[openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0
Hi We're currently blocked on becoming an OpenStack project under the big-tent by the licensing of the 26 OpenStack charms under GPL v3. I'm proposing that we re-license the following code repositories as Apache 2.0: charm-ceilometer charm-ceilometer-agent charm-ceph charm-ceph-mon charm-ceph-osd charm-ceph-radosgw charm-cinder charm-cinder-backup charm-cinder-ceph charm-glance charm-hacluster charm-heat charm-keystone charm-lxd charm-neutron-api charm-neutron-api-odl charm-neutron-gateway charm-neutron-openvswitch charm-nova-cloud-controller charm-nova-compute charm-odl-controller charm-openstack-dashboard charm-openvswitch-odl charm-percona-cluster charm-rabbitmq-server charm-swift-proxy charm-swift-storage The majority of contributors are from Canonical (from whom I have permission to make this switch) with a further 18 contributors from outside of Canonical who I will be directly contacting for approval in gerrit as reviews are raised for each repository. Any new charms and supporting repositories will be licensed under Apache 2.0 from the outset. Cheers James __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0
Hi James, Le 2016-06-08 12:20, James Page a écrit : Hi We're currently blocked on becoming an OpenStack project under the big-tent by the licensing of the 26 OpenStack charms under GPL v3. I'm proposing that we re-license the following code repositories as Apache 2.0: charm-ceilometer charm-ceilometer-agent charm-ceph charm-ceph-mon charm-ceph-osd charm-ceph-radosgw charm-cinder charm-cinder-backup charm-cinder-ceph charm-glance charm-hacluster charm-heat charm-keystone charm-lxd charm-neutron-api charm-neutron-api-odl charm-neutron-gateway charm-neutron-openvswitch charm-nova-cloud-controller charm-nova-compute charm-odl-controller charm-openstack-dashboard charm-openvswitch-odl charm-percona-cluster charm-rabbitmq-server charm-swift-proxy charm-swift-storage The majority of contributors are from Canonical (from whom I have permission to make this switch) with a further 18 contributors from outside of Canonical who I will be directly contacting for approval in gerrit as reviews are raised for each repository. No problem on my side to change the license to apache 2.0. Thanks for checking with us. Gauvain Any new charms and supporting repositories will be licensed under Apache 2.0 from the outset. Cheers James __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Gauvain Pocentek Objectif Libre - Infrastructure et Formations Linux http://www.objectif-libre.com phone: +33 972 54 98 01 / +33 611 60 84 25 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0
> On 8 Jun 2016, at 11:20, James Page wrote: > > The majority of contributors are from Canonical (from whom I have permission > to make this switch) with a further 18 contributors from outside of Canonical > who I will be directly contacting for approval in gerrit as reviews are > raised for each repository. Hey James, I’m happy for you to relicense my contributions as Apache 2.0. Cory signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0
Me too. On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:32 AM Cory Benfield wrote: > > > On 8 Jun 2016, at 11:20, James Page wrote: > > > > The majority of contributors are from Canonical (from whom I have > permission to make this switch) with a further 18 contributors from outside > of Canonical who I will be directly contacting for approval in gerrit as > reviews are raised for each repository. > > Hey James, > > I’m happy for you to relicense my contributions as Apache 2.0. > > Cory > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0
Hey James No problem on my side for this change. Regards On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > Me too. > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:32 AM Cory Benfield wrote: > >> >> > On 8 Jun 2016, at 11:20, James Page wrote: >> > >> > The majority of contributors are from Canonical (from whom I have >> permission to make this switch) with a further 18 contributors from outside >> of Canonical who I will be directly contacting for approval in gerrit as >> reviews are raised for each repository. >> >> Hey James, >> >> I’m happy for you to relicense my contributions as Apache 2.0. >> >> Cory >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Bilal Baqar MTS - PLUMgrid Inc. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Bilal Baqar wrote: > Hey James > > No problem on my side for this change. > > Regards > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > >> Me too. >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:32 AM Cory Benfield wrote: >> >>> >>> > On 8 Jun 2016, at 11:20, James Page wrote: >>> > >>> > The majority of contributors are from Canonical (from whom I have >>> permission to make this switch) with a further 18 contributors from outside >>> of Canonical who I will be directly contacting for approval in gerrit as >>> reviews are raised for each repository. >>> >> No problem on my side either. > >>> Hey James, >>> >>> I’m happy for you to relicense my contributions as Apache 2.0. >>> >>> Cory >>> >>> >>> __ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: >>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > > -- > Bilal Baqar > MTS - PLUMgrid Inc. > > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0
Hello James, No problem on my side. Regards, Andrey. On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 1:20 PM, James Page wrote: > Hi > > We're currently blocked on becoming an OpenStack project under the big-tent > by the licensing of the 26 OpenStack charms under GPL v3. > > I'm proposing that we re-license the following code repositories as Apache > 2.0: > > charm-ceilometer > charm-ceilometer-agent > charm-ceph > charm-ceph-mon > charm-ceph-osd > charm-ceph-radosgw > charm-cinder > charm-cinder-backup > charm-cinder-ceph > charm-glance > charm-hacluster > charm-heat > charm-keystone > charm-lxd > charm-neutron-api > charm-neutron-api-odl > charm-neutron-gateway > charm-neutron-openvswitch > charm-nova-cloud-controller > charm-nova-compute > charm-odl-controller > charm-openstack-dashboard > charm-openvswitch-odl > charm-percona-cluster > charm-rabbitmq-server > charm-swift-proxy > charm-swift-storage > > The majority of contributors are from Canonical (from whom I have permission > to make this switch) with a further 18 contributors from outside of > Canonical who I will be directly contacting for approval in gerrit as > reviews are raised for each repository. > > Any new charms and supporting repositories will be licensed under Apache 2.0 > from the outset. > > Cheers > > James > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Kind regards, Andrey Pavlov. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0
Hi James, No problem on my side. This is a welcome change! Regards, Gabriel Samfira Cloudbase Solutions SRL On Mi, 2016-06-08 at 10:20 +, James Page wrote: > Hi > > We're currently blocked on becoming an OpenStack project under the > big-tent by the licensing of the 26 OpenStack charms under GPL v3. > > I'm proposing that we re-license the following code repositories as > Apache 2.0: > > charm-ceilometer > charm-ceilometer-agent > charm-ceph > charm-ceph-mon > charm-ceph-osd > charm-ceph-radosgw > charm-cinder > charm-cinder-backup > charm-cinder-ceph > charm-glance > charm-hacluster > charm-heat > charm-keystone > charm-lxd > charm-neutron-api > charm-neutron-api-odl > charm-neutron-gateway > charm-neutron-openvswitch > charm-nova-cloud-controller > charm-nova-compute > charm-odl-controller > charm-openstack-dashboard > charm-openvswitch-odl > charm-percona-cluster > charm-rabbitmq-server > charm-swift-proxy > charm-swift-storage > > The majority of contributors are from Canonical (from whom I have > permission to make this switch) with a further 18 contributors from > outside of Canonical who I will be directly contacting for approval > in gerrit as reviews are raised for each repository. > > Any new charms and supporting repositories will be licensed under > Apache 2.0 from the outset. > > Cheers > > James > _ > _ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs > cribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
