Hi Dong:
IMO, apparently, the api-site and the implementation are inconsistent,
we should figure out how it's designed orignally and whether it has been
discussed in the ML before, maybe there's something we missed here. Just
see others' opinions.
P.S. most if not all of the core team may be drinking the beer in the
summit now, so you may need some time to get an answer. :)
2014-05-12 10:23 GMT+08:00 Dong Liu :
> Hi all:
>
> According to the neutron LBaaS api document[1], the attributes of health
> monitor, delay and
> timeout are both non-negative, and the timeout value must be less than
> the delay value.
>
> But in currently implementation, I can do these operations:
> - the timeout value could be negative
> - the timeout value could be less then delay value
>
> I'm not sure if this is a bug, because we have defined the delay value
> could not be negative
> already. If it is a bug, I will report the bug in launch and fix it. If
> not, is there anything
> specific reason?
>
> Thanks,
> Dong Liu
>
> [1]
> http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/lbaas_ext_ops_health_monitor.html
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
*-*
*Lingxian Kong*
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
