Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Jeffrey Zhang]

It is hard for kolla to support both release of Ubuntu.

Because docker separate the image build from deploy. We have no idea about
the Ubuntu version in Dockerfile
except runing command to test it. We build the image by using Dockerfile.
If we want support multi release of
Ubuntu, the Dockerfile will looks like:


RUN if [[ $(cat /etc/os-release | awk '/VERSION_ID/{print $2}') == '14.04'
]] then; \
apt-get install openjdk-7-jre \
elif $(cat /etc/os-release | awk '/VERSION_ID/{print $2}') == '16.04'
]] then; \
apt-get install openjdk-8-jre
fi

This is still possible. Think about how to use COPY in the Dockerfile to
support multi Ubuntu release? like

COPY sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list

As far as I can find out is:

COPY sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN if [[ $(cat /etc/os-release | awk '/VERSION_ID/{print $2}') == '14.04'
]] then; \
sed -i 's/UBUNTU_RELEASE/trusty/' /etc/apt/sources.list \
elif $(cat /etc/os-release | awk '/VERSION_ID/{print $2}') == '16.04'
]] then; \
sed -i 's/UBUNTU_RELEASE/xenial/' /etc/apt/sources.list \
fi

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Jesse Pretorius 
wrote:

> On 6 May 2016 at 16:27, Jeffrey Zhang  wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Jesse Pretorius <
>> jesse.pretor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW OpenStack-Ansible is choosing to support deployment on both Ubuntu
>>> 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.04 LTS for both the Newton and Ocata cycles, with
>>> the current proposal to drop it in P. The intent is to provide our
>>> deployers the opportunity to transition with a mixed deployment.
>>
>>
>> Are you meaning the host/baremetal OS? ​the openstack-ansible deploy the
>> OpenStack in LXC.​
>> So it really do not care about the host machine's OS. Kolla is not care
>> about it, too.
>> I think the openstack-ansible a specify LXC image, and do not support
>> multi base image.
>>
>> if not, could u provide any prove for this?
>>
>
> OSA supports the implementation of OpenStack on bare metal or in LXC
> machine containers, so we need to cater for both. When an LXC machine
> container is deployed we've chosen to use the strategy of always
> implementing the same OS in the container as is implemented on the host.
> This simplifies our testing greatly.
>
> For the sake of background information, seeing as you asked, the base LXC
> image we're using comes from https://images.linuxcontainers.org/ giving
> us the ability to support multiple versions, multiple distributions and
> multiple architectures, and it's especially nifty that the entire image
> build process is open source and therefore can be implemented and
> customised by our deployers.
>
> I guess this is similar for Kolla in a different way because the image
> pipeline is defined by the project and implemented through the docker image
> building processes.
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Jeffrey Zhang
Blog: http://xcodest.me
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Steven Dake (stdake)]

On 5/6/16, 8:32 AM, "Emilien Macchi"  wrote:

>On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Jesse Pretorius
> wrote:
>> On 4 May 2016 at 19:21, Emilien Macchi  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Jeffrey Zhang 
>>> wrote:
>>> > I'd like to lock the tag version in certain branch. One branch only
>>> > support
>>> > one
>>> > distro release.
>>> >
>>> > For example, the mitaka branch only build on Trusty and the
>>> > master/newton
>>> > branch
>>> > only build on Xenial.
>>> >
>>> > So, the branch and OS matrix should like ( fix me and the ?)
>>> >
>>> >   Ubuntu CentOS Debian  OracleLinux
>>> > Liberty14.047  ? ?
>>> > Mitaka 14.047  ? ?
>>> > Master 16.047  ? ?
>>>
>>> FWIW, this is what we plan to do in Puppet OpenStack CI (except we
>>> don't gate on OracleLinux & Debian).
>>
>>
>> FWIW OpenStack-Ansible is choosing to support deployment on both Ubuntu
>> 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.04 LTS for both the Newton and Ocata cycles,
>>with
>> the current proposal to drop it in P. The intent is to provide our
>>deployers
>> the opportunity to transition with a mixed deployment.
>
>AFIK Newton can only be deployed on Xenial, there won't be support on
>Trusty (iirc my conversation with UCA folks).
>So I'm curious how you're going to do. Are you building your own packages?

OK well this changes things.  I hadn't heard of this.  In this case, I
think we need to implement whatever is rationale, which is probably trusty
and xenial side by side.

Do you have a reference to the discussion about Xenial?

Regards
-steve

>
>Puppet OpenStack CI is using upstream packaging provided by Ubuntu (UCA).
>
>> Obviously YMMV and our plans may change based on the actual
>>implementation
>> details.
>>
>> 
>>_
>>_
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: 
>>openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Emilien Macchi
>
>__
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Jesse Pretorius]

On 6 May 2016 at 16:27, Jeffrey Zhang  wrote:

>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Jesse Pretorius  > wrote:
>
>> FWIW OpenStack-Ansible is choosing to support deployment on both Ubuntu
>> 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.04 LTS for both the Newton and Ocata cycles, with
>> the current proposal to drop it in P. The intent is to provide our
>> deployers the opportunity to transition with a mixed deployment.
>
>
> Are you meaning the host/baremetal OS? ​the openstack-ansible deploy the
> OpenStack in LXC.​
> So it really do not care about the host machine's OS. Kolla is not care
> about it, too.
> I think the openstack-ansible a specify LXC image, and do not support
> multi base image.
>
> if not, could u provide any prove for this?
>

OSA supports the implementation of OpenStack on bare metal or in LXC
machine containers, so we need to cater for both. When an LXC machine
container is deployed we've chosen to use the strategy of always
implementing the same OS in the container as is implemented on the host.
This simplifies our testing greatly.

For the sake of background information, seeing as you asked, the base LXC
image we're using comes from https://images.linuxcontainers.org/ giving us
the ability to support multiple versions, multiple distributions and
multiple architectures, and it's especially nifty that the entire image
build process is open source and therefore can be implemented and
customised by our deployers.

I guess this is similar for Kolla in a different way because the image
pipeline is defined by the project and implemented through the docker image
building processes.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Ian Cordasco]

 

-Original Message-
From: Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com>
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Date: May 6, 2016 at 10:34:29
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Jesse Pretorius
> wrote:
> > On 4 May 2016 at 19:21, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Jeffrey Zhang  
> >> wrote:
> >> > I'd like to lock the tag version in certain branch. One branch only
> >> > support
> >> > one
> >> > distro release.
> >> >
> >> > For example, the mitaka branch only build on Trusty and the
> >> > master/newton
> >> > branch
> >> > only build on Xenial.
> >> >
> >> > So, the branch and OS matrix should like ( fix me and the ?)
> >> >
> >> > Ubuntu CentOS Debian OracleLinux
> >> > Liberty 14.04 7 ? ?
> >> > Mitaka 14.04 7 ? ?
> >> > Master 16.04 7 ? ?
> >>
> >> FWIW, this is what we plan to do in Puppet OpenStack CI (except we
> >> don't gate on OracleLinux & Debian).
> >
> >
> > FWIW OpenStack-Ansible is choosing to support deployment on both Ubuntu
> > 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.04 LTS for both the Newton and Ocata cycles, with
> > the current proposal to drop it in P. The intent is to provide our deployers
> > the opportunity to transition with a mixed deployment.
>  
> AFIK Newton can only be deployed on Xenial, there won't be support on
> Trusty (iirc my conversation with UCA folks).
> So I'm curious how you're going to do. Are you building your own packages?
>  
> Puppet OpenStack CI is using upstream packaging provided by Ubuntu (UCA).

OSA installs from source for OpenStack services and all Python dependencies. 
This is how it can support both simultaneously.

--  
Ian Cordasco


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Emilien Macchi]

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Jesse Pretorius
 wrote:
> On 4 May 2016 at 19:21, Emilien Macchi  wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Jeffrey Zhang 
>> wrote:
>> > I'd like to lock the tag version in certain branch. One branch only
>> > support
>> > one
>> > distro release.
>> >
>> > For example, the mitaka branch only build on Trusty and the
>> > master/newton
>> > branch
>> > only build on Xenial.
>> >
>> > So, the branch and OS matrix should like ( fix me and the ?)
>> >
>> >   Ubuntu CentOS Debian  OracleLinux
>> > Liberty14.047  ? ?
>> > Mitaka 14.047  ? ?
>> > Master 16.047  ? ?
>>
>> FWIW, this is what we plan to do in Puppet OpenStack CI (except we
>> don't gate on OracleLinux & Debian).
>
>
> FWIW OpenStack-Ansible is choosing to support deployment on both Ubuntu
> 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.04 LTS for both the Newton and Ocata cycles, with
> the current proposal to drop it in P. The intent is to provide our deployers
> the opportunity to transition with a mixed deployment.

AFIK Newton can only be deployed on Xenial, there won't be support on
Trusty (iirc my conversation with UCA folks).
So I'm curious how you're going to do. Are you building your own packages?

Puppet OpenStack CI is using upstream packaging provided by Ubuntu (UCA).

> Obviously YMMV and our plans may change based on the actual implementation
> details.
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Emilien Macchi

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Jeffrey Zhang]

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Jesse Pretorius 
wrote:

> FWIW OpenStack-Ansible is choosing to support deployment on both Ubuntu
> 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.04 LTS for both the Newton and Ocata cycles, with
> the current proposal to drop it in P. The intent is to provide our
> deployers the opportunity to transition with a mixed deployment.


Are you meaning the host/baremetal OS? ​the openstack-ansible deploy the
OpenStack in LXC.​
So it really do not care about the host machine's OS. Kolla is not care
about it, too.
I think the openstack-ansible a specify LXC image, and do not support multi
base image.

if not, could u provide any prove for this?

-- 
Regards,
Jeffrey Zhang
Blog: http://xcodest.me
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Jesse Pretorius]

On 4 May 2016 at 19:21, Emilien Macchi  wrote:

> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Jeffrey Zhang 
> wrote:
> > I'd like to lock the tag version in certain branch. One branch only
> support
> > one
> > distro release.
> >
> > For example, the mitaka branch only build on Trusty and the master/newton
> > branch
> > only build on Xenial.
> >
> > So, the branch and OS matrix should like ( fix me and the ?)
> >
> >   Ubuntu CentOS Debian  OracleLinux
> > Liberty14.047  ? ?
> > Mitaka 14.047  ? ?
> > Master 16.047  ? ?
>
> FWIW, this is what we plan to do in Puppet OpenStack CI (except we
> don't gate on OracleLinux & Debian).


FWIW OpenStack-Ansible is choosing to support deployment on both Ubuntu
14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.04 LTS for both the Newton and Ocata cycles, with
the current proposal to drop it in P. The intent is to provide our
deployers the opportunity to transition with a mixed deployment.

Obviously YMMV and our plans may change based on the actual implementation
details.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Emilien Macchi]

FYI all blockers that we have in puppet CI:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-xenial

HTH

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Carlos Cesario - Tecnomega
<ccesa...@tecnomega.com.br> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Based in that request, it follows a proposed patch to add support to Ubuntu 
> Xenial - 16.04.
>
> For while, instead to locking distro version in branches this can be used, 
> since Mitaka version is supported by Ubuntu Trusty and Xenial versions.
>
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/496142/
>
> Comments and tests are welcome. If is it ok, I can provide a patch set.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Carlos
>
> __
>
>
> 
> De: Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com>
> Enviado: quarta-feira, 4 de maio de 2016 15:21:14
> Para: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Assunto: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to lock the tag version in certain branch. One branch only support
>> one
>> distro release.
>>
>> For example, the mitaka branch only build on Trusty and the master/newton
>> branch
>> only build on Xenial.
>>
>> So, the branch and OS matrix should like ( fix me and the ?)
>>
>>   Ubuntu CentOS Debian  OracleLinux
>> Liberty14.047  ? ?
>> Mitaka 14.047  ? ?
>> Master 16.047  ? ?
>
> FWIW, this is what we plan to do in Puppet OpenStack CI (except we
> don't gate on OracleLinux & Debian).
>
>> this is enough and easy to maintain.
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Mauricio Lima <mauricioli...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Which will be the default when kolla begin to support xenial? Xenial or
>>> Trusty?
>>>
>>> One proposal is to support both, at least in this beginning and just do
>>> some checks to get which version that the user is using.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Jeffrey Zhang
>> Blog: http://xcodest.me
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Emilien Macchi
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Emilien Macchi

