Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][novaclient] heat gate is broken because of new novaclient
On 04/22/2015 07:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 04/22/2015 04:09 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote: Hi Can we please have a new release of novaclient (after the below fix)? Heat's unit tests pass fine with: python-novaclient (2.23.0) but python-novaclient 2.24.0 introduces this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1437244 We still need this patch in: https://review.openstack.org/176228 We should also update requirements to exclude 2.24.0 I've got an alternate fix here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176252/ I was -1 for a long time on the complex repr stuff in the introducing patch, and I think that's just going to get us into other problems down the road. The repr fall back for Resource is totally fine, and we should just use that. python-novaclient 2.24.1 has been released with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176252/ in place. Hopefully that fixes things for Heat. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][novaclient] heat gate is broken because of new novaclient
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 04/22/2015 07:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 04/22/2015 04:09 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote: Hi Can we please have a new release of novaclient (after the below fix)? Heat's unit tests pass fine with: python-novaclient (2.23.0) but python-novaclient 2.24.0 introduces this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1437244 We still need this patch in: https://review.openstack.org/176228 We should also update requirements to exclude 2.24.0 I've got an alternate fix here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176252/ I was -1 for a long time on the complex repr stuff in the introducing patch, and I think that's just going to get us into other problems down the road. The repr fall back for Resource is totally fine, and we should just use that. python-novaclient 2.24.1 has been released with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176252/ in place. Hopefully that fixes things for Heat. Thanks Sean! Shouldn't we also exclude 2.24.0 from requirements? -Angus -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [heat][novaclient] heat gate is broken because of new novaclient
Hi Can we please have a new release of novaclient (after the below fix)? Heat's unit tests pass fine with: python-novaclient (2.23.0) but python-novaclient 2.24.0 introduces this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1437244 We still need this patch in: https://review.openstack.org/176228 We should also update requirements to exclude 2.24.0 Thanks Angus __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][novaclient] heat gate is broken because of new novaclient
On 04/22/2015 04:09 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote: Hi Can we please have a new release of novaclient (after the below fix)? Heat's unit tests pass fine with: python-novaclient (2.23.0) but python-novaclient 2.24.0 introduces this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1437244 We still need this patch in: https://review.openstack.org/176228 We should also update requirements to exclude 2.24.0 I've got an alternate fix here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176252/ I was -1 for a long time on the complex repr stuff in the introducing patch, and I think that's just going to get us into other problems down the road. The repr fall back for Resource is totally fine, and we should just use that. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
