Re: [openstack-dev] [swg][tc] An attempt to clarify/discuss: what exactly is the Stewardship Working Group, anyhow?

2017-01-03 Thread John Garbutt
On 8 December 2016 at 15:33, Thierry Carrez  wrote:
> Colette Alexander wrote:
>> [...]
>> What are the sorts of things you'd like to see tackled?
>
> John Garbutt recently proposed that the TC works on defining visions for
> itself[1] and OpenStack in general[2] and started laying out the base
> objectives and requirements around that.
>
> Defining a vision is a significant effort, and the SWG is a great venue
> to collaborate on this, especially with the tooling some of us learned
> about in the training. So we could encourage whoever is interested in
> participating in that effort to join the #openstack-swg IRC channel and
> meetings[3].
>
> We could work on the TC vision first, with an (ambitious) objective to
> have it ready for formal submission to the TC after the PTG in February ?
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/401225
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/401226
> [3]
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#OpenStack_Stewardship_Working_Group_Meeting

I have moved my patch for the TC vision to:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AtlantaPTG-SWG-TCVision

I have added some ideas and questions based on the last SWG meeting
log and the current review comments on the patch, but please do add
more!

While we probably can't make real progress on this until the TC vision
is sorted, I have moved the OpenStack vision here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AtlantaPTG-SWG-OpenStackVision

If we can get all current members of TC behind a vision for the TC, I
believe it will really help us work together. Once its clear what
everyone wants to happen in the future, its certainly easy to step up
an help with things that get us closer to the shared vision.

Thanks,
johnthetubaguy

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [swg][tc] An attempt to clarify/discuss: what exactly is the Stewardship Working Group, anyhow?

2016-12-08 Thread Thierry Carrez
Colette Alexander wrote:
> [...]
> So, what do we do exactly? 
> [...]

Thanks a lot for this thorough introduction !

> [...]
> What are the sorts of things you'd like to see tackled?

John Garbutt recently proposed that the TC works on defining visions for
itself[1] and OpenStack in general[2] and started laying out the base
objectives and requirements around that.

Defining a vision is a significant effort, and the SWG is a great venue
to collaborate on this, especially with the tooling some of us learned
about in the training. So we could encourage whoever is interested in
participating in that effort to join the #openstack-swg IRC channel and
meetings[3].

We could work on the TC vision first, with an (ambitious) objective to
have it ready for formal submission to the TC after the PTG in February ?

[1] https://review.openstack.org/401225
[2] https://review.openstack.org/401226
[3]
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#OpenStack_Stewardship_Working_Group_Meeting

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [swg][tc] An attempt to clarify/discuss: what exactly is the Stewardship Working Group, anyhow?

2016-11-21 Thread Colette Alexander
Hi OpenStackers!

At the last Stewardship Working Group (SWG) meeting[0], we discussed a lot
of the feedback that we received in our cross project session and our panel
discussion in Barcelona from people who were wondering what, exactly, the
Stewardship Working Group is and what they do.

I thought it might be appropriate to bring that discussion to the mailing
list, so... here we are.

So, what do we do exactly?

A lot of that is, like other OpenStack projects, kind of up to whoever
shows up.

But, the current history/summary of what has happened with people who've
showed up so far:

The SWG was founded[1] after some members of the TC and some members of the
community attended a leadership training in Ann Arbor, in June of 2016. The
two day workshop covered a variety of topics, including a few key concepts
that I felt mirrored our own values in the community: servant leadership,
visioning, and how to implement change successfully. Out of those two days,
a third day devoted to talking about what we learned and how it might apply
to OpenStack led us to think about forming the SWG. Anne Gentle wrote a
great summary for the OpenStack blog, covering some of these.[2]

When I first thought about the SWG during that day of discussion, I saw it
as having two potential areas of work: 1) researching and discussing ideas
around stewardship and leadership and assessing issues that might arise in
the community in order to make recommendations to the TC around governance,
leadership, and anything related to culture (including, especially,
documenting that culture). And 2) providing/organizing resources for
*anyone* in the entire OpenStack community who is interested in adding to
their leadership skills, or who needs help understanding a less-technical
problem, more-people-problem that comes up. (And I mean "understand"
through any mechanism: resources/training provided, discussions had on the
#openstack-swg IRC channel, in meetings, or in personal discussion) In my
wildest dreams, we would also provide support and learning pathways about
OpenStack's culture and leadership values to anyone in the community.

The major value of the training that was echoed by all participants was
that it wasn't run-of-the-mill "corporate" leadership training - it focused
in on concepts and skills that were far more applicable in our open
governance/open participation environment. Anything that is provided to the
community by the SWG should pass the same smell test.

I feel rather strongly (and have even said so even while being filmed[3])
that OpenStack can often suffer from an avoidance in its culture - people
will tend to look away/walk away/close tabs in another direction when faced
with something that potentially involves having a difficult conversation
with someone or multiple people (especially if those people are in
unfamiliar groups/work at unfamiliar companies). How might we all feel more
comfortable asking each other difficult questions and having constructive
debate that ultimately will lead to a healthier more sustainable and
diverse community? I hope that the SWG can provide a kind of "safe space"
(even just for your brain to think about a thing) to spark some of that
change.

What are the sorts of things you'd like to see tackled? Some thoughts were
thrown up in the etherpad during our cross project session in Barcelona[4]
that might start good discussion here.

Any thoughts/debate/ideas on where we should go and what we should do are
most welcome here or on the other standard channels. I'm currently in the
process of writing a draft vision for where we'd like the group to be and
what we'd like to accomplish before and during the PTG in Atlanta. I'd love
to get more people involved. On account of the US/Thanksgiving holiday, our
next meeting will be Dec. 8, 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 so please
join us in #openstack-swg in the meantime and say hello.

Thanks!

-colette/gothicmindfood


[0]
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_swg/2016/openstack_swg.2016-11-08-15.04.log.txt
[1] https://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20160705-stewardship.html
[2]
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2016/07/technical-committee-highlights-july-17-2016/
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juGktZ3xabA&t=1430s
[4] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Barcelona-SWG-cp
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev