Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Discussion of PuppetOpenstack Project abbreviation

2016-06-03 Thread Rich Megginson 

On 06/03/2016 01:34 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote:

I would vote for POSM - "Puppet OpenStack Modules"



+1 - possum, american slang for the animal "opossum"


--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Cody Herriges > wrote:



> On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:56 AM, Dmitry Tantsur > wrote:
>
> On 06/01/2016 02:20 PM, Jason Guiditta wrote:
>> On 01/06/16 18:49 +0800, Xingchao Yu wrote:
>>>  Hi, everyone:
>>>
>>>  Do we need to give a abbreviation for PuppetOpenstack
project? B/C
>>>  it's really a long words when I introduce this project to
people or
>>>  writng article about it.
>>>
>>>  How about POM(PuppetOpenstack Modules) or POP(PuppetOpenstack
>>>  Project) ?
>>>
>>>  I would like +1 for POM.
>>>  Just an idea, please feel free to give your comment :D
>>>  Xingchao Yu
>>
>> For rdo and osp, we package it as 'openstack-puppet-modules',
or OPM
>> for short.
>
> I definitely love POM as it reminds me of pomeranians :) but I
agree that OPM will probably be easier recognizable.

The project's official name is in fact "Puppet OpenStack" so OPM
would be kinda confusing.  I'd put my vote on POP because it is
closer to the actual definition of an acronym[1], which I
generally find easier to remember over all when it comes to the
shortening of long phrases.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acronym

--
Cody


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Discussion of PuppetOpenstack Project abbreviation

2016-06-03 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk 
I would vote for POSM - "Puppet OpenStack Modules"

--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Cody Herriges  wrote:

>
> > On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:56 AM, Dmitry Tantsur  wrote:
> >
> > On 06/01/2016 02:20 PM, Jason Guiditta wrote:
> >> On 01/06/16 18:49 +0800, Xingchao Yu wrote:
> >>>  Hi, everyone:
> >>>
> >>>  Do we need to give a abbreviation for PuppetOpenstack project? B/C
> >>>  it's really a long words when I introduce this project to people or
> >>>  writng article about it.
> >>>
> >>>  How about POM(PuppetOpenstack Modules) or POP(PuppetOpenstack
> >>>  Project) ?
> >>>
> >>>  I would like +1 for POM.
> >>>  Just an idea, please feel free to give your comment :D
> >>>  Xingchao Yu
> >>
> >> For rdo and osp, we package it as 'openstack-puppet-modules', or OPM
> >> for short.
> >
> > I definitely love POM as it reminds me of pomeranians :) but I agree
> that OPM will probably be easier recognizable.
>
> The project's official name is in fact "Puppet OpenStack" so OPM would be
> kinda confusing.  I'd put my vote on POP because it is closer to the actual
> definition of an acronym[1], which I generally find easier to remember over
> all when it comes to the shortening of long phrases.
>
> [1] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acronym
>
> --
> Cody
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Discussion of PuppetOpenstack Project abbreviation

2016-06-01 Thread Cody Herriges 

> On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:56 AM, Dmitry Tantsur  wrote:
> 
> On 06/01/2016 02:20 PM, Jason Guiditta wrote:
>> On 01/06/16 18:49 +0800, Xingchao Yu wrote:
>>>  Hi, everyone:
>>> 
>>>  Do we need to give a abbreviation for PuppetOpenstack project? B/C
>>>  it's really a long words when I introduce this project to people or
>>>  writng article about it.
>>> 
>>>  How about POM(PuppetOpenstack Modules) or POP(PuppetOpenstack
>>>  Project) ?
>>> 
>>>  I would like +1 for POM.
>>>  Just an idea, please feel free to give your comment :D
>>>  Xingchao Yu
>> 
>> For rdo and osp, we package it as 'openstack-puppet-modules', or OPM
>> for short.
> 
> I definitely love POM as it reminds me of pomeranians :) but I agree that OPM 
> will probably be easier recognizable.

The project's official name is in fact "Puppet OpenStack" so OPM would be kinda 
confusing.  I'd put my vote on POP because it is closer to the actual 
definition of an acronym[1], which I generally find easier to remember over all 
when it comes to the shortening of long phrases.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acronym

--
Cody



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Discussion of PuppetOpenstack Project abbreviation

2016-06-01 Thread Dmitry Tantsur 

On 06/01/2016 02:20 PM, Jason Guiditta wrote:

On 01/06/16 18:49 +0800, Xingchao Yu wrote:

  Hi, everyone:

  Do we need to give a abbreviation for PuppetOpenstack project? B/C
  it's really a long words when I introduce this project to people or
  writng article about it.

  How about POM(PuppetOpenstack Modules) or POP(PuppetOpenstack
  Project) ?

  I would like +1 for POM.
  Just an idea, please feel free to give your comment :D
  Xingchao Yu


For rdo and osp, we package it as 'openstack-puppet-modules', or OPM
for short.


I definitely love POM as it reminds me of pomeranians :) but I agree 
that OPM will probably be easier recognizable.




-j

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Discussion of PuppetOpenstack Project abbreviation

2016-06-01 Thread Jason Guiditta 

On 01/06/16 18:49 +0800, Xingchao Yu wrote:

  Hi, everyone:

  Do we need to give a abbreviation for PuppetOpenstack project? B/C
  it's really a long words when I introduce this project to people or
  writng article about it.

  How about POM(PuppetOpenstack Modules) or POP(PuppetOpenstack
  Project) ?

  I would like +1 for POM.
  Just an idea, please feel free to give your comment :D
  Xingchao Yu


For rdo and osp, we package it as 'openstack-puppet-modules', or OPM
for short.

-j

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Discussion of PuppetOpenstack Project abbreviation

2016-06-01 Thread Xingchao Yu 
Hi, everyone:

Do we need to give a abbreviation for PuppetOpenstack project? B/C it's
really a long words when I introduce this project to people or writng
article about it.

How about POM(PuppetOpenstack Modules) or POP(PuppetOpenstack Project) ?

I would like +1 for POM.

Just an idea, please feel free to give your comment :D




Xingchao Yu
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev