Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-20 Thread Doug Wiegley 
Belated but enthusiastic +1

doug

> On Dec 15, 2016, at 4:58 PM, Armando M.  wrote:
> 
> Hi neutrinos,
> 
> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for 
> service-related patches.
> 
> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and 
> neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework, the 
> agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting them 
> with the responsibility is almost a formality.
> 
> Cheers,
> Armando
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/ 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-19 Thread German Eichberger 
+1

On 12/16/16, 12:35 PM, "Brandon Logan"  wrote:

+1!

On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 00:58 +0100, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi neutrinos,
> 
> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
> service-related patches.
> 
> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing 
> and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service
> framework, the agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this
> point, entrusting them with the responsibility is almost a formality.
> 
> Cheers,
> Armando
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/
> _
> _
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs
> cribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-18 Thread Hirofumi Ichihara 

+1

On 2016/12/16 8:58, Armando M. wrote:

Hi neutrinos,

I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for 
service-related patches.


Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing 
and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service 
framework, the agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this 
point, entrusting them with the responsibility is almost a formality.


Cheers,
Armando

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-18 Thread Gary Kotton 
+1

From: "Armando M." 
Reply-To: OpenStack List 
Date: Friday, December 16, 2016 at 1:58 AM
To: OpenStack List 
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as 
service LTs

Hi neutrinos,

I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for service-related 
patches.

Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and 
neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework, the 
agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting them with 
the responsibility is almost a formality.

Cheers,
Armando

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Brandon Logan 
+1!

On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 00:58 +0100, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi neutrinos,
> 
> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
> service-related patches.
> 
> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing 
> and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service
> framework, the agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this
> point, entrusting them with the responsibility is almost a formality.
> 
> Cheers,
> Armando
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/
> _
> _
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs
> cribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Miguel Lavalle 
+1 for both of them

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Armando M.  wrote:

> Hi neutrinos,
>
> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
> service-related patches.
>
> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and
> neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework, the
> agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting them
> with the responsibility is almost a formality.
>
> Cheers,
> Armando
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Brian Haley 

+1

On 12/15/2016 06:58 PM, Armando M. wrote:

Hi neutrinos,

I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for service-related
patches.

Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and
neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework, the agent
framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting them with the
responsibility is almost a formality.

Cheers,
Armando

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo 
+1 Good work. :)

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Rossella Sblendido 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On 12/16/2016 09:25 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > Armando M.  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi neutrinos,
> >>
> >> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
> >> service-related patches.
> >>
> >> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing
> >> and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service
> >> framework, the agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this
> >> point, entrusting them with the responsibility is almost a formality.
> >
> > Great, +1.
> >
> > 
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:
> unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Rossella Sblendido 
+1

On 12/16/2016 09:25 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Armando M.  wrote:
> 
>> Hi neutrinos,
>>
>> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
>> service-related patches.
>>
>> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing
>> and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service
>> framework, the agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this
>> point, entrusting them with the responsibility is almost a formality.
> 
> Great, +1.
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka 

Armando M.  wrote:


Hi neutrinos,

I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for  
service-related patches.


Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and  
neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework,  
the agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting  
them with the responsibility is almost a formality.


Great, +1.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-15 Thread Oleg Bondarev 
+1

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:04 AM, reedip banerjee 
wrote:

> +1 for both Ryan and Nate :)
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Vikram Choudhary 
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for Ryan!
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2016 7:23 AM, "Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)" <
>> skand...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1. From the neutron-fwaas perspective, Nate has been instrumental in
>>> driving our integration with neutron on the agent extension framework,
>>> neutron-lib as well as on CI.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Sridar
>>>
>>> From: Kevin Benton 
>>> Reply-To: OpenStack List 
>>> Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 5:00 PM
>>> To: OpenStack List 
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate
>>> Johnston as service LTs
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Dec 15, 2016 19:03, "Armando M."  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi neutrinos,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
>>>> service-related patches.
>>>>
>>>> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing
>>>> and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework,
>>>> the agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting
>>>> them with the responsibility is almost a formality.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Armando
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> __
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.op
>>>> enstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.op
>>> enstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Reedip Banerjee
> IRC: reedip
>
>
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-15 Thread reedip banerjee 
+1 for both Ryan and Nate :)

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Vikram Choudhary 
wrote:

> +1 for Ryan!
>
> On Dec 16, 2016 7:23 AM, "Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)" <
> skand...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> +1. From the neutron-fwaas perspective, Nate has been instrumental in
>> driving our integration with neutron on the agent extension framework,
>> neutron-lib as well as on CI.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Sridar
>>
>> From: Kevin Benton 
>> Reply-To: OpenStack List 
>> Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 5:00 PM
>> To: OpenStack List 
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate
>> Johnston as service LTs
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Dec 15, 2016 19:03, "Armando M."  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi neutrinos,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
>>> service-related patches.
>>>
>>> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing
>>> and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework,
>>> the agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting
>>> them with the responsibility is almost a formality.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Armando
>>>
>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/
>>>
>>> 
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.op
>>> enstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Reedip Banerjee
IRC: reedip
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-15 Thread Vikram Choudhary 
+1 for Ryan!

On Dec 16, 2016 7:23 AM, "Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)" 
wrote:

> +1. From the neutron-fwaas perspective, Nate has been instrumental in
> driving our integration with neutron on the agent extension framework,
> neutron-lib as well as on CI.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sridar
>
> From: Kevin Benton 
> Reply-To: OpenStack List 
> Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 5:00 PM
> To: OpenStack List 
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate
> Johnston as service LTs
>
> +1
>
> On Dec 15, 2016 19:03, "Armando M."  wrote:
>
>> Hi neutrinos,
>>
>> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
>> service-related patches.
>>
>> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and
>> neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework, the
>> agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting them
>> with the responsibility is almost a formality.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Armando
>>
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/
>>
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-15 Thread Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw) 
+1. From the neutron-fwaas perspective, Nate has been instrumental in driving 
our integration with neutron on the agent extension framework, neutron-lib as 
well as on CI.

Thanks

Sridar

From: Kevin Benton mailto:ke...@benton.pub>>
Reply-To: OpenStack List 
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 5:00 PM
To: OpenStack List 
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston 
as service LTs

+1

On Dec 15, 2016 19:03, "Armando M." 
mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi neutrinos,

I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for service-related 
patches.

Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and 
neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework, the 
agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting them with 
the responsibility is almost a formality.

Cheers,
Armando

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-15 Thread Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) 
+1

From: Kevin Benton [mailto:ke...@benton.pub]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 5:00 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 

Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston 
as service LTs

+1

On Dec 15, 2016 19:03, "Armando M." 
mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi neutrinos,

I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for service-related 
patches.

Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and 
neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework, the 
agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting them with 
the responsibility is almost a formality.

Cheers,
Armando

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-15 Thread Kevin Benton 
+1

On Dec 15, 2016 19:03, "Armando M."  wrote:

> Hi neutrinos,
>
> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
> service-related patches.
>
> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and
> neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework, the
> agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting them
> with the responsibility is almost a formality.
>
> Cheers,
> Armando
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-15 Thread Armando M. 
 Hi neutrinos,

I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
service-related patches.

Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and
neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework, the
agent framework and other bits and pieces. At this point, entrusting them
with the responsibility is almost a formality.

Cheers,
Armando

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411536/
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev