On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:31 AM, James E. Blair <cor...@inaugust.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We have four traditional fishbowl summit sessions, then two 2-hour > blocks in workrooms (which we can split into 1-hour blocks if we want), > and a full sprint day. > > I've set up an etherpad where we can propose items for each of those > sections: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/infra-liberty-summit-planning > > There are three sections at the bottom, one for each of the meeting > types. Please add proposals there, and feel free to propose it to > multiple sections if you think it might work in more than one context (I > expect we will pick only one for a topic). Please try to add proposals > this week, or early next.
It looks like I am a little late to the party here and all slots have been filled. I was just collecting notes for my JJB2 proposal and it occurred to me that the summit would be a great opportunity to discuss some of the backwards-incompatible API changes I would like to make and to demonstrate some of the progress I have made with JJB configuration using Python modules rather than YAML. So I am curious if there will be other opportunities to get a group together to discuss this, if not is it too late to propose this as a topic for one of the workroom/fishbowl sessions? Apologies for the tardiness, if no opportunity is available to talk about this I am sure discussion via specs/mailing list should be fine. > > -Jim > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra