Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][shade][infra] FFE for zuul-sphinx

2017-08-02 Thread Tony Breeds 
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Heya,
> 
> We'd like to request a requirements feature freeze exception to add the
> zuul-sphinx library.
> 
> zuul-sphinx is an Infra-managed Sphinx extension used to process job
> documentation for zuul jobs for Zuul v3. Since jobs can be defined in
> individual project repos in Zuul v3, generating documentation for in-repo
> jobs is a task that needs to be done in the project itself.
> 
> zuul-sphinx itself will only be used in test-requirements.txt and itself
> only has dependencies on sphinx and pyyaml.
> 
> We'd like an FFE for it because we're using shade as an early test-case of
> an OpenStack project that does all of the normal OpenStack things (release
> management, requirements syncing, devstack jobs) and as shade is release
> managed we can't otherwise add the extension to document the jobs we're
> adding.
> 
> Also - in Zuul v3 jobs can be defined in branches as well, so having
> zuul-sphinx available for stable/pike as we roll it out broadly will be
> nice. It may worth considering ocata backport - but we can consider that
> once it's actually needed.
> 
> Anywho - it would be dandy to get an exception on this one.

As I've said elsewhere this is pretty low risk.  I question if it will
actually get used on pike but I'd be really happen to be wrong, and I
can't be wrong if I don't grant this.

+2

Yours Tony.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][shade][infra] FFE for zuul-sphinx

2017-08-02 Thread Sean McGinnis 
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:36:24PM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> I'd support this FFE for reasons stated above (specifically "only be
> used in test-requirements.txt")
> 
> +1
> 
> Thanks,
> Dims
> 
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Monty Taylor  wrote:
> > Heya,
> >
> > We'd like to request a requirements feature freeze exception to add the
> > zuul-sphinx library.
> >

The risk seems low enough to me. +1

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][shade][infra] FFE for zuul-sphinx

2017-08-02 Thread Matthew Thode 
On 17-08-02 16:32:36, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Heya,
> 
> We'd like to request a requirements feature freeze exception to add the 
> zuul-sphinx library.
> 
> zuul-sphinx is an Infra-managed Sphinx extension used to process job 
> documentation for zuul jobs for Zuul v3. Since jobs can be defined in 
> individual project repos in Zuul v3, generating documentation for 
> in-repo jobs is a task that needs to be done in the project itself.
> 
> zuul-sphinx itself will only be used in test-requirements.txt and itself 
> only has dependencies on sphinx and pyyaml.
> 
> We'd like an FFE for it because we're using shade as an early test-case 
> of an OpenStack project that does all of the normal OpenStack things 
> (release management, requirements syncing, devstack jobs) and as shade 
> is release managed we can't otherwise add the extension to document the 
> jobs we're adding.
> 
> Also - in Zuul v3 jobs can be defined in branches as well, so having 
> zuul-sphinx available for stable/pike as we roll it out broadly will be 
> nice. It may worth considering ocata backport - but we can consider that 
> once it's actually needed.
> 
> Anywho - it would be dandy to get an exception on this one.
> 
> Thanks!
> Monty
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

This is fine with me, it's not used anywhere at the moment so doesn't
look to have any knockon effects.

http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=zuul-sphinx=nope==

-- 
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][shade][infra] FFE for zuul-sphinx

2017-08-02 Thread Davanum Srinivas 
I'd support this FFE for reasons stated above (specifically "only be
used in test-requirements.txt")

+1

Thanks,
Dims

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Monty Taylor  wrote:
> Heya,
>
> We'd like to request a requirements feature freeze exception to add the
> zuul-sphinx library.
>
> zuul-sphinx is an Infra-managed Sphinx extension used to process job
> documentation for zuul jobs for Zuul v3. Since jobs can be defined in
> individual project repos in Zuul v3, generating documentation for in-repo
> jobs is a task that needs to be done in the project itself.
>
> zuul-sphinx itself will only be used in test-requirements.txt and itself
> only has dependencies on sphinx and pyyaml.
>
> We'd like an FFE for it because we're using shade as an early test-case of
> an OpenStack project that does all of the normal OpenStack things (release
> management, requirements syncing, devstack jobs) and as shade is release
> managed we can't otherwise add the extension to document the jobs we're
> adding.
>
> Also - in Zuul v3 jobs can be defined in branches as well, so having
> zuul-sphinx available for stable/pike as we roll it out broadly will be
> nice. It may worth considering ocata backport - but we can consider that
> once it's actually needed.
>
> Anywho - it would be dandy to get an exception on this one.
>
> Thanks!
> Monty
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [release][requirements][shade][infra] FFE for zuul-sphinx

2017-08-02 Thread Monty Taylor 

Heya,

We'd like to request a requirements feature freeze exception to add the 
zuul-sphinx library.


zuul-sphinx is an Infra-managed Sphinx extension used to process job 
documentation for zuul jobs for Zuul v3. Since jobs can be defined in 
individual project repos in Zuul v3, generating documentation for 
in-repo jobs is a task that needs to be done in the project itself.


zuul-sphinx itself will only be used in test-requirements.txt and itself 
only has dependencies on sphinx and pyyaml.


We'd like an FFE for it because we're using shade as an early test-case 
of an OpenStack project that does all of the normal OpenStack things 
(release management, requirements syncing, devstack jobs) and as shade 
is release managed we can't otherwise add the extension to document the 
jobs we're adding.


Also - in Zuul v3 jobs can be defined in branches as well, so having 
zuul-sphinx available for stable/pike as we roll it out broadly will be 
nice. It may worth considering ocata backport - but we can consider that 
once it's actually needed.


Anywho - it would be dandy to get an exception on this one.

Thanks!
Monty

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev