Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Polygerrit
On 10/15/2018 07:08 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2018-10-15 11:54:28 +0100 (+0100), Stephen Finucane wrote: [...] As an aside, are there any plans to enable PolyGerrit [1] in the OpenStack Gerrit instance? [...] I believe so, but first we need to upgrade to a newer Gerrit version which provides it (that in turn requires a newer Java which needs a server built from a newer distro version, which is all we've gotten through on the upgrade plan so far). I'm working on this now, so hopefully we should have an ETA soonish. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Polygerrit (was: [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo)
On 2018-10-15 11:54:28 +0100 (+0100), Stephen Finucane wrote: [...] > As an aside, are there any plans to enable PolyGerrit [1] in the > OpenStack Gerrit instance? [...] I believe so, but first we need to upgrade to a newer Gerrit version which provides it (that in turn requires a newer Java which needs a server built from a newer distro version, which is all we've gotten through on the upgrade plan so far). -- Jeremy Stanley signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [infra] Polygerrit (was: [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo)
On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 13:35 -0500, Greg Hill wrote: > > If it's just about preferring the pull request workflow versus the > > Gerrit rebase workflow, just say so. Same for just preferring the Github > > UI versus Gerrit's UI (which I agree is awful). > > I mean, yes, I personally prefer the Github UI and workflow, but that > was not a primary consideration. I got used to using gerrit well > enough. It was mostly the There's also a sense that if a project is > in the Openstack umbrella, it's not useful outside Openstack, and > Taskflow is designed to be a general purpose library. The hope is > that just making it a regular open source project might attract more > users and contributors. This may or may not bear out, but as it is, > there's no real benefit to staying an openstack project on this front > since nobody is actively working on it within the community. As an aside, are there any plans to enable PolyGerrit [1] in the OpenStack Gerrit instance? The Gerrit documentation lists the feature as a beta [2], but I suspect that might be out-of-date given how long it's been around and folks suggesting the opposite elsewhere [3]. Stephen [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsPhoPGUsss [2] https://www.gerritcodereview.com/dev-polygerrit.html# [3] https://gitenterprise.me/2018/04/23/gerrithub-adopts-100-polygerrit/ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
