Re: [Openstack-operators] Announcing the Non-ATC Recognition Working Group

2016-03-31 Thread Shamail Tahir 
Hi everyone,

The poll is now closed and the most popular option was to meet on *Thursdays
at 1900 UTC*.  The meeting will be held in #openstack-meeting-3 (based on
its availability).  Please check the wiki[1] next week to see the agenda
for our first meeting!

[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NonATCRecognition#Meeting_Information


On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Shamail Tahir  wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> We had some great discussion on the mailing lists on how to recognize
> operators and other contributors in the OpenStack community who don't
> qualify for ATC (Active Technical Contributor) status earlier this
> month[1].  We revisited this topic at the last User Committee meeting[2]
> and decided to start a short-term working group with one objective: to help
> define the User Committee constituency.  This will help us determine who
> should be included in the {not yet named} contributor program by the User
> Committee and how to qualify.
>
> Maish and I volunteered to help start the conversations, document the
> decisions, and provide updates on the outcome to the User Committee.  We
> have created a wiki[3] for this new working group (which will be disbanded
> once we have reached our objective) and there is an active doodle poll[4]
> to determine the time for our weekly meeting, which will be held in an IRC
> channel.  The poll shows the start dates as this week but the please just
> vote for the day/time (not date) since we will not begin our meeting until
> next week (week of 4/4).
>
> Please volunteer if you want to help us develop the membership definition
> for this new designation.  The user committee will have a lot more work
> ahead of them to fully build out a new charter and/or program but this
> activity will be extremely helpful as a foundational building block.
>
> [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/community/2016-March/001422.html
> [2]
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2016/uc.2016-03-14-19.00.log.html
> [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NonATCRecognition
> [4] http://doodle.com/poll/7r5khrefyx7wysi4
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Shamail Tahir
> t: @ShamailXD
> tz: Eastern Time
>



-- 
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Announcing the Non-ATC Recognition Working Group

2016-03-30 Thread Shamail Tahir 
Hi everyone,

Friendly reminder:  The doodle poll[1] for the Non-ATC recognition WG
meeting time will be closing at March 31st, 2100 UTC (tomorrow).

Please vote if you plan to join us!

[1] http://doodle.com/poll/7r5khrefyx7wysi4

Thanks,
Shamail

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Shamail Tahir  wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> We had some great discussion on the mailing lists on how to recognize
> operators and other contributors in the OpenStack community who don't
> qualify for ATC (Active Technical Contributor) status earlier this
> month[1].  We revisited this topic at the last User Committee meeting[2]
> and decided to start a short-term working group with one objective: to help
> define the User Committee constituency.  This will help us determine who
> should be included in the {not yet named} contributor program by the User
> Committee and how to qualify.
>
> Maish and I volunteered to help start the conversations, document the
> decisions, and provide updates on the outcome to the User Committee.  We
> have created a wiki[3] for this new working group (which will be disbanded
> once we have reached our objective) and there is an active doodle poll[4]
> to determine the time for our weekly meeting, which will be held in an IRC
> channel.  The poll shows the start dates as this week but the please just
> vote for the day/time (not date) since we will not begin our meeting until
> next week (week of 4/4).
>
> Please volunteer if you want to help us develop the membership definition
> for this new designation.  The user committee will have a lot more work
> ahead of them to fully build out a new charter and/or program but this
> activity will be extremely helpful as a foundational building block.
>
> [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/community/2016-March/001422.html
> [2]
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2016/uc.2016-03-14-19.00.log.html
> [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NonATCRecognition
> [4] http://doodle.com/poll/7r5khrefyx7wysi4
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Shamail Tahir
> t: @ShamailXD
> tz: Eastern Time
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Announcing the Non-ATC Recognition Working Group

2016-03-29 Thread Matt Jarvis 
Hi Shamail

I'd be happy to volunteer to help with this working group.

Matt



On 28 March 2016 at 20:33, Shamail Tahir  wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> We had some great discussion on the mailing lists on how to recognize
> operators and other contributors in the OpenStack community who don't
> qualify for ATC (Active Technical Contributor) status earlier this
> month[1].  We revisited this topic at the last User Committee meeting[2]
> and decided to start a short-term working group with one objective: to help
> define the User Committee constituency.  This will help us determine who
> should be included in the {not yet named} contributor program by the User
> Committee and how to qualify.
>
> Maish and I volunteered to help start the conversations, document the
> decisions, and provide updates on the outcome to the User Committee.  We
> have created a wiki[3] for this new working group (which will be disbanded
> once we have reached our objective) and there is an active doodle poll[4]
> to determine the time for our weekly meeting, which will be held in an IRC
> channel.  The poll shows the start dates as this week but the please just
> vote for the day/time (not date) since we will not begin our meeting until
> next week (week of 4/4).
>
> Please volunteer if you want to help us develop the membership definition
> for this new designation.  The user committee will have a lot more work
> ahead of them to fully build out a new charter and/or program but this
> activity will be extremely helpful as a foundational building block.
>
> [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/community/2016-March/001422.html
> [2]
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2016/uc.2016-03-14-19.00.log.html
> [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NonATCRecognition
> [4] http://doodle.com/poll/7r5khrefyx7wysi4
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Shamail Tahir
> t: @ShamailXD
> tz: Eastern Time
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>

-- 
DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] Announcing the Non-ATC Recognition Working Group

2016-03-28 Thread Shamail Tahir 
Hi everyone,

We had some great discussion on the mailing lists on how to recognize
operators and other contributors in the OpenStack community who don't
qualify for ATC (Active Technical Contributor) status earlier this
month[1].  We revisited this topic at the last User Committee meeting[2]
and decided to start a short-term working group with one objective: to help
define the User Committee constituency.  This will help us determine who
should be included in the {not yet named} contributor program by the User
Committee and how to qualify.

Maish and I volunteered to help start the conversations, document the
decisions, and provide updates on the outcome to the User Committee.  We
have created a wiki[3] for this new working group (which will be disbanded
once we have reached our objective) and there is an active doodle poll[4]
to determine the time for our weekly meeting, which will be held in an IRC
channel.  The poll shows the start dates as this week but the please just
vote for the day/time (not date) since we will not begin our meeting until
next week (week of 4/4).

Please volunteer if you want to help us develop the membership definition
for this new designation.  The user committee will have a lot more work
ahead of them to fully build out a new charter and/or program but this
activity will be extremely helpful as a foundational building block.

[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/community/2016-March/001422.html
[2]
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2016/uc.2016-03-14-19.00.log.html
[3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NonATCRecognition
[4] http://doodle.com/poll/7r5khrefyx7wysi4

-- 
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators