Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][congress] FFE request to bump python-monascaclient to 1.12.1

2018-08-08 Thread Matthew Thode
On 18-08-08 18:00:35, Eric K wrote:
> Requesting the raised minimun just for openstack/congress.
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/590021/
> 
> No re-release required; it'll just take effect in RC1.
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/8/18, 2:06 PM, "Matthew Thode"  wrote:
> 
> >On 18-08-08 13:14:08, Eric K wrote:
> >> python-monascaclient 1.12.0 paired with osc-lib 1.11.0 seems to
> >> experience a problem around Session.
> >> 
> >> python-monascaclient 1.12.1 fixes the issue [1]. So I'd like to bump
> >> congress requirements to python-monascaclient>=1.12.1 if it is not
> >> disruptive to packaging [2]. If it is disruptive, we can just note it
> >> as a known issue.
> >
> >Which project(s) will need the new minimum?  Those projects would need
> >re-releases.  Then my question then becomes if those projects need a
> >raised minumum too, and for which project(s).  And so on.
> >

SGTM then, ack by requirements

-- 
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][congress] FFE request to bump python-monascaclient to 1.12.1

2018-08-08 Thread Eric K
Requesting the raised minimun just for openstack/congress.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/590021/

No re-release required; it'll just take effect in RC1.



On 8/8/18, 2:06 PM, "Matthew Thode"  wrote:

>On 18-08-08 13:14:08, Eric K wrote:
>> python-monascaclient 1.12.0 paired with osc-lib 1.11.0 seems to
>> experience a problem around Session.
>> 
>> python-monascaclient 1.12.1 fixes the issue [1]. So I'd like to bump
>> congress requirements to python-monascaclient>=1.12.1 if it is not
>> disruptive to packaging [2]. If it is disruptive, we can just note it
>> as a known issue.
>
>Which project(s) will need the new minimum?  Those projects would need
>re-releases.  Then my question then becomes if those projects need a
>raised minumum too, and for which project(s).  And so on.
>
>-- 
>Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
>__
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][congress] FFE request to bump python-monascaclient to 1.12.1

2018-08-08 Thread Matthew Thode
On 18-08-08 13:14:08, Eric K wrote:
> python-monascaclient 1.12.0 paired with osc-lib 1.11.0 seems to
> experience a problem around Session.
> 
> python-monascaclient 1.12.1 fixes the issue [1]. So I'd like to bump
> congress requirements to python-monascaclient>=1.12.1 if it is not
> disruptive to packaging [2]. If it is disruptive, we can just note it
> as a known issue.

Which project(s) will need the new minimum?  Those projects would need
re-releases.  Then my question then becomes if those projects need a
raised minumum too, and for which project(s).  And so on.

-- 
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [requirements][release][congress] FFE request to bump python-monascaclient to 1.12.1

2018-08-08 Thread Eric K
python-monascaclient 1.12.0 paired with osc-lib 1.11.0 seems to
experience a problem around Session.

python-monascaclient 1.12.1 fixes the issue [1]. So I'd like to bump
congress requirements to python-monascaclient>=1.12.1 if it is not
disruptive to packaging [2]. If it is disruptive, we can just note it
as a known issue.

Thanks!

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579139/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/590021/

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev