Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Liberty Design Summit - Proposed room / time layout

2015-04-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thierry Carrez wrote:
 Ben Swartzlander wrote:
 My main request was that the Manila sessions didn't overlap with the
 Cinder sessions, since there are some key people who are involved in
 both projects. It looks like some attempt was made to avoid overlaps
 (the fishbowl sessions at least), but the working sessions could be
 adjusted to overlap less (space permitting). I would prefer that some of
 the Wednesday Manila working sessions were moved to the end of Thursday
 (after the Cinder ones).
 
 I'll shuffle a few things around. No miracle to expect though: there are
 only 18 time slots available and Cinder requested 13, and Manila 7. So
 there will at least be two conflicts.

OK, I pushed a number of changes to accommodate the various requests.
They are highlighted in green in the proposed layout.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VsFdRYGbX5eCde81XDV7TrPBfEC7cgtOFikruYmqbPY/edit#gid=569963128

I expect to make it official tomorrow, so let me know if any of the
changes break the world.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Liberty Design Summit - Proposed room / time layout

2015-04-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
Ben Swartzlander wrote:
 My main request was that the Manila sessions didn't overlap with the
 Cinder sessions, since there are some key people who are involved in
 both projects. It looks like some attempt was made to avoid overlaps
 (the fishbowl sessions at least), but the working sessions could be
 adjusted to overlap less (space permitting). I would prefer that some of
 the Wednesday Manila working sessions were moved to the end of Thursday
 (after the Cinder ones).

I'll shuffle a few things around. No miracle to expect though: there are
only 18 time slots available and Cinder requested 13, and Manila 7. So
there will at least be two conflicts.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Liberty Design Summit - Proposed room / time layout

2015-04-21 Thread Ben Swartzlander

On 04/17/2015 05:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:

Hi PTLs,

Following the slot allocation last week, here is the proposed room layout:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VsFdRYGbX5eCde81XDV7TrPBfEC7cgtOFikruYmqbPY/edit?usp=sharing

It takes into account the following changes:
- Barbican donates on fishbowl room to Security
- Magnum takes one of the available Friday-afternoon sprints

You'll notice that we still have 3 unallocated Friday afternoon sprints,
as well as an unallocated fishbowl room. Ceilometer expressed interest
in having the latter (which would require some shuffling around since
they have a work session at that time). At this point I prefer to keep
it for late adjustments.

If you see major problems with the proposed layout let me know. I may
have missed a blatant issue. It's a bit difficult to find a combination
that works for everyone, especially when you add conference talk
conflicts in the mix, but I'll do my best to accommodate reported issues.


My main request was that the Manila sessions didn't overlap with the 
Cinder sessions, since there are some key people who are involved in 
both projects. It looks like some attempt was made to avoid overlaps 
(the fishbowl sessions at least), but the working sessions could be 
adjusted to overlap less (space permitting). I would prefer that some of 
the Wednesday Manila working sessions were moved to the end of Thursday 
(after the Cinder ones).


-Ben Swartzlander


Barring major issues we'll push this to the Design Summit sched and let
PTLs update the content there as they refine content.

Regards,




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Liberty Design Summit - Proposed room / time layout

2015-04-21 Thread Morgan Fainberg
The work session on wed. at 1350 conflicts with a talk given by keystone
developers: http://sched.co/2qch

Trading this session slot to earlier on Wednesday would be ideal, but if
not I'll plan to use this as a platform to get more people to go to the
talk :)

--Morgan

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Ben Swartzlander b...@swartzlander.org
wrote:

 On 04/17/2015 05:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:

 Hi PTLs,

 Following the slot allocation last week, here is the proposed room layout:


 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VsFdRYGbX5eCde81XDV7TrPBfEC7cgtOFikruYmqbPY/edit?usp=sharing

 It takes into account the following changes:
 - Barbican donates on fishbowl room to Security
 - Magnum takes one of the available Friday-afternoon sprints

 You'll notice that we still have 3 unallocated Friday afternoon sprints,
 as well as an unallocated fishbowl room. Ceilometer expressed interest
 in having the latter (which would require some shuffling around since
 they have a work session at that time). At this point I prefer to keep
 it for late adjustments.

 If you see major problems with the proposed layout let me know. I may
 have missed a blatant issue. It's a bit difficult to find a combination
 that works for everyone, especially when you add conference talk
 conflicts in the mix, but I'll do my best to accommodate reported issues.


 My main request was that the Manila sessions didn't overlap with the
 Cinder sessions, since there are some key people who are involved in both
 projects. It looks like some attempt was made to avoid overlaps (the
 fishbowl sessions at least), but the working sessions could be adjusted to
 overlap less (space permitting). I would prefer that some of the Wednesday
 Manila working sessions were moved to the end of Thursday (after the Cinder
 ones).

 -Ben Swartzlander

  Barring major issues we'll push this to the Design Summit sched and let
 PTLs update the content there as they refine content.

 Regards,



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [all] Liberty Design Summit - Proposed room / time layout

2015-04-17 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi PTLs,

Following the slot allocation last week, here is the proposed room layout:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VsFdRYGbX5eCde81XDV7TrPBfEC7cgtOFikruYmqbPY/edit?usp=sharing

It takes into account the following changes:
- Barbican donates on fishbowl room to Security
- Magnum takes one of the available Friday-afternoon sprints

You'll notice that we still have 3 unallocated Friday afternoon sprints,
as well as an unallocated fishbowl room. Ceilometer expressed interest
in having the latter (which would require some shuffling around since
they have a work session at that time). At this point I prefer to keep
it for late adjustments.

If you see major problems with the proposed layout let me know. I may
have missed a blatant issue. It's a bit difficult to find a combination
that works for everyone, especially when you add conference talk
conflicts in the mix, but I'll do my best to accommodate reported issues.

Barring major issues we'll push this to the Design Summit sched and let
PTLs update the content there as they refine content.

Regards,

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev