Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - Agenda on Sched
On 15/10/15 07:12, Christopher Aedo wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote: Let's do it :) Excellent! Do I need to do anything? Or will something be magically added to the schedule? Just let me know if I need to take any action here, thanks! Automagic :) Check out 2PM on Wednesday: https://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/ops -Christopher On 13/10/15 07:57, Fox, Kevin M wrote: +1 * * *From:* Christopher Aedo *Sent:* Monday, October 12, 2015 3:51:23 PM *To:* openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - Agenda on Sched On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote: Hi all, We are still lacking: * Moderator(s) for Quotas and Billing * Content for about 3 slots. If you have interest for any of this, please speak now - time is running out! I'm very interested in having an operator focused discussion about delivering apps to your users, and whether or not that matters to the cloud operators out there. Apps on OpenStack is something near and dear to my heart (working on apps.openstack.org), is it important to the operators of clouds though? I know a few of the bigger public cloud providers have worked on their own approaches to this (using Heat templates, Murano apps, or some other PaaS layers). I think there's a big benefit to a common catalog of apps that everyone can use, but maybe the big operators want to exert more control by keeping an independent catalog? Or maybe there are other reasons? Please speak up if you're interested in this topic, I'd be very happy to moderate, and I think if we can get some operators talking together about this there would be a lot of value in the conversation! -Christopher ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - Agenda on Sched
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote: > Let's do it :) Excellent! Do I need to do anything? Or will something be magically added to the schedule? Just let me know if I need to take any action here, thanks! -Christopher > On 13/10/15 07:57, Fox, Kevin M wrote: >> >> +1 * >> * >> >> *From:* Christopher Aedo >> *Sent:* Monday, October 12, 2015 3:51:23 PM >> *To:* openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - >> >> Agenda on Sched >> >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We are still lacking: >>> >>> * Moderator(s) for Quotas and Billing >>> * Content for about 3 slots. >>> >>> If you have interest for any of this, please speak now - time is running >>> out! >> >> >> I'm very interested in having an operator focused discussion about >> delivering apps to your users, and whether or not that matters to the >> cloud operators out there. Apps on OpenStack is something near and >> dear to my heart (working on apps.openstack.org), is it important to >> the operators of clouds though? >> >> I know a few of the bigger public cloud providers have worked on their >> own approaches to this (using Heat templates, Murano apps, or some >> other PaaS layers). I think there's a big benefit to a common catalog >> of apps that everyone can use, but maybe the big operators want to >> exert more control by keeping an independent catalog? Or maybe there >> are other reasons? >> >> Please speak up if you're interested in this topic, I'd be very happy >> to moderate, and I think if we can get some operators talking together >> about this there would be a lot of value in the conversation! >> >> -Christopher >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> > > > ___ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - Agenda on Sched
Let's do it :) On 13/10/15 07:57, Fox, Kevin M wrote: +1 * * *From:* Christopher Aedo *Sent:* Monday, October 12, 2015 3:51:23 PM *To:* openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - Agenda on Sched On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote: Hi all, We are still lacking: * Moderator(s) for Quotas and Billing * Content for about 3 slots. If you have interest for any of this, please speak now - time is running out! I'm very interested in having an operator focused discussion about delivering apps to your users, and whether or not that matters to the cloud operators out there. Apps on OpenStack is something near and dear to my heart (working on apps.openstack.org), is it important to the operators of clouds though? I know a few of the bigger public cloud providers have worked on their own approaches to this (using Heat templates, Murano apps, or some other PaaS layers). I think there's a big benefit to a common catalog of apps that everyone can use, but maybe the big operators want to exert more control by keeping an independent catalog? Or maybe there are other reasons? Please speak up if you're interested in this topic, I'd be very happy to moderate, and I think if we can get some operators talking together about this there would be a lot of value in the conversation! -Christopher ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - Agenda on Sched
On 10/12/15 7:21 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: > On 13/10/15 06:01, JJ Asghar wrote: >> >> >> Tom, any chance we can get a "working session" for OSOps? I think some >> face to face time to start bootstrapping'll would be awesome. >> >> (I'd moderate too) :D > > Doesn't that normally happen under "Monitoring and Tools" ? Selfishly speaking, I'm doing another talk at the time which this group got assigned. So I won't be able to attend. :( On the other hand I think if we pulled it out of "Monitoring and Tools" as another project we can help organize and get this group off the ground. I'd be curious to see people join and discuss what they think the project should be; and have those face to face conversations that we need to have. -J ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - Agenda on Sched
Hi all, We are still lacking: * Moderator(s) for Quotas and Billing * Content for about 3 slots. If you have interest for any of this, please speak now - time is running out! Regards, Tom On 05/10/15 09:48, Tom Fifield wrote: OK, Since no burning issues were raised, I'm going to start handing back space, starting with the empty working group slots on Wednesday. Regards, Tom On 30/09/15 11:24, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi all, The agenda for Tokyo design summit's ops track is now on sched (buy Thierry wine if you see him): https://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/ops * Note that we have some unallocated slots (marked "TBC"). In order to help out our software development community who are short of slots, unless we can find something with a burning need to fill them, I propose we hand the slots back. Your thoughts welcome! Regards, Tom ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - Agenda on Sched
Do we have any interest in ways folks are installing OpenStack? I know we have a fair number of consultants on this making list who deploy for different companies, would be cool to do a show and tell for how folks are installing OpenStack or hear creative ways they manage new clouds with companies who don't have a highly developed devops capability... If this was already covered, I'd be happy to moderate if we still need someone... On Oct 11, 2015 8:58 PM, "Tom Fifield"wrote: > Hi all, > > We are still lacking: > > * Moderator(s) for Quotas and Billing > * Content for about 3 slots. > > If you have interest for any of this, please speak now - time is running > out! > > Regards, > > > Tom > > On 05/10/15 09:48, Tom Fifield wrote: > >> OK, >> >> Since no burning issues were raised, I'm going to start handing back >> space, starting with the empty working group slots on Wednesday. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Tom >> >> On 30/09/15 11:24, Tom Fifield wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The agenda for Tokyo design summit's ops track is now on sched (buy >>> Thierry wine if you see him): >>> >>> https://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/ops >>> >>> * Note that we have some unallocated slots (marked "TBC"). In order to >>> help out our software development community who are short of slots, >>> unless we can find something with a burning need to fill them, I propose >>> we hand the slots back. Your thoughts welcome! >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> ___ >>> OpenStack-operators mailing list >>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >>> >> >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> > > > ___ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - Agenda on Sched
Or it could be how they're testing new clouds, metering successes for ISPs, how web hosts are using OpenStack with unique customers.. anything where we can hear what others are doing would be pretty great I think. On Oct 11, 2015 9:45 PM, "Adam Lawson"wrote: > Do we have any interest in ways folks are installing OpenStack? I know we > have a fair number of consultants on this making list who deploy for > different companies, would be cool to do a show and tell for how folks are > installing OpenStack or hear creative ways they manage new clouds with > companies who don't have a highly developed devops capability... > > If this was already covered, I'd be happy to moderate if we still need > someone... > On Oct 11, 2015 8:58 PM, "Tom Fifield" wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We are still lacking: >> >> * Moderator(s) for Quotas and Billing >> * Content for about 3 slots. >> >> If you have interest for any of this, please speak now - time is running >> out! >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Tom >> >> On 05/10/15 09:48, Tom Fifield wrote: >> >>> OK, >>> >>> Since no burning issues were raised, I'm going to start handing back >>> space, starting with the empty working group slots on Wednesday. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> On 30/09/15 11:24, Tom Fifield wrote: >>> Hi all, The agenda for Tokyo design summit's ops track is now on sched (buy Thierry wine if you see him): https://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/ops * Note that we have some unallocated slots (marked "TBC"). In order to help out our software development community who are short of slots, unless we can find something with a burning need to fill them, I propose we hand the slots back. Your thoughts welcome! Regards, Tom ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> OpenStack-operators mailing list >>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >>> >> >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> > ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - Agenda on Sched
OK, Since no burning issues were raised, I'm going to start handing back space, starting with the empty working group slots on Wednesday. Regards, Tom On 30/09/15 11:24, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi all, The agenda for Tokyo design summit's ops track is now on sched (buy Thierry wine if you see him): https://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/ops * Note that we have some unallocated slots (marked "TBC"). In order to help out our software development community who are short of slots, unless we can find something with a burning need to fill them, I propose we hand the slots back. Your thoughts welcome! Regards, Tom ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators