[openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
http://www.quora.com/Why-would-the-creators-of-OpenStack-the-market-leader-in-cloud-computing-platforms-refuse-to-use-it-and-use-AWS-instead -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
This is hardly a development related question. Regards, Steve Martinelli Software Developer - OpenStack Keystone Core Member Phone: 1-905-413-2851 E-mail: steve...@ca.ibm.com 8200 Warden Ave Markham, ON L6G 1C7 Canada Aryeh Friedman wrote on 08/25/2014 12:08:50 PM: > From: Aryeh Friedman > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > , > Date: 08/25/2014 12:12 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to > OS's future > > http://www.quora.com/Why-would-the-creators-of-OpenStack-the-market- > leader-in-cloud-computing-platforms-refuse-to-use-it-and-use-AWS-instead > > -- > Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
On 08/25/2014 12:08 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: http://www.quora.com/Why-would-the-creators-of-OpenStack-the-market-leader-in-cloud-computing-platforms-refuse-to-use-it-and-use-AWS-instead Would you mind please not posting to the developer's mailing list inflammatory random web pages? Thanks, -jay ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
On 08/25/2014 12:29 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 08/25/2014 12:08 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: >> http://www.quora.com/Why-would-the-creators-of-OpenStack-the-market-leader-in-cloud-computing-platforms-refuse-to-use-it-and-use-AWS-instead >> > > Would you mind please not posting to the developer's mailing list > inflammatory random web pages? > > Thanks, > -jay > > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev As well, please keep in mind that OS means operating system. It is not an acronym for OpenStack. Readers who don't know the difference will believe your usage is correct and follow your incorrect example. Thank you, Anita. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/043159.html ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
1. Sorry wrong list 2. Your answers just confirm NASA was right On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Steve Martinelli wrote: > This is hardly a development related question. > > > Regards, > > *Steve Martinelli* > Software Developer - OpenStack > Keystone Core Member > -- > *Phone:* 1-905-413-2851 > * E-mail:* *steve...@ca.ibm.com* > 8200 Warden Ave > Markham, ON L6G 1C7 > Canada > > > > Aryeh Friedman wrote on 08/25/2014 12:08:50 PM: > > > From: Aryeh Friedman > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > , > > Date: 08/25/2014 12:12 PM > > Subject: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to > > OS's future > > > > http://www.quora.com/Why-would-the-creators-of-OpenStack-the-market- > > > leader-in-cloud-computing-platforms-refuse-to-use-it-and-use-AWS-instead > > > > -- > > Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org > <http://www.petitecloud.org/> > > > ___ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
1. If you're wanting to start a fire you need to somewhere else then a development mailing list. 2. Get your facts together, much of what you're writing on Quota as many has pointed out is totally wrong. Also what Anita noted earlier about OS != OpenStack in that sense. Please keep topics like this off the ML. Regards Endre 2014-08-25 18:48 GMT+02:00 Aryeh Friedman : > 1. Sorry wrong list > 2. Your answers just confirm NASA was right > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Steve Martinelli > wrote: > >> This is hardly a development related question. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> *Steve Martinelli* >> Software Developer - OpenStack >> Keystone Core Member >> -- >> *Phone:* 1-905-413-2851 >> * E-mail:* *steve...@ca.ibm.com* >> 8200 Warden Ave >> Markham, ON L6G 1C7 >> Canada >> >> >> >> Aryeh Friedman wrote on 08/25/2014 12:08:50 >> PM: >> >> > From: Aryeh Friedman >> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> > , >> > Date: 08/25/2014 12:12 PM >> > Subject: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to >> > OS's future >> > >> > http://www.quora.com/Why-would-the-creators-of-OpenStack-the-market- >> >> > leader-in-cloud-computing-platforms-refuse-to-use-it-and-use-AWS-instead >> > >> > -- >> > Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org >> <http://www.petitecloud.org/> >> >> > ___ >> > OpenStack-dev mailing list >> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > > -- > Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
Do you call Martin Meckos having no clue... he is the one that leveled the second worse criticism after mine... or is Euclapytus not one the founding members of OpenStack (after all many of the glance commands still use it's name) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Endre Karlson wrote: > 1. If you're wanting to start a fire you need to somewhere else then a > development mailing list. > 2. Get your facts together, much of what you're writing on Quota as many > has pointed out is totally wrong. > > Also what Anita noted earlier about OS != OpenStack in that sense. > > Please keep topics like this off the ML. > > Regards > Endre > > > > 2014-08-25 18:48 GMT+02:00 Aryeh Friedman : > > 1. Sorry wrong list >> 2. Your answers just confirm NASA was right >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Steve Martinelli >> wrote: >> >>> This is hardly a development related question. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> *Steve Martinelli* >>> Software Developer - OpenStack >>> Keystone Core Member >>> -- >>> *Phone:* 1-905-413-2851 >>> * E-mail:* *steve...@ca.ibm.com* >>> 8200 Warden Ave >>> Markham, ON L6G 1C7 >>> Canada >>> >>> >>> >>> Aryeh Friedman wrote on 08/25/2014 12:08:50 >>> PM: >>> >>> > From: Aryeh Friedman >>> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >>> > , >>> > Date: 08/25/2014 12:12 PM >>> > Subject: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to >>> > OS's future >>> > >>> > http://www.quora.com/Why-would-the-creators-of-OpenStack-the-market- >>> >>> > >>> leader-in-cloud-computing-platforms-refuse-to-use-it-and-use-AWS-instead >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org >>> <http://www.petitecloud.org/> >>> >>> > ___ >>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> ___ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
On 25 August 2014 10:34, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > Do you call Martin Meckos having no clue... he is the one that leveled the > second worse criticism after mine... or is Euclapytus not one the founding > members of OpenStack (after all many of the glance commands still use it's > name) > You appear to be trolling, and throwing around amazingly easy-to-disprove 'factoids', in an inappropriate forum, in order to drum up support for your own competing open source cloud platform. Please stop. Your time would be much better spent improving your platform rather than coming up with frankly bizarre criticism of the competitors. -- Ian. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
If I was doing that then I would be promoting the platform by name (which I am not). I was just pointing out in our own internal ananylis OS came in dead last among all the open source IaaS/PaaS's (the current version of mine is not #1 btw) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Ian Wells wrote: > On 25 August 2014 10:34, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > >> Do you call Martin Meckos having no clue... he is the one that leveled >> the second worse criticism after mine... or is Euclapytus not one the >> founding members of OpenStack (after all many of the glance commands still >> use it's name) >> > > You appear to be trolling, and throwing around amazingly easy-to-disprove > 'factoids', in an inappropriate forum, in order to drum up support for your > own competing open source cloud platform. Please stop. > > Your time would be much better spent improving your platform rather than > coming up with frankly bizarre criticism of the competitors. > -- > Ian. > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
So to see if we can get something useful from this thread. What was your internal analysis, can it be published? Even negative analysis is useful to make openstack better... It'd be nice to have some details on what you found, what u didn't find, so that we can all improve... After all that is what it's all about. -Josh On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > If I was doing that then I would be promoting the platform by name (which I > am not). I was just pointing out in our own internal ananylis OS came in > dead last among all the open source IaaS/PaaS's (the current version of mine > is not #1 btw) > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Ian Wells wrote: > On 25 August 2014 10:34, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > Do you call Martin Meckos having no clue... he is the one that leveled the > second worse criticism after mine... or is Euclapytus not one the founding > members of OpenStack (after all many of the glance commands still use it's > name) > > You appear to be trolling, and throwing around amazingly easy-to-disprove > 'factoids', in an inappropriate forum, in order to drum up support for your > own competing open source cloud platform. Please stop. > > Your time would be much better spent improving your platform rather than > coming up with frankly bizarre criticism of the competitors. > -- > Ian. > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > -- > Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
On 08/25/2014 02:36 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > So to see if we can get something useful from this thread. not on this mailing list. Move it somewhere else: this thread is off topic here. /stef ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] What does NASA not using OpenStack mean to OS's future
Don't feed the troll. :) :)= On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:39 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: So to see if we can get something useful from this thread. What was your internal analysis, can it be published? Even negative analysis is useful to make openstack better... It'd be nice to have some details on what you found, what u didn't find, so that we can all improve... After all that is what it's all about. -Josh On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: If I was doing that then I would be promoting the platform by name (which I am not). I was just pointing out in our own internal ananylis OS came in dead last among all the open source IaaS/PaaS's (the current version of mine is not #1 btw) > > > > >On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Ian Wells wrote: > >On 25 August 2014 10:34, Aryeh Friedman wrote: >> >>Do you call Martin Meckos having no clue... he is the one that leveled the >>second worse criticism after mine... or is Euclapytus not one the founding >>members of OpenStack (after all many of the glance commands still use it's >>name) >>> >> >> >>You appear to be trolling, and throwing around amazingly easy-to-disprove >>'factoids', in an inappropriate forum, in order to drum up support for your >>own competing open source cloud platform. Please stop. >> >>Your time would be much better spent improving your platform rather than >>coming up with frankly bizarre criticism of the competitors. >>-- >>Ian. >> >>___ >>OpenStack-dev mailing list >>OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > >-- > >Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org > ___ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
