Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit group adds for user-committee

2016-07-20 Thread Tom Fifield 

Thanks for the rapid reply,

I submitted the patches, on behalf of the user committee:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330403/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330510/

As I'm not on the user committee, I probably shouldn't be on the ACLs, 
hence the request :)



Regards,


Tom

On 20/07/16 14:38, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote:

Hi Tom. The way it normally works is that the person that created the project, 
is added as group owner. Then this group owner can add other people.
Please can you share the change that created these groups, so we can add the 
owner there?

Best
Yolanda

- Original Message -
From: "Tom Fifield" 
To: "openstack-infra" 
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 5:10:08 AM
Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit group adds for user-committee

Hello Infra!


Two new gerrit groups need the same list of people added to them:

https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1454,members

https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1453,members

They are:

shilla.sa...@gmail.com
emag...@gmail.com
j...@csail.mit.edu


Can we make it happen? :)




(NB: You can verify these names at
https://www.openstack.org/foundation/user-committee/ if needed)



Regards,


Tom



___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra




___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit group adds for user-committee

2016-07-20 Thread Joshua Hesketh 
I went to do this but it looks like somebody beat me to it. So just FYI
these people are now part of the appropriate groups.

Cheers,
Josh

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Tom Fifield  wrote:

> Thanks for the rapid reply,
>
> I submitted the patches, on behalf of the user committee:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330403/
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330510/
>
> As I'm not on the user committee, I probably shouldn't be on the ACLs,
> hence the request :)
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 20/07/16 14:38, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom. The way it normally works is that the person that created the
>> project, is added as group owner. Then this group owner can add other
>> people.
>> Please can you share the change that created these groups, so we can add
>> the owner there?
>>
>> Best
>> Yolanda
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Tom Fifield" 
>> To: "openstack-infra" 
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 5:10:08 AM
>> Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit group adds for user-committee
>>
>> Hello Infra!
>>
>>
>> Two new gerrit groups need the same list of people added to them:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1454,members
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1453,members
>>
>> They are:
>>
>> shilla.sa...@gmail.com
>> emag...@gmail.com
>> j...@csail.mit.edu
>>
>>
>> Can we make it happen? :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> (NB: You can verify these names at
>> https://www.openstack.org/foundation/user-committee/ if needed)
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Not able to login for https://review.openstack.org

2016-07-20 Thread Joshua Hesketh 
Hi Prabhu,

I've re-activated your account for you. Let me know if you have any
troubles.

Cheers,
Josh

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Murthy, Prabhu  wrote:

> Hi ,
>
>
>
> I am not able to login for https://review.openstack.org . Showing error
> [1].
>
> I came to know that my account is deactivated due to personal account used
> for third party CI [2].
>
> I didn’t know that , Sorry for that.
>
>
>
> I agree to use my personal gerrit account for personal committing and
> reviewing only.
>
> Please re-enable it.
>
>
>
> Name : Prabhu Murthy
>
> Company  : prabhu...@hpe.com
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Prabhu.M
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] Not Found
>
> The page you requested was not found, or you do not have permission to
> view this page.
>
>
>
> [2]
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cloud.openstack.infrastructure/3810
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
>
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Not able to login for https://review.openstack.org

2016-07-20 Thread Murthy, Prabhu 
Hi Josh,

Thanks a  lot .

Regards
Prabhu.M

From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 4:42 PM
To: Murthy, Prabhu 
Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Not able to login for 
https://review.openstack.org

Hi Prabhu,

I've re-activated your account for you. Let me know if you have any troubles.

Cheers,
Josh

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Murthy, Prabhu 
mailto:prabhu...@hpe.com>> wrote:
Hi ,

I am not able to login for https://review.openstack.org . Showing error [1].
I came to know that my account is deactivated due to personal account used for 
third party CI [2].
I didn’t know that , Sorry for that.

I agree to use my personal gerrit account for personal committing and reviewing 
only.
Please re-enable it.

Name : Prabhu Murthy
Company  : prabhu...@hpe.com

Thanks,
Prabhu.M


[1] Not Found
The page you requested was not found, or you do not have permission to view 
this page.

[2] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cloud.openstack.infrastructure/3810



___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] JJB V2.0 planning

2016-07-20 Thread Darragh Bailey 
Hi,


Quick reminder that we're approaching the second planned sync up for JJB
v2.0 api patches.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#JJB_V2.0_API_Sprint


https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/jjb_api_v2.0 contains a list of 7 patches
that I'd like us to get close to merging.


The first sync up helped clarify a few things, and I've a couple of
suggestions to help us improve on the progress made:

   - Try to review the next set of patches before the sync up start
   - Use the meeting time to agree what changes need to be made if any
   - Document changes that can be added as follow up work (although
   rebasing the set with invasive reworks can help you understand how
   everything is working and help you better understand the entire series,
   it's best if we can avoid doing that for the proposed patches for the sync
   up, and do any more extensive rework outside of them).
   - Then look to try and sub divide some patches to spread the load


I've pushed up a rebased set of Wayne's patches yesterday and this morning,
to make it easier to follow the changes added to the series by a patch I've
added in.

Hopefully everyone gets a chance to review in time, and I think things will
get substantially easier now after this week, hopefully see more landed
outside of the sync-ups from next week.

Chat to you in #openstack-sprint on Friday.

-- 
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] JJB V2.0 planning

2016-07-20 Thread Darragh Bailey 
Hi,

Just realised I forgot to include the date/time in the email (I know it's
available via the virtual sprint wiki page, should have still mentioned it)

Next sprint/sync-up is schedule: 14:00 - 18:00 (UTC) 22nd July


On 20 July 2016 at 12:45, Darragh Bailey  wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> Quick reminder that we're approaching the second planned sync up for JJB
> v2.0 api patches.
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#JJB_V2.0_API_Sprint
>
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/jjb_api_v2.0 contains a list of 7
> patches that I'd like us to get close to merging.
>
>
> The first sync up helped clarify a few things, and I've a couple of
> suggestions to help us improve on the progress made:
>
>- Try to review the next set of patches before the sync up start
>- Use the meeting time to agree what changes need to be made if any
>- Document changes that can be added as follow up work (although
>rebasing the set with invasive reworks can help you understand how
>everything is working and help you better understand the entire series,
>it's best if we can avoid doing that for the proposed patches for the sync
>up, and do any more extensive rework outside of them).
>- Then look to try and sub divide some patches to spread the load
>
>
> I've pushed up a rebased set of Wayne's patches yesterday and this
> morning, to make it easier to follow the changes added to the series by a
> patch I've added in.
>
> Hopefully everyone gets a chance to review in time, and I think things
> will get substantially easier now after this week, hopefully see more
> landed outside of the sync-ups from next week.
>
> Chat to you in #openstack-sprint on Friday.
>
> --
> Darragh Bailey
> "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
>



-- 
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Work toward a translations checksite and call for help

2016-07-20 Thread Frank Kloeker 

Am 2016-07-11 14:59, schrieb Vipul Nayyar:

Hey Elizabeth,

I'd like to contribute. :-)

I have some past deployment and Ops experience and I'm really
interested in building something of a blue green deployment system
here, to decrease the downtime. Although, I'm still going through the
infra related docs which I'm fairly new to, but with a little bit of
guidance early on, I'll be happy to take over some responsibilities
over time.

Maybe a good place for me to start might be, to have a deep look at
the puppet module written by Frank and probably noting down the most
common errors that are encountered regularly. I'd like to hear more
concrete thoughts from the community about how to proceed on this, if
any.


Welcome Vipul,

no big prefaces, I'd like the idea with blue/green deployment because we 
have to bridge downtime when DevStack is re-installing, requirement is 
once a week (day). And we have to pick a way return if DevStack 
installation failed. The reason for this is more DevStack specific 
because we want to use master branch with the newest changes.
I have gained some experience with LXD containter and want to push the 
topic a little bit forward. The draft of my idea is here: 
https://github.com/eumel8/translation_checksite/blob/container/translation_check_container.jpg
There are 2 container with DevStack installation + translation 
checksite. In front of the container is some magic, called Watchdog for 
installing the stuff and guarding the installation. Traffic will be 
route to the last available container version. Container installation is 
a little bit described here: 
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/devstack/guides/lxc.html But needs 
to adapt for LXD 2.0.

And we have to persuade the infra team to provide 16.04 VM :-)
Let me know what do you think.

kind regards

Frank


___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] JJB V2.0 planning

2016-07-20 Thread Wayne Warren 
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Darragh Bailey 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> Quick reminder that we're approaching the second planned sync up for JJB
> v2.0 api patches.
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#JJB_V2.0_API_Sprint
>

Awesome, thanks for the reminder...I will try to address comments from last
sprint that haven't been addressed yet before then.


>
>
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/jjb_api_v2.0 contains a list of 7
> patches that I'd like us to get close to merging.
>
>
> The first sync up helped clarify a few things, and I've a couple of
> suggestions to help us improve on the progress made:
>
>- Try to review the next set of patches before the sync up start
>- Use the meeting time to agree what changes need to be made if any
>- Document changes that can be added as follow up work (although
>rebasing the set with invasive reworks can help you understand how
>everything is working and help you better understand the entire series,
>it's best if we can avoid doing that for the proposed patches for the sync
>up, and do any more extensive rework outside of them).
>- Then look to try and sub divide some patches to spread the load
>
>
> I've pushed up a rebased set of Wayne's patches yesterday and this
> morning, to make it easier to follow the changes added to the series by a
> patch I've added in.
>
> Hopefully everyone gets a chance to review in time, and I think things
> will get substantially easier now after this week, hopefully see more
> landed outside of the sync-ups from next week.
>
> Chat to you in #openstack-sprint on Friday.
>
> --
> Darragh Bailey
> "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
>
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra