[Openstack-operators] User Committee Weekly IRC meeting reminder (9/25/2017)

[Shamail Tahir]

Hi everyone,

The User Committee will be meeting later today. The agenda can be found on
our wiki page[1] and the meeting details are on eavesdrop[2]. We hope to
see you there!

[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee#
Meeting_Agenda.2FPrevious_Meeting_Logs
[2] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#User_Committee_Meeting

-- 
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Forum Reminder! Submissions due by Sept 29th

[Jimmy McArthur]

Argh! Sorry everyone. We changed the link:

http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/create

Mea culpa!!


AMIT KUMAR JAISWAL 
September 25, 2017 at 8:34 AM
Hi Jimmy.

The above link you have given is broken and is saying "Internal Server 
Error".


Please re-check the link again.

Thanks
Amit Kumar Jaiswal
ᐧ

Amit Kumar Jaiswal
Mozilla Representative  | 
LinkedIn  | Portfolio 


New Delhi, India
M : +91-8081187743 | T : @AMIT_GKP | PGP : EBE7 39F0 0427 4A2C









Jimmy McArthur 
September 25, 2017 at 8:25 AM
Hello!

This is a friendly reminder that all proposed Forum session leaders 
must submit their abstracts at:


http://odsreg.openstack.org

before 11:59PM UTC on Friday, September 29th!

Cheers,
Jimmy



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Forum Reminder! Submissions due by Sept 29th

[AMIT KUMAR JAISWAL]

Hi Jimmy.

The above link you have given is broken and is saying "Internal Server
Error".

Please re-check the link again.

Thanks
Amit Kumar Jaiswal
ᐧ

Amit Kumar Jaiswal
Mozilla Representative  | LinkedIn
 | Portfolio

New Delhi, India
M : +91-8081187743 | T : @AMIT_GKP | PGP : EBE7 39F0 0427 4A2C








On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Jimmy McArthur  wrote:

> Hello!
>
> This is a friendly reminder that all proposed Forum session leaders must
> submit their abstracts at:
>
> http://odsreg.openstack.org
>
> before 11:59PM UTC on Friday, September 29th!
>
> Cheers,
> Jimmy
>
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] Forum Reminder! Submissions due by Sept 29th

[Jimmy McArthur]

Hello!

This is a friendly reminder that all proposed Forum session leaders must 
submit their abstracts at:


http://odsreg.openstack.org

before 11:59PM UTC on Friday, September 29th!

Cheers,
Jimmy



___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] [neutron] Should we continue providing FQDNs for instance hostnames?

[Volodymyr Litovka]

Hi Matt,

On 9/22/17 7:10 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:

while this approach is ok in general, some comments from my side -
1. For a new instance, if the neutron network has a dns_domain set, 
use it. I'm not totally sure how we tell from the metadata API if it's 
a new instance or not, except when we're building the config drive, 
but that could be sorted out.
In some scenarios, ports can be created for VM but be detached until 
"right" time. For example, at the moment Nova don't reflect Neutron's 
port admin state to VM (long time was going to, but thanks to this 
discussion just filled a bug 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1719261 ). So, if you need VM with 
predefined port roles (with corresponding iptables rules), but, for some 
reasons, these ports should be DOWN, you need:


- create them before VM will be created
- pass their MAC addresses to VM in order to create corresponding udev 
naming rules and subsequent configuration

- but don't attach them

In such scenario, network with "dns_domain" parameter can be unavailable 
to VM since there are no attached ports from this network at the VM 
creation time.


And a second point: what I wanted to say is that "dns_domain" is a 
property, which is available only when Designate is in use. While it can 
be immanent property of network for use with dnsmasq's "--domain" 
parameter, in order to get useful responces for DHCP "domain" queries. 
Not too critical, but full integration with DNS don't always required 
while simple DHCP functionality is enough.



2. Otherwise use the dhcp_domain config option in nova.
Crazy idea is to get customization right here - if instance's "name" is 
FQDN itself (e.g. myhost.some.domain.here) then:

- ignore "dhcp_domain" and pass "name" unchanged as hostname to VM
- but use "hostname"-part of name (e.g. myhost) to register VM in Openstack

Thank you.

--
Volodymyr Litovka
  "Vision without Execution is Hallucination." -- Thomas Edison

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder quota per volume types in the dashboard

[Arne Wiebalck]

Ah, nice, wasn’t aware. Mateusz is one of the Horizon experts here at CERN I 
was referring to :)

On 25 Sep 2017, at 10:41, Massimo Sgaravatto 
> wrote:

Just found that there is already this one:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1717342

2017-09-25 10:28 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto 
>:
Yes I am interested. Are you going to push them to gerrit ?
Should we open a bug to track this change into Horizon ?

massimo do you want to open the bug on Launchpad ? So if Arne pushed
the patches on gerrit we can link them to the bug. I pointed
robcresswell to this thread, he is reading us.

thanks !

Saverio

2017-09-25 10:13 GMT+02:00 Arne Wiebalck 
>:
> Massimo, Saverio,
>
> We faced the same issue and have created patches for Horizon to display
> - the per volume quota in the volume request panel, and also
> - additional information about the volume type (like IOPS and throughput 
> limits, intended usage etc.)
>
> The patches will need some polishing before being sent upstream (I’ll need
> need to cross-check with our Horizon experts), but we use them in prod since
> quite a while and are happy to already share patch files if you’re interested.
>
> Cheers,
>  Arne
>
>
>
>> On 25 Sep 2017, at 09:58, Saverio Proto 
>> > wrote:
>>
>> I am pinging on IRC robcresswell from the Horizon project. He is still
>> PTL I think.
>> If you are on IRC please join #openstack-horizon.
>>
>> We should ask the Horizon PTL how to get this feature request into
>> implementation.
>>
>> With the command line interface, can you already see the two different
>> quotas for the two different volume types ? Can you paste an example
>> output from the CLI ?
>>
>> thank you
>>
>> Saverio
>>
>>
>> 2017-09-25 9:55 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto 
>> >:
>>> We are currently running Mitaka (preparing to update to Ocata). I see the
>>> same behavior on an Ocata based testbed
>>>
>>> Thanks, Massimo
>>>
>>> 2017-09-25 9:50 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto 
>>> >:

 Hello Massimo,

 what is your version of Openstack ??

 thank you

 Saverio

 2017-09-25 9:13 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto
 >:
> Hi
>
>
> In our OpenStack cloud we have two backends for Cinder (exposed using
> two
> volume types), and we set different quotas for these two volume types.
>
> The problem happens when a user, using the dashboard, tries to create a
> volume using a volume type for which the project quota is over:
>
> - the reported error message simply reports "unable to create volume",
> without mentioning that the problem is with quota
>
> - (by default) the dashboard only shows the overall Cinder quota (and
> not
> the quota per volume)
>
>
> Do you know if it possible in some to expose on the dashboard the cinder
> quota per volume type ?
>
>
> Thanks, Massimo
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
> --
> Arne Wiebalck
> CERN IT
>


--
Arne Wiebalck
CERN IT

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder quota per volume types in the dashboard

[Massimo Sgaravatto]

Just found that there is already this one:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1717342

2017-09-25 10:28 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto :

> Yes I am interested. Are you going to push them to gerrit ?
> Should we open a bug to track this change into Horizon ?
>
> massimo do you want to open the bug on Launchpad ? So if Arne pushed
> the patches on gerrit we can link them to the bug. I pointed
> robcresswell to this thread, he is reading us.
>
> thanks !
>
> Saverio
>
> 2017-09-25 10:13 GMT+02:00 Arne Wiebalck :
> > Massimo, Saverio,
> >
> > We faced the same issue and have created patches for Horizon to display
> > - the per volume quota in the volume request panel, and also
> > - additional information about the volume type (like IOPS and throughput
> limits, intended usage etc.)
> >
> > The patches will need some polishing before being sent upstream (I’ll
> need
> > need to cross-check with our Horizon experts), but we use them in prod
> since
> > quite a while and are happy to already share patch files if you’re
> interested.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >  Arne
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 25 Sep 2017, at 09:58, Saverio Proto  wrote:
> >>
> >> I am pinging on IRC robcresswell from the Horizon project. He is still
> >> PTL I think.
> >> If you are on IRC please join #openstack-horizon.
> >>
> >> We should ask the Horizon PTL how to get this feature request into
> >> implementation.
> >>
> >> With the command line interface, can you already see the two different
> >> quotas for the two different volume types ? Can you paste an example
> >> output from the CLI ?
> >>
> >> thank you
> >>
> >> Saverio
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-09-25 9:55 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto <
> massimo.sgarava...@gmail.com>:
> >>> We are currently running Mitaka (preparing to update to Ocata). I see
> the
> >>> same behavior on an Ocata based testbed
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, Massimo
> >>>
> >>> 2017-09-25 9:50 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto :
> 
>  Hello Massimo,
> 
>  what is your version of Openstack ??
> 
>  thank you
> 
>  Saverio
> 
>  2017-09-25 9:13 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto
>  :
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > In our OpenStack cloud we have two backends for Cinder (exposed using
> > two
> > volume types), and we set different quotas for these two volume
> types.
> >
> > The problem happens when a user, using the dashboard, tries to
> create a
> > volume using a volume type for which the project quota is over:
> >
> > - the reported error message simply reports "unable to create
> volume",
> > without mentioning that the problem is with quota
> >
> > - (by default) the dashboard only shows the overall Cinder quota (and
> > not
> > the quota per volume)
> >
> >
> > Do you know if it possible in some to expose on the dashboard the
> cinder
> > quota per volume type ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks, Massimo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
> > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
> openstack-operators
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> >
> > --
> > Arne Wiebalck
> > CERN IT
> >
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder quota per volume types in the dashboard

[Arne Wiebalck]

Massimo, Saverio,

We faced the same issue and have created patches for Horizon to display
- the per volume quota in the volume request panel, and also
- additional information about the volume type (like IOPS and throughput 
limits, intended usage etc.)

The patches will need some polishing before being sent upstream (I’ll need
need to cross-check with our Horizon experts), but we use them in prod since
quite a while and are happy to already share patch files if you’re interested.

Cheers,
 Arne



> On 25 Sep 2017, at 09:58, Saverio Proto  wrote:
> 
> I am pinging on IRC robcresswell from the Horizon project. He is still
> PTL I think.
> If you are on IRC please join #openstack-horizon.
> 
> We should ask the Horizon PTL how to get this feature request into
> implementation.
> 
> With the command line interface, can you already see the two different
> quotas for the two different volume types ? Can you paste an example
> output from the CLI ?
> 
> thank you
> 
> Saverio
> 
> 
> 2017-09-25 9:55 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto :
>> We are currently running Mitaka (preparing to update to Ocata). I see the
>> same behavior on an Ocata based testbed
>> 
>> Thanks, Massimo
>> 
>> 2017-09-25 9:50 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto :
>>> 
>>> Hello Massimo,
>>> 
>>> what is your version of Openstack ??
>>> 
>>> thank you
>>> 
>>> Saverio
>>> 
>>> 2017-09-25 9:13 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto
>>> :
 Hi
 
 
 In our OpenStack cloud we have two backends for Cinder (exposed using
 two
 volume types), and we set different quotas for these two volume types.
 
 The problem happens when a user, using the dashboard, tries to create a
 volume using a volume type for which the project quota is over:
 
 - the reported error message simply reports "unable to create volume",
 without mentioning that the problem is with quota
 
 - (by default) the dashboard only shows the overall Cinder quota (and
 not
 the quota per volume)
 
 
 Do you know if it possible in some to expose on the dashboard the cinder
 quota per volume type ?
 
 
 Thanks, Massimo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 OpenStack-operators mailing list
 OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

--
Arne Wiebalck
CERN IT

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder quota per volume types in the dashboard

[Massimo Sgaravatto]

Yes. From the CLI I have the info. E.g in the following example I have
three volume-types (ceph, iscsi-infnpd, gluster) and for two of them a
quota was set

Thanks, Massimo

[sgaravat@lxsgaravat ~]$ cinder quota-usage ${OS_PROJECT_ID}
+++--+---+
| Type   | In_use | Reserved | Limit |
+++--+---+
| backup_gigabytes   | 0  | 0| 1000  |
| backups| 0  | 0| 10|
| gigabytes  | 120| 0| 300   |
| gigabytes_ceph | 85 | 0| 100   |
| gigabytes_gluster  | 0  | 0| -1|
| gigabytes_iscsi-infnpd | 35 | 0| 200   |
| per_volume_gigabytes   | 0  | 0| 1000  |
| snapshots  | 0  | 0| 10|
| snapshots_ceph | 0  | 0| -1|
| snapshots_gluster  | 0  | 0| -1|
| snapshots_iscsi-infnpd | 0  | 0| -1|
| volumes| 8  | 0| 20|
| volumes_ceph   | 6  | 0| -1|
| volumes_gluster| 0  | 0| -1|
| volumes_iscsi-infnpd   | 2  | 0| -1|
+++--+---+
[sgaravat@lxsgaravat ~]$


2017-09-25 9:58 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto :

> I am pinging on IRC robcresswell from the Horizon project. He is still
> PTL I think.
>  If you are on IRC please join #openstack-horizon.
>
> We should ask the Horizon PTL how to get this feature request into
> implementation.
>
> With the command line interface, can you already see the two different
> quotas for the two different volume types ? Can you paste an example
> output from the CLI ?
>
> thank you
>
> Saverio
>
>
> 2017-09-25 9:55 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto  >:
> > We are currently running Mitaka (preparing to update to Ocata). I see the
> > same behavior on an Ocata based testbed
> >
> > Thanks, Massimo
> >
> > 2017-09-25 9:50 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto :
> >>
> >> Hello Massimo,
> >>
> >> what is your version of Openstack ??
> >>
> >> thank you
> >>
> >> Saverio
> >>
> >> 2017-09-25 9:13 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto
> >> :
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > In our OpenStack cloud we have two backends for Cinder (exposed using
> >> > two
> >> > volume types), and we set different quotas for these two volume types.
> >> >
> >> > The problem happens when a user, using the dashboard, tries to create
> a
> >> > volume using a volume type for which the project quota is over:
> >> >
> >> > - the reported error message simply reports "unable to create volume",
> >> > without mentioning that the problem is with quota
> >> >
> >> > - (by default) the dashboard only shows the overall Cinder quota (and
> >> > not
> >> > the quota per volume)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Do you know if it possible in some to expose on the dashboard the
> cinder
> >> > quota per volume type ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks, Massimo
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ___
> >> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
> >> > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
> openstack-operators
> >> >
> >
> >
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder quota per volume types in the dashboard

[Saverio Proto]

I am pinging on IRC robcresswell from the Horizon project. He is still
PTL I think.
 If you are on IRC please join #openstack-horizon.

We should ask the Horizon PTL how to get this feature request into
implementation.

With the command line interface, can you already see the two different
quotas for the two different volume types ? Can you paste an example
output from the CLI ?

thank you

Saverio


2017-09-25 9:55 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto :
> We are currently running Mitaka (preparing to update to Ocata). I see the
> same behavior on an Ocata based testbed
>
> Thanks, Massimo
>
> 2017-09-25 9:50 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto :
>>
>> Hello Massimo,
>>
>> what is your version of Openstack ??
>>
>> thank you
>>
>> Saverio
>>
>> 2017-09-25 9:13 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto
>> :
>> > Hi
>> >
>> >
>> > In our OpenStack cloud we have two backends for Cinder (exposed using
>> > two
>> > volume types), and we set different quotas for these two volume types.
>> >
>> > The problem happens when a user, using the dashboard, tries to create a
>> > volume using a volume type for which the project quota is over:
>> >
>> > - the reported error message simply reports "unable to create volume",
>> > without mentioning that the problem is with quota
>> >
>> > - (by default) the dashboard only shows the overall Cinder quota (and
>> > not
>> > the quota per volume)
>> >
>> >
>> > Do you know if it possible in some to expose on the dashboard the cinder
>> > quota per volume type ?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks, Massimo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>> >
>
>

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder quota per volume types in the dashboard

[Massimo Sgaravatto]

We are currently running Mitaka (preparing to update to Ocata). I see the
same behavior on an Ocata based testbed

Thanks, Massimo

2017-09-25 9:50 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto :

> Hello Massimo,
>
> what is your version of Openstack ??
>
> thank you
>
> Saverio
>
> 2017-09-25 9:13 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto  >:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > In our OpenStack cloud we have two backends for Cinder (exposed using two
> > volume types), and we set different quotas for these two volume types.
> >
> > The problem happens when a user, using the dashboard, tries to create a
> > volume using a volume type for which the project quota is over:
> >
> > - the reported error message simply reports "unable to create volume",
> > without mentioning that the problem is with quota
> >
> > - (by default) the dashboard only shows the overall Cinder quota (and not
> > the quota per volume)
> >
> >
> > Do you know if it possible in some to expose on the dashboard the cinder
> > quota per volume type ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks, Massimo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
> > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> >
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder quota per volume types in the dashboard

[Saverio Proto]

Hello Massimo,

what is your version of Openstack ??

thank you

Saverio

2017-09-25 9:13 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto :
> Hi
>
>
> In our OpenStack cloud we have two backends for Cinder (exposed using two
> volume types), and we set different quotas for these two volume types.
>
> The problem happens when a user, using the dashboard, tries to create a
> volume using a volume type for which the project quota is over:
>
> - the reported error message simply reports "unable to create volume",
> without mentioning that the problem is with quota
>
> - (by default) the dashboard only shows the overall Cinder quota (and not
> the quota per volume)
>
>
> Do you know if it possible in some to expose on the dashboard the cinder
> quota per volume type ?
>
>
> Thanks, Massimo
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] Cinder quota per volume types in the dashboard

[Massimo Sgaravatto]

Hi


In our OpenStack cloud we have two backends for Cinder (exposed using two
volume types), and we set different quotas for these two volume types.

The problem happens when a user, using the dashboard, tries to create a
volume using a volume type for which the project quota is over:

- the reported error message simply reports "unable to create volume",
without mentioning that the problem is with quota

- (by default) the dashboard only shows the overall Cinder quota (and not
the quota per volume)


Do you know if it possible in some to expose on the dashboard the cinder
quota per volume type ?


Thanks, Massimo
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators