Re: [Openstack-operators] Barcelona Ops Meetup Planning

[Edgar Magana]

Done!

Edgar

From: Chris Morgan 
Date: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 10:29 AM
To: Matt Van Winkle 
Cc: OpenStack Operators 
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Barcelona Ops Meetup Planning

If you do have contributions, also please "sign-in" to the ether pad top left 
and pick a color. It helps a bit to know who liked what. Thanks!

Chris

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Matt Van Winkle 
> wrote:
Hello all,
The etherpad to gather ideas from you all for sessions during the Barcelona Ops 
Meetup.  Please take some time to review and add your comments here:

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BCN-ops-meetup


The meetup planning team will be meeting weekly between now and the summit to 
plan all this.  If You are interested in helping with that process, you are 
welcome to join us in #openstack-operators at 14:00 UTC on Tuesdays.  We are 
always ready to welcome new help.

Thanks!
VW




___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators



--
Chris Morgan >
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Docs session in the Ops Track?

[Lana Brindley]

That's probably more than we're able to focus on in a session, but if Ops have 
specific feedback on other docs, that session would be a good time for them to 
mention it. Otherwise, they can come to relevant sessions in the Docs track 
instead.

Lana

On 21/09/16 03:17, Matt Kassawara wrote:
> All relevant documentation for operators - which adds at least all of the 
> material under "Operations and Administration Guides" on d.o.o, the 
> configuration reference, and API reference.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Anne Gentle  > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Matt Kassawara  > wrote:
> 
> Operators use other documentation besides the operations guide, which 
> is arguably more of an overview for potential operators than current 
> operators. Same for the architecture guide.
> 
> 
> Hi -- You said "focus on all" -- can you be more specific what topics 
> you'd like? 
> 
> Plus, who has the ability to add to the ops track?
> 
> Anne
>  
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Lana Brindley 
> > wrote:
> 
> What do you mean by that? Can you please elaborate?
> 
> L
> 
> On 20/09/16 13:52, Matt Kassawara wrote:
> > Can we focus on all of the potentially relevant documentation?
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Lana Brindley 
>  
> >> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ops,
> >
> > For the last few Design Summits, I've run a docs session in 
> the Ops track, to focus on the Ops Guide (and, to a lesser extent, the 
> Architecture Guide). Is there interest in doing this again? If so, can I 
> please grab a slot?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lana (Docs PTL)
> >
> > --
> > Lana Brindley
> > Technical Writer
> > Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
> > http://lanabrindley.com
> >
> >
> > ___
> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
> > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org 
>  
>  >
> > 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators 
>  
>  >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Lana Brindley
> Technical Writer
> Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
> http://lanabrindley.com
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org 
> 
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Anne Gentle
> www.justwriteclick.com 
> 
> 

-- 
Lana Brindley
Technical Writer
Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
http://lanabrindley.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Barcelona Ops Meetup Planning

[Chris Morgan]

If you do have contributions, also please "sign-in" to the ether pad top
left and pick a color. It helps a bit to know who liked what. Thanks!

Chris

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Matt Van Winkle 
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> The etherpad to gather ideas from you all for sessions during the
> Barcelona Ops Meetup.  Please take some time to review and add your
> comments here:
>
>
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BCN-ops-meetup
>
>
>
>
>
> The meetup planning team will be meeting weekly between now and the summit
> to plan all this.  If You are interested in helping with that process, you
> are welcome to join us in #openstack-operators at 14:00 UTC on Tuesdays.
> We are always ready to welcome new help.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> VW
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>


-- 
Chris Morgan 
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Docs session in the Ops Track?

[Matt Kassawara]

All relevant documentation for operators - which adds at least all of the
material under "Operations and Administration Guides" on d.o.o, the
configuration reference, and API reference.

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Anne Gentle  wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Matt Kassawara 
> wrote:
>
>> Operators use other documentation besides the operations guide, which is
>> arguably more of an overview for potential operators than current
>> operators. Same for the architecture guide.
>>
>
> Hi -- You said "focus on all" -- can you be more specific what topics
> you'd like?
>
> Plus, who has the ability to add to the ops track?
>
> Anne
>
>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Lana Brindley <
>> openst...@lanabrindley.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What do you mean by that? Can you please elaborate?
>>>
>>> L
>>>
>>> On 20/09/16 13:52, Matt Kassawara wrote:
>>> > Can we focus on all of the potentially relevant documentation?
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Lana Brindley <
>>> openst...@lanabrindley.com > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Ops,
>>> >
>>> > For the last few Design Summits, I've run a docs session in the
>>> Ops track, to focus on the Ops Guide (and, to a lesser extent, the
>>> Architecture Guide). Is there interest in doing this again? If so, can I
>>> please grab a slot?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Lana (Docs PTL)
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Lana Brindley
>>> > Technical Writer
>>> > Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
>>> > http://lanabrindley.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ___
>>> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>> > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensta
>>> ck-operators >> i-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lana Brindley
>>> Technical Writer
>>> Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
>>> http://lanabrindley.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Anne Gentle
> www.justwriteclick.com
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Docs session in the Ops Track?

[Anne Gentle]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Matt Kassawara 
wrote:

> Operators use other documentation besides the operations guide, which is
> arguably more of an overview for potential operators than current
> operators. Same for the architecture guide.
>

Hi -- You said "focus on all" -- can you be more specific what topics you'd
like?

Plus, who has the ability to add to the ops track?

Anne


>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Lana Brindley <
> openst...@lanabrindley.com> wrote:
>
>> What do you mean by that? Can you please elaborate?
>>
>> L
>>
>> On 20/09/16 13:52, Matt Kassawara wrote:
>> > Can we focus on all of the potentially relevant documentation?
>> >
>> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Lana Brindley <
>> openst...@lanabrindley.com > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Ops,
>> >
>> > For the last few Design Summits, I've run a docs session in the Ops
>> track, to focus on the Ops Guide (and, to a lesser extent, the Architecture
>> Guide). Is there interest in doing this again? If so, can I please grab a
>> slot?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Lana (Docs PTL)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lana Brindley
>> > Technical Writer
>> > Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
>> > http://lanabrindley.com
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensta
>> ck-operators > ck-operators>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Lana Brindley
>> Technical Writer
>> Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
>> http://lanabrindley.com
>>
>>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>


-- 
Anne Gentle
www.justwriteclick.com
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Docs session in the Ops Track?

[Matt Kassawara]

Operators use other documentation besides the operations guide, which is
arguably more of an overview for potential operators than current
operators. Same for the architecture guide.

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Lana Brindley 
wrote:

> What do you mean by that? Can you please elaborate?
>
> L
>
> On 20/09/16 13:52, Matt Kassawara wrote:
> > Can we focus on all of the potentially relevant documentation?
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Lana Brindley <
> openst...@lanabrindley.com > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ops,
> >
> > For the last few Design Summits, I've run a docs session in the Ops
> track, to focus on the Ops Guide (and, to a lesser extent, the Architecture
> Guide). Is there interest in doing this again? If so, can I please grab a
> slot?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lana (Docs PTL)
> >
> > --
> > Lana Brindley
> > Technical Writer
> > Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
> > http://lanabrindley.com
> >
> >
> > ___
> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
> > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org  lists.openstack.org>
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
> openstack-operators  openstack-operators>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Lana Brindley
> Technical Writer
> Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
> http://lanabrindley.com
>
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] [scientific][scientific-wg] Reminder: Scientific WG meeting Tuesday 2100 UTC

[Stig Telfer]

Hi all - 

We have a Scientific WG IRC meeting on Tuesday at 2100 UTC on channel 
#openstack-meeting.

The agenda is available here[1] and full IRC meeting details are here[2].

This week we have updates on Barcelona, and are looking for OpenStack-centric 
picks from the Supercomputing 2016 conference schedule.  I’m also interested in 
discussing how people might like to change the way the WG works for the next 
cycle and gather peoples thoughts for the agenda for the Barcelona committee 
meeting.

If anyone would like to add an item for discussion on the agenda, it is also 
available in an etherpad[3].

Best wishes,
Stig

[1] 
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Scientific_working_group#IRC_Meeting_September_20th_2016
[2] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Scientific_Working_Group
[3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Scientific-WG-next-meeting-agenda
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] Volunteers needed for help with Barcelona ops meetups ( and beyond )

[Matt Jarvis]

Hello all

We're a bit thin on the ground in the ops meetup team, and could really do
with some more volunteers to help with the work of organising the Summit
and Midcycle Ops Meetups. No previous experience required, enthusiasm and
some time is all that's needed ! We're meeting regularly on
#openstack-operators, and you can find all the info on the wiki at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team. Getting involved is a
great way to contribute to the community, so please do come join us.

If you have any questions feel free to reach out to me or any of the other
members of the team, or just drop in on IRC and say hi.

Matt

-- 
DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] Barcelona Ops Meetup Planning

[Matt Van Winkle]

Hello all,
The etherpad to gather ideas from you all for sessions during the Barcelona Ops 
Meetup.  Please take some time to review and add your comments here:

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BCN-ops-meetup


The meetup planning team will be meeting weekly between now and the summit to 
plan all this.  If You are interested in helping with that process, you are 
welcome to join us in #openstack-operators at 14:00 UTC on Tuesdays.  We are 
always ready to welcome new help.

Thanks!
VW



___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] libvirt: make snapshot use RBD snapshot/clone when available

[Mohammed Naser]

I'm fairly certain Redhat OSP has this backported in their liberty release too.

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Saverio Proto  wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I rebuilt my ubuntu packages and I am testing the patch on Liberty.
>
> So far so good.
>
> If anyone else wants this change officially in Ubuntu liberty please
> comment here:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~zioproto/ubuntu/+source/nova/+git/nova/+merge/304952
>
> Saverio
>
>
> 2016-09-03 1:09 GMT+02:00 Logan V. :
>> Have been using it since kilo. It was a clean pick into Liberty and worked
>> great for me.
>>
>> Logan
>>
>>
>> On Friday, September 2, 2016, Saverio Proto  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> this is merged upstream in Mitaka:
>>>
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287954/
>>>
>>> anyone already did a cherry pick in Liberty and is running this in
>>> production ?
>>> I plan to test this soon. Any feedback is appreciated !
>>>
>>> thank you
>>>
>>> Saverio
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators



-- 
Mohammed Naser

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Database cleanup scripts?

[Kostiantyn.Volenbovskyi]

> >
> 
> If someone can backport that to stable/mitaka I'll +2 it. It's not a clean 
> backport
> to mitaka.
> 
> There are also archive scripts in the osops repo here:
> 
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/osops-tools-
> generic/tree/nova/openstack_db_archive.sh
> 
> I haven't used ^ personally, but I know it was written because the archive 
> scripts
> in nova-manage were broken until a couple of releases back where we fixed the
> FKey issue.
> 
> We're still working on getting a purge instances nova-manage command in
> ocata (don't archive, straight up delete).
Hi Matt,everyone


I think you mean [1] and [2]. But could you comment on comment of Sergii Rizvan 
(srizvan) in [3] ("archiving tables like 'instances' still fails'):
"The patches from upstream [1], [2] provide only partial fix of the original 
issue. Before applying patches the command "nova-manage db 
archive_deleted_rows" doesn't move the entries to the shadow tables at all 
because of foreign key constraint issue. After applying patch [1] nova-manage 
firstly process tables that don't have foreign keys. Patch [2] fixes issue with 
archiving instance_actions and instance_actions_event. And after applying those 
two patches we are able to archive some tables, but archiving tables with 
foreign key constraint issue, like 'instances', still fails."

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/246635/

[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/326730/

[3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/mos/+bug/1562863/comments/6 

BR, 
Konstantin

> 

> --
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt Riedemann
> 
> 
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators