Re: [Openstack-operators] new SIGs to cover use cases
You are right to make the connection - this is a subject that regularly comes up in the discussions of the Scientific SIG, though it’s just one of many use cases for hybrid cloud. If a new SIG was created around hybrid cloud, it would be useful to have it closely connected with the Scientific SIG. Cheers, Stig > On 13 Nov 2018, at 09:01, > wrote: > > Good point. > Adding SIG list. > > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 4:46 PM > To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] new SIGs to cover use cases > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for sensitive > information. > > > On 2018-11-12 15:46:38 + (+), arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: > [...] >> 1. Do we have or want to create a user community around Hybrid cloud. > [...] >> 2. As we target AI/ML as 2019 target application domain do we >> want to create a SIG for it? Or do we extend scientific >> community SIG to cover it? > [...] > > It may also be worthwhile to ask this on the openstack-sigs mailing > list. > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > ___ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] new SIGs to cover use cases
Good point. Adding SIG list. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 4:46 PM To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] new SIGs to cover use cases [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for sensitive information. On 2018-11-12 15:46:38 + (+), arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: [...] > 1. Do we have or want to create a user community around Hybrid cloud. [...] > 2. As we target AI/ML as 2019 target application domain do we > want to create a SIG for it? Or do we extend scientific > community SIG to cover it? [...] It may also be worthwhile to ask this on the openstack-sigs mailing list. -- Jeremy Stanley ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] new SIGs to cover use cases
On 2018-11-12 15:46:38 + (+), arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: [...] > 1. Do we have or want to create a user community around Hybrid cloud. [...] > 2. As we target AI/ML as 2019 target application domain do we > want to create a SIG for it? Or do we extend scientific > community SIG to cover it? [...] It may also be worthwhile to ask this on the openstack-sigs mailing list. -- Jeremy Stanley signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
[Openstack-operators] new SIGs to cover use cases
Team, At today Board and joint TC and UC meetings 2 questions come up: 1. Do we have or want to create a user community around Hybrid cloud. This is one of the major push of OpenStack for the communities. With 70+% of questionnaire responders told that they deploy and use hybrid cloud. We do have Public and Private clouds SIGs but not hybrid. That brings the question where do we capture and driver hybrid cloud requirements. 2. As we target AI/ML as 2019 target application domain do we want to create a SIG for it? Or do we extend scientific community SIG to cover it? Want to start dialog on it. Thanks, Arkady ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
