Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] more specific tags?
Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote on 08/31/2015 10:16:23 PM: > From: Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Date: 08/31/2015 10:21 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] more specific tags? > > > > On 8/28/2015 10:37 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > > This is a proposal to enhance the list of offical tags for our bugs > > in Launchpad. During the tagging process in the last weeks it seems > > to me that some of the tags are too coarse-grained. Would you see a > > benefit in enhancing the official list to more fine-grained tags? > > > > [...] > > > > Would you see this as benefitial? If yes, which tags would you like to > > have additionally? If no, what did I miss or overlook? > > > > Regards, > > Markus Zoeller (markus_z) > > Given my cynical nature, I have to ask, are the bug tags really helping > with focusing triage by sub-teams? Or are we somehow pulling or > planning to pull this info into some analysis, like, 'we have a lot of > bugs in component x, use case y, so we need to refactor and/or beef up > testing there'. Otherwise I feel like we're just adding more official > tags that very few people will be aware of or care about. > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann If this would help the sub-teams to split things up cannot be answered by me. I hope some of the sub-team leaders will give their opinion here. >From a users point of view I don't care, as an example, if the libvirt driver is (theoretically) without bugs. I'm interested if I can do a live-migration/snapshot/reboot/ and if I can do so, what are my restrictions. So, yes, the rationale behind the proposal was indeed to get an impression where it makes sense to invest time and effort, mainly from a use case perspective through the layers. We have enough open bugs to be busy all the time and I don't want to make any orders of direction. You could see it as a navigation system. It makes nice suggestions which way you could go, but you are free to take another route because of personal experience or unforeseen events. Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] more specific tags?
On 08/28/2015 11:37 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: This is a proposal to enhance the list of offical tags for our bugs in Launchpad. During the tagging process in the last weeks it seems to me that some of the tags are too coarse-grained. Would you see a benefit in enhancing the official list to more fine-grained tags? Yes. refine component oriented tags: * network: nova-network + neutron + pci-passthrough * volumes: block-device-mapping + multipath + fibre-channel + attachment ++ on all the above. add new "bug-theme" tags: * numa * availability_zones Replace _ with -, but yes on both. add use case centered tags: * spawn * resize * rebuild * snapshot * swap-disk Not entirely sure about swap-disk, but the others look fine to me. add non-functional tags: * performance * gate-failure * upgrades Yeah, no brainers. add release cycle tags: * in-stable-juno * in-stable-kilo Hmm, I'm negative on this. Because bugs can be targeted at individual multiple milestones/releases, I don't think this is necessary. Would you see this as benefitial? If yes, which tags would you like to have additionally? If no, what did I miss or overlook? Yeah, I really like the proposed new tags, thank you for this, Markus! Best, -jay __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] more specific tags?
On 8/28/2015 10:37 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: This is a proposal to enhance the list of offical tags for our bugs in Launchpad. During the tagging process in the last weeks it seems to me that some of the tags are too coarse-grained. Would you see a benefit in enhancing the official list to more fine-grained tags? Additionally I would like to enhance the tags by use case oriented tags like "spawn" and "snapshot" (like we already have with "live-migration") to signalize which features are impacted by this bug which could be benefitial for: * release letters * use case centered SMEs through the components/layers refine component oriented tags: * network: nova-network + neutron + pci-passthrough * volumes: block-device-mapping + multipath + fibre-channel + attachment add new "bug-theme" tags: * numa * availability_zones add use case centered tags: * spawn * resize * rebuild * snapshot * swap-disk add non-functional tags: * performance * gate-failure * upgrades add release cycle tags: * in-stable-juno * in-stable-kilo Would you see this as benefitial? If yes, which tags would you like to have additionally? If no, what did I miss or overlook? Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Given my cynical nature, I have to ask, are the bug tags really helping with focusing triage by sub-teams? Or are we somehow pulling or planning to pull this info into some analysis, like, 'we have a lot of bugs in component x, use case y, so we need to refactor and/or beef up testing there'. Otherwise I feel like we're just adding more official tags that very few people will be aware of or care about. -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] more specific tags?
This is a proposal to enhance the list of offical tags for our bugs in Launchpad. During the tagging process in the last weeks it seems to me that some of the tags are too coarse-grained. Would you see a benefit in enhancing the official list to more fine-grained tags? Additionally I would like to enhance the tags by use case oriented tags like spawn and snapshot (like we already have with live-migration) to signalize which features are impacted by this bug which could be benefitial for: * release letters * use case centered SMEs through the components/layers refine component oriented tags: * network: nova-network + neutron + pci-passthrough * volumes: block-device-mapping + multipath + fibre-channel + attachment add new bug-theme tags: * numa * availability_zones add use case centered tags: * spawn * resize * rebuild * snapshot * swap-disk add non-functional tags: * performance * gate-failure * upgrades add release cycle tags: * in-stable-juno * in-stable-kilo Would you see this as benefitial? If yes, which tags would you like to have additionally? If no, what did I miss or overlook? Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
