Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
+1 On 04/23/2014 07:53 AM, Liang Chen wrote: +1 ! On 04/23/2014 02:43 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat community for around a year, since the time of the Havana design summit. His code reviews are of extremely high quality IMO, and he has been reviewing at a rate consistent with a member of the core team[1]. One thing worth addressing is that Thomas has only recently started expanding the focus of his reviews from HOT-related changes out into the rest of the code base. I don't see this as an obstacle - nobody is familiar with *all* of the code, and we trust core reviewers to know when we are qualified to give +2 and when we should limit ourselves to +1 - and as far as I know nobody else is bothered either. However, if you have strong feelings on this subject nobody will take it personally if you speak up :) Heat Core team members, please vote on this thread. A quick reminder of your options[2]: +1 - five of these are sufficient for acceptance 0 - abstention is always an option -1 - this acts as a veto cheers, Zane. [1] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-30.txt [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/CoreTeam#Adding_or_Removing_Members ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
On 23/04/14 04:14, Thomas Spatzier wrote: Hi all, I just realized during a review that I see a couple of more options, so this poll seems to be thru already ;-) Yep, I updated the list yesterday :) Thank you all for your support! I'm glad to be part of this great team! Congrats, and keep up the great work! cheers, Zane. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
Hi all, I just realized during a review that I see a couple of more options, so this poll seems to be thru already ;-) Thank you all for your support! I'm glad to be part of this great team! Cheers, Thomas Liang Chen wrote on 23/04/2014 07:53:07: > From: Liang Chen > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Date: 23/04/2014 07:56 > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core > > +1 ! > > On 04/23/2014 02:43 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > > Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. > > > > On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: > >> I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. > >> > >> Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat > >> community for around a year, since the time of the Havana design summit. > >> His code reviews are of extremely high quality IMO, and he has been > >> reviewing at a rate consistent with a member of the core team[1]. > >> > >> One thing worth addressing is that Thomas has only recently started > >> expanding the focus of his reviews from HOT-related changes out into the > >> rest of the code base. I don't see this as an obstacle - nobody is > >> familiar with *all* of the code, and we trust core reviewers to know > >> when we are qualified to give +2 and when we should limit ourselves to > >> +1 - and as far as I know nobody else is bothered either. However, if > >> you have strong feelings on this subject nobody will take it personally > >> if you speak up :) > >> > >> Heat Core team members, please vote on this thread. A quick reminder of > >> your options[2]: > >> +1 - five of these are sufficient for acceptance > >> 0 - abstention is always an option > >> -1 - this acts as a veto > >> > >> cheers, > >> Zane. > >> > >> > >> [1] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-30.txt > >> [2] > >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/CoreTeam#Adding_or_Removing_Members > >> > >> ___ > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > ___ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
+1 ! On 04/23/2014 02:43 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat community for around a year, since the time of the Havana design summit. His code reviews are of extremely high quality IMO, and he has been reviewing at a rate consistent with a member of the core team[1]. One thing worth addressing is that Thomas has only recently started expanding the focus of his reviews from HOT-related changes out into the rest of the code base. I don't see this as an obstacle - nobody is familiar with *all* of the code, and we trust core reviewers to know when we are qualified to give +2 and when we should limit ourselves to +1 - and as far as I know nobody else is bothered either. However, if you have strong feelings on this subject nobody will take it personally if you speak up :) Heat Core team members, please vote on this thread. A quick reminder of your options[2]: +1 - five of these are sufficient for acceptance 0 - abstention is always an option -1 - this acts as a veto cheers, Zane. [1] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-30.txt [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/CoreTeam#Adding_or_Removing_Members ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
On 22/04/14 14:43 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. +1 -Angus Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat community for around a year, since the time of the Havana design summit. His code reviews are of extremely high quality IMO, and he has been reviewing at a rate consistent with a member of the core team[1]. One thing worth addressing is that Thomas has only recently started expanding the focus of his reviews from HOT-related changes out into the rest of the code base. I don't see this as an obstacle - nobody is familiar with *all* of the code, and we trust core reviewers to know when we are qualified to give +2 and when we should limit ourselves to +1 - and as far as I know nobody else is bothered either. However, if you have strong feelings on this subject nobody will take it personally if you speak up :) Heat Core team members, please vote on this thread. A quick reminder of your options[2]: +1 - five of these are sufficient for acceptance 0 - abstention is always an option -1 - this acts as a veto cheers, Zane. [1] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-30.txt [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/CoreTeam#Adding_or_Removing_Members ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
+1 nice work Thomas! On 23/04/14 06:43, Zane Bitter wrote: > Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. > > On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: >> I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. >> >> Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat >> community for around a year, since the time of the Havana design summit. >> His code reviews are of extremely high quality IMO, and he has been >> reviewing at a rate consistent with a member of the core team[1]. >> >> One thing worth addressing is that Thomas has only recently started >> expanding the focus of his reviews from HOT-related changes out into the >> rest of the code base. I don't see this as an obstacle - nobody is >> familiar with *all* of the code, and we trust core reviewers to know >> when we are qualified to give +2 and when we should limit ourselves to >> +1 - and as far as I know nobody else is bothered either. However, if >> you have strong feelings on this subject nobody will take it personally >> if you speak up :) >> >> Heat Core team members, please vote on this thread. A quick reminder of >> your options[2]: >> +1 - five of these are sufficient for acceptance >> 0 - abstention is always an option >> -1 - this acts as a veto >> >> cheers, >> Zane. >> >> >> [1] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-30.txt >> [2] >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/CoreTeam#Adding_or_Removing_Members >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:43:08PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. > > On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: > >I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. > > > >Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat > >community for around a year, since the time of the Havana design summit. > >His code reviews are of extremely high quality IMO, and he has been > >reviewing at a rate consistent with a member of the core team[1]. > > > >One thing worth addressing is that Thomas has only recently started > >expanding the focus of his reviews from HOT-related changes out into the > >rest of the code base. I don't see this as an obstacle - nobody is > >familiar with *all* of the code, and we trust core reviewers to know > >when we are qualified to give +2 and when we should limit ourselves to > >+1 - and as far as I know nobody else is bothered either. However, if > >you have strong feelings on this subject nobody will take it personally > >if you speak up :) > > > >Heat Core team members, please vote on this thread. A quick reminder of > >your options[2]: > >+1 - five of these are sufficient for acceptance > > 0 - abstention is always an option > >-1 - this acts as a veto +1, I agree, great work Thomas! :) Steve ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
+1 On Tue, Apr 22 2014, Steven Dake wrote: > HOT seemed like a job for Ethan Hunt. > > Nice work on finishing the job! > > big +1 from me > > > On 04/22/2014 11:43 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: >> Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. >> >> On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: >>> I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. >>> >>> Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat >>> community for around a year, since the time of the Havana design summit. >>> His code reviews are of extremely high quality IMO, and he has been >>> reviewing at a rate consistent with a member of the core team[1]. >>> >>> One thing worth addressing is that Thomas has only recently started >>> expanding the focus of his reviews from HOT-related changes out into the >>> rest of the code base. I don't see this as an obstacle - nobody is >>> familiar with *all* of the code, and we trust core reviewers to know >>> when we are qualified to give +2 and when we should limit ourselves to >>> +1 - and as far as I know nobody else is bothered either. However, if >>> you have strong feelings on this subject nobody will take it personally >>> if you speak up :) >>> >>> Heat Core team members, please vote on this thread. A quick reminder of >>> your options[2]: >>> +1 - five of these are sufficient for acceptance >>> 0 - abstention is always an option >>> -1 - this acts as a veto >>> >>> cheers, >>> Zane. >>> >>> >>> [1] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-30.txt >>> [2] >>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/CoreTeam#Adding_or_Removing_Members >>> >>> ___ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
HOT seemed like a job for Ethan Hunt. Nice work on finishing the job! big +1 from me On 04/22/2014 11:43 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat community for around a year, since the time of the Havana design summit. His code reviews are of extremely high quality IMO, and he has been reviewing at a rate consistent with a member of the core team[1]. One thing worth addressing is that Thomas has only recently started expanding the focus of his reviews from HOT-related changes out into the rest of the code base. I don't see this as an obstacle - nobody is familiar with *all* of the code, and we trust core reviewers to know when we are qualified to give +2 and when we should limit ourselves to +1 - and as far as I know nobody else is bothered either. However, if you have strong feelings on this subject nobody will take it personally if you speak up :) Heat Core team members, please vote on this thread. A quick reminder of your options[2]: +1 - five of these are sufficient for acceptance 0 - abstention is always an option -1 - this acts as a veto cheers, Zane. [1] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-30.txt [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/CoreTeam#Adding_or_Removing_Members ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
> Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. > > On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: > > I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. > > > > Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat > > community for around a year, since the time of the Havana design summit. > > His code reviews are of extremely high quality IMO, and he has been > > reviewing at a rate consistent with a member of the core team[1]. > > > > One thing worth addressing is that Thomas has only recently started > > expanding the focus of his reviews from HOT-related changes out into the > > rest of the code base. I don't see this as an obstacle - nobody is > > familiar with *all* of the code, and we trust core reviewers to know > > when we are qualified to give +2 and when we should limit ourselves to > > +1 - and as far as I know nobody else is bothered either. However, if > > you have strong feelings on this subject nobody will take it personally > > if you speak up :) > > > > Heat Core team members, please vote on this thread. A quick reminder of > > your options[2]: > > +1 - five of these are sufficient for acceptance > > 0 - abstention is always an option > > -1 - this acts as a veto > > > > cheers, > > Zane. +1! That's the beginning of the Thomas' versus the Steves. -- Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
+1 On Apr 22, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. > > On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: >> I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. >> >> Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat >> community for around a year, since the time of the Havana design summit. >> His code reviews are of extremely high quality IMO, and he has been >> reviewing at a rate consistent with a member of the core team[1]. >> >> One thing worth addressing is that Thomas has only recently started >> expanding the focus of his reviews from HOT-related changes out into the >> rest of the code base. I don't see this as an obstacle - nobody is >> familiar with *all* of the code, and we trust core reviewers to know >> when we are qualified to give +2 and when we should limit ourselves to >> +1 - and as far as I know nobody else is bothered either. However, if >> you have strong feelings on this subject nobody will take it personally >> if you speak up :) >> >> Heat Core team members, please vote on this thread. A quick reminder of >> your options[2]: >> +1 - five of these are sufficient for acceptance >> 0 - abstention is always an option >> -1 - this acts as a veto >> >> cheers, >> Zane. >> >> >> [1] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-30.txt >> [2] >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/CoreTeam#Adding_or_Removing_Members >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core
Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat community for around a year, since the time of the Havana design summit. His code reviews are of extremely high quality IMO, and he has been reviewing at a rate consistent with a member of the core team[1]. One thing worth addressing is that Thomas has only recently started expanding the focus of his reviews from HOT-related changes out into the rest of the code base. I don't see this as an obstacle - nobody is familiar with *all* of the code, and we trust core reviewers to know when we are qualified to give +2 and when we should limit ourselves to +1 - and as far as I know nobody else is bothered either. However, if you have strong feelings on this subject nobody will take it personally if you speak up :) Heat Core team members, please vote on this thread. A quick reminder of your options[2]: +1 - five of these are sufficient for acceptance 0 - abstention is always an option -1 - this acts as a veto cheers, Zane. [1] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-30.txt [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/CoreTeam#Adding_or_Removing_Members ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
