-glance.2015-09-22.log.html#t2015-09-22T14:31:00 [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-upload-mechanism-reloaded [3] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_mQZlUN_AtqhH6qh3ANz-m1zCOYkp1GyxndLtYMFRb0 [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232371/ [5] http://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/event/398b1f44af7a4ae3dde9cb47d4d52d9a -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
