Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Few hot questions related to patching for openstack
Hi, my 2 cents: 1) Fuel version (+1 to Dmitry) 2) Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by our patches / our first patch? Thank! ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Few hot questions related to patching for openstack
Sure. We can check if release is installed on any cluster and refuse to
remove it.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think we should allow user to delete unneeded releases.
In this case user won't be able to add new nodes to the existing
environments of the same version. So we should check and warn user about
it, or simply not allow to delete releases if there are live envs with the
same version.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Dmitry Pyzhov dpyz...@mirantis.com
wrote:
So, our releases will have following versions of releases on UI:
5.0) 2014.1
5.0.1) 2014.1.1-5.0.1
5.1) 2014.1.1-5.1
And if someone install 5.0, upgrade it to 5.0.1 and then upgrade to 5.1,
he will have three releases for each OS. I think we should allow user to
delete unneeded releases. It also will add free space on his masternode.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hello,
Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by our patches /
our first patch?
I mean which version should we use in 5.0.1, for example? As far as I
understand @DmitryB, it have to be 2014.1-5.0.1. Am I right?
Thanks,
Igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi,
my 2 cents:
1) Fuel version (+1 to Dmitry)
2) Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by our patches /
our first patch?
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko
dborodae...@mirantis.com wrote:
1) Puppet manifests are part of Fuel so the version of Fuel should be
used. It is possible to have more than one version of Fuel per
OpenStack version, but not the other way around: if we upgrade
OpenStack version we also increase version of Fuel.
2) Should be a combination of both: it should indicate which OpenStack
version it is based on (2014.1.1), and version of Fuel it's included
in (5.0.1), e.g. 2014.1.1-5.0.1. Between Fuel versions, we can have
additional bugfix patches added to shipped OpenStack components.
my 2c,
-DmitryB
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Igor Kalnitsky
ikalnit...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi fuelers,
I'm working on Patching for OpenStack and I have the following
questions:
1/ We need to save new puppets and repos under some versioned folder:
/etc/puppet/{version}/ or /var/www/nailgun/{version}/centos.
So the question is which version to use? Fuel or OpenStack?
2/ Which version we have to use for our patchs? We have an OpenStack
2014.1.
Should we use 2014.1.1 for our first patch? Or we have to use another
format?
I need a quick reply since these questions have to be solved for
5.0.1 too.
Thanks,
Igor
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Few hot questions related to patching for openstack
So, our releases will have following versions of releases on UI:
5.0) 2014.1
5.0.1) 2014.1.1-5.0.1
5.1) 2014.1.1-5.1
And if someone install 5.0, upgrade it to 5.0.1 and then upgrade to 5.1, he
will have three releases for each OS. I think we should allow user to
delete unneeded releases. It also will add free space on his masternode.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hello,
Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by our patches /
our first patch?
I mean which version should we use in 5.0.1, for example? As far as I
understand @DmitryB, it have to be 2014.1-5.0.1. Am I right?
Thanks,
Igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi,
my 2 cents:
1) Fuel version (+1 to Dmitry)
2) Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by our patches / our
first patch?
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko
dborodae...@mirantis.com wrote:
1) Puppet manifests are part of Fuel so the version of Fuel should be
used. It is possible to have more than one version of Fuel per
OpenStack version, but not the other way around: if we upgrade
OpenStack version we also increase version of Fuel.
2) Should be a combination of both: it should indicate which OpenStack
version it is based on (2014.1.1), and version of Fuel it's included
in (5.0.1), e.g. 2014.1.1-5.0.1. Between Fuel versions, we can have
additional bugfix patches added to shipped OpenStack components.
my 2c,
-DmitryB
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi fuelers,
I'm working on Patching for OpenStack and I have the following
questions:
1/ We need to save new puppets and repos under some versioned folder:
/etc/puppet/{version}/ or /var/www/nailgun/{version}/centos.
So the question is which version to use? Fuel or OpenStack?
2/ Which version we have to use for our patchs? We have an OpenStack
2014.1.
Should we use 2014.1.1 for our first patch? Or we have to use another
format?
I need a quick reply since these questions have to be solved for 5.0.1
too.
Thanks,
Igor
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Few hot questions related to patching for openstack
Hi,
I think we should allow user to delete unneeded releases.
In this case user won't be able to add new nodes to the existing
environments of the same version. So we should check and warn user about
it, or simply not allow to delete releases if there are live envs with the
same version.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Dmitry Pyzhov dpyz...@mirantis.com wrote:
So, our releases will have following versions of releases on UI:
5.0) 2014.1
5.0.1) 2014.1.1-5.0.1
5.1) 2014.1.1-5.1
And if someone install 5.0, upgrade it to 5.0.1 and then upgrade to 5.1,
he will have three releases for each OS. I think we should allow user to
delete unneeded releases. It also will add free space on his masternode.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hello,
Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by our patches /
our first patch?
I mean which version should we use in 5.0.1, for example? As far as I
understand @DmitryB, it have to be 2014.1-5.0.1. Am I right?
Thanks,
Igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi,
my 2 cents:
1) Fuel version (+1 to Dmitry)
2) Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by our patches /
our first patch?
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko
dborodae...@mirantis.com wrote:
1) Puppet manifests are part of Fuel so the version of Fuel should be
used. It is possible to have more than one version of Fuel per
OpenStack version, but not the other way around: if we upgrade
OpenStack version we also increase version of Fuel.
