Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptl] Next PTL/TC elections timeframes
Thierry Carrez wrote: >> See: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385951/ > [...] > So we'd like to get extra time for PTLs to chime in on the change and > post their +1 if they are fine with it. We'll wait until the TC meeting > on November 8th to finally approve this. Quick reminder for PTLs to chime in on the review before next week TC meeting ! -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptl] Next PTL/TC elections timeframes
Thierry Carrez wrote: > [...] > As a result of that discussion a proposal was made, with a focus on > limiting the impact of the change, avoid the need to modify Foundation > bylaws, and introduce some flexibility in vote organization. > > See: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385951/ > > The TL;DR: is that PTL elections would continue to be organized around > development cycle boundaries, while TC elections would continue to be > organized relative to OpenStack Summit dates. The net effect is that TC > elections would now be organized separately from PTL elections (rather > than run just the week after). > > Another consequence is that since we'd continue to elect PTLs around > development cycles (and Ocata being a short cycle), the Ocata PTLs would > be renewed early (vote early February). This proposal was discussed on the review and at the TC meeting yesterday. While it has so far attracted broad support, we'd like to give extra time for PTLs to review it. As mentioned by notmyname on the review, the change is effectively changing the term for which the current PTLs just got elected. The charter said "6 months", and with this change in effect the PTLs will actually be renewed before the start of Pike, so in 4 months. So we'd like to get extra time for PTLs to chime in on the change and post their +1 if they are fine with it. We'll wait until the TC meeting on November 8th to finally approve this. Regards, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptl] Next PTL/TC elections timeframes
Hi everyone, At the last TC meeting, the newly-elected (and continuing) TC members has been discussing the future election periods. With the Design Summit functions being split between the OpenStack Summit and the Project Teams Gathering, the current wording in the TC charter around election (which uses "Design Summit" and "Summit" interchangeably) is no longer valid and requires a change. As a result of that discussion a proposal was made, with a focus on limiting the impact of the change, avoid the need to modify Foundation bylaws, and introduce some flexibility in vote organization. See: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385951/ The TL;DR: is that PTL elections would continue to be organized around development cycle boundaries, while TC elections would continue to be organized relative to OpenStack Summit dates. The net effect is that TC elections would now be organized separately from PTL elections (rather than run just the week after). Another consequence is that since we'd continue to elect PTLs around development cycles (and Ocata being a short cycle), the Ocata PTLs would be renewed early (vote early February). Please read more and comment on the review. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
