Re: [openstack-dev] [manila][tc] Seeking feedback on the OpenStack cloud vision

2018-10-31 Thread Tom Barron

On 24/10/18 11:14 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:

Greetings, Manila team!
As you may be aware, I've been working with other folks in the 
community on documenting a vision for OpenStack clouds (formerly known 
as the 'Technical Vision') - essentially to interpret the mission 
statement in long-form, in a way that we can use to actually help 
guide decisions. You can read the latest draft here: 
https://review.openstack.org/592205


We're trying to get feedback from as many people as possible - in many 
ways the value is in the process of coming together to figure out what 
we're trying to achieve as a community with OpenStack and how we can 
work together to build it. The document is there to help us remember 
what we decided so we don't have to do it all again over and over.


The vision is structured with two sections that apply broadly to every 
project in OpenStack - describing the principles that we believe are 
essential to every cloud, and the ones that make OpenStack different 
from some other clouds. The third section is a list of design goals 
that we want OpenStack as a whole to be able to meet - ideally each 
project would be contributing toward one or more of these design 
goals.


I think that, like Cinder, Manila would qualify as contributing to the 
'Basic Physical Data Center Management' goal, since it also allows 
users to access external storage providers through a standardised API.


If you would like me or another TC member to join one of your team IRC 
meetings to discuss further what the vision means for your team, 
please reply to this thread to set it up. You are also welcome to 
bring up any questions in the TC IRC channel, #openstack-tc - there's 
more of us around during Office Hours 
(https://governance.openstack.org/tc/#office-hours), but you can talk 
to us at any time.


Feedback can also happen either in this thread or on the review 
https://review.openstack.org/592205


If the team is generally happy with the vision as it is and doesn't 
have any specific feedback, that's cool but I'd like to request that 
at least the PTL leave a vote on the review. It's important to know 
whether we are actually developing a consensus in the community or 
just talking to ourselves :)


many thanks,
Zane.


Zane and I chatted on IRC and he is going to attend the manila 
community meeting tomorrow, November 1, at 1500 UTC in 
#openstack-meeting-alt to follow up and solicit feedback.  If you are 
unable to attend the meeting and have points to make or questions 
please follow up in this thread or in the review mentioned above.


Cheers,

-- Tom


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [manila][tc] Seeking feedback on the OpenStack cloud vision

2018-10-24 Thread Zane Bitter

Greetings, Manila team!
As you may be aware, I've been working with other folks in the community 
on documenting a vision for OpenStack clouds (formerly known as the 
'Technical Vision') - essentially to interpret the mission statement in 
long-form, in a way that we can use to actually help guide decisions. 
You can read the latest draft here: https://review.openstack.org/592205


We're trying to get feedback from as many people as possible - in many 
ways the value is in the process of coming together to figure out what 
we're trying to achieve as a community with OpenStack and how we can 
work together to build it. The document is there to help us remember 
what we decided so we don't have to do it all again over and over.


The vision is structured with two sections that apply broadly to every 
project in OpenStack - describing the principles that we believe are 
essential to every cloud, and the ones that make OpenStack different 
from some other clouds. The third section is a list of design goals that 
we want OpenStack as a whole to be able to meet - ideally each project 
would be contributing toward one or more of these design goals.


I think that, like Cinder, Manila would qualify as contributing to the 
'Basic Physical Data Center Management' goal, since it also allows users 
to access external storage providers through a standardised API.


If you would like me or another TC member to join one of your team IRC 
meetings to discuss further what the vision means for your team, please 
reply to this thread to set it up. You are also welcome to bring up any 
questions in the TC IRC channel, #openstack-tc - there's more of us 
around during Office Hours 
(https://governance.openstack.org/tc/#office-hours), but you can talk to 
us at any time.


Feedback can also happen either in this thread or on the review 
https://review.openstack.org/592205


If the team is generally happy with the vision as it is and doesn't have 
any specific feedback, that's cool but I'd like to request that at least 
the PTL leave a vote on the review. It's important to know whether we 
are actually developing a consensus in the community or just talking to 
ourselves :)


many thanks,
Zane.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev