Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] CI status for Ubuntu

[Alex Schultz]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:43 AM, Corey Bryant
 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Alex Schultz  wrote:
>>
>> Just FYI,
>>
>> We switched the Ubuntu scenario jobs to non-voting this week due to
>> the large amount of breakage caused by the ocata-proposed update to m2
>> based packages.  The Ubuntu beaker jobs are still voting on the
>> modules themselves.
>>
>> Here's where we're keeping track of issues:
>>
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-ubuntu-ocata-m2
>>
>> So if anyone wants to jump in and help that would be great.  We
>> addressed the libvirt, ceilometer and aodh issues. Still outstanding
>> as of now are items related to the webob 1.7, designate mdns failure
>> and python-gabbi missing for tempest.  There might be more issues, but
>> this is what we're aware of at the moment.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>
> Alex, I just wanted to make sure webob is no longer an issue for you now.
> It should be ok now that we're at version 1:1.6.2-2.
>

Just to communicate the current status, we've managed to clean up most
of the issues from the etherpad[0] and the jobs will be green shortly.
We had to disable designate for now[1], but the rest is green.  Thanks
to the Ubuntu team for addressing some of the packaging & dependency
issues we found.

Thanks,
-Alex

[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-ubuntu-ocata-m2
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424936/

> --
> Regards,
> Corey
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] CI status for Ubuntu

[Julien Danjou]

On Tue, Jan 24 2017, Thomas Goirand wrote:

> Check this bug entry:
> https://bugs.debian.org/851032
>
> This may have been fixed since Newton though. The FTBFS was reported
> against packages aimed for Debian Stretch.

This is likely a race condition, it has nothing to do with webob IMHO.
We fixed a few of those, so I imagine it is now fixed indeed.

-- 
Julien Danjou
/* Free Software hacker
   https://julien.danjou.info */


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] CI status for Ubuntu

[Thomas Goirand]

On 01/24/2017 04:15 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24 2017, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> 
>> FYI, this was a very unfortunate upload of the latest webob version in
>> Sid, which was reverted. IMO though, OpenStack should prepare itself to
>> support the latest version to avoid failures once we decide that webob
>> 1.7.x should be uploaded again. Affected projects:
>>
>> - glance
>> - gnocchi
>> - keystone
>> - nova
>> - keystonemiddleware
>> - oslo.middleware
> 
> What are the failure with Gnocchi? We run the tests with WebOb 1.7.0 and
> everything works fine.
> 

Check this bug entry:
https://bugs.debian.org/851032

This may have been fixed since Newton though. The FTBFS was reported
against packages aimed for Debian Stretch.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] CI status for Ubuntu

[Julien Danjou]

On Tue, Jan 24 2017, Thomas Goirand wrote:

> FYI, this was a very unfortunate upload of the latest webob version in
> Sid, which was reverted. IMO though, OpenStack should prepare itself to
> support the latest version to avoid failures once we decide that webob
> 1.7.x should be uploaded again. Affected projects:
>
> - glance
> - gnocchi
> - keystone
> - nova
> - keystonemiddleware
> - oslo.middleware

What are the failure with Gnocchi? We run the tests with WebOb 1.7.0 and
everything works fine.

-- 
Julien Danjou
/* Free Software hacker
   https://julien.danjou.info */


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] CI status for Ubuntu

[Thomas Goirand]

On 01/24/2017 02:43 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Alex Schultz  > wrote:
> 
> Just FYI,
> 
> We switched the Ubuntu scenario jobs to non-voting this week due to
> the large amount of breakage caused by the ocata-proposed update to m2
> based packages.  The Ubuntu beaker jobs are still voting on the
> modules themselves.
> 
> Here's where we're keeping track of issues:
> 
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-ubuntu-ocata-m2
> 
> 
> So if anyone wants to jump in and help that would be great.  We
> addressed the libvirt, ceilometer and aodh issues. Still outstanding
> as of now are items related to the webob 1.7, designate mdns failure
> and python-gabbi missing for tempest.  There might be more issues, but
> this is what we're aware of at the moment.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
> 
> 
> Alex, I just wanted to make sure webob is no longer an issue for you
> now.  It should be ok now that we're at version 1:1.6.2-2.

FYI, this was a very unfortunate upload of the latest webob version in
Sid, which was reverted. IMO though, OpenStack should prepare itself to
support the latest version to avoid failures once we decide that webob
1.7.x should be uploaded again. Affected projects:

- glance
- gnocchi
- keystone
- nova
- keystonemiddleware
- oslo.middleware

There's probably more, but that's what was detected rebuilding all of
the Debian archive after webob 1.7.x was uploade in Sid.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] CI status for Ubuntu

[Corey Bryant]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Alex Schultz  wrote:

> Just FYI,
>
> We switched the Ubuntu scenario jobs to non-voting this week due to
> the large amount of breakage caused by the ocata-proposed update to m2
> based packages.  The Ubuntu beaker jobs are still voting on the
> modules themselves.
>
> Here's where we're keeping track of issues:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-ubuntu-ocata-m2
>
> So if anyone wants to jump in and help that would be great.  We
> addressed the libvirt, ceilometer and aodh issues. Still outstanding
> as of now are items related to the webob 1.7, designate mdns failure
> and python-gabbi missing for tempest.  There might be more issues, but
> this is what we're aware of at the moment.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
>
Alex, I just wanted to make sure webob is no longer an issue for you now.
It should be ok now that we're at version 1:1.6.2-2.

-- 
Regards,
Corey
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [puppet] CI status for Ubuntu

[Alex Schultz]

Just FYI,

We switched the Ubuntu scenario jobs to non-voting this week due to
the large amount of breakage caused by the ocata-proposed update to m2
based packages.  The Ubuntu beaker jobs are still voting on the
modules themselves.

Here's where we're keeping track of issues:

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-ubuntu-ocata-m2

So if anyone wants to jump in and help that would be great.  We
addressed the libvirt, ceilometer and aodh issues. Still outstanding
as of now are items related to the webob 1.7, designate mdns failure
and python-gabbi missing for tempest.  There might be more issues, but
this is what we're aware of at the moment.

Thanks,
-Alex

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev