Re: [opensuse] Are bittorrent downloads reliable?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Coan schrieb: Thanks very much, Ken. I wouldn't have thought to find the md5sum for the iso under the delta-iso directory. Unfortunately the md5sum for the beta2 iso doesn't match the iso of my downloaded file, so I guess the transfer was garbled somehow. Maybe trying is better than guessing. Burn it, boot it, check it out. Or are you that short on recordables? I never had any problem with the integrity of torrent downloads. Checksumming is kind of a basic principle of torrent downloading, isn't it? Tilman -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFZHfv9ZPu6Yae8lkRAg8TAJ94O5TEjTanp4ysNRoORZ5CVMmyXgCaA78I tR0/LUbMy9lzSKGlqCtUoiU= =WYnO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Now even smart is boken :-(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! No replies on my smart / rpm pubkey post? Am I completely off the right track? Just curious: Tilman -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE7VxX9ZPu6Yae8lkRAiqfAJ98Jr3xwm48mcVWMcOS8+jyMBJmBACdHb0y TkddorJxqA9mzu1uRHuQrdQ= =BcB6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Adressing SUSEs weakness
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I completely agree with Kenneth. I just had the pleasure to fix my colleague's fresh from the DVD SuSE 10.1 install. - From my impression, SuSE 10.1 is really just broken when freshly installed, and that fact should be clearly stated on the website at a prominent place together with the fix-up procedure, just as proposed by Kenneth. When I started searching on hints on the opensuse Website, I got the impression that everything's ok. In other words it was very hard to get hints on how to bootstrap SuSE 10.1 into a working state. I'd have appreciated his remarks very much. Don't get me wrong, I really like openSUSE and will keep on using this distribution. (I am still on 10.0 aka paradise ;-), so I was not familiar with the 10.1 problems yet...) Kenneth's statement makes 10.1 better than it was before. Regards, Tilman -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE6ZiY9ZPu6Yae8lkRAhQGAKCOpX6D+lOM9KZfmZzQPlV7lcNH1ACcCOq5 87EFqYfHCGduexQpbximAB8= =Dbex -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Sources, revisited
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just my vote (not that it weighs anything, but...): The standard behaviour in a mailing list is discussion, i.e. replying in a way so that everybody can participate, not to fork off 1-to-1 communication. To achieve this, one needs to make sure, that (at least one copy of) the reply is sent to the mailing list, and here the traditional method has two structural and big disadvantages over the reply-to method: 1) Replying per default (ok, depends on MUA) creates a fork off into 1-to-1 communication. 2) Replying to the list (via Reply to all) without special user intervention will _always_ send off two copies of the reply. The use of the copy to the individual predecessor in the thread is at least questionable from my perspective. And it tends to annoy people! Because to me the advantage of the traditional method has not been made plausible, I don't understand the decision. Either you want to discuss something on the list, so you join and post. Or you just don't do it. The only advantage of the traditional method, I heard of yet, was making it easy to answer to outsiders asking questions to the list. That's a rare circumstance in my experience! So my vote is for the reply-to method. Tilman -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE4GmO9ZPu6Yae8lkRAg/MAJ4i9UiSPILtySFAP4iPiGT97RycPQCeNm+M 3EzM4y5R+KWJgq7SkRmVCKU= =eRWS -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Re: Sources, revisited
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernhard Walle schrieb: Now, where KMail and even Mozilla Thunderbird and Seamonkey have support for it (and Sylpheed Claws, but that's not well-known) should we change? Ok, I am using Mozilla Thunderbird Version 1.5.0.5 (20060725). Could you please elaborate on how I can get around the following procedure in order to get decent replying behaviour? 1) Click reply all 2) Remove To: Bernhard Walle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3) Change CC: opensuse@opensuse.org to To: opensuse@opensuse.org With the Reply-To method, I just click on reply and everything works as desired. Tilman -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE4KOh9ZPu6Yae8lkRAhwIAKClwVdku9E6wXbeAsEcIWmX0RJEtgCePZy6 eH2l8HRqIAJzwXJxVhvmGWs= =i6q4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] OT: Reply-To or not Reply-To (was Re: Sources, revisited)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernhard Walle schrieb: Get the lastest Thunderbird RPMs from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/mozilla/experimental/10.1 and install the extension at http://open.nit.ca/wiki/index.php?page=ReplyToListThunderbirdExtension7. See also http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.suse.opensuse.devel/3416. Thanks for the hints, I'll look at it. Good to know also for all the other lists who drive on the wrong side of the road ;-) On the other hand: What's the main advantage of _not_ having Reply-To? Never understood it... With it, I guess, every MUA would do, without, now I need to install an extension for Thunderbird and do i-dont-know-what for other MUAs... Tilman -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE4MBt9ZPu6Yae8lkRApsoAJ9ghOxzRw4y1PgTsv9g1nWGW9KdTwCfSerm gx/1o7cyW6mKV8kXqwot5oE= =UFi2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Re: OT: Reply-To or not Reply-To (was Re: Sources, revisited)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernhard Walle schrieb: Tilman Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-14]: On the other hand: What's the main advantage of _not_ having Reply-To? Never understood it... You can reply to the poster without manually edit the receiver. As a Thunderbird user I can only say: Click on the From line, choose compose to, you're done. No extension required. Personal opinion: MUAs that don't offer such functionality are b0rken. Ok, I'll shut up now. Cheers, Tilman -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE4Nss9ZPu6Yae8lkRAuSSAKCA07XTnvJFeBFoetkQoasrWzqrAwCeJW4v Na9sx3+41glWeprzD0ERzLY= =8+8d -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
