Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Not support dnsmasq 2.63?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 30/07/14 04:00, Kyle Mestery wrote: I'm personally ok with this hard limit, but I'd really like to hear from distribution people here to understand their thoughts, including what versions of dnsmasq ship with their products and how this would affect them. On Red Hat side, we are planning to ship Juno based build for RHEL 7 only. Currently, we already ship dnsmasq-2.66-10.el7 with Icehouse based build (RHEL7-OSP5), so we should be ok with dropping support for older versions. Cheers, /Ihar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJT2LGYAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57f/sH/j7xaMGoZApJ29mXdSgGRqFb CdWZQTeLcPvProQ9XPzFVO5ic1SkoJlwCvBBskswuG558qxamYRIataC11GhoiJD fwFHxlt/830rnnZXUD9r4wKq/yXWgEnQA/B9B7R7K7vfQNqbsg5ZZL6pq5mUMatM yV+SK13G3irqk6Fc0ygNH2UAhw8IBZDadxic/dvfoUZ5vHLJJc+FIMvFv0mXAF52 7dxhsUgzQtNNaISXcK6q++sb9eRFbAxY/vh645eww9cAMsgllwwo/O+TeKtUgcE0 EB2spDkfY8rRjWvf8bIqGSQNz1k0IXWj6rHRYrshARwMAc5a1to9SFMshTXsn8w= =bKfw -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Not support dnsmasq 2.63?
Hi Kyle, SUSE Cloud ships dnsmasq 2.71 . For us it's fine to bump the minimum version supported to 2.63 . cheers, Rossella On 07/30/2014 04:00 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Xuhan Peng pengxu...@gmail.com wrote: We bumped the minimum version of dnsmasq to 2.63 a while ago by this code change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105378/ However, currently we still kind of support earlier version of dnsmasq because we only give a warning and don't exit the program when we find dnsmasq version is less than the minimum version. This causes some confusion and complicates the code since we need to take care different syntax of dnsmasq of different version in dhcp code (Note that the previous version doesn't support tag). I wonder what's your opinion on NOT supporting dnsmasq version less than 2.63 in Juno? I think we can prompt error message and exit the program when we detect invalid version but I would like to gather more thoughts on this one. I'm personally ok with this hard limit, but I'd really like to hear from distribution people here to understand their thoughts, including what versions of dnsmasq ship with their products and how this would affect them. Thanks, Kyle Thanks, Xu Han ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Not support dnsmasq 2.63?
The hard limit should be 2.63 since that is supported in all of the modern long term releases from the distros. I’d prefer we not exit processes because we’ve been removing active checks on process starts. mark On Jul 29, 2014, at 9:51 PM, Xuhan Peng pengxu...@gmail.commailto:pengxu...@gmail.com wrote: We bumped the minimum version of dnsmasq to 2.63 a while ago by this code change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105378/ However, currently we still kind of support earlier version of dnsmasq because we only give a warning and don't exit the program when we find dnsmasq version is less than the minimum version. This causes some confusion and complicates the code since we need to take care different syntax of dnsmasq of different version in dhcp code (Note that the previous version doesn't support tag). I wonder what's your opinion on NOT supporting dnsmasq version less than 2.63 in Juno? I think we can prompt error message and exit the program when we detect invalid version but I would like to gather more thoughts on this one. Thanks, Xu Han ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Not support dnsmasq 2.63?
We bumped the minimum version of dnsmasq to 2.63 a while ago by this code change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105378/ However, currently we still kind of support earlier version of dnsmasq because we only give a warning and don't exit the program when we find dnsmasq version is less than the minimum version. This causes some confusion and complicates the code since we need to take care different syntax of dnsmasq of different version in dhcp code (Note that the previous version doesn't support tag). I wonder what's your opinion on NOT supporting dnsmasq version less than 2.63 in Juno? I think we can prompt error message and exit the program when we detect invalid version but I would like to gather more thoughts on this one. Thanks, Xu Han ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Not support dnsmasq 2.63?
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Xuhan Peng pengxu...@gmail.com wrote: We bumped the minimum version of dnsmasq to 2.63 a while ago by this code change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105378/ However, currently we still kind of support earlier version of dnsmasq because we only give a warning and don't exit the program when we find dnsmasq version is less than the minimum version. This causes some confusion and complicates the code since we need to take care different syntax of dnsmasq of different version in dhcp code (Note that the previous version doesn't support tag). I wonder what's your opinion on NOT supporting dnsmasq version less than 2.63 in Juno? I think we can prompt error message and exit the program when we detect invalid version but I would like to gather more thoughts on this one. I'm personally ok with this hard limit, but I'd really like to hear from distribution people here to understand their thoughts, including what versions of dnsmasq ship with their products and how this would affect them. Thanks, Kyle Thanks, Xu Han ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
