Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Hi all,
Our team in the Federal University of Campina Grande implemented the
initial Hierarchical Multitenancy support and now we are implementing
the Reseller use case in Keystone.
Already answering Travis question, in the Reseller solution we are
merging the domains and projects entities: domains are going to be a
"feature" of projects - if a project has the "domain" feature enabled,
it will behave exactly as domains currently behave (being a container of
users). With domain being a project, they will be part of the same
hierarchy, for more details you may read the spec:
https://github.com/openstack/keystone-specs/blob/master/specs/liberty/reseller.rst
And yes, we need to extend the Hierarchical Mutlitenancy concept to
other projects and our team is already working in Horizon and in contact
with Sajeesh (Nova). We are definitely interested in participating the
proposed design session and discussions that could emerge from it.
--
Rodrigo Duarte
On 28-04-2015 10:59, Geoff Arnold wrote:
Yes. 100% upstream.
And although I’ve referred to it as “reseller” (following the previous
Keystone BP), it’s a much more generic pattern. Long term, I think it
turns into something like a supply chain framework for services.
Geoff
On Apr 28, 2015, at 3:51 AM, Tim Bell <mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch>> wrote:
Geoff,
Would the generic parts of your “reseller” solution by contributed to
the upstream projects (e.g. glance, horizon, ceilometer) ? It would
be good to get the core components understanding hierarchical
multitenancy for all the use cases.
The nova quota work is being submitted upstream for Liberty by
Sajeesh
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api)
The cinder quota proposal is also underway
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-nested-quota-driver)
Tim
*From:*Geoff Arnold [mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com]
*Sent:* 28 April 2015 08:11
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical
multitenancy and Glance?
Use cases:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy
Blueprints:
(Kilo):
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller
(Liberty):
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api
(Pending):
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles
As for adoption, it’s hard to say. The HMT work in Keystone was a
necessary starting point, but in order to create a complete solution
we really need the corresponding changes in Nova (quotas), Glance
(resource visibility), Horizon (UI scoping), and probably Ceilometer
(aggregated queries). We (Cisco) are planning to kick off a
Stackforge project to knit all of these things together into a
complete “reseller” federation system. I’m assuming that there will
be other system-level compositions of the various pieces.
Geoff
On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Tripp, Travis S mailto:travis.tr...@hp.com>> wrote:
Geoff,
Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned.
As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs
hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that
highlights what
the desired path forward is with regard to domains?
Thanks,
Travis
On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, "Geoff Arnold" mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> wrote:
Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller
guys will have
some comments.
Geoff
On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar
mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com>> wrote:
Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions.
-Nikhil
From: Geoff Arnold mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical
multitenancy
and Glance?
In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for
blueprints and
design summit discussions involving the application of
the Keystone
hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack
projects. One obvious
candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want
domain-local
resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I
wasn¹t able to
find anything. Did I miss something obvious?
I¹ve added a paragraph to
https://etherpad.o
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Yes. 100% upstream. And although I’ve referred to it as “reseller” (following the previous Keystone BP), it’s a much more generic pattern. Long term, I think it turns into something like a supply chain framework for services. Geoff > On Apr 28, 2015, at 3:51 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > > Geoff, > > Would the generic parts of your “reseller” solution by contributed to the > upstream projects (e.g. glance, horizon, ceilometer) ? It would be good to > get the core components understanding hierarchical multitenancy for all the > use cases. > > The nova quota work is being submitted upstream for Liberty by Sajeesh > (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api > <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api>) > > The cinder quota proposal is also underway > (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-nested-quota-driver > <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-nested-quota-driver>) > > Tim > > From: Geoff Arnold [mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com] > Sent: 28 April 2015 08:11 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and > Glance? > > Use cases: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy > <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy> > > Blueprints: > (Kilo): > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy > <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller > <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller> > (Liberty): > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management > > <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api > <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api> > (Pending): > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects > <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles > <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles> > > As for adoption, it’s hard to say. The HMT work in Keystone was a necessary > starting point, but in order to create a complete solution we really need the > corresponding changes in Nova (quotas), Glance (resource visibility), Horizon > (UI scoping), and probably Ceilometer (aggregated queries). We (Cisco) are > planning to kick off a Stackforge project to knit all of these things > together into a complete “reseller” federation system. I’m assuming that > there will be other system-level compositions of the various pieces. > > Geoff > > On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Tripp, Travis S <mailto:travis.tr...@hp.com>> wrote: > > Geoff, > > Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned. > > As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs > hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what > the desired path forward is with regard to domains? > > Thanks, > Travis > > On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, "Geoff Arnold" <mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> wrote: > > > Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have > some comments. > > Geoff > > > On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar > mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com>> wrote: > > Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. > > -Nikhil > > > From: Geoff Arnold mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy > and Glance? > > In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and > design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone > hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious > candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local > resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to > find anything. Did I miss something obvious? > > I¹ve added a paragraph to > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics > <https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics> to make > sure it doesn¹t get overlooked. > > Cheers, > >
