Re: [opensuse] Routing Question
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 22:57 -0500, ka1ifq wrote: > > Here is the setup, >Machine 1, my main machine Machine 2, > Remote Machine ( in same building ) >Nic 1, Network 1, connects to internet ( Nic 1, Network 1 ) - > possible... >via router. > Nic 2, Network 2, just for VNC to Machine 1 >Nic 2, Network 2, just for VNC to >Machine 2 If the distance is short, or cabling between rooms are under your control, you can connect both NIC2s with a cross-over cable (transmit and receive pairs need to be swapped somewhere inbetween) without switch or router. Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Routing Question
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 00:43 -0500, ka1ifq wrote: > Yes, true. The distance is not a problem as I could run another cable > or > split the existing one. I am more interested in the internal logistics of > getting the VNC working, will there be a problem with the 2 nics in the main > machine. > > Thanks, Mike I personally hasn't done this myself, but I would say "it shouldn't cause any problems." Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] Evolution:sending email to two addresses
Hi, I'm looking for a better way than manually typing the second email address for one person in cc. I set two email addresses for the person in Contacts as Work and Home. But once I chose one of them into To: list, the other disappears from the selections. The version is 2.8.2 w/ 10.2. Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Routing Question
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 15:02 -0600, Billie Erin Walsh wrote: > I think I saw where the previous problem was solved so now I have a > network/routing question(s). > > First: Suse 10.1 > Second: We have two high speed ISP's. Two Routers. Possibility of two > networks. > Third: I want to install another network card and plug in the secondary > network. > I think, first, you need to ask yourself this question: How do you want to use two different ISP's Internet connections, like specific destinations (or type of traffic) via ISP1, and the others via ISP2, or loadbalancing, or ISP2 as the backup in case ISP1's connection is down. Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Routing Question
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 16:46 -0600, Billie Erin Walsh wrote: > On 12/31/2006 Toshi Esumi wrote: > > or loadbalancing, or ISP2 as the backup in case ISP1's connection is > > down. > > Yeah. Something like that. It's a royal pain in the B___ to have to pull > the computer out and switch cables then reboot to get the new address > right in the middle of doing something. Once upon a time long long ago > in one of my windows setups I had a setting where I could use the high > speed through the local network or it would automatically connect > through the modem and share the connection if the high speed failed. > > Load sharing would be nice sometimes, like doing multiple downloads with > kget or ktorrent. > > AND an automatic backup connection would be great. One drops and the > other just takes up the load. I don't know how Linux routing works for your requirement but the device that make the routing decision needs to detect a connectivity down on one of ISPs. The simplest idea is to switch the default gateway from the router for your main ISP to the other when you found the main ISP is down. Another solution is to have a device specifically designed for load balancing for two internet connections. We used one of those, namely Nexland ISB Pro 800, in our office until a couple of months ago but I decided taking it out. Because it was causing strange problems, like intermittent connection loss without ISP's problems. It was too cheap for office use, I guess (US$400). It can be set to ping public IPs via both interfaces to detect connection downs. Idea itself was good but just didn't work well for us. Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] tar
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 13:57 -0700, John Meyer wrote: > 2. The file you want to backup to is $HOME/backups/Pictures.tar.gz I think you need to unzip it to use -u option. Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] tar
I did some test. It works for me as below: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents/test> tar uf test.tar *.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents/test> tar tvf test.tar -rwxr--r-- toshi/users 171936 2005-04-09 19:13:23 04092005.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents/test> ls -l total 528 -rwxr--r-- 1 toshi users 171936 2005-04-09 19:13 04092005.jpg -rwxr--r-- 1 toshi users 171936 2005-04-09 19:13 add1.jpg -rw-r--r-- 1 toshi users 174080 2007-01-21 14:44 test.tar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents/test> tar uf test.tar *.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents/test> tar tvf test.tar -rwxr--r-- toshi/users 171936 2005-04-09 19:13:23 04092005.jpg -rwxr--r-- toshi/users 171936 2005-04-09 19:13:23 add1.jpg Toshi On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 14:43 -0700, John Meyer wrote: > James Knott wrote: > Okay, here's what I finally came up with > > cd $HOME && tar uf $HOME/backups/Pictures.tar Pictures > gzip $HOME/backups/Pictures.tar > > Seems to work, but I can't get the incremental backup feature. Any > suggestions? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] tar
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 18:56 -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote: > On Sunday 21 January 2007 18:41, John Meyer wrote: > > Here is what I am trying: > > > > cd $HOME && tar uf $HOME/backups/Pictures.tar Pictures > > gzip $HOME/backups/Pictures.tar > > > > I'm no expert on tar but what you are trying never looked right to me. > > Just where is this Pictures? a directory off your home directory?? > > I would think Pictures/* would be the thing to use.. > According to man page the list can be directories. I tested it further, it still works for me. So, that doesn't seem to be the issue I guess: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents> ls -l total 172 drwxr-xr-x 4 toshi users 4096 2007-01-21 16:15 Misc drwxr-xr-x 2 toshi users 4096 2007-01-21 16:15 test [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents> ls -l test total 172 -rwxr--r-- 1 toshi users 171936 2005-04-09 19:13 04092005.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents> tar cvf test.tar test test/ test/04092005.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents> tar tvf test.tar drwxr-xr-x toshi/users 0 2007-01-21 16:26:12 test/ -rwxr--r-- toshi/users 171936 2005-04-09 19:13:23 test/04092005.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents> cp Misc/add1.jpg test/. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents> ls -l test total 348 -rwxr--r-- 1 toshi users 171936 2005-04-09 19:13 04092005.jpg -rwxr--r-- 1 toshi users 171936 2007-01-21 16:27 add1.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents> tar uvf test.tar test test/ test/add1.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents> tar tvf test.tar drwxr-xr-x toshi/users 0 2007-01-21 16:26:12 test/ -rwxr--r-- toshi/users 171936 2005-04-09 19:13:23 test/04092005.jpg drwxr-xr-x toshi/users 0 2007-01-21 16:27:21 test/ -rwxr--r-- toshi/users 171936 2007-01-21 16:27:21 test/add1.jpg Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Evolution email link problem
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:56 -0700, Carl Spitzer wrote: > Seems clicking links no longer opens the browser. > I use Firefox and want that for the browser. > Evolution 2.4.0 and SuSE 10.0 fully updated. > > Which config file do I hack to fix this or is this one of those must fix > in YAST things? Expecially when it appears to be set in > user.applications. > > in /.gnome/application.info/user.applications > # This file is automatically generated by gnome-vfs application registry > # Do NOT edit by hand > # Generated: Sat Jun 2 12:07:30 2007 > > Firefox > requires_terminal=false > command=/usr/bin/firefox > can_open_multiple_files=false > mime_types=application/xhtml+xml,text/html > supported_uri_schemes=http,https,ftp,gopher,chrome,file > expects_uris=true > name=Mozilla Firefox > mime_types=text/html,application/xhtml+xml > > > > CWSIV > If you're using Gnome, I would check Control Center-> Preferred Applications first. Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] subnet mask for 192.168.1.2
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 12:19 +0100, primm wrote: > What's my Subnet Mask? Make sure your PC's mask matches the one at your gateway device. I'm assuming your GW is 192.168.1.1. Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] FW: IPTABLES
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 19:35 +0200, Tage Danielsen wrote: > You see, I have a internet connection with 8 ekstra IP's and each of > this IP is mapped down to a privat IP, and I feel that it is not a good > idea to give the windows server a public IP where all port service is > open. My cisco router is routing all port service down to my servers, I > am using Suse server now for 6 years that way, and have no problem with > this, but I am afraid forthe windows server, that is the reason for to > route just rdp servise fromone of my linux server to the windows server. I'm not exactly sure but without NAT on at your linux and assign a different subnet between the Linux and your widows server, I don't think you can "map" a port access to 10.10.10.240 to your windows server. In other words, double NATting is necessary, like: x.x.x.x(a public IP at CISCO:1st NAT)->mapped to 10.10.10.240(at Linux:2nd NAT)->mapped to 192.168.0.1/24. Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Network settings
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 19:59 -0400, John wrote: > I have used ifconfig, net and route, I would use only ifconfig and route. > (sorry about the comparison, but like ipconfig /all in win) ipconfig /all doesn't show routing tables. You still need to use route print in win, which is the same as ifconfig + route in Linux. Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] User permission problems - plz help!
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 22:23 +0200, Alexey Eremenko wrote: > Other priviledge problem, that I would like to solve: > Why simple utilities, such as ifconfig and traceroute require root > priviledges ? I think you just don't have PATH to the commands. Try full path like: /usr/sbin/traceroute 4.2.2.2 If it works, then check "echo $PATH". Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [opensuse] server can ping local network & net, local network can't ping it
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 18:13 -0700, James D. Parra wrote: > It is specific to the machine. Can't ping it from any subnet on the network. > It had a static IP on one NIC, If you have multiple subnets and this server didn't have multiple IPs assigned from each subnet, a device(s) is(are) acting as a router(s). Forget about the other subnets but use a pc in the same subnet to test this. Try /sbin/ifconfig at the server to make sure the interface is there, as well as to see its MAC address. And, try /sbin/arp at the test linux pc (if it's a windows pc, arp -a) in the same subnet to see if it can get the server's MAC address. You may need to ping again the server to see that. By this point, you would have a good sense which part is not working as it should. Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [opensuse] server can ping local network & net, local network can't ping it
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 10:01 -0700, James D. Parra wrote: > Thanks for the info. I pinged the server from two different test boxes on > the same subnet, which did not get any response, however arp on the test > boxes did return a response showing the IP address and the mac address of > the server having problems. I might add that no other service, ssh, telnet, > traceroute, etc, can get to the server either. > /sbin/arp or arp -a on Windows shows just contents of cache table on the machine you operated the command. It doesn't send any packets at the time. When you ping the server first time by its IP address the machine broadcasts ARP request to LAN to get the MAC address of the destination. It caches on the memory for a limited duration of time to avoid another broadcast when it needs to send another packet to the same destination. Anyhow, you proved all the hardware NIC, Eth Switch, cables, or whatever inbetween are good. Because the server responded its MAC address to the device you pinged from. So, something on the server is preventing from accepting ping packets from outside, or just ignoring. 90% of the times it's caused by firewall setting at the server. Something must have gotten changed recently. Whatever the trigger was, like online updates. I'm actually not a specialist for firewall setting or that kind of stuff. Please get help from somebody else from here. Toshi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
