Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][requirements] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/heat failed

2016-08-01 Thread Ethan Lynn 
Hi Tony,
  patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347634/ 
  for master branch is merged, patch 
for mitaka https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347637/ and for liberty 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347639/ 
 are being review.

Best Regards,
Ethan Lynn
xuanlangj...@gmail.com




> On Jul 28, 2016, at 02:19, Tony Breeds  wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:20:38PM +0800, Ethan Lynn wrote:
>> Hi Tony,
>>  I submit a patch to use upper-constraints for review,
>>  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347639/
>>   . Let’s wait for the feedback
>>  and results.
> 
> Thanks.  I see that you have reviews for master, mitaka and liberty.  Thanks 
> for doign that.
> 
> Once the mast patch merges let me know and I'll help approve the stable 
> patches
> 
> Yours Tony.
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][requirements] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/heat failed

2016-07-27 Thread Tony Breeds 
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:20:38PM +0800, Ethan Lynn wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>   I submit a patch to use upper-constraints for review,
>   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347639/
>    . Let’s wait for the feedback
>   and results.

Thanks.  I see that you have reviews for master, mitaka and liberty.  Thanks 
for doign that.

Once the mast patch merges let me know and I'll help approve the stable patches

Yours Tony.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][requirements] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/heat failed

2016-07-27 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka 

Ethan Lynn  wrote:


Hi Tony,
  I submit a patch to use upper-constraints for review, 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347639/ . Let’s wait for the feedback and 
results.


Why is it sent to liberty? isn’t master affected too?

I see no constraints applied in master:  
https://github.com/openstack/heat/blob/master/tox.ini#L9


Ihar

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][requirements] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/heat failed

2016-07-27 Thread Ethan Lynn 
Hi Tony,
  I submit a patch to use upper-constraints for review, 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347639/ 
 . Let’s wait for the feedback and 
results.



Best Regards,
Ethan Lynn
xuanlangj...@gmail.com




> On Jul 27, 2016, at 07:47, Tony Breeds  wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:44:06AM +, A mailing list for the OpenStack 
> Stable Branch test reports. wrote:
>> Build failed.
>> 
>> - periodic-heat-docs-liberty 
>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-heat-docs-liberty/6835807/
>>  : SUCCESS in 10m 19s
>> - periodic-heat-python27-db-liberty 
>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-heat-python27-db-liberty/0dd2d48/
>>  : FAILURE in 8m 19s
> 
> This job started failing recently [1] with the following error[2]:
> novaclient.exceptions.Forbidden: 'novaclient.v2.client.Client' is not 
> designed to be initialized directly. It is inner class of novaclient. You 
> should use 'novaclient.client.Client' instead. Related lp bug-report: 1493576 
> (HTTP 403)
> 
> This is because the heat tests on the liberty branch are using the novaclient 
> from master.
> 
> As I see it there are 2 options
> 1. Add upper-constraints support to heat, this will ensure that all client
>   libraries are used appropriately per release.
> 2. Backport variations of:
>I8f42e4ab446b0369d4c53fa4d3a734689ab541e3
>I428abb4ca05847da8ffc2da7157aa5c34263a205
>  To mitaka and liberty
> 3. Something else I haven't thought of
> 
> From a stable-maint point of view option 1 is preferred.  Is there anything
> specific to heat that would prevent it from working with upper-constraints
> enabled?
> 
> Yours Tony.
> 
> [1] 
> http://status.openstack.org//openstack-health/#/job/periodic-heat-python27-db-liberty
> [2] 
> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-heat-python27-db-liberty/0dd2d48/console.html#_2016-07-26_05_35_18_970003
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [heat][requirements] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/heat failed

2016-07-26 Thread Tony Breeds 
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:44:06AM +, A mailing list for the OpenStack 
Stable Branch test reports. wrote:
> Build failed.
> 
> - periodic-heat-docs-liberty 
> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-heat-docs-liberty/6835807/ 
> : SUCCESS in 10m 19s
> - periodic-heat-python27-db-liberty 
> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-heat-python27-db-liberty/0dd2d48/
>  : FAILURE in 8m 19s

This job started failing recently [1] with the following error[2]:
 novaclient.exceptions.Forbidden: 'novaclient.v2.client.Client' is not designed 
to be initialized directly. It is inner class of novaclient. You should use 
'novaclient.client.Client' instead. Related lp bug-report: 1493576 (HTTP 403)

This is because the heat tests on the liberty branch are using the novaclient 
from master.

As I see it there are 2 options
1. Add upper-constraints support to heat, this will ensure that all client
   libraries are used appropriately per release.
2. Backport variations of:
I8f42e4ab446b0369d4c53fa4d3a734689ab541e3
I428abb4ca05847da8ffc2da7157aa5c34263a205
  To mitaka and liberty
3. Something else I haven't thought of

From a stable-maint point of view option 1 is preferred.  Is there anything
specific to heat that would prevent it from working with upper-constraints
enabled?

Yours Tony.

[1] 
http://status.openstack.org//openstack-health/#/job/periodic-heat-python27-db-liberty
[2] 
http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-heat-python27-db-liberty/0dd2d48/console.html#_2016-07-26_05_35_18_970003


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev