Re: [Openstack-operators] Dedicated Network node ?
> On 1. Feb 2018, at 21:42, Flint WALRUS wrote: > > Don’t get it, are you talking about the Neutron FWaaS ? If so, yes it would > avoid the so called High traffic situation that I talked about on baremetal. I expressed myself in a misleading way. Depending on the firewall / security concept and / or the network implementation, a separation of network nodes and controller nodes is required. Regardless of the size of the environment and the load / high traffic in the network. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Dedicated Network node ?
Interesting, could you provide an example ? Le jeu. 1 févr. 2018 à 22:48, Christian Berendt < bere...@betacloud-solutions.de> a écrit : > > > > On 1. Feb 2018, at 21:42, Flint WALRUS wrote: > > > > Don’t get it, are you talking about the Neutron FWaaS ? If so, yes it > would avoid the so called High traffic situation that I talked about on > baremetal. > > I expressed myself in a misleading way. > > Depending on the firewall / security concept and / or the network > implementation, a separation of network nodes and controller nodes is > required. Regardless of the size of the environment and the load / high > traffic in the network. > > Christian. > > -- > Christian Berendt > Chief Executive Officer (CEO) > > Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de > Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de > > Betacloud Solutions GmbH > Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland > > Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt > Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart > Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 > > ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Dedicated Network node ?
Don’t get it, are you talking about the Neutron FWaaS ? If so, yes it would avoid the so called High traffic situation that I talked about on baremetal. Docker is less subject to such issue as the workload would so be distributed among multiple nodes thanks to LBaaS, LB Solution such as HAProxy/Vendor solutions or even ingress technics. I would however agree for small docker clusters but I highly doubt that professional company would indeed choose to host such services without having correctly forecasted enough hardware. Le jeu. 1 févr. 2018 à 21:34, Christian Berendt < bere...@betacloud-solutions.de> a écrit : > > > > On 1. Feb 2018, at 19:42, Flint WALRUS wrote: > > > > I think that indeed make sens as because now a day most the > installations tend to either be within a dockerized solution or a > relatively fair amont (3/4) of large hw nodes. > > > > One situation that would require dedicated hw would be a very large > installation requiring you to lower the network pression on your > controllers or docker workers in order to avoid noisy behaviors. > > Depending on the firewall concept, dedicated networks make sense in > smaller environments using Docker. > > Christian. > > -- > Christian Berendt > Chief Executive Officer (CEO) > > Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de > Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de > > Betacloud Solutions GmbH > Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland > > Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt > Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart > Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 > > ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Dedicated Network node ?
> On 1. Feb 2018, at 19:42, Flint WALRUS wrote: > > I think that indeed make sens as because now a day most the installations > tend to either be within a dockerized solution or a relatively fair amont > (3/4) of large hw nodes. > > One situation that would require dedicated hw would be a very large > installation requiring you to lower the network pression on your controllers > or docker workers in order to avoid noisy behaviors. Depending on the firewall concept, dedicated networks make sense in smaller environments using Docker. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Dedicated Network node ?
I think that indeed make sens as because now a day most the installations tend to either be within a dockerized solution or a relatively fair amont (3/4) of large hw nodes. One situation that would require dedicated hw would be a very large installation requiring you to lower the network pression on your controllers or docker workers in order to avoid noisy behaviors. Le jeu. 1 févr. 2018 à 09:05, Zeeshan Ali Shah a écrit : > > > In Kilo the installation guide did contains the section of installing a > dedicated network node. > > in current Pike release it mentioned to configure controller as network > node. > > https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/pike/install/controller-install-option2-ubuntu.html > > is this for a particular reason ? > > any guide for Pike to have a dedicated Network node ? > -- > > Regards > > Zeeshan Ali Shah > System Administrator - PDC HPC > PhD researcher (IT security) > Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan > +46 8 790 9115 > http://www.pdc.kth.se/members/zashah > ___ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
[Openstack-operators] Dedicated Network node ?
In Kilo the installation guide did contains the section of installing a dedicated network node. in current Pike release it mentioned to configure controller as network node. https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/pike/install/controller-install-option2- ubuntu.html is this for a particular reason ? any guide for Pike to have a dedicated Network node ? -- Regards Zeeshan Ali Shah System Administrator - PDC HPC PhD researcher (IT security) Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan +46 8 790 9115 http://www.pdc.kth.se/members/zashah ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
