Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum
Thanks All Magnum Guys, It is my honor to work with all of you to make Magnum Better. :) Thanks Stdake. Best Wishes, Kai Qiang Wu (吴开强 Kennan） IBM China System and Technology Lab, Beijing E-mail: wk...@cn.ibm.com Tel: 86-10-82451647 Address: Building 28(Ring Building), ZhongGuanCun Software Park, No.8 Dong Bei Wang West Road, Haidian District Beijing P.R.China 100193 Follow your heart. You are miracle! From: Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 06/07/2015 08:03 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum Kennan, Welcome to the magnum-core team! Regards -steve From: Steven Dake std...@cisco.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:56 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum Hi core team, Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu’s nickname) has really done a nice job in Magnum contributions. I would like to propose Kennan for the core reviewer team. I don’t think we necessarily need more core reviewers on Magnum, but Kennan has demonstrated a big commitment to Magnum and is a welcome addition in my opinion. For the lifetime of the project, Kennan has contributed 8% of the reviews, and 8% of the commits. Kennan is also active in IRC. He meets my definition of what a core developer for Magnum should be. Consider my proposal to be a +1 vote. Please vote +1 to approve or vote �C1 to veto. A single �C1 vote acts as a veto, meaning Kennan would not be approved for the core team. I believe we require 3 +1 core votes presently, but since our core team is larger now then when we started, I’d like to propose at our next team meeting we formally define the process by which we accept new cores post this proposal for Magnum into the magnum-core group and document it in our wiki. I’ll leave voting open for 1 week until June 6th to permit appropriate time for the core team to vote. If there is a unanimous decision or veto prior to that date, I’ll close voting and make the appropriate changes in gerrit as appropriate. Thanks -steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum
Kennan, Welcome to the magnum-core team! Regards -steve From: Steven Dake std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:56 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum Hi core team, Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu’s nickname) has really done a nice job in Magnum contributions. I would like to propose Kennan for the core reviewer team. I don’t think we necessarily need more core reviewers on Magnum, but Kennan has demonstrated a big commitment to Magnum and is a welcome addition in my opinion. For the lifetime of the project, Kennan has contributed 8% of the reviews, and 8% of the commits. Kennan is also active in IRC. He meets my definition of what a core developer for Magnum should be. Consider my proposal to be a +1 vote. Please vote +1 to approve or vote –1 to veto. A single –1 vote acts as a veto, meaning Kennan would not be approved for the core team. I believe we require 3 +1 core votes presently, but since our core team is larger now then when we started, I’d like to propose at our next team meeting we formally define the process by which we accept new cores post this proposal for Magnum into the magnum-core group and document it in our wiki. I’ll leave voting open for 1 week until June 6th to permit appropriate time for the core team to vote. If there is a unanimous decision or veto prior to that date, I’ll close voting and make the appropriate changes in gerrit as appropriate. Thanks -steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum
GRATZ, Kai Qiang! On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com wrote: Kennan, Welcome to the magnum-core team! Regards -steve From: Steven Dake std...@cisco.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:56 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum Hi core team, Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu’s nickname) has really done a nice job in Magnum contributions. I would like to propose Kennan for the core reviewer team. I don’t think we necessarily need more core reviewers on Magnum, but Kennan has demonstrated a big commitment to Magnum and is a welcome addition in my opinion. For the lifetime of the project, Kennan has contributed 8% of the reviews, and 8% of the commits. Kennan is also active in IRC. He meets my definition of what a core developer for Magnum should be. Consider my proposal to be a +1 vote. Please vote +1 to approve or vote –1 to veto. A single –1 vote acts as a veto, meaning Kennan would not be approved for the core team. I believe we require 3 +1 core votes presently, but since our core team is larger now then when we started, I’d like to propose at our next team meeting we formally define the process by which we accept new cores post this proposal for Magnum into the magnum-core group and document it in our wiki. I’ll leave voting open for 1 week until June 6th to permit appropriate time for the core team to vote. If there is a unanimous decision or veto prior to that date, I’ll close voting and make the appropriate changes in gerrit as appropriate. Thanks -steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum
+1 On May 31, 2015, at 12:56 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com wrote: Hi core team, Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu’s nickname) has really done a nice job in Magnum contributions. I would like to propose Kennan for the core reviewer team. I don’t think we necessarily need more core reviewers on Magnum, but Kennan has demonstrated a big commitment to Magnum and is a welcome addition in my opinion. For the lifetime of the project, Kennan has contributed 8% of the reviews, and 8% of the commits. Kennan is also active in IRC. He meets my definition of what a core developer for Magnum should be. Consider my proposal to be a +1 vote. Please vote +1 to approve or vote –1 to veto. A single –1 vote acts as a veto, meaning Kennan would not be approved for the core team. I believe we require 3 +1 core votes presently, but since our core team is larger now then when we started, I’d like to propose at our next team meeting we formally define the process by which we accept new cores post this proposal for Magnum into the magnum-core group and document it in our wiki. I’ll leave voting open for 1 week until June 6th to permit appropriate time for the core team to vote. If there is a unanimous decision or veto prior to that date, I’ll close voting and make the appropriate changes in gerrit as appropriate. Thanks -steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum
+1! 2015-05-31 23:30 GMT+08:00 Hongbin Lu hongbin...@huawei.com: +1! *From:* Steven Dake (stdake) [mailto:std...@cisco.com] *Sent:* May-31-15 1:56 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum Hi core team, Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu’s nickname) has really done a nice job in Magnum contributions. I would like to propose Kennan for the core reviewer team. I don’t think we necessarily need more core reviewers on Magnum, but Kennan has demonstrated a big commitment to Magnum and is a welcome addition in my opinion. For the lifetime of the project, Kennan has contributed 8% of the reviews, and 8% of the commits. Kennan is also active in IRC. He meets my definition of what a core developer for Magnum should be. Consider my proposal to be a +1 vote. Please vote +1 to approve or vote –1 to veto. A single –1 vote acts as a veto, meaning Kennan would not be approved for the core team. I believe we require 3 +1 core votes presently, but since our core team is larger now then when we started, I’d like to propose at our next team meeting we formally define the process by which we accept new cores post this proposal for Magnum into the magnum-core group and document it in our wiki. I’ll leave voting open for 1 week until June 6th to permit appropriate time for the core team to vote. If there is a unanimous decision or veto prior to that date, I’ll close voting and make the appropriate changes in gerrit as appropriate. Thanks -steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks, Jay Lau (Guangya Liu) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum
+1! From: Steven Dake (stdake) [mailto:std...@cisco.com] Sent: May-31-15 1:56 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum Hi core team, Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu's nickname) has really done a nice job in Magnum contributions. I would like to propose Kennan for the core reviewer team. I don't think we necessarily need more core reviewers on Magnum, but Kennan has demonstrated a big commitment to Magnum and is a welcome addition in my opinion. For the lifetime of the project, Kennan has contributed 8% of the reviews, and 8% of the commits. Kennan is also active in IRC. He meets my definition of what a core developer for Magnum should be. Consider my proposal to be a +1 vote. Please vote +1 to approve or vote -1 to veto. A single -1 vote acts as a veto, meaning Kennan would not be approved for the core team. I believe we require 3 +1 core votes presently, but since our core team is larger now then when we started, I'd like to propose at our next team meeting we formally define the process by which we accept new cores post this proposal for Magnum into the magnum-core group and document it in our wiki. I'll leave voting open for 1 week until June 6th to permit appropriate time for the core team to vote. If there is a unanimous decision or veto prior to that date, I'll close voting and make the appropriate changes in gerrit as appropriate. Thanks -steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum
+1 for Kennan. Thanks Regards Madhuri Kumari From: Steven Dake (stdake) [std...@cisco.com] Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 11:26 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum Hi core team, Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu’s nickname) has really done a nice job in Magnum contributions. I would like to propose Kennan for the core reviewer team. I don’t think we necessarily need more core reviewers on Magnum, but Kennan has demonstrated a big commitment to Magnum and is a welcome addition in my opinion. For the lifetime of the project, Kennan has contributed 8% of the reviews, and 8% of the commits. Kennan is also active in IRC. He meets my definition of what a core developer for Magnum should be. Consider my proposal to be a +1 vote. Please vote +1 to approve or vote –1 to veto. A single –1 vote acts as a veto, meaning Kennan would not be approved for the core team. I believe we require 3 +1 core votes presently, but since our core team is larger now then when we started, I’d like to propose at our next team meeting we formally define the process by which we accept new cores post this proposal for Magnum into the magnum-core group and document it in our wiki. I’ll leave voting open for 1 week until June 6th to permit appropriate time for the core team to vote. If there is a unanimous decision or veto prior to that date, I’ll close voting and make the appropriate changes in gerrit as appropriate. Thanks -steve DISCLAIMER: --- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEC or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . ---__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum
+1 from me! On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com wrote: Hi core team, Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu’s nickname) has really done a nice job in Magnum contributions. I would like to propose Kennan for the core reviewer team. I don’t think we necessarily need more core reviewers on Magnum, but Kennan has demonstrated a big commitment to Magnum and is a welcome addition in my opinion. For the lifetime of the project, Kennan has contributed 8% of the reviews, and 8% of the commits. Kennan is also active in IRC. He meets my definition of what a core developer for Magnum should be. Consider my proposal to be a +1 vote. Please vote +1 to approve or vote –1 to veto. A single –1 vote acts as a veto, meaning Kennan would not be approved for the core team. I believe we require 3 +1 core votes presently, but since our core team is larger now then when we started, I’d like to propose at our next team meeting we formally define the process by which we accept new cores post this proposal for Magnum into the magnum-core group and document it in our wiki. I’ll leave voting open for 1 week until June 6th to permit appropriate time for the core team to vote. If there is a unanimous decision or veto prior to that date, I’ll close voting and make the appropriate changes in gerrit as appropriate. Thanks -steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum
Hi core team, Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu’s nickname) has really done a nice job in Magnum contributions. I would like to propose Kennan for the core reviewer team. I don’t think we necessarily need more core reviewers on Magnum, but Kennan has demonstrated a big commitment to Magnum and is a welcome addition in my opinion. For the lifetime of the project, Kennan has contributed 8% of the reviews, and 8% of the commits. Kennan is also active in IRC. He meets my definition of what a core developer for Magnum should be. Consider my proposal to be a +1 vote. Please vote +1 to approve or vote –1 to veto. A single –1 vote acts as a veto, meaning Kennan would not be approved for the core team. I believe we require 3 +1 core votes presently, but since our core team is larger now then when we started, I’d like to propose at our next team meeting we formally define the process by which we accept new cores post this proposal for Magnum into the magnum-core group and document it in our wiki. I’ll leave voting open for 1 week until June 6th to permit appropriate time for the core team to vote. If there is a unanimous decision or veto prior to that date, I’ll close voting and make the appropriate changes in gerrit as appropriate. Thanks -steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