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Geoff, Would the generic parts of your "reseller" solution by contributed to the upstream projects (e.g. glance, horizon, ceilometer) ? It would be good to get the core components understanding hierarchical multitenancy for all the use cases. The nova quota work is being submitted upstream for Liberty by Sajeesh (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api) The cinder quota proposal is also underway (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-nested-quota-driver) Tim From: Geoff Arnold [mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com] Sent: 28 April 2015 08:11 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? Use cases: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy Blueprints: (Kilo): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller (Liberty): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api (Pending): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles As for adoption, it's hard to say. The HMT work in Keystone was a necessary starting point, but in order to create a complete solution we really need the corresponding changes in Nova (quotas), Glance (resource visibility), Horizon (UI scoping), and probably Ceilometer (aggregated queries). We (Cisco) are planning to kick off a Stackforge project to knit all of these things together into a complete "reseller" federation system. I'm assuming that there will be other system-level compositions of the various pieces. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Tripp, Travis S mailto:travis.tr...@hp.com>> wrote: Geoff, Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned. As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what the desired path forward is with regard to domains? Thanks, Travis On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, "Geoff Arnold" mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> wrote: Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have some comments. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com>> wrote: Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. -Nikhil From: Geoff Arnold mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious? I¹ve added a paragraph to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it doesn¹t get overlooked. Cheers, Geoff _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Thanks, I’ll have to read! Do you have a quick summary on what role domains are intended to play in this? Has the following statement been decided? 1. Domains may be modified to exist as top-level projects, or they may still exist solely as containers for users with the project hierarchy remaining separate. From: Geoff Arnold mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 12:10 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? Use cases: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy Blueprints: (Kilo): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller (Liberty): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api (Pending): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles As for adoption, it’s hard to say. The HMT work in Keystone was a necessary starting point, but in order to create a complete solution we really need the corresponding changes in Nova (quotas), Glance (resource visibility), Horizon (UI scoping), and probably Ceilometer (aggregated queries). We (Cisco) are planning to kick off a Stackforge project to knit all of these things together into a complete “reseller” federation system. I’m assuming that there will be other system-level compositions of the various pieces. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Tripp, Travis S mailto:travis.tr...@hp.com>> wrote: Geoff, Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned. As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what the desired path forward is with regard to domains? Thanks, Travis On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, "Geoff Arnold" mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> wrote: Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have some comments. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com>> wrote: Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. -Nikhil From: Geoff Arnold mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious? I¹ve added a paragraph to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it doesn¹t get overlooked. Cheers, Geoff _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Use cases: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy> Blueprints: (Kilo): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller> (Liberty): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api> (Pending): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles> As for adoption, it’s hard to say. The HMT work in Keystone was a necessary starting point, but in order to create a complete solution we really need the corresponding changes in Nova (quotas), Glance (resource visibility), Horizon (UI scoping), and probably Ceilometer (aggregated queries). We (Cisco) are planning to kick off a Stackforge project to knit all of these things together into a complete “reseller” federation system. I’m assuming that there will be other system-level compositions of the various pieces. Geoff > On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Tripp, Travis S wrote: > > Geoff, > > Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned. > > As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs > hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what > the desired path forward is with regard to domains? > > Thanks, > Travis > > On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, "Geoff Arnold" wrote: > >> Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have >> some comments. >> >> Geoff >> >>> On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar >>> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. >>> >>> -Nikhil >>> >>> ________________ >>> From: Geoff Arnold >>> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM >>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy >>> and Glance? >>> >>> In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and >>> design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone >>> hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious >>> candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local >>> resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to >>> find anything. Did I miss something obvious? >>> >>> I¹ve added a paragraph to >>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make >>> sure it doesn¹t get overlooked. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Geoff >>> >>> _ >>> _ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: >>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >>> _ >>> _ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: >>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Geoff, Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned. As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what the desired path forward is with regard to domains? Thanks, Travis On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, "Geoff Arnold" wrote: >Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have >some comments. > >Geoff > >> On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar >> wrote: >> >> Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. >> >> -Nikhil >> >> >> From: Geoff Arnold >> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy >>and Glance? >> >> In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and >>design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone >>hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious >>candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local >>resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to >>find anything. Did I miss something obvious? >> >> I¹ve added a paragraph to >>https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make >>sure it doesn¹t get overlooked. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Geoff >> >>_ >>_ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >>openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >>_ >>_ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >>openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > >__ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Good points. I’ll add some details. I’m sure the Reseller guys will have some comments. Geoff > On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar > wrote: > > Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. > > -Nikhil > > > From: Geoff Arnold > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and > Glance? > > In preparation for Vancouver, I’ve been looking for blueprints and design > summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical > multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is > Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as > a default. Despite my searches, I wasn’t able to find anything. Did I miss > something obvious? > > I’ve added a paragraph to > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it > doesn’t get overlooked. > > Cheers, > > Geoff > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. -Nikhil From: Geoff Arnold Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? In preparation for Vancouver, I’ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn’t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious? I’ve added a paragraph to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it doesn’t get overlooked. Cheers, Geoff __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
In preparation for Vancouver, I’ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn’t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious? I’ve added a paragraph to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it doesn’t get overlooked. Cheers, Geoff __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