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Carlos Cesario - Tecnomega]

Hi folks,

Based in that request, it follows a proposed patch to add support to Ubuntu 
Xenial - 16.04.

For while, instead to locking distro version in branches this can be used, 
since Mitaka version is supported by Ubuntu Trusty and Xenial versions.

http://paste.openstack.org/show/496142/

Comments and tests are welcome. If is it ok, I can provide a patch set.

Best regards,

Carlos

__



De: Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com>
Enviado: quarta-feira, 4 de maio de 2016 15:21:14
Para: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Assunto: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to lock the tag version in certain branch. One branch only support
> one
> distro release.
>
> For example, the mitaka branch only build on Trusty and the master/newton
> branch
> only build on Xenial.
>
> So, the branch and OS matrix should like ( fix me and the ?)
>
>   Ubuntu CentOS Debian  OracleLinux
> Liberty14.047  ? ?
> Mitaka 14.047  ? ?
> Master 16.047  ? ?

FWIW, this is what we plan to do in Puppet OpenStack CI (except we
don't gate on OracleLinux & Debian).

> this is enough and easy to maintain.
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Mauricio Lima <mauricioli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Which will be the default when kolla begin to support xenial? Xenial or
>> Trusty?
>>
>> One proposal is to support both, at least in this beginning and just do
>> some checks to get which version that the user is using.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Jeffrey Zhang
> Blog: http://xcodest.me
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



--
Emilien Macchi

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Emilien Macchi]

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Jeffrey Zhang  wrote:
> I'd like to lock the tag version in certain branch. One branch only support
> one
> distro release.
>
> For example, the mitaka branch only build on Trusty and the master/newton
> branch
> only build on Xenial.
>
> So, the branch and OS matrix should like ( fix me and the ?)
>
>   Ubuntu CentOS Debian  OracleLinux
> Liberty14.047  ? ?
> Mitaka 14.047  ? ?
> Master 16.047  ? ?

FWIW, this is what we plan to do in Puppet OpenStack CI (except we
don't gate on OracleLinux & Debian).

> this is enough and easy to maintain.
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Mauricio Lima 
> wrote:
>>
>> Which will be the default when kolla begin to support xenial? Xenial or
>> Trusty?
>>
>> One proposal is to support both, at least in this beginning and just do
>> some checks to get which version that the user is using.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Jeffrey Zhang
> Blog: http://xcodest.me
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Emilien Macchi

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Jeffrey Zhang]

I'd like to lock the tag version in certain branch. One branch only support
one
distro release.

For example, the mitaka branch only build on Trusty and the master/newton
branch
only build on Xenial.

So, the branch and OS matrix should like ( fix me and the ?)

  Ubuntu CentOS Debian  OracleLinux
Liberty14.047  ? ?
Mitaka 14.047  ? ?
Master 16.047  ? ?

this is enough and easy to maintain.

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Mauricio Lima 
wrote:

> Which will be the default when kolla begin to support xenial? Xenial or
> Trusty?
>
> One proposal is to support both, at least in this beginning and just do
> some checks to get which version that the user is using.
>
> Regards,
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Jeffrey Zhang
Blog: http://xcodest.me
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

[Mauricio Lima]

Which will be the default when kolla begin to support xenial? Xenial or
Trusty?

One proposal is to support both, at least in this beginning and just do
some checks to get which version that the user is using.

Regards,
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev