Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Jenkins job builder status report

[Dong Ma]

Hello Kien Ha,

Thanks for the contribution to the Jenkins job builder projects, have one
comment here, how about add your proposal document link or create a new
etherpad into the commit message of each patches as reference to keep
tracking the process.

Vincent

2016-06-11 4:05 GMT+08:00 Kien Ha :

> Hello,
>
> My name is Kien Ha and I am being mentored by Thanh Ha. I mainly work on
> the Jenkins Job Builder Project. I was asked to give my status report to
> the OpenStack.
>
> This week I have:
> - Update Cucumber Reports plugin
> - Update EnvInject plugin
> - Update FSTrigger plugin
> - Update JaCoCo plugin
> - Update support for BuildResultTrigger plugin
> - Update Sonatype CLM for CI plugin
> - External Monitor Job Type is up-to-date
> - Investigate HTTP Request
>
> I was asked to investigate HTTP Request and I found out that it does not
> have a way to put files onto nexus. It can however delete files on nexus if
> they are there.
>
> Next week I plan on working on:
> - FindBugs Plugin
> - Gearman Plugin
> - IvyTrigger Plugin
>
> I have a final exam next week so I will be more focused on my studies.
>
> Attach below is a link to my Jenkins job builder project proposal document
> with a complete table of plugins that I have worked on found at the top of
> the document [0]. The weekly work log is found at the bottom of the
> document.
>
> Regards,
> Kien Ha
>
> [0]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AHluxqiBFcsTCkpyekDOFSTahX50pXFmQgjlK-PoEQ/edit
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
>
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Fun (important!) project: optimize Gerrit's nova git repo

[Zaro]

I forgot to mention that the apps we use (gerrit and cgit) to host our
git repos do read the repos directly from disk therefore I think that
performing a gc on the repos would provide a performance improvement
(CPU and memory utilization) to gerrit and cgit.  It might be
difficult to quantify how much of an improvement since both those apps
do some cacheing of the repo data.  Anyways I think there would be
other benefits of `git gc` over `gerrit repack -adf` besides just
recovering disk space.  -Khai

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Jeremy Stanley  wrote:
> On 2016-06-10 12:20:01 -0700 (-0700), Zaro wrote:
> [...]
>> The difference is that we would save a significant amount
>> of disk space on the servers (7G for nova-nogc vs 400M for nova-gc).
> [...]
>
> And that's with an old snapshot. For some reason after the upgrade
> from 2.8 to 2.11 our repos have been rapidly growing in size on
> disk. The space occupied by
> ~gerrit2/review_site/git/openstack/nova.git is now a whopping 38GiB.
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra