Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Try to introduce RFC mechanism to CI.

[Jeremy Stanley]

On 2015-10-09 18:06:55 +0800 (+0800), Tang Chen wrote:
[...]
> It is just a waste of resource if reviewers are discussing about
> where this function should be, or what the function should be
> named. After all these details are agreed on, run the CI.
[...]

As one of the people maintaining the upstream CI and helping
coordinate our resources/quotas, I don't see that providing early
test feedback is a waste. We're steadily increasing the instance
quotas available to us, so check pipeline utilization should
continue to become less and less of a concern anyway.

For a change which is still under debate, feel free to simply ignore
test results until you get it to a point where you see them start to
become relevant.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Try to introduce RFC mechanism to CI.

[Znoinski, Waldemar]

 >-Original Message-
 >From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org]
 >Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 1:17 PM
 >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 ><openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
 >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Try to introduce RFC mechanism to CI.
 >
 >On 2015-10-09 18:06:55 +0800 (+0800), Tang Chen wrote:
 >[...]
 >> It is just a waste of resource if reviewers are discussing about where
 >> this function should be, or what the function should be named. After
 >> all these details are agreed on, run the CI.
 >[...]
 
[WZ] I'm maintaining 2 3rdparty CIs here, for Nova and Neutron each, and to me 
there's no big difference in maintaining/supporting a CI that runs 5 or 150 
times a day. The only difference may be in resources required to keep up with 
the Gerrit stream. In my opinion (3rdparty) CIs should help early-discover the 
problems so should run on all patchsets as they appear - that's their main 
purpose to me.

 >As one of the people maintaining the upstream CI and helping coordinate our
 >resources/quotas, I don't see that providing early test feedback is a waste.
 >We're steadily increasing the instance quotas available to us, so check
 >pipeline utilization should continue to become less and less of a concern
 >anyway.
 >
 >For a change which is still under debate, feel free to simply ignore test 
 >results
 >until you get it to a point where you see them start to become relevant.
 >--
 >Jeremy Stanley
 >
 >__
 >
 >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 >Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
 >requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Intel Shannon Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263
Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole 
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is 
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender and delete all copies.



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev