Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Hi Sumit,
That's fine. That repo wasn't marked for removal.
Cheers,
Josh
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
> wrote:
> > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> with
> > a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> >
> > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
>
> Hi Joshua, Apologies for chiming in late, but we request that the
> openstack/group-based-policy repo’s stable/liberty branch be _not_
> removed/EOL’ed and the currently open patches not be abandoned. We
> have consumers of this branch and we do backport bug fixes. Thanks in
> advance!
>
> ~Sumit.
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Josh
> >
> > [0]
> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Tony and all,
> >>
> >> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't
> get
> >> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me
> to
> >> it I'll look at it then.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Josh
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov
> 28th
> >>> > and Dec
> >>> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
> >>> > zuul/layout.yaml
> >>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
> >>>
> >>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL
> that
> >>> were a
> >>> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
> >>>
> >>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed
> at
> >>> that
> >>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
> >>> later.
> >>>
> >>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
> >>> something like:
> >>>
> >>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
> >>>
> >>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
> >>>
> >>> Yours Tony.
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>> https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4
> ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
> >>> [2]
> >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
> tree/eol_branch.sh
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> >>> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ___
> > OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
wrote:
> The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with
> a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
>
> Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
Hi Joshua, Apologies for chiming in late, but we request that the
openstack/group-based-policy repo’s stable/liberty branch be _not_
removed/EOL’ed and the currently open patches not be abandoned. We
have consumers of this branch and we do backport bug fixes. Thanks in
advance!
~Sumit.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> [0]
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Tony and all,
>>
>> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
>> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
>> it I'll look at it then.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Josh
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
>>> > and Dec
>>> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
>>> > zuul/layout.yaml
>>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
>>>
>>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
>>> were a
>>> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
>>>
>>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
>>> that
>>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
>>> later.
>>>
>>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
>>> something like:
>>>
>>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
>>>
>>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
>>>
>>> Yours Tony.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
>>> [2]
>>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/tree/eol_branch.sh
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>>> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2016-12-14 08:37:10 -0500:
> Excerpts from Joshua Hesketh's message of 2016-12-14 23:54:20 +1100:
> > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> >
> > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Josh
>
> Projects seeing release note build failures with errors like:
>
> Command '(['git', 'log', '--simplify-by-decoration', '--pretty="%d"',
> 'origin/stable/liberty'],)' returned non-zero exit status 128
>
> Should remove the liberty.rst page from their release notes builds.
I've posted https://review.openstack.org/410792 to teach reno about our
EOL process, but it may be some time before we have a release that
includes that fix because it relies on a significant rewrite of reno's
internals.
Rather than removing the liberty.rst file, it may also be possible
to just change "stable/liberty" in that file to "liberty-eol", since
the fix linked above should support that form, too. vdrok is going
to try this in ironic.
Doug
>
> Where do I go to add this step to our branch EOL process documentation?
>
> Doug
>
> >
> > [0]
> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Tony and all,
> > >
> > > I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
> > > to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
> > > it I'll look at it then.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Josh
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
> > >> and Dec
> > >> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
> > >> zuul/layout.yaml
> > >> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
> > >>
> > >> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
> > >> were a
> > >> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
> > >>
> > >> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
> > >> that
> > >> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
> > >> later.
> > >>
> > >> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
> > >> something like:
> > >> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa4
> > >> 6269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> > >> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
> > >>
> > >> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
> > >>
> > >> Yours Tony.
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0
> > >> a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
> > >> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
> > >> tree/eol_branch.sh
> > >>
> > >> ___
> > >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> > >> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> > >>
> > >
> > >
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Excerpts from Joshua Hesketh's message of 2016-12-14 23:54:20 +1100:
> The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
>
> Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
Projects seeing release note build failures with errors like:
Command '(['git', 'log', '--simplify-by-decoration', '--pretty="%d"',
'origin/stable/liberty'],)' returned non-zero exit status 128
Should remove the liberty.rst page from their release notes builds.
Where do I go to add this step to our branch EOL process documentation?
Doug
>
> [0]
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Tony and all,
> >
> > I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
> > to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
> > it I'll look at it then.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Josh
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
> >> and Dec
> >> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
> >> zuul/layout.yaml
> >> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
> >>
> >> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
> >> were a
> >> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
> >>
> >> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
> >> that
> >> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
> >> later.
> >>
> >> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
> >> something like:
> >> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa4
> >> 6269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
> >>
> >> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
> >>
> >> Yours Tony.
> >>
> >> [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0
> >> a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
> >> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
> >> tree/eol_branch.sh
> >>
> >> ___
> >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> >> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> >>
> >
> >
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
Cheers,
Josh
[0]
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh
wrote:
> Hey Tony and all,
>
> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
> it I'll look at it then.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>
>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
>> and Dec
>> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
>> zuul/layout.yaml
>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
>>
>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
>> were a
>> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
>>
>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
>> that
>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
>> later.
>>
>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
>> something like:
>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa4
>> 6269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
>>
>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
>>
>> Yours Tony.
>>
>> [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0
>> a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
>> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
>> tree/eol_branch.sh
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>
>
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
