Re: [Openstack-operators] floatin ip issue

2014-10-25 Thread George Shuklin
Check out if qrouter got floating inside network namespace  (ip net exec 
qrouter... ip -4 a), or just bash in to it (stdbuf -e0 -o0 ip net exec 
qrouter... /bin/bash) and play with it like with normal server.



On 10/24/2014 07:38 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:

Hello,

Assigned a floating ip to an instance. But I can't ping the instance. 
This instance can reach internet with no problem. But I can't ssh or 
icmp to this instance. Its not a security group issue.


On my network node that runs l3, I can see qrouter. The extenel subnet 
looks like this:


allocation-pool start=192.168.122.193,end=192.168.122.222 
--disable-dhcp --gateway 192.168.122.1 192.168.122.0/24 
http://192.168.122.0/24


I can ping 192.168.122.193 using: ip netns exec 
qrouter-34f3b828-b7b8-4f44-b430-14d9c5bd0d0c ping 192.168.122.193


but not 192.168.122.194 (which is the floating ip)

Doing tcp dump on the interace that connects to the external world, I 
can see ICMP request but not reply from the interface :



11:36:40.360255 IP 192.168.122.1  192.168.122.194 
http://192.168.122.194: ICMP echo request, id 2589, seq 312, length 64


11:36:41.360222 IP 192.168.122.1  192.168.122.194 
http://192.168.122.194: ICMP echo request, id 2589, seq 313, length 64



Ideas?

Thanks

Paras.



___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


Re: [Openstack-operators] Three Node Deployment Model

2014-10-25 Thread Hossein Zabolzadeh
Thanks for your useful answers.
Very helpful resource and guides.

On 10/23/14, Adam Lawson alaw...@aqorn.com wrote:
 Your dilemna looks like this as I see it:

 Highly-Available, Highly-Scalable, Limited Hardware. Pick any 2.

 In an ideal world we'd all like the benefits of everything with limited
 resources. True HA requires some meaningful separation (logical fencing if
 you will). You can't do that with only 3 nodes so you need to make some
 concessions. Starting with motivation that begins your efforts within
 Openstack Docs per Anne. ; )

 Mahalo,
 Adam


 *Adam Lawson*

 AQORN, Inc.
 427 North Tatnall Street
 Ste. 58461
 Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2230
 Toll-free: (844) 4-AQORN-NOW ext. 101
 International: +1 302-387-4660
 Direct: +1 916-246-2072


 On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote:



 On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Hossein Zabolzadeh
 zabolza...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi there,
 I have an openstack deployment question. I have three physical
 server(Configurations are listed in the following). What is the best
 optimized production-ready deployment model to achieve the following
 goals in mind(Users will not exceeds more than 10)?
 - Ability to add more services(compute, controller, storage node)
 later, without service interruption
 - Ability to provide HA for all services, after more nodes added
 without service interruption
 - No need to change the deployment architecture later when more
 physical nodes and resources available(My physical infrastructure will
 be scaled later, and not limitted to these three physical machines).
 For example I don't know is it better to have 1 neutron node, or have
 two neutron service on my two compute nodes?


 Hi - Have you read:
 http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/scaling.html

 and


 http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/example_architecture.html#example_architecture-neutron

 Horizontal scaling is covered in these as well as your neutron question.

 Anne



 A really appreciate any helps.
 Thanks in advance.
 --
 Server 1:
 RAM: 128GB
 HDD: 300GB
 --
 Server 2:
 RAM: 128GB
 HDD: 300GB
 --
 Server 3:
 RAM: 256GB
 HDD: 512GB

 ___
 OpenStack-operators mailing list
 OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators



 ___
 OpenStack-operators mailing list
 OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators




___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


[Openstack-operators] [Nova] bind vnic to phys nic

2014-10-25 Thread Adam Lawson
I hate requests like this but I've been asked one again how to bind a
single vm to a physical NIC on a cookout node. Kicking and screaming I've
tried to steer them away from this bad decision with no luck. So I have to
ask, is this even possible within Openstack? I'm sure it's technically
possible but I really hate wasting everyone's time trying to eliminate the
benefits of the cloud...

Thoughts?
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators