++ it'd be great to come up with some sort of pattern here that other
projects can follow if they need to implement the same thing. Some sort
of consistency would be great when/if we start seeing more http_check
adoption.
On 09/29/2017 07:56 AM, ruan...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> We are testing the http_check function in Oslo policy, and we figure
> out a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1720354.
>
> We believe that this is due to the Glance part since it doesn't well
> prepare the authorization request (body) to Oslo policy.
>
> Can we put this topic for the next Oslo meeting?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ruan HE
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