2) Should be a combination of both: it should indicate which OpenStack
version it is based on (2014.1.1), and version of Fuel it's included
in (5.0.1), e.g. 2014.1.1-5.0.1. Between Fuel versions, we can have
additional bugfix patches added to shipped OpenStack components.
my 2c,
-DmitryB
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi fuelers,
I'm working on Patching for OpenStack and I have the following
questions:
1/ We need to save new puppets and repos under some versioned folder:
/etc/puppet/{version}/ or /var/www/nailgun/{version}/centos.
So the question is which version to use? Fuel or OpenStack?
2/ Which version we have to use for our patchs? We have an OpenStack
2014.1.
Should we use 2014.1.1 for our first patch? Or we have to use another
format?
I need a quick reply since these questions have to be solved for
5.0.1 too.
Thanks,
Igor
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Few hot questions related to patching for openstack
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: I think we should allow user to delete unneeded releases. In this case user won't be able to add new nodes to the existing environments of the same version. So we should check and warn user about it, or simply not allow to delete releases if there are live envs with the same version. +1 -DmitryB ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Few hot questions related to patching for openstack
Hello,
Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by our patches /
our first patch?
I mean which version should we use in 5.0.1, for example? As far as I
understand @DmitryB, it have to be 2014.1-5.0.1. Am I right?
Thanks,
Igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi,
my 2 cents:
1) Fuel version (+1 to Dmitry)
2) Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by our patches / our
first patch?
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko
dborodae...@mirantis.com wrote:
1) Puppet manifests are part of Fuel so the version of Fuel should be
used. It is possible to have more than one version of Fuel per
OpenStack version, but not the other way around: if we upgrade
OpenStack version we also increase version of Fuel.
2) Should be a combination of both: it should indicate which OpenStack
version it is based on (2014.1.1), and version of Fuel it's included
in (5.0.1), e.g. 2014.1.1-5.0.1. Between Fuel versions, we can have
additional bugfix patches added to shipped OpenStack components.
my 2c,
-DmitryB
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi fuelers,
I'm working on Patching for OpenStack and I have the following
questions:
1/ We need to save new puppets and repos under some versioned folder:
/etc/puppet/{version}/ or /var/www/nailgun/{version}/centos.
So the question is which version to use? Fuel or OpenStack?
2/ Which version we have to use for our patchs? We have an OpenStack
2014.1.
Should we use 2014.1.1 for our first patch? Or we have to use another
format?
I need a quick reply since these questions have to be solved for 5.0.1
too.
Thanks,
Igor
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Few hot questions related to patching for openstack
Hi fuelers,
I'm working on Patching for OpenStack and I have the following questions:
1/ We need to save new puppets and repos under some versioned folder:
/etc/puppet/{version}/ or /var/www/nailgun/{version}/centos.
So the question is which version to use? Fuel or OpenStack?
2/ Which version we have to use for our patchs? We have an OpenStack 2014.1.
Should we use 2014.1.1 for our first patch? Or we have to use another
format?
I need a quick reply since these questions have to be solved for 5.0.1 too.
Thanks,
Igor
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Few hot questions related to patching for openstack
1) Puppet manifests are part of Fuel so the version of Fuel should be
used. It is possible to have more than one version of Fuel per
OpenStack version, but not the other way around: if we upgrade
OpenStack version we also increase version of Fuel.
2) Should be a combination of both: it should indicate which OpenStack
version it is based on (2014.1.1), and version of Fuel it's included
in (5.0.1), e.g. 2014.1.1-5.0.1. Between Fuel versions, we can have
additional bugfix patches added to shipped OpenStack components.
my 2c,
-DmitryB
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi fuelers,
I'm working on Patching for OpenStack and I have the following questions:
1/ We need to save new puppets and repos under some versioned folder:
/etc/puppet/{version}/ or /var/www/nailgun/{version}/centos.
So the question is which version to use? Fuel or OpenStack?
2/ Which version we have to use for our patchs? We have an OpenStack 2014.1.
Should we use 2014.1.1 for our first patch? Or we have to use another
format?
I need a quick reply since these questions have to be solved for 5.0.1 too.
Thanks,
Igor
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Few hot questions related to patching for openstack
Hi,
my 2 cents:
1) Fuel version (+1 to Dmitry)
2) Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by our patches / our
first patch?
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko dborodae...@mirantis.com
wrote:
1) Puppet manifests are part of Fuel so the version of Fuel should be
used. It is possible to have more than one version of Fuel per
OpenStack version, but not the other way around: if we upgrade
OpenStack version we also increase version of Fuel.
2) Should be a combination of both: it should indicate which OpenStack
version it is based on (2014.1.1), and version of Fuel it's included
in (5.0.1), e.g. 2014.1.1-5.0.1. Between Fuel versions, we can have
additional bugfix patches added to shipped OpenStack components.
my 2c,
-DmitryB
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi fuelers,
I'm working on Patching for OpenStack and I have the following questions:
1/ We need to save new puppets and repos under some versioned folder:
/etc/puppet/{version}/ or /var/www/nailgun/{version}/centos.
So the question is which version to use? Fuel or OpenStack?
2/ Which version we have to use for our patchs? We have an OpenStack
2014.1.
Should we use 2014.1.1 for our first patch? Or we have to use another
format?
I need a quick reply since these questions have to be solved for 5.0.1
too.
Thanks,
Igor
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
