Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OpenStack-docs] Training guides meeting @Barcelona Summit

2016-11-09 Thread Ildiko Vancsa 
Hi,

I like the ISO week numbers better. I think it’s more consistent, gives a 
regular cadence and does not cause confusions with having a meeting on the 5th 
week or not for instance.

My 2 cents.

Thanks and Best Regards,
Ildikó


> On 2016. Nov 9., at 20:21, Ian Y. Choi  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> IMO if there is an IRC meeting on every week with alternating times for odd 
> and even weeks,
> having two bi-weekly schedules with alternating times would be 
> self-explanatory.
> However, if the meeting frequency would be just one or two in a month,
> then referring such as n-th week in every month would be more intuitive I 
> think.
> 
> Unfortunately current yaml2ical does not support such logistics,
> but my WIP patch ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/395762/ 
>  ) will make a clue
> to support such logistics in the near future I think :)
> 
> Note that I suggest not to consider 5th weeks because some months do not have 
> 5th weeks.
> 
> 
> With many thanks,
> 
> /Ian
> 
> Jeremy Stanley wrote on 11/9/2016 10:45 PM:
>> On 2016-11-09 13:34:34 +0900 (+0900), Ian Y. Choi wrote:
>>> My understanding of *odd* weeks is the 1st and 3rd weeks in every month,
>>> since we actually had training-guides meetings with such logistics a few
>>> months ago.
>> [...]
>> 
>> So you skip 5th weeks when those happen? Or you have back-to-back
>> meeting weeks in those cases?
>> 
>> The way alternating weeks are usually interpreted (and handled in
>> the IRC meeting scheduling automation we have) is based on even or
>> odd ISO week numbers:
>> 
>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/yaml2ical/tree/README.rst?id=c29e042#n163
>> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_week_date
>> 
> 
> 
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org 
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra 
> 
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OpenStack-docs] Training guides meeting @Barcelona Summit

2016-11-11 Thread Ildiko Vancsa 
Hi Ian,

I agree, let’s have a meeting next Tuesday and we can agree on the logistics 
there.

Thanks,
Ildikó


> On 2016. Nov 10., at 19:10, Ian Y. Choi  wrote:
> 
> Ildiko Vancsa wrote on 11/10/2016 4:57 AM:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I like the ISO week numbers better. I think it’s more consistent, gives a 
>> regular cadence and does not cause confusions with having a meeting on the 
>> 5th week or not for instance.
>> 
>> My 2 cents.
> Make sense. Then IMO changing [1] with biweekly-odd or documenting this as 
> description would be good.
> For monthly meeting occurrence idea, I would like to follow another mail 
> thread [2].
> 
> Although the next week is even according to ISO week numbers, let's have 
> training-guides meeting
> on next Tuesday 13:00 UTC and make accordance for that, since there were no 
> training-guides team meeting for latest 3 weeks.
> 
> Is this okay for all training-guides meeting attendees?
> 
> 
> [1] 
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/irc-meetings/tree/meetings/training-guides-team-meeting.yaml
>  
> <http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/irc-meetings/tree/meetings/training-guides-team-meeting.yaml>
> [2] 
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2016-November/004835.html
>  
> <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2016-November/004835.html>
> 
> 
> With many thanks,
> 
> /Ian
>> 
>> Thanks and Best Regards,
>> Ildikó
>> 
>> 
>>> On 2016. Nov 9., at 20:21, Ian Y. Choi >> <mailto:ianyrc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> IMO if there is an IRC meeting on every week with alternating times for odd 
>>> and even weeks,
>>> having two bi-weekly schedules with alternating times would be 
>>> self-explanatory.
>>> However, if the meeting frequency would be just one or two in a month,
>>> then referring such as n-th week in every month would be more intuitive I 
>>> think.
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately current yaml2ical does not support such logistics,
>>> but my WIP patch ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/395762/ 
>>> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/395762/> ) will make a clue
>>> to support such logistics in the near future I think :)
>>> 
>>> Note that I suggest not to consider 5th weeks because some months do not 
>>> have 5th weeks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> With many thanks,
>>> 
>>> /Ian
>>> 
>>> Jeremy Stanley wrote on 11/9/2016 10:45 PM:
>>>> On 2016-11-09 13:34:34 +0900 (+0900), Ian Y. Choi wrote:
>>>>> My understanding of *odd* weeks is the 1st and 3rd weeks in every month,
>>>>> since we actually had training-guides meetings with such logistics a few
>>>>> months ago.
>>>> [...]
>>>> 
>>>> So you skip 5th weeks when those happen? Or you have back-to-back
>>>> meeting weeks in those cases?
>>>> 
>>>> The way alternating weeks are usually interpreted (and handled in
>>>> the IRC meeting scheduling automation we have) is based on even or
>>>> odd ISO week numbers:
>>>> 
>>>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/yaml2ical/tree/README.rst?id=c29e042#n163
>>>>  
>>>> <http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/yaml2ical/tree/README.rst?id=c29e042#n163>
>>>> 
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_week_date 
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_week_date>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>>> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org 
>>> <mailto:OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra 
>>> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra>
> 

___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra