Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] [Tempest] [Ironic] Testing Ironic
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 10/31/2013 04:38 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: Hi all, Ironic has reached a point where it is capable of being added to integration tests and the gate pipeline. Does that mean we /should/ add it? I think so, and I'd like to know what others think, but let me be more specific about what I'm talking about. Yes, we should - with caveats. At this point, it is possible for devstack to start ironic-api and ironic-conductor services, register them with keystone, init the db, etc. Then, tempest [1] can perform basic actions like create, update, delete records. Testing the hardware drivers will come later, which is where we'll see integration tests with glance, neutron, etc, become more important. Roman has been working on enabling these tests [2] and I'd like to nudge the reviewers of the tempest and infra teams to take a look at his patches. At the very least, I'd like to make folks aware of this work so we can all discuss it at the summit. Basically, we've been wanting for a while to see gate integration before something graduates incubation - but there is a chicken and egg sitch where we can't REALLY add it to the gate until after graduation. Ah, I see. So, I think what we want to do is add the tests to tempest/devstack, and then make a job that only runs on ironic changes that runs that. That will show us that you're ready once graduation review comes up. That works for me. Getting tempest/devstack tests going for Ironic is what I really want, and yea, that should happen before we're in all the other project's gate checks. I'll look at the infra patches (it's been slow with jeblair out) Thanks! [1] Tempest tests for Ironic API: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48109 [2] Pre-cache Ironic to slaves: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54569 Enable Ironic in devstack-gate: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53899 Enable tempest tests in the experimental pipeline: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53917 Thanks! Devananda ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Infra] [Tempest] [Ironic] Testing Ironic
Hi all, Ironic has reached a point where it is capable of being added to integration tests and the gate pipeline. Does that mean we /should/ add it? I think so, and I'd like to know what others think, but let me be more specific about what I'm talking about. At this point, it is possible for devstack to start ironic-api and ironic-conductor services, register them with keystone, init the db, etc. Then, tempest [1] can perform basic actions like create, update, delete records. Testing the hardware drivers will come later, which is where we'll see integration tests with glance, neutron, etc, become more important. Roman has been working on enabling these tests [2] and I'd like to nudge the reviewers of the tempest and infra teams to take a look at his patches. At the very least, I'd like to make folks aware of this work so we can all discuss it at the summit. [1] Tempest tests for Ironic API: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48109 [2] Pre-cache Ironic to slaves: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54569 Enable Ironic in devstack-gate: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53899 Enable tempest tests in the experimental pipeline: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53917 Thanks! Devananda ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] [Tempest] [Ironic] Testing Ironic
On 10/31/2013 04:38 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: Hi all, Ironic has reached a point where it is capable of being added to integration tests and the gate pipeline. Does that mean we /should/ add it? I think so, and I'd like to know what others think, but let me be more specific about what I'm talking about. Yes, we should - with caveats. At this point, it is possible for devstack to start ironic-api and ironic-conductor services, register them with keystone, init the db, etc. Then, tempest [1] can perform basic actions like create, update, delete records. Testing the hardware drivers will come later, which is where we'll see integration tests with glance, neutron, etc, become more important. Roman has been working on enabling these tests [2] and I'd like to nudge the reviewers of the tempest and infra teams to take a look at his patches. At the very least, I'd like to make folks aware of this work so we can all discuss it at the summit. Basically, we've been wanting for a while to see gate integration before something graduates incubation - but there is a chicken and egg sitch where we can't REALLY add it to the gate until after graduation. So, I think what we want to do is add the tests to tempest/devstack, and then make a job that only runs on ironic changes that runs that. That will show us that you're ready once graduation review comes up. I'll look at the infra patches (it's been slow with jeblair out) [1] Tempest tests for Ironic API: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48109 [2] Pre-cache Ironic to slaves: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54569 Enable Ironic in devstack-gate: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53899 Enable tempest tests in the experimental pipeline: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53917 Thanks! Devananda ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
